Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Diversity Mode in OFDMA Date: 2015-11-09 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /569r0 Submission Performance of 1x, 2x, and 4x HE-LTF May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Doc.: IEEE /0358r3 Submission March 2015 Daewon Lee, NEWRACOM Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Preamble Structure in ax
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1227r3 SubmissionSlide 1 OFDMA Performance Analysis Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Sept 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r1 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 OFDMA Non-contiguous Channel Utilization Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1452r0 November 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency selective scheduling in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0823r1 July 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Preamble Design and Auto-Detection for 11ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0845r0 July 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1056r1 Submission Clarifying Link Level Simulator Assumptions Sept Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0824r0 July 2015 Slide 1 Pilot Design for 11ax Downlink Transmissions Date: Authors: Yujin Noh, Newracom.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1088r0 September 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 September 2015 Considerations on Range Extension with SIG-A Repetition Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE SubmissionSlide 1 Interleavers for 160MHz Transmission Date: Authors: Mediatek.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Submission Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0584r1May 2015 Considerations on LTF Sequence Design Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0586r1 Slide 1 Frequency Diversity Options in OFDMA Date: Authors: Reza Hedayat, Newracom NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU with BCC
Submission doc.: IEEE /1314r2 November 2015 Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 I/Q Imbalance Impact to TGax OFDMA Uplink Reception Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0818r1 Submission Further Analysis of Feedback and Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA July 2015 Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection for MU Transmission Date: Authors: July 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /1057r0 Submission Multiple Resource Unit Allocation for TGax OFDMA Sept 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Submission doc.: IEEE /0079r2 January 2016 Kentaro Taniguchi, ToshibaSlide 1 Allocation sizes for BCC in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1089r0 September 2015 Slide 1 Considerations on PHY Padding and Packet Extension in 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 January 2016 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Congestion control for UL MU random access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0854r2 July 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 DL OFDMA Signalling Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1329r2 November 2015 Yujin Noh, NewracomSlide 1 Link Adaptation for HE WLAN Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0331r1 March 2016 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 1 Power Control for Multi-User Transmission in ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU with BCC
LTF Sequence Designs Date: Authors: November 2015
Supported Resource Allocations in SIG-B
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Data Rate for Range Requirement in 11ba
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: Authors: September 2010
Explanations for CR on NDP feedback report
Link Adaptation for HE WLAN
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: XX Authors: September 2010
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Compressed Midamble in NGV
Non-OFDMA Tone Plan for 320MHz
Presentation transcript:

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Diversity Mode in OFDMA Date: Authors:

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 2 Background OFDMA numerology is optimized considering tradeoff between OFDMA gain and signaling overhead for 11ax In this submission, diversity gain is shown to discuss about feasibility for non-contiguous resource allocation

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Need for Robust Transmission in OFMDA Multicast Trigger Frame is used in cascaded MU operation. Given the small payload size of TR (compared with Data frames) it is likely to be allocated with small RU (e.g. 26 or 52 RU). The nature of multi-cast creates difficulty in obtaining frequency selective gain since it will be difficult to choose a channel that has good link conditions for multiple STAs simultaneously. The narrow RU size and random selection of frequency position makes the Trigger frame susceptible to packet reception loss from channel deep fading. Currently, narrow RUs have no diversity gain. Slide 3 preamble STA 1 (Data+unicast TR) STA 2 (Data+unicast TR) STA 3 (Data+unicast TR) Multicast TR preamble STA 1 (BA+Data) STA 2 (BA) STA 3 (BA + Data) STA 5 (Data) STA 4 (Data) UL MUDL MU … …

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Non-Contiguous Resource Allocation Diversity gain can be achieved by non-contiguous resource allocation spread over frequency Design complexity can be reduced by configuring some limitation on non-contiguous allocation Keep the number of data/pilots tones identical to contiguous RUs No introduction of new BCC/LDPC interleaver sizes Slide 4 Channel coding MOD N-tones N/2-tones For example) IFFT

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Simulation Parameters Bandwidth : 80MHz Multi-antenna transmission : 1x1 and 4x1 MCS: 0, 3 (code rate ½) and 4 (code rate ¾ ) Payload Size: 100 bytes Channel: TGac ChD Carrier frequency offset (CFO): fixed at 40 ppm 5GHz) Phase noise (both at Tx/Rx): -41dBc Real timing estimation & synchronization Diversity tested using evenly spaced subblocks Examples shown in next slide Slide 5

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Subblocks of a Non-contiguous RU is chosen to be equally spaced apart within 10/20/40/80 MHz. Number of pilots for a given RU is split equally between subblocks. 1 pilot per subblock, 2 subblocks for 26 RU 2 pilot per subbblock, 2 subblock for 52 RU etc Examples of Sub-blocks Used for Simulation Slide 6 N N/2 10/20/40/80 MHz N N/4 10/20/40/80 MHz

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Two Sub-block 26/52 RU - 1x1 Tx-Rx, MCS 0/3/4 Slide 7 Diversity gain is expected to be the largest when code rate is ½ or when DCM is used. Around 2 dB gain observed even with 10MHz separation Performance saturated after 10MHz separation 2-3 dB 1 dB 2 dB 1.7 dB 0.7 dB MCS 0 MCS 3 MCS 4 MCS 0 MCS 3 MCS 4

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Two Sub-block 106/242 RU - 1x1 Tx-Rx, MCS 0/3/4 Slide 8 Two sub-blocks for 106 RU & 242 RU Diversity gain are smaller for 106 RU and 242 RU (compared with 26 and 52 RU). MCS 0 MCS 3 MCS 4 MCS 0 MCS 3 MCS 4

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Four Sub-block 106/242 RU - 1x1 Tx-Rx, MCS 0/3/4 Slide 9 Four sub-blocks for 106 RU & 242 RU 1.5 dB performance gain for 106 RU. Diversity gain seems to be minimal for 242 RU. 1.5 dB 0.7 dB MCS 0 MCS 3 MCS 4 MCS 0 MCS 3 MCS 4

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Simulation Summary Diversity Gain at 10% PER* 26 RU52 RU106 RU242 RU 2 sub-blocks1 ~ 3 dB0.7 ~ 2 dB> 0.7 dB> 0.3 dB 4 sub-blocks- 3.5 dB (Appendix) > 1.5 dB> 0.7 dB Slide 10 With small RU (e.g. 26 RU and 52 RU), up to 3.5 dB gain can be achieved As expected small RUs have the most diversity gain. Large RUs already span wide enough to capture most of diversity gains. Given hierarchical structure of OFDMA numerology, 4 sub-blocks may give scheduling limitation (e.g. large fragmentation of the resources) Limiting the diversity mode to 26 and/or 52 RU may be sufficient. Once 4 green colored sub-blocks of 26 tones are assigned for a STA, rest red colored 52/106/242 tones cannot be assigned to other STAs in OFDMA > Results in fragmentation of the resources Example on 40MHz *Based on 1 Tx, with MCS between 0 ~ 4

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Signaling Aspects of Non-Continuous RU Given that performance benefits of non-continuous RU is focused on 26/52 RU with at least 10MHz or more separation, we can define non-continuous RU allocations with the reserved states. For example, only support non-continuous allocation for 26 and/or 52 RU Excellent candidates for non-continuous RU are the central 26 RUs in 20/40/80 MHz. 8 bit RU allocation field in SIG-B only may to signal ~180 some states. This means there are additional ~70 states reserved. Slide 11

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Example Candidates for Non-Continuous RU Slide 12 HE Case 1) Case 3) Case 2) Two separate 26 RUs can be combined into a single non- continuous 52 RU. Two 13 tones of 26 RUs (i.e. half) can be combined into a single non-continuous 26 RU. The other half can form another non-continuous 26 RU.

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Straw Poll 1 Do you agree to add the following to the SFD? Transmission diversity mode (i.e. non-continuous transmission) shall be supported in 11ax. Transmission diversity mode divides a single encoded packet in half and maps to (26 RU) or (52 RU) tones, that are spaced apart in frequency. TBD whether only 26 RU, only 52 RU, or both 26 and 52 RU support transmit diversity mode. Y/N/A Slide 13

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 14 References [1] 11-15/0132r9, Specification Framework for TGax [2] 11-15/1066r0, HE-SIG-B Contents

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Appendix Slide 15

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Two Non-Contiguous 13 tones for RU26 (examples for simulation) Slide 16 10M 20M 40M 80M

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 17 Two Non-Contiguous 26 tones for RU52 (examples for simulation) 10M 20M 40M 80M

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 18 Four Non-Contiguous 13 tones for RU52 (examples for simulation) 20M 40M 80M

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 19 Two Non-Contiguous 53 tones for RU106 (examples for simulation) 20M 40M 80M

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 20 Four Non-Contiguous 26/27 tones for RU106 (examples for simulation) 20M 40M 80M

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 21 Two Non-Contiguous 121 tones for RU242 Four Non-Contiguous 60/61 tones for RU242 (examples for simulation) 40M 80M 40M 80M

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Non-Contiguous RU52 (Tx 1 and MCS 0) Slide dB

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Non-Contiguous RU26 (TX1/Tx4 and MCS 3) Slide 23 TX 1 TX 4 2 sub-blocks for 26 RU Diversity gain seems to be decreased with increased number of Tx antenna

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Non-Contiguous RU52 and RU106 (Tx1/Tx 4 and MCS 3) Slide 24 TX 1 TX 4 TX 1