Environmental water requirements Surface water. From Guide to Plan Guide proposed reduction in diversions from 3000 to 4000 GL Reductions based on simplified.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marmot Creek Research Basin 50 th Anniversary Workshop March , 2013 John Diiwu Forest Management Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource.
Advertisements

Reconfiguring the River The 4 th Annual Water Symposium, 20 February 2009, Darling Harbour, Sydney Prof Mike Young, Executive Director Research Chair,
Case study of sub-region Barmah-Millewa Wetlands.
1 Floodplain Management Session 13 Biology Management and restoration of floodplain ecology Prepared by Susan Bolton, PhD, PE.
Re-plumbing irrigation in the Murray Darling Basin; an analysis of five years of Australian Government investment Richard McLoughlin.
AIACC Regional Study AS07 Southeast Asia Regional Vulnerability to Changing Water Resources and Extreme Hydrological due to Climate Change.
Water availability, drought and climate change in the MDB: a hydrological perspective Mac Kirby MDB Water Policy Workshop, Brisbane 21 October 2010.
Water Policy in the MDB The Basin Plan - have we finally got it right? University of Queensland workshop, Brisbane Jim Donaldson 21 October 2010.
Farm Irrigation (DSEWPaC) Murray-Goulburn (J. Baker) Murrumbidgee River Corridor (J. Houldsworth) River Murray at Bunyip Reach (J. Baker) Rainwater tank.
The Environment Institute Where ideas grow Striking the Balance between Food and Fibre Production and the Environment Mike Young Executive Director, The.
1 Recent and Emerging Water Policy Reforms in Australia Paper presented at National Taiwan University – Taipei 14 September 2006 Dr. Henning Bjornlund.
Taking environmental water requirements and climate change into account in the designation and management of protected areas for floodplain ecosystems.
Environmental flows in Europe Mike Acreman. Green and pleasant land? Thames basin 10,000 km mm rainfall 15 million people significant water stress.
Lin Crase Markets, Property Rights and Managing the Environmental Water Reserve.
Integrated Catchment Management Key Elements - Julie Burke.
OPTIMISING THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC OUTCOMES UNDER THE MURRAY- DARLING BASIN PLAN – Water Policies and Programs Presentation to ABARES Outlook Conference, Canberra.
Murray-Darling Basin – A Living Landscape Lawrie Kirk Manager Communication MDBC Presentation to Geography Teachers.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Integrated River Basin Management under Climate Change Dr Akhtar Abbas.
Using the DSF to assess scenarios Some things it will do for you - and some things it won’t.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
Dr Richard Johnson, Mountain Environments, UK.  Lead Partner: Germany: Research Institute of Forest Ecology and Forestry  Partner countries: Germany,
The Environment Institute Life Impact The University of Adelaide Fixing the River Murray What still needs to be done? IRR Regional Water Conference, Adelaide.
St. Johns River Water Management District Special Publication SJ97-SP8 Water Management Alternatives: Effects on Lake Levels and Wetlands in the Orange.
Setting the Murray-Darling Basin Scene R. Quentin Grafton 1.
DRAFT MURRAY DARLING BASIN PLAN. Where is the Murray–Darling Basin? Large system in south-eastern Australia 1 million km 2 1/7 area of Australia Contains.
Management of Commonwealth environmental water in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia David Papps, Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder Environmental.
Economic Impacts of SDLs and Water for the Future Peter Gooday 22 October 2010.
Presentation overview Drivers leading to a future with less water Management of water resources in the MDB Water for the Future initiatives assisting.
Maintenance / restoration of environmental flows entails caps to water abstraction and regulation.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Balancing water use for food and the environment: Looking to the North based on lessons from the South Gary Jones Chief Executive, eWater Adjunct Professor,
Otter Creek Watershed Meeting January 19, 2008 Mike Dreischmeier Agricultural Engineer Natural Resources Conservation Service.
MURRUMBIDGEE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY Presentation to UNESCO HELP Meeting 4 March 2005 Lee O’Brien - Chairperson Murrumbidgee Catchment Management.
Umbrella Environmental Assets: establishing environmental water requirements in the Murray-Darling Basin Matt O’Brien Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Australia.
Dr. Richard Palmer Professor and Head Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Massachusetts Amherst.
“The minimum flow for a given watercourse shall be the limit at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology.
Fish and Dams/Weirs. In the Murray Darling Basin. Re-snagging Strategies.
Management policies for the Murray- Darling Basin.
Farm Irrigation (DSEWPaC) Murray-Goulburn (J. Baker) Murrumbidgee River Corridor (J. Houldsworth) River Murray at Bunyip Reach (J. Baker) Rainwater tank.
Murray Darling Basin Plan. Key Knowledge and Skills Current management policies and strategies to implement these policies The effectiveness of water.
The Environment Institute Where ideas grow The Murray-Darling Basin Mike Young Executive Director, The Environment Institute.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
AHSS Council September Initial Recovery Strategy Deliverable Due to PSP in early October Focused on documenting / describing our work to date Will.
Run of the River Introducing a healthy rivers board game Proudly presented by: Swap with Regional WW logo.
The Environment Institute Where ideas grow Chewing over the CEWH Mike Young Executive Director, The Environment Institute.
 The Living Murray. What is The Living Murray?  The Living Murray is one of Australia’s most significant river restoration programs. It aims to improve.
1 Scenario formulation Scenario-based planning is a structured way of thinking about what might happen in the future Scenarios are descriptions of possible.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
The Environment Institute Where ideas grow Environmental Water Mike Young Executive Director, The Environment Institute
CABY and WEAP: Modeling to Support the IRWMP Process David R. Purkey, Ph.D. Natural Heritage Institute David N. Yates, Ph.D. National Center for Atmospheric.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
WHY IS INTEGRATED RIVER BASIN PLANNING IMPORTANT? Module 1 pp 1.1.
Developing recommendations for sustainable flows in the Great Lakes Basin of New York and Pennsylvania Sustainable Flows: The flow of water in a natural.
MACQUARIE RIVER CATCHMENT WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC MEETING ( Information Session) ROSS TOWN HALL 10:30 AM WEDNESDAY, 12 DECEMBER, 2012 Department of.
Environmental watering – How is it the same or different from floods? Denis Flett Chairperson, Victorian Environmental Water Holder Friday 14 November.
“THERE IS NOT ENOUGH WATER IN THE SYSTEM TO DO EVERYTHING WE WANT” CONFLICTS.
environmental water management framework
BASIN-PLAN-IN-CONFIDENCE
Environmental watering – CEWH 2016
NSW Wetland Recovery Program
Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder
Perin Davey, Corporate Affairs, Murray Irrigation Limited
environmental water management framework
Making every drop count Optimising outcomes through coordination
BASIN-PLAN-IN-CONFIDENCE
Presentation transcript:

Environmental water requirements Surface water

From Guide to Plan Guide proposed reduction in diversions from 3000 to 4000 GL Reductions based on simplified end of system flow analysis – due to limited time Draft plan to be informed by hydrologic modelling of environmental flows Balance environmental and socio- economic objectives

End of System Flows

Flow enhancement to reinstate ecologically significant components of the flow regime

Estimating Environmental Water Requirements Implicit socio-economic filtering at each step Water Act “protect, restore.. Ecological values and ecosystem services” Basin Plan Objectives ‘Healthy working Basin’ Determine location specific env. objectives For each objective determine specific flow events required For each specific flow event set frequency target Use models to test ability to achieve frequency targets with SDLs Select SDL scenario using all lines of evidence (including socio- economic) Final scenario that balances all objectives (env and socio-economic) Test alterative scenarios Hydrological Indicator Site Method

Choice of Indicator Sites

Location objectives To maintain current extent of red gum forest at Barmah- Millewa in good condition Hydrological Indicator Site Method Water Act “protect, restore.. Ecological values and ecosystem services” Basin Plan Objectives ‘Healthy working Basin’ Determine location specific env. objectives For each objective determine specific flow events required For each specific flow event set frequency target Use models to test ability to achieve frequency targets with SDLs Select SDL scenario using all lines of evidence (including socio- economic) Final scenario that balances all objectives (env and socio-economic) Test alterative scenarios

Flow events For red gum forests in Barmah-Millewa 25,000 ML/day for 42 days 35,000 ML/day for 30 days 50,000 ML/day for 21 days Hydrological Indicator Site Method Water Act “protect, restore.. Ecological values and ecosystem services” Basin Plan Objectives ‘Healthy working Basin’ Determine location specific env. objectives For each objective determine specific flow events required For each specific flow event set frequency target Use models to test ability to achieve frequency targets with SDLs Select SDL scenario using all lines of evidence (including socio- economic) Final scenario that balances all objectives (env and socio-economic) Test alterative scenarios

Frequency targets For red gum forests in Barmah-Millewa 25,000 ML/day for 42 days - Currently 30% (3 times in every 10 years) - ‘Without Development’ 66% (~7 times in every 10 yrs) - Target 40% (4 times in every 10 years) Hydrological Indicator Site Method Water Act “protect, restore.. Ecological values and ecosystem services” Basin Plan Objectives ‘Healthy working Basin’ Determine location specific env. objectives For each objective determine specific flow events required For each specific flow event set frequency target Use models to test ability to achieve frequency targets with SDLs Select SDL scenario using all lines of evidence (including socio- economic) Final scenario that balances all objectives (env and socio-economic) Test alterative scenarios

Frequency targets Could stop here and determine ‘perfect’ volume based on these alone Hydrological Indicator Site Method Water Act “protect, restore.. Ecological values and ecosystem services” Basin Plan Objectives ‘Healthy working Basin’ Determine location specific env. objectives For each objective determine specific flow events required For each specific flow event set frequency target Use models to test ability to achieve frequency targets with SDLs Select SDL scenario using all lines of evidence (including socio- economic) Final scenario that balances all objectives (env and socio-economic) Test alterative scenarios

Modelling Assessment of success against specific objective Can also then infer success against location objectives Hydrological Indicator Site Method Water Act “protect, restore.. Ecological values and ecosystem services” Basin Plan Objectives ‘Healthy working Basin’ Determine location specific env. objectives For each objective determine specific flow events required For each specific flow event set frequency target Use models to test ability to achieve frequency targets with SDLs ` Select SDL scenario using all lines of evidence (including socio- economic) Final scenario that balances all objectives (env and socio-economic) Test alterative scenarios

Step 1 – water available

Step 2 – env water use

Step 3 24 separate models Variety of software and timescales

Step 4 – analyse results

Key assumptions Indicator sites represent broader environmental flow needs Existing operating constraints eg dam outlet capacities Non-targeted diversion reductions Many potential ways to utilise water over 114 year model period – different environmental outcomes

Results in many forms Regions/sub regions (based on changes in expected outcomes) > increasing flow magnitude > Instream habitats Wetlands - permanent and semi permanent Near channel vegetation eg Red Gum, Coobah Lower level floodplain communities eg Red Gum forest Mid level floodplain communities eg Lignum shrublands, red gum forest/woodland and floodplain wetlands High level floodplain communities eg Red gum woodland, Black box, Coolibah Upper Murray (US Hume) Not assessed. Largely unregulated with few extractions. Mid Murray (Hume to Euston) Good ModeratePoor Lower Murray (DS Euston) Good Poor Upper Goulburn Not assessed. Largely unregulated with few extractions. Mid Goulburn Good Moderate Not a major component Lower Goulburn Good ModeratePoor Upper Murrumbidgee Not assessed. Largely unregulated with few extractions. Mid Murrumbidgee Good Moderate Not a major component Lower Murrumbidgee Good

Results in many forms

Number of objectives achieved Volume of reduction to diversions Operational Constraints Town Flood Constraints Modelling Using carry-over and trading Efficiency range

Further analysis Scenario testing GL, 2800 GL, 3200 GL Separating local and shared reductions Removal/relaxation of operating constraints Better coordination with existing environmental water Alternative environmental water management approaches Current climate and potential future climate change

Questions?

Sustainable Diversion Limits Hydrological Indicator Site Method Water Act “protect, restore.. Ecological values and ecosystem services” Basin Plan Objectives ‘Healthy working Basin’ Determine location specific env. objectives For each objective determine specific flow events required For each specific flow event set frequency target Use models to test ability to achieve frequency targets with SDLs ` Select SDL scenario using all lines of evidence (including socio- economic) Final scenario that balances all objectives (env and socio-economic) Test alterative scenarios Sustainable Diversion Limits

Sustainable Diversion Limit = Baseline Diversion Limit - Local Reduction Amount - Shared Reduction Amount Specified as a formula Achievement will be confirmed through accredited Water Resource Plans

Sustainable Diversion Limit = Baseline Diversion Limit - Local Reduction Amount - Shared Reduction Amount What’s covered by SDLWhat’s not covered by SDL Consumptive diversions from watercourses Floodplain harvesting Take under basic rights Take by run-off dams Take by commercial plantations Planned environmental water Held environmental water Other interceptions are to be managed at 2009 levels or any increase to be offset under rules of accredited Water Resource Plans.

Baseline Diversion Limit Specified as diversions at 30 June 2009 Based on description Current estimate provided as note only Detailed technical report (#2010/20) Includes water recovered to 30 June 2009 Sustainable Diversion Limit = Baseline Diversion Limit - Local Reduction Amount - Shared Reduction Amount

Baseline Diversion Limit Sustainable Diversion Limit = Baseline Diversion Limit - Local Reduction Amount - Shared Reduction Amount Baseline Diversion Limit equals; Take from watercourses and floodplain harvesting (under current state water management laws) PLUS Take of water by run-off dams PLUS Take of water by commercial plantations MINUS Living Murray, Water for Rivers, etc

Existing Environmental Water Included in baseline modelling for environmental water requirements, including its intended use Determined, and removed, from baseline diversion limit estimate where recovered from consumptive use

Modelling Sustainable Diversion Limit = Baseline Diversion Limit - Local Reduction Amount - Shared Reduction Amount +

Local Reduction Amount Based on various lines of evidence (Environmental water requirements, socio-economic studies, etc) Specified as a long-term average volume Long-term diversion limit equivalent factors can be used to show entitlement contribution Sustainable Diversion Limit = Baseline Diversion Limit - Local Reduction Amount - Shared Reduction Amount

Determined in similar way to local Covers water requirement for –Barwon-Darling in Northern system –Murray in Southern system Total volume of each is fixed, but share from each connected tributary not fixed Sustainable Diversion Limit = Baseline Diversion Limit - Local Reduction Amount - Shared Reduction Amount

33

Bridging the Gap It is anticipated that the Commonwealth will ‘bridge the gap’ by 2019 Water being recovered to ‘bridge the gap’ needs to be from within the Baseline Diversion Limit SDLs are implemented through State Water Resource Plans (WRPs) WRPs give effect to SDLs from 2019 – no temporary diversion provision Long-term diversion limit equivalent factors – measure progress to bridging the gap

Recovery so far (‘09 – ‘11) Figures sourced from SEWPaC, plus some other State water recovery Estimates to 30 June 2011 to be included as notes Long-term Diversion Limit Equivalent Factors still under discussion

Northern Basin SDL Resource Unit/Catchment Total reduction Shared Reduction (GL) LocalExisting Residual incl shared reduction (GL) Reduction (GL)Recovery (GL) Reduction (GL) Northern Basin Paroo 450 NA Warrego NA88 Intersecting streams NA1.5 Gwydir NA52 Nebine NA11 Condamine-Balonne Moonie 11 Namoi 105 Macquarie-Castlereagh 6584 Queensland Border Rivers 83 NSW Border Rivers 7- Border Rivers - Total153 Barwon-Darling68

Southern Basin SDL Resource Unit/Catchment Total reduction Shared LocalExisting Residual incl shared reduction (GL) Reduction (GL) Recovery (GL) Reduction (GL) Southern Basin Ovens Goulburn Broken-- Goulburn-Broken - Total Loddon122 Campaspe1829 Murrumbidgee - NSW32089 ACT-- Murrumbidgee - Total32089 Kiewa-- EMLR-- NSW Murray Victorian Murray SA Murray10157 Murray - Total Lower Darling80 Marne Saunders / SA Non Prescribed NA--