Preliminary Geoacoustic Inversion Results from SW06 Data Ross Chapman ONR Shallow Water Experiment 06 Workshop January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Acoustical Modeling Tools for ESME
Advertisements

Think & Solve Problems Chapter 26
Passive Sonar Wrap Up Exercise And Exam Review. Data The two submarines described below are to engage in a sonar detection exercise off the coast of Kauai.
ADVANCES IN HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING* Houston Business Roundtable Forum - May 2013 Depth Sounding Fusion with Above-Water LIDAR Sidescan Sonar Imaging Sonar.
Differences measuring levels Root mean square (RMS) –For long (continuous) signals –Average power delivered Peak-to-peak (pp) –Extremely short signals.
Lynn K. Shay 1, J. Martinez-Pedraja 1, M. Powell 2, B. Haus 1, and J. Brewster 1 1 Division of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography, RSMAS 2 Hurricane.
1 of 12 Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Intermediate Licence Course Christopher Chapman G0IPU Slide Set 8 (6) Propagation Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society.
Seismic reflection Seismic reflection profiling basically same principle as echo sounding But lower frequency used for greater subbottom penetration Trade.
Defence Research and Development Canada Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada Canada DRDC Aspects of SW06 – 2007 Workshop Sean Pecknold, Paul.
Defence Research and Development Canada Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada Canada The impact of noise on passive monitoring of marine mammals.
Sonar Chapter 9. History Sound Navigation And Ranging (SONAR) developed during WW II –Sound pulses emitted reflected off metal objects with characteristic.
ACOUSTIC SIGNATURES Oğuzhan U. BAŞKURT B. Sertaç SERBEST.
Reflection Field Methods
Acquisiton of Passive Seismic Data at Tooele Army Depot, Utah David Sheley, Travis Crosby, Jianming Sheng.
1 Progress Towards Developing a Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean Framework for Research and Operational Hurricane Models Isaac Ginis B. Thomas, R. Yablonsky,
Long-Term Ambient Noise Statistics in the Gulf of Mexico Mark A. Snyder & Peter A. Orlin Naval Oceanographic Office Stennis Space Center, MS Anthony I.
MIMO Time Reversal Communications Hee-Chun Song, W.S. Hodgkiss, and W.A. Kuperman Marine Physical Laboratory/Scripps Institution Oceanography University.
Acoustic Detection Activities in the UK Status and Future Plans Lee F. Thompson University of Sheffield, UK Acoustic Detection Workshop, Stanford, CA 14th.
Study of the acoustic field generated by the electron beam in water Olga Ershova July, 19 th 2006 INFN Genova.
AERIALS AND RADIO FREQUENCY PROPAGATION By Farhan Saeed.
Parameters, pulse parameters, attenuation, and resolution.
Environmental Variability on Acoustic Prediction Using CASS/GRAB Nick A. Vares June 2002.
Review of Passive Sonar Equation
AWACS/SW06 Sea Tests: RV Endeavor Cruise # August – 10 September, 2006 Phil Abbot, OASIS Inc Jim Lynch and Glen Gawarkiewicz, WHOI John Joseph, NPS.
Intensity, Intensity Level, and Intensity Spectrum Level
Outline Glider acoustics Combustive sound source inversions 3D effects of front and internal waves Papers in progress Preliminary Results James H. Miller.
Graduate Program in Acoustics Applied Research Laboratory 8-13 July 2007 MaxEnt Application of the Maximum Entropy method to sonar signal processing.
Statistics of broadband transmissions through a range-dependent fluctuating ocean waveguide Mark Andrews and Purnima Ratilal; Northeastern University,
ARENA Workshop, May, 2005 First Activities in Acoustic Detection of Particles in UPV M. Ardid, J. Ramis, V. Espinosa, J.A. Martínez-Mora, F. Camarena,
Effects of a Suspended Bottom Boundary Layer on Sonar Propagation Michael Cornelius June 2004.
OS 72B-0355 Analysis of Acoustic Signals from Ship Traffic at Pioneer Seamount Carl O. Vuosalo, 1 Craig Huber, 1 Michael D. Hoffman, 1 Newell Garfield,
Pressure-particle velocity coherence Environmental effects on coherence of pressure–vertical particle velocity David Dall’Osto and Peter H. Dahl Applied.
U.S. HYDRO 2007 TIDES WORKSHOP May 17, 2006 UNCERTAINTY WORKSHOP SKGILL SLIDES.
SAN DIEGO 16/11/2010 Contact: Philippe Plantevin - Website : Tél. +33 (0)4.
The main instrument used is called the sonde. A basic sonde consists of a source and two receivers one-foot apart. The sonde is lowered down the borehole.
3D models of sound propagating in shallow water Alexander Tshoidze Voronezh State University.
University of Kansas S. Gogineni, P. Kanagaratnam, R. Parthasarathy, V. Ramasami & D. Braaten The University of Kansas Wideband Radars for Mapping of Near.
Georges Dossot, James H. Miller, Gopu R. Potty, Dept. of Ocean Engineering, URI James F. Lynch, Arthur E. Newhall, Ying Tsong Lin, WHOI Mohsen Badiey,
Maximising the acoustics of your meeting room
Sediment Properties and the Acoustic Field in a Three-layer Waveguide David Barclay AOS seminar June 1st, 2006.
John Learned at Stanford 13 September 2003 Early Work on Acoustic Detection of Neutrinos John G. Learned University of Hawaii at Stanford Workshop, 9/13/03.
SOES6002: Modelling in Environmental and Earth System Science CSEM Lecture 3 Martin Sinha School of Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton.
Estimation of wave spectra with SWIM on CFOSAT – illustration on a real case C. Tison (1), C. Manent (2), T. Amiot (1), V. Enjolras (3), D. Hauser (2),
Arrival time variations of pulses in shallow water and low frequency acoustical underwater positioning B.Katsnelson (Voronezh Uni, Russia) M.Badiey (Uni.
Calculating Wave Speed. Wave Speed v fλ Practice Problem #1 What is the speed of a sound wave that has a wavelength of 2 m and a frequency of Hz?
Low to Mid frequency propagation through Internal Waves during SW06 experiment M. Badiey B. Katsnelson J. Lynch.
NEMO-O DE NEMO First results from the NEMO Test Site G. Riccobene, for the NEMO Collaboration The NEMO Collaboration is performing the Phase 1 of the project,
SW06 Acoustics and Oceanography Data and Analysis Plans Jim Lynch, Art Newhall, et al. WHOI et elsewhere.
V f λ.
Evaluation of SVP-BW drifters thanks to deployments near moored buoys DBCP-18 workshop - Martinique October 2002 By Pierre Blouch Presentation :
Infrasound Technology Workshop – Tokyo, November Listen to the Sounds of the Antarctic Atmosphere L. Ceranna, A. Le Pichon & E. Blanc BGR / B3.11,
Milton Garces, Claus Hetzer, and Mark Willis University of Hawaii, Manoa Source modeling of microbarom signals generated by nonlinear ocean surface wave.
Properties of the non-propulsive ship noise field as measured from a research vessel moored in the Yellow Sea and relation to sea bed parameters Peter.
ARENA08 Roma June 2008 Francesco Simeone (Francesco Simeone INFN Roma) Beam-forming and matched filter techniques.
2D modeling of tsunami generation F. Chierici, L. Pignagnoli, D. Embriaco.
PROPERTIES OF WAVES. Waves A wave is a means of transferring energy and information from one point to another without there being any transfer of matter.
Wave speed equation v=ƒλ.
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
V f λ.
SW06 Modal Mapping Experiment (MOMAX) Overview
New ProMAX modules for reflectivity calibration and noise attenuation
PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER: A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM
Calculating Wave Speed
What we will do today: Carry out calculations involving the relationship between speed, wavelength and frequency for waves.
OS 72B-0355 Analysis of Acoustic Signals from Ship Traffic at Pioneer Seamount Carl O. Vuosalo,1 Craig Huber,1 Michael D. Hoffman,1 Newell Garfield,2 and.
What is SONAR? A remote sensing technique or device that uses sound waves to detect, locate, and sometimes identify objects in water. The term is an acronym.
LCDR John Hendrickson 17SEP2008
Senior Project – Computer Engineering Active Noise Cancellation For the Attenuation of Sound Stephen E. Lee Advisor – Prof. Catravas Results One.
Real-time Uncertainty Output for MBES Systems
Summary of 2003 Infrasound Technology Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Geoacoustic Inversion Results from SW06 Data Ross Chapman ONR Shallow Water Experiment 06 Workshop January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA University of Victoria, BC, Canada

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Low Frequency Geoacoustics (Knorr: Aug 23 – Sept 06) - Bill Hodgkiss, Peter Gerstoft, Chenfen Huang (MPL) - David Knobles et al (ARL) - Ross Chapman, Yongmin Jiang, (UVic)

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Data sets used (at VLA1) : Low frequency tonals for 3 ranges along ‘DJ’ track Chirps at fixed range Objectives: Geoacoustic model for common site Broad frequency band Well surveyed range dependence Approaches: MFI for tonal signals single layer geoacoustic model Reflection coefficient inversion of fixed range chirp data

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Example of matched field inversion result – parameter uncertainty estimates at WP21 (~ 1km)

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Example of data processing for reflectivity coefficient inversion – Fixed range high frequency chirps Sea floor & subbottom reflection at VLA1 site Sound speed and attenuation from 2000 ~ 4000 Hz Sound speed ~ 1580 m/s

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Some problems with the data: MFI: no information in some tonal frequencies Significant variation in signal level Significant variation in SSP Array geometry: hydrophone depths uncertain? What other information do we need? Chirp sonar track over DJ line; geoprobe data Swell and wave direction & height Source levels for LF and MF sound sources ARL acoustic data from SWAMIs Preliminary low frequency geoacoustic model for ‘DJ’ track sea floor sediment parameters over range dependent track sediment sound speed: ~1600 m/s (50 – 900 Hz) Collaborations for geoacoustics: - Geoacoustic models for broad frequency band for DJ track and Moray/VLA site - SWAMI site data -

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Collaborations for geoacoustics: - Geoacoustic models for broad frequency band for DJ track and Moray/VLA site: MPL (LF < 4500 Hz) and APL (2 – 20 kHz) - SWAMI site data: ARL - long and short range geoacoustic inversion at sandy site - expect less variation in SSP - LF and MF data (chirps) - Experimental benchmark data set for inversion methods? - Target a JASAEL collection of preliminary results (2007)? - Hurricane Ernesto Noise data: SWAMIs

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Discussion Slides

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA final energy of each frequency in optimization: ( 53Hz) (103Hz) (203Hz) (253Hz) (303Hz) (403Hz) (503Hz) (703Hz) Energy Function:

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA WD=79.5, Rdvb = 8.2mWD=79.5m, Rdvb=11.8m WD=78.8, rdvb =11.8m, 8fresWD=78.8, rdvb =8.2m, 8fres

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA WD=78.8, rdvb =9.05m, 8fresWD=78.8, rdvb =8.55m, 8fres WD=78.8, rdvb =11.8m, wp21 ssp WD=78.8, rdvb =11.8m, wp22 ssp

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA WD=78.8, rdvb =11.8m, WP22WD=78.8, rdvb =8.2m, WP22 WD=81.0, rdvb =11.8m, WP23 WD=81.0, rdvb =8.2m, WP23

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Discussion: Way Point 21(0.98km), LF(5mins) + MF(5mins) Tonal, 8 fres

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Way Point 22(2.98km), LF(5mins) Tonal(53, , 253)Hz

ONR SW06 Workshop, January, 30-31, 2007 San Diego, CA Way Point 23(4.98km), LF(5mins) Tonal(53, , 253)Hz