Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 16 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Next Key Stone Problem… Set 7 Part 2 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
Advertisements

Algebra Problems… Solutions
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
Key Stone Problem… Key Stone Problem… next Set 16 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
Keystone Illustrations Keystone Illustrations next Set 10 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 7 part 1 By Herb I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Key Stone Problem… Key Stone Problem… next Set 7 Part 1 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 13 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
Key Stone Problems… Key Stone Problems… next Set 11 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 7 part 2 By Herb I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Key Stone Problem… Key Stone Problem… next Set 21 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 4 By Herb I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 22 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross By Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 21 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
2.4 Solving Equations with Variables on Both Sides
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
Key Stone Problems… Key Stone Problems… next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 12.
College Algebra Fifth Edition James Stewart Lothar Redlin Saleem Watson.
Introduction Solving inequalities is similar to solving equations. To find the solution to an inequality, use methods similar to those used in solving.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 5 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 12 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 6 By Herb I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Integers and Introduction to Solving Equations
Algebra Problems… Solutions
Keystone Problems… Keystone Problems… next Set 19 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
Key Stone Problem… Key Stone Problem… next Set 24 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
3-2: Solving Linear Systems
Introduction While it may not be efficient to write out the justification for each step when solving equations, it is important to remember that the properties.
Review for Final Exam Systems of Equations.
Introduction Two equations that are solved together are called systems of equations. The solution to a system of equations is the point or points that.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 20 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 2 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Key Stone Problem… Key Stone Problem… next Set 22 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 24 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Solve Equations with Variables on Both Sides
Variables Tutorial 3c variable A variable is any symbol that can be replaced with a number to solve a math problem. An open sentence has at least one.
Algebra Form and Function by McCallum Connally Hughes-Hallett et al. Copyright 2010 by John Wiley & Sons. All rights reserved. 3.1 Solving Equations Section.
Keystone Problems… Keystone Problems… next Set 2 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 10 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Section 2.2 More about Solving Equations. Objectives Use more than one property of equality to solve equations. Simplify expressions to solve equations.
College Algebra Sixth Edition James Stewart Lothar Redlin Saleem Watson.
The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic The Game of Algebra or The Other Side of Arithmetic © 2007 Herbert I. Gross by Herbert I. Gross & Richard.
Solving Equations. The equations are equivalent If they have the same solution(s)
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2.6 Solving Equations: The Addition and Multiplication Properties.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 18 part 2 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Dividing Decimals # ÷ 3.5 next Taking the Fear out of Math
2-4 Solving Equations with Variables on Both Sides Warm Up Warm Up Lesson Quiz Lesson Quiz Lesson Presentation Lesson Presentation.
Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 17 part 2 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next.
Key Stone Problem… Key Stone Problem… Set 17 Part 2 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next.
Warm Up Simplify each expression. 1.10c + c 2. 5m + 2(2m – 7) 11c 9m – 14.
Lesson 8.1. » A statement where two mathematical expressions are. » Think of an equation as a balance scale or teeter-totter. The left side must always.
3-2: Solving Linear Systems. Solving Linear Systems There are two methods of solving a system of equations algebraically: Elimination Substitution.
Solving Equations With Variables on Both Sides Section 2-4.
Chapter 3 Systems of Equations. Solving Systems of Linear Equations by Graphing.
Example: Solve the equation. Multiply both sides by 5. Simplify both sides. Add –3y to both sides. Simplify both sides. Add –30 to both sides. Simplify.
Equations and Inequalities
Introduction Solving inequalities is similar to solving equations. To find the solution to an inequality, use methods similar to those used in solving.
Objective Solve equations in one variable that contain more than one operation.
Objective Solve equations in one variable that contain more than one operation.
Algebra 1 09/21/16 EQ: How do I solve equations with variables on both sides? HW: Due Friday pg. 95 # 1-33 all Bring textbooks tomorrow Quiz on Friday.
Presentation transcript:

Algebra Problems… Solutions Algebra Problems… Solutions © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Set 16 By Herbert I. Gross and Richard A. Medeiros next

Problem #1 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next For what value of x does 2(x + 3) + 5x = 7x + 6 ? Answer: Every value of x next

Answer: Every value of x Solution for #1: The left-hand side of the equation 2(x + 3) + 5x = 7x + 6 is not in the “mx + b” form. However, we may paraphrase by the methods we used in previous Lessons… that is, by the distributive property we may rewrite the expression… next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross 2(x + 3) + 5x next as… 2x x

Solution for # 1: Then by the associative and commutative properties for addition, we may rewrite the expression 2x x as… next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross (2x + 5x) + 6 next 7x + 6 or… We can now replace the expression 2(x + 3) + 5x by the expression 7x + 6 on the left-hand side of the equation 2(x + 3) + 5x = 7x + 6 to obtain the identity… next 7x + 6 = 7x + 6

Solution for #1: Since the equation 7x + 6 = 7x + 6 is equivalent to the equation 2(x + 3) + 5x = 7x + 6, it means that this equation is also an identity. next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross

next Notes on #1 The fact that the equation… 2(x + 3) + 5 x = 7x + 6 is an identity means that the left-hand side of the equation above is simply another way of saying the same thing the right-hand side says. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross If you don’t quite have a feeling yet for what an identity means, try substituting a few values of x into the equation and observe what happens. next

Notes on #1 For example, if we elect to replace x by 9 in the equation 2(x + 3) + 5x = 7x + 6, we get the true statements… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next 2( x + 3 ) + 5( x ) = 7( x ) + 6 2(12) + 45 = = = next

Notes on #1 If we had instead to replace x by, say, - 6 in the equation 2(x + 3) + 5x = 7x + 6, we would have obtained the true statements… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next 2( x + 3 ) + 5( x ) = 7( x ) + 6 2( - 3) = = = next

Notes on #1 We happened to choose 9 and - 6 as replacements for x in the equation 2(x + 3) + 5x = 7x + 6. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross The point is that no matter what values we replaced x by in our equation, the resulting equation would be a true statement. next

Notes on #1 In “program” format, the expression 2(x + 3) + 5x may be rewritten as… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next Program # 1 Step 1Start with x.xStep 2Add 3.x + 3Step 3Multiply by 2.2(x + 3)Step 4Store the result.2(x + 3)Step 5Input x.xStep 6Multiply by 5.5xStep 7Add step 6 to step 4.2(x + 3) + 5xStep 8The output of step 7 is the answer. 2(x + 3) + 5x

next Notes on #1 What we have shown in this exercise is that Program #1 is equivalent to the simpler program… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next Program # 2 Step 1Start with x.xStep 2Multiply by 7.7xStep 3Add 6.7x + 6Step 4The output of step 3 is the answer. 7x + 6

next Notes on #1 In summary… We may always replace the more complicated Program #1 by the simpler Program #2. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next That is, for each input, the output we get in Program #1 is equal to what the output would be for the same input in Program #2.

Problem #2 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next For what value of x does 2(x + 3) + 5x = 7x + 9 ? next Answer: No value of x

Solution for #2: We have already seen in our solution for Problem #1 that the left side of the equation 2(x + 3) + 5 x = 7x + 9 is equivalent to the simpler expression 7x + 6. next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross 2(x + 3) + 5x next Hence, we may replace… 7x + 9 by the simpler expression…

Solution for #2: Hence… 7x + 6 = 7x + 9. next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross 7x + 6 = 7x + 9 next If we now subtract 7x from both sides of equation 7x + 6 = 7x + 9, we obtain the false statement… 6 = 9 – 7x – 7x

Solution for #2: No matter what value we choose for x, the equation 6 = 9 is a false statement; and since the equation is equivalent to the algebraic equations 2(x + 3) + 5 x = 7x + 9 and 7x + 6 = 7x + 9 the fact that the equation 6 = 9 is always false means that neither the equation 2(x + 3) + 5 x = 7x + 9 nor the equation 7x + 6 = 7x + 9 can be true for any value of x. next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross

next Notes on #2 Looking at the equation 7x + 6 = 7x + 9, we might have immediately noticed that adding 9 to 7x will always give an answer that is 3 more than if we had added 6 to 7x. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross This observation blends nicely with the result we got when we subtracted 7x from both sides of the equation. next

Notes on #2 Namely: since 9 is 3 more than 6, the equation 6 = 9 tells us that not only is there no value of x that is a solution for the equation 2(x + 3) + 5 x = 7x + 9, but also us that for any value of x, the right-hand side of the equation is always 3 more than the left-hand side. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross

next Notes on #2 Do not confuse the false statement 6 = 9 with the algebraic equation x + 6 = 9. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross While there is no value of x for which 6 = 9 (that is, for 0x + 6 = 9); the equation x + 6 = 9 is satisfied by x = 3. next

Problem #3 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next For what value of x does 2(x + 3) + 5x = 6x + 9 ? next Answer: x = 3

Solution for #3: We already know from our solutions for Problems #1 and #2 that the left-hand side of the equation 2(x + 3) + 5x = 6x + 9 can be replaced by 7x + 6. next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross 7x + 6 = 6x + 9 next Making this same substitution, we now obtain the equation…

Solution for #3: To solve the equation 7x + 6 = 6x + 9, we may begin by subtracting 6x from both sides to obtain the algebraic equation… next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next If we now subtract 6 from both sides of the equation x + 6 = 9, we obtain as our solution… x + 6 = 9 x = 3

next Notes on #3 As a reminder, notice that we still have to check whether x = 3 is a solution. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next That is, so far our solution has only proved that if x ≠ 3, then 2(x + 3) + 5x ≠ 6x + 9.

Notes on #3 To check that x = 3 is indeed a solution, we can replace x by 3 in 2(x + 3) + 5x = 6x + 9, to obtain the true statements… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next 2( x + 3 ) + 5( x ) = 6( x ) + 9 2(6) + 15 = = = next

Summary of Problems #1, #2, and #3 Every linear equation can be written in the form… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next mx + b = nx + c Notice that the left-hand sides of the equations in Problems #1, #2, and #3 were the same, and that they were equivalent to the simpler expression 7x + 6. That is, the left-hand side of each equation could be written in the form… mx + b where m = 7 and b = 6 next

Summary of Problems #1, #2, and #3 In other words, each of the three equations could be written in the form… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next 7x + 6 = nx + c Hence, we could be guaranteed that there would be one and only one solution of the equation unless the multiplier of x on the right-hand side of the above equation was also 7. next In fact, this happened in Problems #1 and #2 but not in Problem #3.

Summary of Problem #1 Problem #1 is an example of an identity. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next In terms of the “ordering from a catalog” model discussed in the lesson, it corresponds to the case in which two catalogs offer the same item for both the same price and the same shipping charge. $44.99 Shipping $10.50 $44.99 Shipping $10.50

next Summary of Problem #2 Problem #2 is an example of “No Solution”. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next It corresponds to the case in which two catalogs offer the same item for the same price but with a different shipping charge. $44.99 Shipping $10.50 Shipping $12.50

next Summary of Problem #3 Problem #3 is an example of a unique solution. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next It corresponds to the case in which two catalogs offer the same item at different prices and different shipping charges. $39.99 $44.99 Shipping $10.50 Shipping $5.50

Problem #4 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next For what value of x does 2(5 – 3x) – 4(5 – 2x) = 2x + 12 ? next Answer: No value of x

Solution for #4: The right-hand side of 2(5 – 3x) – 4(5 – 2x) = 2x + 12 is already in the mx + b form. next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next So we will use our rules of arithmetic to rewrite the left-hand side of the above equation in the mx + b form also.

Solution for # 4: To this end we see that… 2(5 – 3x) – 4(5 – 2x) = next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next 2( x) + - 4( x) = 2(5) + 2( - 3x) + - 4(5) + - 4( - 2x) = x x = ( ) + ( - 6x + 8x) = 2x

Solution for #4: Therefore, in the equation 2(5 – 3x) – 4(5 – 2x) = 2x + 12 we may replace the left-hand side by 2x to obtain the equivalent equation… next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next 2(5 – 3x) – 4(5 – 2x) = 2x + 12 then by subtracting 2x from both sides of the equation above, - 10 = 12 2x – 2x – 2x we get the false statement… - 10 = 12 next

Solution for #4: if we now add 10 to both sides of - 10 = 12, we get the equivalent false statement… next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next Since the equations 2(5 – 3x) – 4(5 – 2x) = 2x + 12, - 10 = 12, and 0 = 22 are equivalent, it means that there is no value of x for which the equation 2(5 – 3x) – 4(5 – 2x) = 2x + 12 is a true statement. 0 = 22

next Note on Problem #4 Moreover, the equation 0 = 22 tells us that for any value of x, the number on the right side of the equation 2(5 – 3x) – 4(5 – 2x) = 2x + 12 is 22 greater than the number on the left side of the equation. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross

next Note on Problem #4 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross 2(5 – 3x) – 4(5 – 2x) = 2x – 20 = 12 2(5 – 0) – 4(5 – 0) = = 12 …and 12 exceeds - 10 by 22. Choosing x to be 0 will simplify our computation. Doing this we obtain… next

Note on Problem #4 Notice that our demonstration only validated our claim in the case when x was replaced by 0. It told us nothing about what would happen for other values of x. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross In contrast, using our “rules of the game”: the algebraic solution validates our claim, independently of the number which we use to replace x. next

Problem #5a © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next For what value of x does 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = 2x + 5 ? next Answer: All values of x

Solution for #5a: Just as in our solution to the previous problem, the right-hand side of 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = 2x + 5 is already in the mx + b form. next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next So we will use our rules of arithmetic to rewrite the left-hand side of the above equation in the mx + b form also.

Solution for #5a: To this end, we see that… 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next 5[2(x + - 3) + 7] + - 8x = 5[2x ] + - 8x = 5[2x + ( )] + - 8x = 5[2x + 1] + - 8x = 10x x = (10x + - 8x) + 5 = 2x + 5 =

Solution for #5a: So in the equation 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = 2x + 5, we replace 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x by 2x + 5 to obtain the equivalent equation… 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = 2x + 5 next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next which is a true statement for all values of x. 2x + 5

next If you tried to solve the equation 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = 2x + 5 by working on both sides of the equation at the same time, avoid the temptation to “cancel” the 5 in the expression 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x with the 5 in the expression 2x + 5. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross

next It would have been okay to do that if the equation had been… 5 + [2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = 2x + 5 in which case we could subtract 5 from both sides of the equation. © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Or if it had been 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = 5(2x) in which case we could divide by 5 on both sides of the equation. next However, if we divide one side by 5 but subtract 5 from the other side, we do not get an equivalent equation.

Problem #5b © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next For what value of x does 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = 17 ? next Answer: x = 6

Solution for #5b: In part (a) of this problem, we saw that 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x was equivalent to 2x+ 5. next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next Hence, solving 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x = 17 is equivalent to solving the simpler equation 2x + 5 = 17 To solve this equation, we subtract 5 from both sides to obtain… 2x = 12 And if we then divide both sides of 2x = 12 by 2, we obtain… x = 6

© 2007 Herbert I. Gross next 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x ≠ 17 Notes on #5b Actually, all we’ve shown so far is that if x ≠ 6, then… To check that x = 6 is the solution, we now replace x by 6 in the expression 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x and see if we obtain 17 as the answer.

next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next 5[2(x – 3) + 7] + - 8x = Notes on #5b To this end… 5[2(6 – 3) + 7] + - 8(6) = 5[2(3) + 7] + - 8(6) = 5[6 + 7] + - 8(6) = 5[13] = = 17

next Notice the power of paraphrasing. The problem asked us to find that value of x for which the output will be 17. That is… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next Program # 1 Step 1Start with x.xStep 2Subtract 3.x – 3Step 3Multiply by 2.2(x – 3)Step 4Add 7.2(x – 3) + 7Step 5Multiply by 5. 5[2(x – 3) + 7]Step 6Store the answer.5[2(x – 3) + 7]Step 7Input xxStep 8Multiply by 8.8x Step 9 Subtract the answer in step 8 from the number stored in step 6. 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x Step 10Write the answer.5[2(x – 3) + 7 ] – 8x next 17 next

And we can also find the answer by using the much simpler Program #2, where… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next Program # 2 Step 1Start with x.xStep 2Multiply by 2.2xStep 3Add 5.2x + 5Step 10Write the answer.2x next

As a check, notice that… © 2007 Herbert I. Gross next Program # 1 Step 1Start with x.x Step 2Subtract 3.x – 3 Step 3Multiply by 2.2(x – 3) Step 4Add 7.2(x – 3) + 7 Step 5Multiply by 5. 5[2(x – 3) + 7] Step 6Store the answer.5[2(x – 3) + 7] Step 7Input xx Step 8Multiply by 8.8x Step 9 Subtract the answer in step 8 from the number stored in step 6. 5[2(x – 3) + 7] – 8x Step 10Write the answer.5[2(x – 3) + 7 ] – 8x

next © 2007 Herbert I. Gross Key Point Notice that if we had tried to solve for x in Program #1 by using the undoing method, we would have been stymied when we tried to undo Step 9 because, in undoing, we wouldn’t yet know what the number stored in Step 6 was.