Site Certification Process (Round Table) Fabio Hernandez IN2P3 Computing Center - Lyon October 30 2002

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DataTAG WP4 Meeting CNAF Jan 14, 2003 Interfacing AliEn and EDG 1/13 Stefano Bagnasco, INFN Torino Interfacing AliEn to EDG Stefano Bagnasco, INFN Torino.
Advertisements

LNL M.Biasotto, Roma, 22 novembre Some notes on WP6 INFN Testbed.
Workload Management David Colling Imperial College London.
Andrew McNab - Manchester HEP - 17 September 2002 Putting Existing Farms on the Testbed Manchester DZero/Atlas and BaBar farms are available via the Testbed.
ATLAS/LHCb GANGA DEVELOPMENT Introduction Requirements Architecture and design Interfacing to the Grid Ganga prototyping A. Soroko (Oxford), K. Harrison.
EU 2nd Year Review – Jan – Title – n° 1 WP1 Speaker name (Speaker function and WP ) Presentation address e.g.
Réunion DataGrid France, Lyon, fév CMS test of EDG Testbed Production MC CMS Objectifs Résultats Conclusions et perspectives C. Charlot / LLR-École.
Job Submission The European DataGrid Project Team
Andrew McNab - EDG Access Control - 14 Jan 2003 EU DataGrid security with GSI and Globus Andrew McNab University of Manchester
WP 1 Grid Workload Management Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
The DataGrid Project NIKHEF, Wetenschappelijke Jaarvergadering, 19 December 2002
A Model for Grid User Management Rich Baker Dantong Yu Tomasz Wlodek Brookhaven National Lab.
Basic Grid Job Submission Alessandra Forti 28 March 2006.
DataGrid Kimmo Soikkeli Ilkka Sormunen. What is DataGrid? DataGrid is a project that aims to enable access to geographically distributed computing power.
1 Use of the European Data Grid software in the framework of the BaBar distributed computing model T. Adye (1), R. Barlow (2), B. Bense (3), D. Boutigny.
QCDgrid Technology James Perry, George Beckett, Lorna Smith EPCC, The University Of Edinburgh.
The EDG Testbed Deployment Details The European DataGrid Project
GRACE Project IST EGAAP meeting – Den Haag, 25/11/2004 Giuseppe Sisto – Telecom Italia Lab.
5 November 2001F Harris GridPP Edinburgh 1 WP8 status for validating Testbed1 and middleware F Harris(LHCb/Oxford)
Workload Management WP Status and next steps Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
WP9 – Earth Observation Applications – n° 1 Experiences with Testbed1, plans and objectives for Testbed 2 Testbed retreat th August 2002
C. Loomis – Testbed Status – 28/01/2002 – n° 1 Future WP6 Tasks Charles Loomis January 28, 2002
Computational grids and grids projects DSS,
:: ::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: :: GridKA School 2009 MPI on Grids 1 MPI On Grids September 3 rd, GridKA School 2009.
QCDGrid Progress James Perry, Andrew Jackson, Stephen Booth, Lorna Smith EPCC, The University Of Edinburgh.
DataGrid WP1 Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova. WP1 (Grid Workload Management) Objective of the first DataGrid workpackage is (according to the project "Technical.
- Distributed Analysis (07may02 - USA Grid SW BNL) Distributed Processing Craig E. Tull HCG/NERSC/LBNL (US) ATLAS Grid Software.
CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE GEOSCIENCES Data Replication Service Sandeep Chandra GEON Systems Group San Diego Supercomputer Center.
CMS Stress Test Report Marco Verlato (INFN-Padova) INFN-GRID Testbed Meeting 17 Gennaio 2003.
C. Loomis – Integration Status- October 31, n° 1 Integration Status October 31, 2001
Andrew McNabETF Firewall Meeting, NeSC, 5 Nov 2002Slide 1 Firewall issues for Globus 2 and EDG Andrew McNab High Energy Physics University of Manchester.
November SC06 Tampa F.Fanzago CRAB a user-friendly tool for CMS distributed analysis Federica Fanzago INFN-PADOVA for CRAB team.
Responsibilities of ROC and CIC in EGEE infrastructure A.Kryukov, SINP MSU, CIC Manager Yu.Lazin, IHEP, ROC Manager
First attempt for validating/testing Testbed 1 Globus and middleware services WP6 Meeting, December 2001 Flavia Donno, Marco Serra for IT and WPs.
TERENA 2003, May 21, Zagreb TERENA Networking Conference, 2003 MOBILE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR GRID USERS. TESTBED Miroslaw Kupczyk Rafal.
George Tsouloupas University of Cyprus Task 2.3 GridBench ● 1 st Year Targets ● Background ● Prototype ● Problems and Issues ● What's Next.
GRIDS Center Middleware Overview Sandra Redman Information Technology and Systems Center and Information Technology Research Center National Space Science.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE OSG-LCG Interoperability Activity Author: Laurence Field (CERN)
DataGRID PTB, Geneve, 10 April 2002 Testbed Software Test Plan Status Laurent Bobelin on behalf of Test Group.
Overview of Privilege Project at Fermilab (compilation of multiple talks and documents written by various authors) Tanya Levshina.
DataGRID Testbed Enlargement EDG Retreat Chavannes, august 2002 Fabio HERNANDEZ
VO management: Progress since Chicago Workshop Vincenzo Ciaschini 23/5/2002 CNAF – Bologna.
Andrew McNab - Manchester HEP - 17 September 2002 UK Testbed Deployment Aim of this talk is to the answer the questions: –“How much of the Testbed has.
High-Performance Computing Lab Overview: Job Submission in EDG & Globus November 2002 Wei Xing.
LCG LCG-1 Deployment and usage experience Lev Shamardin SINP MSU, Moscow
VO Box Issues Summary of concerns expressed following publication of Jeff’s slides Ian Bird GDB, Bologna, 12 Oct 2005 (not necessarily the opinion of)
LCG CERN David Foster LCG WP4 Meeting 20 th June 2002 LCG Project Status WP4 Meeting Presentation David Foster IT/LCG 20 June 2002.
Data Management The European DataGrid Project Team
Testing the HEPCAL use cases J.J. Blaising, F. Harris, Andrea Sciabà GAG Meeting April,
Grid Workload Management (WP 1) Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
The DataGrid Project NIKHEF, Wetenschappelijke Jaarvergadering, 19 December 2002
VOX Project Tanya Levshina. 05/17/2004 VOX Project2 Presentation overview Introduction VOX Project VOMRS Concepts Roles Registration flow EDG VOMS Open.
EMI Inter-component and Large Scale Testing Infrastructure Danilo Dongiovanni INFN-CNAF.
INFN GRID Production Infrastructure Status and operation organization Cristina Vistoli Cnaf GDB Bologna, 11/10/2005.
Tests at Saclay D. Calvet, A. Formica, Z. Georgette, I. Mandjavidze, P. Micout DAPNIA/SEDI, CEA Saclay Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex.
Site Authorization Service Local Resource Authorization Service (VOX Project) Vijay Sekhri Tanya Levshina Fermilab.
10 March Andrey Grid Tools Working Prototype of Distributed Computing Infrastructure for Physics Analysis SUNY.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST New VO Integration Fabio Hernandez ROC Managers Workshop,
SAM Status Update Piotr Nyczyk LCG Management Board CERN, 5 June 2007.
CERN LCG1 to LCG2 Transition Markus Schulz LCG Workshop March 2004.
Testbed: Status & Plans
Regional Operations Centres Core infrastructure Centres
The EDG Testbed Deployment Details
Work Package 9 – EO Applications
OGF PGI – EDGI Security Use Case and Requirements
Introduction to Grid Technology
CRC exercises Not happy with the way the document for testbed architecture is progressing More a collection of contributions from the mware groups rather.
Leanne Guy EGEE JRA1 Test Team Manager
CMS report from FNAL demo week Marco Verlato (INFN-Padova)
Site availability Dec. 19 th 2006
Presentation transcript:

Site Certification Process (Round Table) Fabio Hernandez IN2P3 Computing Center - Lyon October

F. Hernandez – 30 Oct 2002 – 2 Outline  Process overview  Open Questions  Discussion

F. Hernandez – 30 Oct 2002 – 3 Problem Statement  We need to define and implement a process to let EDG Applications Testbed sites be certified omain target: sites joining the testbed for the first time omay also apply for sites in the testbed when a new EDG release needs to be deployed  Goal: to allow sites to join and leave(!) the testbed with minimal disruption for end users and testbed operators oalthough some service providers (like RB and RCs) may not leave without disruption ;-)  Document written by Laurent Bobelin submitted for comments otargeted at EDG services providers (UI installation should not need certification)

F. Hernandez – 30 Oct 2002 – 4 Process Overview  Certification process depends on the EDG component being certified oCE, RC(?), VO can be certified in a more or less stand alone way oSE certification needs at least another correctly configured SE oRB certification needs at least a correctly configured CE  The most common components that will be deployed are CE and SE oLet's look at the process for CE certification  Actors oSite administrator oResource Broker operators oTest group

F. Hernandez – 30 Oct 2002 – 5 Process Overview (cont.) StepWhoTools 1. Install and configure new CEsite admin.EDG documentation, Globus basic commands 2. Verify interaction between testbed RB and this new CE site admin.EDG commands for job management, test suite(?) 3. Verify new CE/new site information system Advertise site status EDG-TEST site admin./RB operators should be informed ( required for manual configuration of II) EDG commands for job management, tools for LDAP browsing, test suite welcome 4. Verify the whole chain of job management (submission, execution, query status, output retrieval) test grouptest suite 5. Advertise site status EDG- CERTIFIED site admin.

F. Hernandez – 30 Oct 2002 – 6 Process Overview (cont.) StepWhoTools 6. Implement site operation procedures (periodic CRL retrieval and grid-mapfile update,...) site admin.EDG documentation, EDG tools 7. Install applications software (update site information system) site admin.Application's toolkit test suite

F. Hernandez – 30 Oct 2002 – 7 Open Questions  The certification process for a SE needs a correctly configured SE for validation of replicate management osolution 1: configure two storage elements in the same site and make replication test between them osolution 2: request the registration of the new SE in an already configured SE (certification testbed?) ohow to prevent Replica Catalog corruption?  RB matchmaking process needs to be modified to only include (unless otherwise specified) EDG-CERTIFIED sites ois this an acceptable request for RB implementers?  Currently we are using a manual configuration of sites known to the RB oin the future, a simple registration of a site's information system on the testbed hierarchy will be enough

F. Hernandez – 30 Oct 2002 – 8 Open Questions (cont.)  Manual vs. Automatic registration of testbed sites (cont.) oA single site can bring down the whole testbed operation: how can we prevent that? oWill the testbed information system be robust enough to support the temporal unavailability of a site?  Do we need a team in charge of the whole testbed operation?  Who will decide which sites can join and when?