Enacting variation theory in the design of task sequences in mathematics education Anne Watson VT SIG Oxford 2014 University of Oxford Dept of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Micro-Features of Mathematical Tasks The Micro-Features of Mathematical Tasks Anne Watson & John Mason Nottingham Feb The Open University.
Advertisements

Key Messages Learners need to know  What skills are available  When to use them  Why they are appropriate for the task  How to apply them to achieve.
Math CAMPPP 2011 Plenary 1 What’s the Focus? An Introduction to Algebraic Reasoning Ruth Beatty and Cathy Bruce 1.
Demonstration of the use of variation to scaffold abstract thinking Anne Watson ICMI Study 22 Oxford 2013.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
English Language Learners and Secondary Mathematics By: Jaclyn Berlin.
1 With and Across the Grain: making use of learners’ powers to detect and express generality London Mathematics Centre June 2006.
Approaches to Representing and Recognizing Objects Visual Classification CMSC 828J – David Jacobs.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
Framework for K-12 Science Education
Qualitative differences in teachers’ approaches to task-based teaching and learning in ESL classrooms International Conference on task-based language teaching’
1 A Lesson Without the Opportunity for Learners to Generalise …is NOT a Mathematics lesson! John Mason ‘Powers’ Norfolk Mathematics Conference Norwich.
Extended Assessments Elementary Mathematics Oregon Department of Education and Behavioral Research and Teaching January 2007.
1 Reasoning in the Mathematics Curriculum Anne Watson & John Mason Prince’s Trust Maths CPD London Mar 2 Manchester Mar The Open University Maths.
1 Using Mathematical Structure to Inform Pedagogy Anne Watson & John Mason NZAMT July 2015 The Open University Maths Dept University of Oxford Dept of.
1 On the Structure of Attention & its Role in Engagement & the Assessment of Progress John Mason Oxford PGCE April 2012 The Open University Maths Dept.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
< BackNext >PreviewMain Chapter 2 Data in Science Preview Section 1 Tools and Models in ScienceTools and Models in Science Section 2 Organizing Your DataOrganizing.
Day 3 Professional Learning for Mathematics Leaders and Coaches— Not just a 3-part series 1.
1 Drawing on Learners’ Perspectives Anne Watson & John Mason STEM Education NW July The Open University Maths Dept University of Oxford Dept of.
Adolescence and secondary mathematics: shifts of perspective Anne Watson December 2008.
Teaching children to reason mathematically Anne Watson Ironbridge 2014 University of Oxford Dept of Education.
Preparing school students for a problem-solving approach to mathematics Professor Anne Watson University of Oxford Kerala, 2013.
Questioning in Mathematics Anne Watson Cayman Islands Webinar, 2013.
Teaching Mathematics in Primary Schools Using Problem Solving in the NC Anne Watson 2014.
Anne Watson Hong Kong  grasp formal structure  think logically in spatial, numerical and symbolic relationships  generalise rapidly and broadly.
Mathematical thinking in adolescence: possible shifts of perspective Anne Watson University of Oxford Nottingham, November 2007.
Mathematics departments making autonomous change Anne Watson University of Oxford Warwick 24 Nov 2009.
1 You will need two blank pieces of A4 paper, and something else to write on Outer & Inner Tasks: on being clear about what a mathematical task is supposed.
WHY 'WHAT WORKS' DOESN'T WORK IN PRACTICE, AND WHAT MIGHT WORK BETTER Anne Watson University of Oxford Department of Education IMA, Glasgow 2015 University.
What makes a difference in secondary maths? Bucks, Berks and Oxon Maths Hub 23 June 2015 High Wycombe University of Oxford Dept of Education Promoting.
Tasks and learning mathematics Anne Watson University of Oxford DfE 2010.
Making Maths Count Anne Watson Bristol Heads’ Conference Chepstow March 2015 University of Oxford Dept of Education Promoting Mathematical Thinking.
Adolescence and secondary mathematics: possible shifts of perspective Anne Watson Nottingham, November 2007.
1 Designing and Using Tasks Effectively for Conceptual Development Anne Watson John Mason Agder College Kristiansand Norway September 2006.
What really matters for adolescents in mathematics lessons? Anne Watson University of Sussex CIRCLETS May 2011.
Learner differences in mathematics Professor Anne Watson CANOTTA Distinguished Visiting Fellow in Faculty of Education, HKU University of Oxford Hong Kong.
What do we have to learn in order to learn mathematics? Anne Watson Stirling 2009.
Key understandings in mathematics: synthesis of research Anne Watson NAMA 2009 Research with Terezinha Nunes and Peter Bryant for the Nuffield Foundation.
What varies and what stays the same? Insights into mathematics teaching methods based on variation Anne Watson Middlesex March 2015 University of Oxford.
1 Reasoning in the Mathematics Curriculum Anne Watson & John Mason Prince’s Trust Maths CPD London Mar 2 Manchester Mar The Open University Maths.
Algebra; ratio; functions Nuffield Secondary School Mathematics BSRLM March 12 th 2011.
Issues in classroom research: getting at the subject detail of teacher-student interaction Anne Watson AKU/IED Karachi August 2008.
Developing mathematical thinking in the core curriculum Anne Watson East London Maths Forum June 2008.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
Researching how successful teachers structure the subject matter of mathematics Anne Watson BSRLM Nov 2008.
NY State Learning Standard 3- Mathematics at the Commencement Level By Andrew M. Corbett NY State HS Math Teacher Click to continue >>>
1 Teaching for Mastery: Variation Theory Anne Watson and John Mason NCETM Standard Holders’ Conference March The Open University Maths Dept University.
Lessons that inspire critical reasoning and problem solving in mathematics.
Comparison of Students’ Understanding of Functions throughout School Years in Israel and England Michal Ayalon 1, Anne Watson 2 & Stephen Lerman 3 1&2.
The role of examples in mathematical reasoning
Analysis of some primary lesson segments using variation
Thoughts about variation and example spaces
Mathematical thinking and task design
Math Curriculum “The philosophy of the Core Plus Mathematics Program is that students are working in groups to identify, investigate, and explore the.
University of Oxford Dept of Education The Open University Maths Dept
Anne Watson & John Mason
Presented by: Angela J. Williams
Inner & Outer Aspects Outer Inner
Anne Watson & John Mason
Embedding enrichment Anne Watson NRich July 2013.
Consultant’s Day, November 11th 2017
Variation: the ‘acoustic’ version
Teaching for Mastery: variation theory
VARIATION AND MATHEMATICAL LANGUAGE NETWORK MEETING
TSG: 34 Task design and analysis: a response to the first four papers
Mathematical thinking and task design
Mental and Written Calculation Multiplication and Division
Variation/Invariance: pupils’ experience
Presentation transcript:

Enacting variation theory in the design of task sequences in mathematics education Anne Watson VT SIG Oxford 2014 University of Oxford Dept of Education

Variation Slope and position are varying The question draws attention to slope Seek similarity among line segments (compare) Similarity is called ‘vector’ (generalisation) Define vector How do they learn that position does not matter? (need vector AND position; fusion) Limited range of change

Variation Size and position vary; shape invariant Can discuss size or position (intended variation is the same) Relation is called ‘enlargement’ (generalisation) Identify properties Size and position vary together (not fusion; dependency relation) Limited range of change

Midlands Mathematics Experiment

3 x 2 – 5 x 1 = 4 x 3 – 6 x 2 = 5 x 4 – 7 x 3 = x ( - 1) – ( + 2) x ( - 2) =

Variation In each subset, numbers vary but structure does not (induction from pattern) Generalise structure of subset Structure varies Structure of structures (generalisation) Intended object of learning – structure – is not visible but limits the choice of DofV - DofPV

Visual variation; all answers are the same

all possible variations of a subclass of matrices; compare outcomes; relate matrix to outcome; relate outcomes to characteristics of matrices; dependency relationship DofV position and sign of a and 0, range of change limited to 2x2 matrix

Availability of variation/invariant relation Visual, available without teacher direction Visual, available with teacher direction Visual or non-visual and independent of prior knowledge V or non-V but dependent on prior knowledge Dependent on prior knowledge and teacher direction

Priorities Mathematics Variation theory How VT is being used in mathematics education field more generally (building on ICMI Study and yesterday’s symposium) Work in progress...burning the midnight oil

Issues What varies; what is invariant? How do they relate? Mixture of variation and invariance varies: – Learning about things – Learning about actions – Learning about mathematical relations

What do you look at?

Kullberg, Runesson and Måtensson Division with denominator <1 Counterintuitive Varying – object of learning (numbers in division) against a background of invariant relations – outcomes – presentation in lessons

Issues Mixture of variation and invariance; visual variation offers several DofV and RofC Role of attention to focus on variation in relation Relation is about dependency (not fusion) Talk about ‘division’ as an abstract idea, not as a calculation

What do you look at?

Sun OPMS: one problem - multiple methods of solution OPMC; one problem - multiple changes (transformations) Varying – actions (enactive –iconic-symbolic) – representations IOOL – deriving facts, i.e. method of variation – invariant relationship between addition and subtraction

Big problem for variation theory You cannot vary an invariant mathematical dependency relation when that is the intended object of learning – Can you vary its critical features? – Can you offer varied examples? (induction)

Dynamic geometry

What do you look at?

Leung Variation used to explore possibilities and generate examples Direct perception is used in this task in two ways: – enact idea of 'parallel' by sight – researcher sees range understandings

What do you see?

Koichu IOOL: " mathematics teachers' awareness of structural similarities and differences" among some geometry concepts achieve this through sorting and matching task – Verbal; algebraic; graphical – Algebra: first distraction (hindrance) – Visual graphics: second distraction (familiarity) Final version verbal only – no visual or symbolic impact; vary objects and generators only Relate objects and their properties

The problem of abstraction

New question-types On an 9-by-9 grid my tetramino covers 8 and 18. Guess my tetramino. What tetramino, on what grid, would cover the numbers 25 and 32? What tetramino, on what grid, could cover cells (m-1) and (m+7)? New object: grid-shape relation

Generalise for a times table grid

New question-types What is the smallest ‘omino’ that will cover cells (n + 1, m – 11) and (n -3, m + 1)? New object: cell-shape relationship

Variations and their affordances Shape and orientation (comparable examples) Position on grid (generalisations on one grid) Size of number grid (generalisations with grid size as parameter) New abstract object Nature of number grid (focus on variables to generalise a familiar relation) Unfamiliar number grid (focus on relations between variables) New abstract object

The problem of relation

Giant

Role of formatting to draw attention to variation and invariance objectg÷h=rg÷r=hhxr=g shoelace bus pass width footprint

Use of variation in mathematical tasks (cf. Ingerman) IOOLs are often an invariant abstract relationship that can only be experienced (mediated) through varied examples relating varied input and dependent output (Kullberg, Sun) the intended object of learning might be awareness of an invariant relation (Koichu) attention drawn to intended relationship (Kullberg, Sun, Watson) – Role of teacher – Role of layout variation can sometimes be directly visible, such as through geometry or through page layout, but often requires interpretation of symbolic forms that are not visualisable (Kullberg, Leung, Koichu, Watson) the learners' action as a result of perceiving variation can be intuitive and superficial (Koichu) role of limited range of change

Does VT bring something to maths that cannot be seen already? Maths is about variation/invariance VT gives focus, language, structure VT gives commitment to analysing and constructing variation Experiential, no need for ‘black box’ e.g neuroscience; laboratory studies

VT focuses on... What is available to be learnt? Where and how can attention be focused? What alternative generalisations are available for learners?

Questions arising... How to focus on dependent relations which do not vary? How to focus on structures that are abstract, invisible? – when relevance is outside students’ experience, being in their future abstract mathematical world.

Role in English policy and practice Reason requires knowledge Shanghai Textbook design Professional training and development..... 

University of Oxford Dept of Education