Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
-- in other words, logic is
Advertisements

Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments
LOGICAL REASONING Study Unit 5 – eLearning RPK 214.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
Reason & Argument Lecture 3. Lecture Synopsis 1. Recap: validity, soundness & counter- examples, induction. 2. Arguing for a should conclusion. 3. Complications.
 Assertions: unsupported declaration of a belief  Prejudice: a view without evidence for or against  Premises: explicit evidence that lead to a conclusion.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Fall 2007 Dr. Robert Barnard.
Logical Arguments in Mathematics. A proof is a collection of statements and reasons in a logical order used to verify universal truths. However… depending.
TWISTERTWISTER. TWISTERTWISTER Directions: 1)Each student picks a circle with a color (red, blue, green, yellow) from a bag. 2)The teacher spins the spinner.
For Wednesday, read Chapter 3, section 4. Nongraded Homework: Problems at the end of section 4, set I only; Power of Logic web tutor, 7.4, A, B, and C.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
Deduction and Induction
1 Chapter 7 Propositional and Predicate Logic. 2 Chapter 7 Contents (1) l What is Logic? l Logical Operators l Translating between English and Logic l.
For Friday, read chapter 2, sections 1-2 (pp ). As nongraded homework, do the problems on p. 19. Graded homework #1 is due at the beginning of class.
TR1413: INTRO TO DISCRETE MATHEMATICS LECTURE 2: MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION.
For Monday, read Chapter 4, Sections 1 and 2. Nongraded homework: Problems on pages Graded HW #4 is due on Friday, Feb. 11, at the beginning of.
Logical Arguments an argument can be defined as a: form of reasoning that attempts to establish the truth of one claim (called a conclusion) based on the.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
For Friday, read Chapter 3, section 4. Nongraded Homework: Problems at the end of section 4, set I only; Power of Logic web tutor, 7.4, A, B, and C. Graded.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Deductive reasoning.
1.5 Rules of Inference.
Validity All UH students are communists. All communists like broccoli. All UH students like broccoli.
Deduction, Induction, & Truth Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
Today’s Quote Use soft words and hard arguments English Proverb.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Logic & Propositions Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
Responding Critically to Texts
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
The Science of Good Reasons
Explicit Textual Evidence. When we read, we are often asked to __________ questions or __________ our ideas about the text.
Do Now Each of the letters stands for a different digit. The first digit in a number is never zero. Replace the letters so that each sum is correct.
Ch. 4 DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT Reasoning from the General to the Specific.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
1.1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
MATH 104 Chapter 1 Reasoning.
Irrational Techniques of Persuasion
From conclusions by applying the laws of logic. Symbolic Notation Conditional statement If p, then qp ⟶q Converseq⟶p Biconditional p ⟷ q.
Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer
Philosophy: Logic and Logical arguments
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
The construction of a formal argument
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
Philosophy and Logic The Process of Correct Reasoning.
Chapter 4: Logic as The Art of Arts By Kasey Fitzpatrick.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
Evaluate Inductive Reasoning and Spot Inductive Fallacies
PHI 103 ASH Courses For more course tutorials visit Get Ready to grant success at exam by shop at uoptutorial.
GST 113: LOGIC, PHILOSOPHY AND HUMAN EXISTECE
Explore: The figure shows a pattern of squares made from toothpicks. Use the figure to complete the following. Record your answers. Size of Square Toothpicks.
THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.
UOP CRT 205 Week 7 Assignment Argument Evaluation Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
a valid argument with true premises.
Win Every Argument Every Time
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Evaluate Deductive Reasoning and Spot Deductive Fallacies
Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
PHL 320 Week 1 Apply: Creating an Argument Complete the "Creating an Argument" homework assignment in Connect ®. For each statement, select the conclusion.
PHL 320 Week 2 Apply: Vague Statements Complete the "Vague Statements" homework assignment in Connect ®. Each of the questions in Connect ® contains a.
Principles of Argument
SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.
Chapter 2: Geometric Reasoning
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
True or False True or False
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Avoiding Ungrounded Assumptions
Presentation transcript:

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12

Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12 FallaciesFallacies How to answer a fallacy question  This argument contains a fallacy.  A fallacy is a mistake in reasoning  The fallacy in question is……  It is a fallacy because….  (another example might be…)

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12 Homework NAB Summary  Where you are asked to pick out premises and conclusions, be precise with your copying out – use the wording from the argument, not your interpretation of them.  Remember a conclusion is a statement as well!  Where you are asked to describe the difference between, make sure you use link words between sentences (i.e. a statement is a proposition that may be true or false whereas an argument is a series of statements so connected as to lead to a conclusion.  Remember to include an extra sentence (regarding premises and conclusions or questions and imperatives) when answering an argument question.  There is a difference between what is the conclusion and what is a conclusion.  Answering questions about Sound arguments should result in you also saying what an unsound argument is….

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12 Homework NAB Summary  When discussing the difference between deductive and inductive arguments, make sure you give the correct definition with a link word. If the question says ‘using your own examples’ then you will need to do so!!  There is almost always either a fallacy or logical fallacy question in a Critical Thinking NAB. Miss it and miss out!

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12 NABNAB

Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB