QoS in IEEE 802.11 Networks Resources. Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /080r1 Submission January 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Jie Liang Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas,
Advertisements

Networks: Wireless LANs1 Wireless Local Area Networks.
QoS In WLAN By Abdulbaset Hassan Muneer Bazama. Outline Introduction QoS Parameters medium access control schemes (MAC) e medium access.
Contents IEEE MAC layer operation Basic CSMA/CA operation
Lecture 5: IEEE Wireless LANs (Cont.). Mobile Communication Technology according to IEEE (examples) Local wireless networks WLAN a.
Achieving Quality of Service in Wireless Networks A simulation comparison of MAC layer protocols. CS444N Presentation By: Priyank Garg Rushabh Doshi.
– Wireless PHY and MAC Stallings Types of Infrared FHSS (frequency hopping spread spectrum) DSSS (direct sequence.
© Kemal AkkayaWireless & Network Security 1 Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale CS591 – Wireless & Network Security.
Dynamic Bandwidth Scheduling for QoS Enhancement over IEEE WLAN Sangwook Kang, Sungkwan Kim, Mingan Wang, Sunshin An Korea University European Wireless.
Presented by Scott Kristjanson CMPT-820 Multimedia Systems Instructor: Dr. Mohamed Hefeeda 1 Cross-Layer Wireless Multimedia.
Module C- Part 1 WLAN Performance Aspects
P. Bhagwat Specification overview. P. Bhagwat Specifications PLCP Sublayer PHY layer Management PMD Sublayer MAC sublayer MAC Layer Management.
1 CSE401n:Computer Networks Lecture 16 Wireless Link & LANs WS: ch-14 KR: 5.7.
QoS in Reference : IEEE e: QoS Provisioning At The MAC Layer & A survey of quality of service in IEEE networks 通工所一 馮士銓.
1 QoS Schemes for IEEE Wireless LAN – An Evaluation by Anders Lindgren, Andreas Almquist and Olov Schelen Presented by Tony Sung, 10 th Feburary.
110/15/2003CS211 IEEE Standard Why we study this standard: overall architecture physical layer spec. –direct sequence –frequency hopping MAC layer.
802.11g & e Presenter : Milk. Outline g  Overview of g  g & b co-exist QoS Limitations of e  Overview of.
Voice Traffic Performance over Wireless LAN using the Point Coordination Function Wei Supervisor: Prof. Sven-Gustav Häggman Instructor: Researcher Michael.
Lecture #2 Chapter 14 Wireless LANs.
Opersating Mode DCF: distributed coordination function
PLANETE group, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis July 1, 2003 Adaptive Channel allocation for QoS Enhancement in IEEE Wireless LANs Presented by: Mohammad.
MAC layer Taekyoung Kwon. Media access in wireless - start with IEEE In wired link, –Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection –send.
IEEE Project started by IEEE for setting standard for LAN. This project started in (1980, February), Name given to project is year and month.
1 Real-Time Traffic over the IEEE Medium Access Control Layer Tian He J. Sobrinho and A. krishnakumar.
1 Dynamic Adaption of DCF and PCF mode of IEEE WLAN Abhishek Goliya Guided By: Prof. Sridhar Iyer Dr. Leena-Chandran Wadia MTech Dissertation.
Providing QoS in Ad Hoc Networks with Distributed Resource Reservation IEEE802.11e and extensions Ulf Körner and Ali Hamidian.
Lecture 4 Wireless Medium Access Control
Company LOGO Provision of Multimedia Services in based Networks Colin Roby CMSC 681 Fall 2007.
IEEE Wireless LAN Standard. Medium Access Control-CSMA/CA IEEE defines two MAC sublayers Distributed coordination function (DCF) Point coordination.
F ACULTY OF C OMPUTER S CIENCE & E NGINEERING Chapter 05. MAC and Physical Layers.
IEEE EDCF: a QoS Solution for WLAN Javier del Prado 1, Sunghyun Choi 2 and Sai Shankar 1 1 Philips Research USA - Briarcliff Manor, NY 2 Seoul National.
Copyright © 2003 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Confidential, not for distribution to third parties. Quality of Service(QoS) in IEEE Wireless LANs: Evaluation.
1 Real-Time Traffic over the IEEE Medium Access Control Layer Tian He.
Qos support and adaptive video. QoS support in ad hoc networks MAC layer techniques: – e - alternation of contention based and contention free periods;
IEEE WLAN.
Ch 14. Wireless LANs IEEE Specification for a wireless LAN – Cover physical and data link layers Basic service sets (BSS) and extended service.
Planning and Analyzing Wireless LAN
Universität Karlsruhe Institut für Telematik ECE 591
WLAN. Networks: Wireless LANs2 Distribute Coordination Function (DCF) Distributed access protocol Contention-Based Uses CSMA/ CA – Uses both physical.
Chapter 14 Wireless LANs.
MAC Sublayer MAC layer tasks: – Control medium access – Roaming, authentication, power conservation Traffic services – DCF (Distributed Coordination.
Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE Wireless LANs-An Evaluation 主講人 : 黃政偉.
Medium Access Control in Wireless networks
Wireless Protocols. 2 Outline MACA 3 ISM: Industry, Science, Medicine unlicensed frequency spectrum: 900Mhz, 2.4Ghz, 5.1Ghz, 5.7Ghz.
MAC Layer Protocols for Wireless Networks. What is MAC? MAC stands for Media Access Control. A MAC layer protocol is the protocol that controls access.
MAC for WLAN Doug Young Suh Last update : Aug 1, 2009 WLAN DCF PCF.
Distributed-Queue Access for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Authors: V. Baiamonte, C. Casetti, C.-F. Chiasserini Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di.
COE-541 LAN / MAN Simulation & Performance Evaluation of CSMA/CA
DSSS PHY packet format Synchronization SFD (Start Frame Delimiter)
Copyright © 2003 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Confidential, not for distribution to third parties. Wireless LANs Session
IEEE Wireless LAN. Wireless LANs: Characteristics Types –Infrastructure based –Ad-hoc Advantages –Flexible deployment –Minimal wiring difficulties.
CS440 Computer Networks 1 Wireless LAN (IEEE ) Neil Tang 10/01/2008.
EA C451 (Internetworking Technologies)
Medium Access Control MAC protocols: design goals, challenges,
Computer Communication Networks
Lecture 27 WLAN Part II Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Mobile and Ad hoc Networks
IEEE : Wireless LANs ALOHA, Slotted ALOHA
IEEE Wireless LAN wireless LANs: untethered (often mobile) networking
Specification overview
Provision of Multimedia Services in based Networks
Specification overview
QoS in Wireless Networks
Specification overview
Specification overview
Performance Evaluation of an Integrated-service IEEE Network
Specification overview
Specification overview
Student : Min-Hua Yang Advisor : Ho-Ting Wu Date :
Specification overview
Presentation transcript:

QoS in IEEE Networks Resources

Introduction

IEEE Simple, Effective Designed for Best Effort Service Real Time Services: Throughput and Delay Sensitive End-to-End QoS Guarantees, IEEE e

IEEE Architecture STA AP ESS BSS Existing Wired LAN Infrastructure Network Ad Hoc Network

IEEE e -QAP = QoS AP -QSTA = QoS Station

TCP PHY MAC IP MAC PHY TCP PHY MAC IP MAC PHY LLC Station AP server infrastructure network Layers

PHY Layer -HR/DSSS: High Rate Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum - FHSS : Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum

MAC Sublayer PCF (Point Coordination Function) DCF (Distributed Coordination Function)

PCF -Point Coordinator (PC) -Only in infrastructure networks -Designed for delay-bounded services PIFS EIFS: Extended IFS

PCF - Centralized: location-dependent errors -Stations must wait for polling: Delay at low load -AP needs to contend for the channel using DCF to begin a CFP: variable CFP -Managing large number of stations using polling affects the applications that use DCF -No admission control

DCF Distributed, Contention-based CSMA/CA Binary Exponential Back-Off (CW: Contention Window) Physical channel sensing Virtual channel sensing (NAV: Network Allocation Vector) Hidden Terminal problem: RTS/CTS Timers Retry limits Fragmentation

Priority NAV: Network Allocation Vector DIFS: DCF Inter Frame Space SIFS: Short IFS PIFS: PCF IFS EIFS: Extended IFS time medium busy SIFS PIFS DIFS next framecontention

Tunable Parameters

QoS Mechanisms

Service Differentiation Priority: classification of traffic Fair Scheduling: partitioning the bandwidth fairly by regulating the wait times of traffic classes according to given weights

EDCF (Enhanced DCF) Virtual Collision Handler ~ Internal Collisions Priority ACFor 10Best Effort Video Probe 42Video 52 63Voice 73 AC: Access Category AIFS: Arbitrary IFS

Persistent Factor DCF (P-DCF) -A persistent factor P is selected; small P means higher priority traffic class -A uniform random number r is generated every slot in back-off stages. -A flow stops the back-off and starts transmission only if r > p in the current slot given no transmission occurs in previous slots  The back-off interval is a geometric distributed random variable with P Geometric random variable is the number of trials required to obtain the first failure

Distributed Weighted Fair Queue 2 schemes are proposed: CW for a flow = Difference between actual and expected throughput A station decreases the CW to get higher priority  Lower CW when the actual throughput is lower than the expected one Li’ = Ri/Wi Ri = the actual throughput Wi = the weight Each station adjust its CW by comparing others Li’  Selfishness  More stations will have small value of CW

Distributed Fair Scheduling (DFS) The back-off interval is based on the packet length and traffic class For flow i, BI i proportional to: 1. The weight (higher for higher throughput classes) 2. The packet length 3. A scaling factor (to min the probability of collisions in case different stations have same back off interval)

Distributed Deficit Round Robin (DDRR) 1. Each throughput class i at station j is given a service quantum rate (Q ij ) equal to its required throughput 2. A deficit counter (DC ij ) is advanced at the rate Qij in a round robin fashion 3. Once a DC ij becomes positive, the i th queue is allowed to send one packet 4. After transmission, DC ij will be decreased by packet length each time a packet is transmitted  DCij is used to calculate IFS ij (time before transmit or back-off): larger DC ij, smaller IFS ij

DDRR Polling in a round robin way Queues of different throughput classes

Admission Control and Bandwidth Reservation Service differentiation does not perform well under high traffic loads There is a need to protect existing streams A wireless node has no knowledge of exact condition of the network With CSMA/CA, bandwidth provision is quite difficult

Measurement-Based Admission Control -The decision is made on measurement of existing network status (delay, throughput, …) -Different methods used: -Virtual MAC: the use of virtual MAC frames, and using a virtual source algorithm to tune the virtual MAC. -Probe packet: the use of probe packet for ad hoc -Data probe: the use of data packets

Calculation-Based Admission Control Performance metrics or criteria for evaluating the network status Permissible throughput propagation Saturation-based

Scheduling and Reservation-Based Schemes ARME (ASSURED RATE MAC EXTENSION ): - Extension of DCF - Uses token bucket-based algorithm to detect overloading condition - improvements mad by adjusting CW

Scheduling/Reservation AACA: - RTS/CTS used for reservation - Mainly was for solving hidden terminal problem

Link Adaptation Dynamically change the transmit rate, specified in the PLCP header of the PHY layer, that depend on channel conditions

Link Adaptation Received Signal Strength (RSS) –Each station maintains 12 RSS thresholds and corresponding transmission rate –Measure RSS and adjust the transmission rate PER-Prediction –Decisions are based on Packet Error Rate-Prediction MPDU-Based Success/Fail Thresholds Code Adapts To Enhance Reliability

Direct Link Protocol (DLP) QSTA transmits directly to another QSTA Set up with the QAP is needed STAs cannot go into power saving mode for active duration of the direct stream. DLP is not applied in Ad Hoc networks DLP messages can include security information

Group ACK Send a group of frames before any ACK to reduce overhead GroupAckReq GroupAck frame with an ACK bitmap Sender retry unacknowledged frames with a retry limit Receiver should keep the state of burst data received (sender address, bit map, sequence numbers)

Challenges IEEE e and DiffServ IEEE e and IntServ Integration of WLAN and MANET Integration of WLAN and Bluetooth Integration of WLAN and 3G wireless networks

Resources 1. “A SURVEY OF QUALITY OF SERVICE IN IEEE NETWORKS” By: HUA ZHU, MING LI, IMRICH CHLAMTAC, AND B. PRABHAKARAN THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS winter04/cs117/chap7wlanRvsd.ppt 4. Up