Global Health Outcomes & Strategic Pricing (GHOSP) Carole Dembek.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David M. Pollock Medical College of Georgia Discovery-Academia.
Advertisements

Pharmaceutical Policy and Pricing: How are Countries Getting Greater Value? Commonwealth Fund/ Alliance for Health Reform Briefing on Capitol Hill Dr.
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
Implementation of new technologies Dr Keith Cooper Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre University of Southampton.
Pricing and Reimbursement Policies 27. Pricing Policies Patented Medicines Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) monitors and sets the price of.
Transition Brand Messaging for Medtronic plc
March 10,  Need to bend the cost curve  Increased attention to quality metrics  Reimbursement models that incent patients and providers to move.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
David Tyas Global HEOR - Lundbeck
Jan D. Hirsch, BS Pharm, PhD Research Interests Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research “Value” of Pharmacist Services & Pharmaceuticals - Economic, clinical.
Michelle Boudreau, Vice President, Private Markets, March 11, 2015 Presentation to CADA.
Paying Less By Purchasing Smarter Gerard Anderson, PhD Professor Johns Hopkins University.
Clinical importance and safety of ESAs for patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Steven D. Gore, MD Associate Professor of Oncology Sidney Kimmel.
3rd Baltic Conference on Medicines Economic Evaluation, Reimbursement and Rational Use of Pharmaceuticals Pricing and Reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals.
Current Approaches in European Health Care Policy What models can balance the needs of payors and industry?
Developing Your ACO Strategy Mike Scribner Beth Spoto Jimmy Lewis Kathy Whitmire Michelle Madison February 4, 2011 Spoto & Associates.
Cost-Containment, Medical Technology and Access to Care: A Comparative Analysis of Health Policy in the United States, the United Kingdom And Canada Emily.
Better Care, Lower Costs Value-Driven Health Care Carol Kelly Director, Office of Policy Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
November 12, 2014 St. Louis, Missouri OPTN Strategic Planning Feedback Board of Directors.
Community-wide Coordinated Care. © 2011 Clarity Health Services The typical primary care physician has 229 other physicians working in 117 practices with.
Therapeutic Response to Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (sMDS) Enrolled in the AVIDA Registry 1 Prospective Trial.
FDG-PET Adapted Sequential Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin and Augmented ICE Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin.
Transition Brand Messaging for Medtronic plc. 2 | Medtronic Confidential Universal Messaging for Internal and External Audiences The foundation for all.
6.3 Ethics in Statistics. Minimizing Risk vs. Maximizing Info To test a new surgical practice, should you account for the placebo effect by performing.
Performance Measurement Sets Dolores Yanagihara Program Development Manager IHA.
Involved Field Radiotherapy versus No Further Treatment in Patients with Clinical Stages IA/IIA Hodgkin Lymphoma and a “Negative” PET Scan After 3 Cycles.
Rivaroxaban for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Impact on Healthcare Costs Based on the RECORD3 Study Kwong L, Lees.
Integrate Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategies (REMS) with Health Management Craig Kephart, President & CEO Centric Health Resources, Inc. July 15,
ENDEP : A virtual network to provide evidence on pharmaceutical policies Patient charges in Europe and patients and physicians’ decision making process.
Supporting Informed Formulary Decision Making: CADTH’s Common Drug Review Denis Bélanger, Director, CADTH New Brunswick Stroke Summit November 27, 2010,
ASPECTS AFFECTING THE HOSPITAL OPERATION Financial Financial Operational Operational Administrative Administrative Clinical Clinical Safety Safety.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” AHCCCS/ADHS Report Summary & Recommendations.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
Steven Lieberman Assistant Director Health and Human Resources Division Congressional Budget Office Lowering Medicare Costs: Regions or Beneficiaries?
Industry Prospective Robin Bostic, Thoratec VP Health Policy and Health Economics INTERMACS Industry Sub-Committee Representative Our Future.
Medicare Part B CAP Dead ?… GTCbio September 10, 2007.
Better Care, Lower Costs Value-Driven Health Care Gordon Woodrow Regional Director U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Collection of peripheral blood stem cells Dr Kacem Karima Department of clinical haematology -HAO CMH - 26/05/2012.
Consumers Have Spoken Job Creation The National Debt Healthcare Costs.
A New Era of Healthcare Reform – part 2. Objectives Share cost and outcome information in the USA compared to other countries. Discuss strategies hospitals.
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK.
Technology, Information Systems and Reporting in Pharmacy Benefit Management Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Updated: February.
ICD-10 Operational and Revenue Cycle Impacts Wendy Haas, MBA, RN Dell Services Healthcare Consulting.
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
FINDING A PRACTICUM Lauri Rich – Career Services Ryan Gallagan- Career Services
Question Are Medical Emergency Team calls effective in reducing cardiopulmonary arrest rates in the general medical surgical setting? Problem The degree.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Regulatory and Reimbursement Harmonization An Industry Perspective Adrian Griffin | April 2016.
Advancing Health Economics, Services, Policy and Ethics Collecting Real World Evidence: HTA’s perspective Dr. Kelvin Chan, MD FRCPC MSc (Clin Epi) MSc.
Global Clinical Engineering Success Stories Maintenance of medical devices Name: Ledina Picari Affiliation: CED Collaborator Location: Tirana, Albania.
Chen R et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 518.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Bundled Payments: An Initiative of Payment Reform
Treatment With Continuous, Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Weston Park Hospital Experience.
Public Investment on Medical-Hospital Equipment: Creation of National List of Equipment (RENEM) and Management System (SIGEM) Submitted by Name:
ASCT for AL Seok Jin Kim
European Society of Endodontology ESE Antibiotic Awareness Campaign
Patient Characteristic
9/17/2018 Meeting local HTA requirements Challenges for the Pharma HTA Statistician Marie-Ange PAGET Project Statistician – Lilly France EFSPI meeting.
Positive Impacts of Developing Novel Endpoints Generated by Mobile Technology for Use in Clinical Trials* SPECIFIC BENEFITS   SHORT-TERM MEDIUM-TERM LONG-TERM.
278 REQUEST and RESPONSE Response (275) of additional info
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Comparative Effectiveness: Implications for the Pharmaceutical Sector Health Policy Audioconference February 23, 2009 Dr Marc Berger Vice-President, Global.
Regulatory and Reimbursement Harmonization
Germany’s Approach to Prescription Drug Pricing
A single centre experience of febrile neutropenia rates in long acting compared with short acting GCSF preparations in breast cancer patients Dr Rebecca.
Germany’s Approach to Prescription Drug Pricing
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK Description: A systematic methodology was developed in order to create the.
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Presentation transcript:

Global Health Outcomes & Strategic Pricing (GHOSP) Carole Dembek

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Global Health Outcomes  Establish and communicate the economic value of Mozobil to global markets  Support value-based pricing & market adoption through outcomes research studies, economic models and value dossiers  Collaborate with US and global colleagues to adapt economic models to specific markets or customers to support product adoption

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Identifying Value Drivers Reduced cost of remobilization More patients reach 2m cells -fewer failed mobilizers Patients mobilize more cells for transplant More cells transplanted associated with less resource use & cost Fewer apheresis procedures Lower apheresis costs Mozobil is well - tolerated with few side effects Eliminates cost of treating side effects of mobilizing with chemotherapy Clinical Data*Economic Value * Data from Phase III trials 3101 & 3102

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Value Pre- and Post- Transplant Pre-transplant Period (Mobilization & Apheresis) Post-transplant Period Economic Value: Cost savings from fewer side effects of chemomobilization Cost savings from fewer apheresis procedures Potential for less use of G-CSF compared to chemomobilization Fewer failed mobilizers will result in less remobilization cost More predictability in scheduling apheresis Economic Value: More CD34+ cells may result in less supportive care, hospital days and lower cost More CD34+ cells may be associated with better survival Transplant

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Economic Value Messages  Compared to mobilization with G-CSF alone:  Mozobil may reduce cost by reducing apheresis days  Mozobil may reduce the cost of post-transplant care by enabling patients to be transplanted with more cells  Mozobil may reduce cost by reducing the number of patients who require remobilization  Compared to mobilization with G-CSF + chemo  Mozobil may reduce cost by eliminating side effects of chemomobilization and reducing the amount of G-CSF required for mobilization  Mozobil may improve the predictability of scheduling apheresis & provide greater efficiency in the apheresis unit

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Evidence to Support Value Messages  Mozobil clinical data  Good data comparing Mozobil to G-CSF mobilization  No data comparing Mozobil to G-CSF + chemotherapy  No economic data collected in Mozobil trials  Published literature – not specific to Mozobil  20+ publications  Cost data – cost of apheresis day avoided  Limitations – old data, small sample sizes, not MM or NHL  Outcomes studies  Partner with physicians to generate new economic data

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Supporting Evidence More CD34+ cells = Less resource use AuthorJournalYearCountry KlausEur J of Haematology2007Germany ScheidBM Transplantation1999Germany LimatEur J of Cancer2000France KettererBlood1998France OlivieriHaematologica1998Italy SchulmanJ of Clinical Oncol1999USA SolaHematology1999Spain

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Supporting Evidence Side effects of Chemomobilization AuthorJournalYearCountry CorsoHaematologica2002Italy JantunenBM Transplantation2003Finland FitoussiBM Transplantation2001France DesikanJ of Clinical Oncology1998USA PetrucciActa Haematologica2003Italy AlegreBM Transplantation1997Spain MiloneLeuk & Lymphoma2007Italy GojoBM Transplantation2004USA

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Outcomes Research Studies Pr. Michallet – France 200 MM pts Comparison of resource use and cost of patients transplanted with >4m vs. <4m CD34+ cells Status – Preliminary data expected Q4 Pr. Einsele – Germany 200 MM & NHL pts Resource use and CD34+ cell dose Treatment of chemomobilization side effects Status – Data collection underway for cell dose study Pr. Apperley – UK 150 MM & NHL Outcomes of mobilizing with chemotherapy - % febrile neutropenia, cost, failure rate Status – Preliminary data received; ASH abstract accepted Dr. Gertz – US (Mayo) MM & lymphoma pts Comparison of resource use in patients mobilized with G-CSF alone vs. G-CSF + 3g Cytoxan (no cost data) Status – Preliminary data expected Q4

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Pharmetrics Private Payer Data Study #1 – Cost of ASCT Objectives  Determine total cost of ASCT  Determine proportion of cost associated with mobilization & apheresis  Findings  Total cost = $150,000  Mobilization/apheresis = 26%  Abstract accepted for poster presentation at ASH Study #2 – Cost comparison of chemo + G vs. G alone Objectives  Determine cost of mobilization with chemo vs. G-CSF alone  Findings  Cost of mobilization with chemo was 27% higher than G- CSF  More inpatient hospital days & drug use in chemo pts  Excluding Rituxan & G-CSF, cost difference in drugs was $1,600 per patient  Abstract submitted for Tandem

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Tools to Support Economic Value Cost-effectiveness Model Model will support global health technology appraisals & reimbursement submissions  Preliminary model for frontline use completed  Rescue model under development  Validating with KOLs  Models to be finalized in Q4  GHOSP will work with affiliates to adapt models for specific country needs Budget Impact Model Model will demonstrate the budgetary impact of adopting Mozobil  Can be used for hospitals, payers, HTA organizations, local, regional and national health systems  Model to be completed in Q4  Adapt to specific hospitals, payers or countries Value Dossier will be used to communicate the clinical & economic value story to global decision makers  Dossier to be completed end of 2008  Dossier will be updated as new data become available through clinical trials, outcomes studies and published literature Value Dossier

Confidential November 10-11, 2008 Next Steps  Complete economic models & value dossier by end of 2008  Collaborate with country affiliates to adapt for local reimbursement submissions & HTA reviews  Adapt models to support formulary adoption by transplant centers  Complete outcomes studies, present & publish data  ASH  Tandem  EBMT  Training on economic messages, models, value dossier