LIGO-G060150-00-ZRai Weiss LSC Session on Scientific Monitoring March 21, 2006 Committee formed by Peter Saulson to: Consider the value and effectiveness.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,

Advertisements

Chapter 7 | Session 4: ENERGY OUT Session 4: Less Sit, More Fit: ENERGY OUT Chapter 7 | Parent Program Training Session 4: Less Sit, More Fit: ENERGY OUT.

SAT Process Larianne Polk

LIGO-G W Lessons Learned From E7 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab Daniel Sigg.

G D Interferometer Status LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor, June 4, 2005 Daniel Sigg.

The reform of A level qualifications in the sciences Dennis Opposs SCORE seminar on grading of practical work in A level sciences, 17 October 2014, London.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.

LIGO-G L Peter Fritschel & Michael Zucker PAC18 meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 18 May 2005 S5 Run Performance Goals.

How do I manage my work as well as possible? Know who is responsible for what Three key parties: 1.The student (you) 2.Your supervisor 3.Your unit/UCC.

Parent Session #1 Thursday, March 5th, Parent Session #1 Thursday, March 5, 2015.

Protection Against Occupational Exposure

Milliman USA - Slide 1 Underwriting Risk Models: An Assessment Presented by Urban E. Leimkuhler, FCAS, MAAA Manager & Senior Consultant Milliman - Princeton.

Glitch Group S5 Activities LSC LSU, Baton Rouge August 15, 2006 G Z L. Blackburn, L. Cadonati, S. Chatterji, J. Dalrymple, S. Desai,

LEADERS AND MEMBERS LEARNING AND WORKING TOGETHER

Report From Joint Run Planning Committee R. Passaquieti & F. Raab - LSC / VIRGO Collaboration Meeting rd July 2007 – LIGO-G Z.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Activities Keith.

LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.

LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.

LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.

LIGO-G W News From Joint Run Planning Committee Roberto Passaquieti & Fred Raab 23May2007.

LIGO-G Z 1 “Welcome to the LSC meeting” Peter Saulson.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.

LSC Meeting, Livingston Observatory, 3/18/03 Proposal for Trinity University Participation in the LSC Dennis Ugolini, Trinity University Wednesday Plenary.

3/19/08G D S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2008 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.

LIGO-G R LSC Presentations Policy: a proposal for procedures David Shoemaker and Peter Saulson LSC, Livingston 14 March 2001.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.

Effective Groups and Teams

19 Aug 2003, LSC Hannover G Z1 State of the LSC Peter Saulson Syracuse University.

LSC at LHO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Data Analysis Summary Alan Wiseman G040xxxx-zz.

1 Feedback from the executive committee meeting Benno Willke GEO meeting, Glasgow October 2006.

Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.

LIGO-G D Global Diagnostics and Detector Characterization 9 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.

LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.

LIGO-G Z 1 LSC Council Meeting Peter Saulson.

LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 Spectral Line Working Group Report Keith Thorne, Chair.

LIGO-G Z LIGO at the start of continuous observation Prospects and Challenges Albert Lazzarini LIGO Scientific Collaboration Presentation at NSF.

LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.

LIGO- G D E7: An Instrument-builder’s Perspective Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting Upper Limits Plenary Session 22 May 2002 LIGO Livingston.

LSC Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Software Coordinator Report Alan Wiseman LIGO-G Z.

© 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. Chapter 4 Participative Leadership, Delegation, and Empowerment.

© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 Teambuilding for All Employees.

LIGO-G Z DMT Status for UL Analysis K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 DMT Monitors -- Status Update for Upper Limits Analysis.

Application of a personal exposure visualisation tool for environmental monitoring Dr Peter Walsh Environmental Monitoring Group Health and Safety Laboratory.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Issues -- S2 Analysis & S3 Planning.

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Team Management and Conflict.

Advanced Project Management Project Planning Phase Ghazala Amin.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.

Lecture 8 TQM 311 lecturer: Noura Al-Afeef Medical Record Department 1.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.

LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.

LIGO-G Z How to organize the global network? Introduction to a “town meeting” Peter R. Saulson Syracuse University.

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.

LIGO-G W Interferometer and modecleaner transients during the E2 run Rauha Rahkola and Ray Frey University of Oregon Rick Savage LIGO Hanford.

IIPP An Overview of the Injury and Illness Prevention Program.

LIGO-G Z 1 “Welcome to the LSC meeting” Peter Saulson.

LIGO R&D1 Proposed Changes in LSC Publication Policy Committee »Jim Hough, Nergis Mavalvala, Dave Reitze, Kip Thorne »Input from Alan Wiseman Charge »to.

Various Gave presentation at TIG meeting on p5 control room. Feedback included… Proposal should explicitly cover all phases of CMS operations Running.

NSF/ LIGO Review Rainer Weiss Cambridge, Mass October 23, 2002

Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections

Haz Mat Incident Considerations

Activity of the USER GROUP (January October 2012)

S2 Inspiral Hardware Injections

Planning for the S4 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)

Teacher Guide This lesson is designed to teach kids to ask a critical thinking question that you can’t just put into a search box to solve. To do that,

ECSE Advising 10 September /20/2019 Kenneth A. Connor.

LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan

Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G ZRai Weiss LSC Session on Scientific Monitoring March 21, 2006 Committee formed by Peter Saulson to: Consider the value and effectiveness of the sci-mon program to the LSC and LIGO Laboratory Consider the value of the program to the individual researchers and their groups Motivation in part was to determine if $500K/year used in running the sci- mon program (3 sci-mon/day/site) was needed Initial arguments for the program Authors need to understand the data and the experiment and should contribute to the effort of running the experiment Assert the LSC responsibility for data validation and the quality of results

LIGO-G ZRai Weiss Sci-Mon Functions Data management Checking validity of channels Determine data is being recorded Determine that data monitors are functioning Operations Working with operators – improvement in site safety Advice on operational decisions that affect the science Specific on site analysis tasks (examples) lock loss studies, correlation analysis…… long term trending for commissioning

LIGO-G ZRai Weiss Performance Ingredients for success Enough time to become familiar with instrument and tools Having a research task coupled to an analysis group or commissioning Coupling to other sci-mon in the research group Ingredients for failure Insufficient time to become familiar with instrument and tools Inability to relate to the operators No feedback to parent research group

LIGO-G ZRai Weiss Suggestions to improve Proposal 1 (small changes) Maintain 3 shifts per day Leave tasks to the institution in coordination with the detector characterization group Sci-mon to stay 7 days or hopefully longer Task assignment and monitoring by local run coordinator Proposal 2 (bigger changes) Reduce to 2 shifts per day Otherwise the same as proposal 1 Proposal 3 (major change) One shift per day assigned by detector characterization Groups assign additional sci-mon for specific tasks to be coordinated with an analysis group or the detector commissioning group Report to the analysis or commissioning group Spend at least 10 days at site or longer

LIGO-G ZRai Weiss More suggestions Operational idea to maintain more continuity for smaller research groups Several groups to pool sci-mon roles and shifts (J. Giaime) Idea to increase potential pool of good Sci-mons Encourage groups to place graduate students at the sites for extended periods (B. O’Reilly, F. Raab, D. Sigg, K. Riles ++++)