LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G020355-00-Z Vetoes Used in the E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Part 2 Peter Shawhan,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
Advertisements

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
LIGO-G Z Update on the Analysis of S2 Burst Hardware Injections L. Cadonati (MIT), A. Weinstein (CIT) for the Burst group Hannover LSC meeting,
GWDAW, Dec 2003 Shawhan, Christensen, Gonzalez1 LIGO Inspiral Veto Studies Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech) Nelson Christensen (Carleton College) Gabriela.
G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
Veto Analysis Marina Del Prete Corso di Dottorato dell’ Universita’ di Siena It is a gravewave? Or did something locally create this ? Seismometer Dark.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
LIGO-G Z LSC March 2004 KYF1 Veto efficiency study of triple coincidence playground WaveBurst events using WaveMon and glitchMon S2 veto triggers.
E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
LSC Meeting, 17 March 2004 Shawhan, Marka, et al.LIGO-G E Summary of E10 / S3 Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Szabolcs Márka, Bruce.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
Waveburst DSO: current state, testing on S2 hardware burst injections Sergei Klimenko Igor Yakushin LSC meeting, March 2003 LIGO-G Z.
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
3 May 2011 VESF DA schoolD. Verkindt 1 Didier Verkindt Virgo-LAPP CNRS - Université de Savoie VESF Data Analysis School Data Quality and vetos.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Upper Limits on the Rate of Gravitational Wave Bursts from the First LIGO Science Run Edward Daw Louisiana.
CaJAGWR Seminar, 11 March 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)LIGO-G E First LIGO Search for Binary Inspirals Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech)
Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO PAC Meeting, 6 June 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)LIGO-G E First LIGO Search for Binary Inspirals Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech)
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO-G M GWDAW, December LIGO Burst Search Analysis Laura Cadonati, Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
G R LSC UL 13 Aug 011 Detector Characterization; Triggers, code infrastructure; Followup Analysis for the UL groups Nelson Christensen, Szabi.
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
Veto Selection for Gravitational Wave Event Searches Erik Katsavounidis 1 and Peter Shawhan 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139,
LIGO- G D Burst Search Report Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting LIGO1 Plenary Session 18 August 2003 Hannover.
LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka.
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data LSC Inspiral Analysis Working Group LIGO-G Z LSC Meeting Andres C. Rodriguez.
PSU CGPG Seminar, 31 March 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)LIGO-G E First LIGO Search for Binary Inspirals Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech)
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
LSC Meeting: 3/14/01Inspiral Upper Limit - Detector Characterization 1 Inspiral Upper Limit: Detector Characterization Needs Nelson Christensen Carleton.
Characterization of PEM Channels Chirpiness of the Test Mass motion due to “Noise” Anthony Rizzi Staff Scientist, LIGO LIGO-G D.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
The 9th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop (December 15-18, 2004, Annecy, France) Results of the search for burst gravitational waves with the TAMA300.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
First Year S5 Low Mass Compact Binary Coalescences Drew Keppel 1 representing the LIGO/VIRGO Compact Binary Coalescence Group 1 California Institute of.
Results From the Low Threshold, Early S5, All-Sky Burst Search Laura Cadonati for the Burst Group LSC MIT November 5, 2006 G Z.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LIGO-G Z Results of the LIGO-TAMA S2/DT8 Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G Z r statistics for time-domain cross correlation on burst candidate events Laura Cadonati LIGO-MIT LSC collaboration meeting, LLO march.
LSC Meeting, 10 Nov 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)1 Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests Evan Ochsner and Peter Shawhan (U. of Chicago) (LIGO / Caltech)
S5 First Epoch BNS Inspiral Results Drew Keppel 1 representing the Inspiral Group 1 California Institute of Technology Nov LSC Meeting MIT, 4 November.
LIGO-G Z Inspiral Upper Limits Detector Characterization Nelson Christensen Carleton College August 15, 2001.
LIGO-G D S2 Glitch Investigation Report Laura Cadonati (MIT) on behalf of the Glitch Investigation Team LSC meeting, August 2003, Hannover.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LSC Burst Analysis Group LSC Observational Results Meeting November 4, 2006 The S4 LIGO All-Sky Burst Search.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
LIGO-G D Glitch Investigation Update Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Investigation Group LSC meeting, Hanford November 12, 2003.
LIGO-G Z Introduction to QScan Shourov K. Chatterji SciMon Camp LIGO Livingston Observatory 2006 August 18.
LIGO-G Z E4 Correlations: Detector Characterization Nelson Christensen Carleton College August 15, 2001.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Inspiral Glitch Veto Studies
S3 Spinning Binary Black Hole Search: Status Report
r-statistic performance in S2
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
S3 Glitch Updates Laura Cadonati
WaveMon and Burst FOMs WaveMon WaveMon FOMs Summary & plans
Background estimation in searches for binary inspiral
S2/S3 Glitch Investigation Update
Towards the first coherent multi-ifo search for NS binaries in LIGO
Line tracking methods used in LineMon
First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1
Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data
Presentation transcript:

LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes Used in the E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Part 2 Peter Shawhan, reporting for the Inspiral Upper Limit Working Group LSC Meeting August 21, 2002

LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes for E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Overview Goal: reduce number of inspiral candidates by vetoing times when a transient is detected in an auxiliary channel Target sample: events found by inspiral search code with snr>7 & chisq 7) Take an empirical approach to deciding which channel(s) and transient detection algorithm(s) to use Try as many things as possible! Evaluate trade-off between veto efficiency and deadtime We studied veto performance (for H2 and L1 only) using the E7 “playground” triple-coincidence data Details are in document circulated to U.L. groups

LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes for E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Initial Exploration We used a variety of existing tools to find transients in auxiliary channels DMT monitors: absGlitch, CorrMon, NonMon TFCLUSTERS Standard inspiral template search code, processing auxiliary channels Matlab scripts Visual examination with DTT Many thanks to Burst U.L. group for sharing information! Compared against lists of GW inspiral event candidates Find that interferometer channels (L1:PSL-ISS_ACTM_F, H2:LSC-MICH_CTRL, etc.) provide better vetoes than PEM channels, for this data

LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Wrote a C program called “ivana” to read files of inspiral candidates & veto events and compare event times Can extend intrinsic veto event duration with a user- specified “window” ivana calculates veto efficiency and deadtime Figure of merit: residual rate (as defined by Burst Group) Accounts for deadtime introduced by the veto Veto event Vetoes for E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Quantitative Evaluation Time Veto event extended with “window”—total time interval vetoed

LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes for E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Automated Optimization Study Wrote a script to loop over many combinations and log the output from ivana in each case Veto event files evaluated: absGlitch applied to CARM_CTRL, MICH_CTRL, REFL_Q, H2:POB_Q, L1:PSL-ISS_ACTM_F, with various thresholds (courtesy of S. Ballmer) WaveMon applied to above plus IOO-MC_F (courtesy of S. Klimenko) Inspiral template search code applied to MICH_CTRL, REFL_Q, H2:POB_Q, with a few different SNR thresholds Used seven different windows, from 0 to ±0.3 sec Total of 1078 combinations evaluated in a few hours

LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes for E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Results of Optimization Study H2: H2:LSC-POB_Q (MICH_CTRL is similar) Processed with inspiral search code SNR>7, window = ±0.2 sec Residual rate reduced by 51% Deadtime = 8.3%

LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes for E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Results of Optimization Study L1: H2:PSL-ISS_ACTM_F Processed with absGlitch Filtered at 100 Hz, threshold=10 Similar: 30Hz/12, 30Hz/10 Window = ±0.05 sec Residual rate reduced by 90% Deadtime = 13.4% WaveMon

LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Effect of Vetoes on E7 Inspiral Candidate SNR Distributions (Fine-tuning of veto windows further reduces deadtime by ~1% without degrading veto efficiency) chisq cut gets rid of most events, and vetoes help even more H2 L1

LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z A Sneak Peek at S1 Nelson Christensen and his student, Carl Ebeling, have used ivana to study data taken at LLO on July Target sample (for now): transients in AS_Q found by absGlitch Have looked for correlations with transients found by absGlitch in many PEM and interferometer channels A few channels may show a little benefit when used as a veto, but nothing like the veto effectiveness achieved for the E7 data