Experimental Research Design Causality & Validity Threats to Validity –Construct (particular to experiments) –Internal –External – already discussed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PhD Research Seminar Series: Valid Research Designs
Advertisements

Agenda Group Hypotheses Validity of Inferences from Research Inferences and Errors Types of Validity Threats to Validity.
Experimental Design I. Definition of Experimental Design
Reliability and Validity of Dependent Measures
Variance in Research Design Sources, threats to internal validity, and “Noise”
Types of Experimental Designs Non-experimental –Post-test only –Pre-post test Experimental –Pre & post-test with control group –Pre & multiple post-test.
Inadequate Designs and Design Criteria
GROUP-LEVEL DESIGNS Chapter 9.
Experimental Research Designs
Research Design and Validity Threats
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS Criteria for Experiments
Who are the participants? Creating a Quality Sample 47:269: Research Methods I Dr. Leonard March 22, 2010.
Chapter 9 Group-Level Research Designs. CHARACTERISTICS OF “IDEAL” EXPERIMENTS Controlling the Time Order of Variables Manipulating the Independent Variable.
MSc Applied Psychology PYM403 Research Methods Validity and Reliability in Research.
Types of Group Designs ____________ group design. The experiment compares groups that receive or _______________ the IV (control group) e.g., behavior.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 4 Choosing a Research Design.
Sampling; Experiments. Sampling  Logic: representative sampling  Sample should have the same variations existing in the larger population  Biased samples.
Sampling and Experimental Control Goals of clinical research is to make generalizations beyond the individual studied to others with similar conditions.
Educational Research by John W. Creswell. Copyright © 2002 by Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Chapter 11 Experimental and Quasi-experimental.
Experiments Pierre-Auguste Renoir: Barges on the Seine, 1869.
Validity Lecture Overview Overview of the concept Different types of validity Threats to validity and strategies for handling them Examples of validity.
Experimental Research
L1 Chapter 11 Experimental and Quasi- experimental Designs Dr. Bill Bauer.
Experimental Design 264a Marketing Research. Criteria for Establishing a Causal Relationship Concomitant variation Temporal variation Control over other.
EVALUATING YOUR RESEARCH DESIGN EDRS 5305 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH & STATISTICS.
Chapter 8 Experimental Research
Experimental Design The Gold Standard?.
Research Tools and Techniques
Applying Science Towards Understanding Behavior in Organizations Chapters 2 & 3.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Choosing a Research Design.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Consumer Preference Test Level 1- “h” potato chip vs Level 2 - “g” potato chip 1. How would you rate chip “h” from 1 - 7? Don’t Delicious like.
Chapter 11 Experimental Designs
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 11 Experimental Designs.
Experimental Research Validity and Confounds. What is it? Systematic inquiry that is characterized by: Systematic inquiry that is characterized by: An.
CHAPTER 8, experiments.
 Internal Validity  Construct Validity  External Validity * In the context of a research study, i.e., not measurement validity.
Copyright ©2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Foundations of Nursing Research, 5e By Rose Marie Nieswiadomy.
Techniques of research control: -Extraneous variables (confounding) are: The variables which could have an unwanted effect on the dependent variable under.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 11 Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Research.
Experimental Design Chapter 1 Research Strategies and the Control of Nuisance Variables.
Research methods and statistics.  Internal validity is concerned about the causal-effect relationship in a study ◦ Can observed changes be attributed.
Research Methods ContentArea Researchable Questions ResearchDesign MeasurementMethods Sampling DataCollection StatisticalAnalysisReportWriting ?
Introduction section of article
Chapter 6 Research Validity. Research Validity: Truthfulness of inferences made from a research study.
Chapter Six: The Basics of Experimentation I: Variables and Control.
Experimental & Quasi-Experimental Designs Dr. Guerette.
Research Design. Time of Data Collection Longitudinal Longitudinal –Panel study –Trend study –Cohort study Cross-sectional Cross-sectional.
Chapter 11.  The general plan for carrying out a study where the independent variable is changed  Determines the internal validity  Should provide.
 The basic components of experiments are: 1) taking action 2) observing the consequence of that action  Experimental model is most closely linked to.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS. Categories Lab experiments –Experiments done in artificial or contrived environment Field experiments –Experiments done in natural.
CHAPTER 8 EXPERIMENTS.
11 Chapter 9 Experimental Designs © 2009 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
CJ490: Research Methods in Criminal Justice UNIT #4 SEMINAR Professor Jeffrey Hauck.
Can you hear me now? Keeping threats to validity from muffling assessment messages Maureen Donohue-Smith, Ph.D., RN Elmira College.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Internal Validity Questions
Experimental Research
Experiments Why would a double-blind experiment be used?
Experimental Research Designs
New Media Research Methods
Introduction to Design
Chapter 6 Research Validity.
Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
The Nonexperimental and Quasi-Experimental Strategies
Group Experimental Design
Study on Method of Mass Communication Research 传播研究方法 (7&8) Dr
Experimental Design I. Definition of Experimental Design
Chapter 11 EDPR 7521 Dr. Kakali Bhattacharya
Presentation transcript:

Experimental Research Design Causality & Validity Threats to Validity –Construct (particular to experiments) –Internal –External – already discussed

Threats to Construct Validity Mono Method bias –Remove common method variance –Establish convergent & discriminant validity Hypothesis guessing Inappropriate level of construct –Usually lower than what occurs in natural setting

Threats to Internal Validity Time –History, Maturation Measurement –Testing, Instrumentation Selection –Randomization, Statistical regression, Mortality Contamination –Diffusion, Compensation Interaction among threats

Internal Validity Establish that cause led to the effect –Identify non-experimental (uncontrolled) factors that affect the dependent variable or the relation b/w the independent and dependent variables

10 Threats to Internal Validity Time History –Factors occurring along with the independent variable An event occurring at the time of the intervention that overshadows (or reduces the effect of iv) and causes changes in dv –E.g., change in manufacturing material along with training influences performance quality

FIGURE 7.1 Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sekaran/RESEARCH 4E

10 Threats to Internal Validity Time Maturation –Biological or psychological processes or factors that occur w/the passage of time & affect the dependent variable E.g., job experience, socialization etc. affect performance

FIGURE 7.2 Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sekaran/RESEARCH 4E

10 Threats to Internal Validity Measurement Testing –Studies w/pre-post measures or multiple measures Increased or decreased sensitization to post- test measures Changes in participants due to measurement itself Increased fatigue or resentment Self-consistency effects

10 Threats to Internal Validity Instrumentation –Change in the measures from pre to post test Change in observers’ frames of reference Changes in participants’ frames of reference (e.g., beta & gamma changes p. 43 Saks) Change in instrumentation quality (e.g., performance quality measurement)

10 Threats to Internal Validity Instrumentation –Use of different measurement techniques Establish expected convergent & discriminant validity Importance of using different measures to overcome percept-percept problem

Threats to Internal Validity Selection Randomization –Randomly assign to experimental conditions Only in experimental designs Matching on key variable if random assignment not possible

Threats to Internal Validity Selection Randomization –Randomly select from population Calculate response rate Establish comparability of respondents to population on key features Stratified (v. cluster?) sampling

10 Threats to Internal Validity Selection Statistical Regression –Upon repeat measurement, scores usually “regress” or “move toward” the mean Usually when extreme scorers are selected into the study –Can be classified as ‘error’ variation

10 Threats to Internal Validity Selection Mortality –Features of participants who do not complete the study affect the results –Reduced power in testing effects

10 Threats to Internal Validity Contamination Diffusion/imitation of treatments –When people in control groups inadvertently know about or are affected by intervention and that changes their behavior

10 Threats to Internal Validity Contamination Compensatory Effects –Knowledge about intervention and changes in control group members’ behavior is more purposeful

10 Threats to Internal Validity Interaction among threats –When multiple threats operate at the same time obscuring the effect of the IV on the DV

Threats to Internal Validity Time-related –History, maturation Measurement –Testing, Instrumentation Selection –Randomization, Statistical regression, mortality Contamination –Diffusion, Compensation Interaction among threats