Predicting the In-System Performance of the CMS Tracker Analog Readout Optical Links Stefanos Dris CERN & Imperial College, London.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Digital Communications
Advertisements

Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) And
Data Domains and Introduction to Statistics Chemistry 243.
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 DATA AND SIGNALS T.Najah Al_Subaie Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Prince Norah bint Abdul Rahman University.
Capacity of Wireless Channels
Announcements Assignment 8 posted –Due Friday Dec 2 nd. A bit longer than others. Project progress? Dates –Thursday 12/1 review lecture –Tuesday 12/6 project.
Worst Case Analysis Using Analog Workbench by Andrew G. Bell ITT Industries.
Module 4: Analog programming blocks. Module Objectives Analyze a control task that uses analog inputs. Connect a potentiometer to LOGO! controller and.
Information Processing & Digital Systems COE 202 Digital Logic Design Dr. Aiman El-Maleh College of Computer Sciences and Engineering King Fahd University.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
Optimization of pilot Locations in Adaptive M-PSK Modulation in a Rayleigh Fading Channel Khaled Almustafa Information System Prince Sultan University.
Department of Electrical Engineering National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan IEEE ICHQP 10, 2002, Rio de Janeiro NCCU Gary W. Chang Paulo F. Ribeiro Department.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Lecture 8 Power Amplifier (Class A)
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
10/11/2004EE 42 fall 2004 lecture 181 Lecture #18 Summary of ideal devices, amplifier examples Reminder: MIDTERM coming up one week from today (Monday.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
Switching Power Supply Component Selection 7.2b Inductor Selection – Application.
Lecture 1 Signals in the Time and Frequency Domains
Engineering 1040: Mechanisms & Electric Circuits Winter 2015 Analog & Digital Signals Analog to Digital Conversion (ADC)
Electronics Involves the use of devices and circuits to control the flow of electric current to achieve some purpose. These circuits contain: Resistors,
Solid State Electricity Metrology
ابزاردقیق ارائه دهم. The device has 2 input ports, named inverting ( - ) input and non-inverting (+) input. The output is simply an amplified signal of.
Optical Fiber Basics-Part 2
Module 4: Analog programming blocks. Module Objectives Analyze a control task that uses analog inputs. Connect a potentiometer to LOGO! controller and.
Understanding ADC Specifications September Definition of Terms 000 Analogue Input Voltage Digital Output Code FS1/2.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
By Grégory Brillant Background calibration techniques for multistage pipelined ADCs with digital redundancy.
Number of Blocks per Pole Diego Arbelaez. Option – Number of Blocks per Pole Required magnetic field tolerance of ~10 -4 For a single gap this can be.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
Data Acquisition Systems
LECC 2006, Valencia Potential Upgrade of the CMS Tracker Analog Readout Optical Links Using Bandwidth Efficient Digital Modulation Stefanos Dris Imperial.
Discrete Distributions The values generated for a random variable must be from a finite distinct set of individual values. For example, based on past observations,
Brian Macpherson Ph.D, Professor of Statistics, University of Manitoba Tom Bingham Statistician, The Boeing Company.
The Physical Layer Lowest layer in Network Hierarchy. Physical transmission of data. –Various flavors Copper wire, fiber optic, etc... –Physical limits.
HBD FEM Overall block diagram Individual building blocks Outlook ¼ detector build.
Impact of Process Variation on Input Referred Current Offset in Current Sense Amplifiers Riya Shergill Meenakshi Sekhar.
Commissioning and Operation of the CMS Tracker analogue optical link system at TIF with CMSSW: R.Bainbridge, A.Dos Santos Assis Jesus, K.A.Gill, V. Radicci.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK)
Physical Layer Continued. Review Discussed how to design the communication scheme depending on the physical mediums – pulling voltage up and down for.
FED RAL: Greg Iles5 March The 96 Channel FED Tester What needs to be tested ? Requirements for 96 channel tester ? Baseline design Functionality.
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
March 2004 Charles A. DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG287 Optical Detection Course Notes Part 15: Introduction to Array Detectors Profs.
1 Quantization Error Analysis Author: Anil Pothireddy 12/10/ /10/2002.
Dr. Sudharman K. Jayaweera and Amila Kariyapperuma ECE Department University of New Mexico Ankur Sharma Department of ECE Indian Institute of Technology,
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
January, 2003CMS Ecal1 MGPA Specification Discussion – 9 th Jan. 03 OUTLINE 3 or 4 gain channels discussion technical background - why 3 gains could be.
MPPC Saturation Corection Idea -> how to do. MPPC Gain measurement To apply saturation correction to the beam data, all MPPC are needed to be calibrated.
Computer simulation Sep. 9, QUIZ 2 Determine whether the following experiments have discrete or continuous out comes A fair die is tossed and the.
Amplitude/Phase Modulation
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
Digital to Analog Converter (DAC)
Charles University Prague Charles University Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Absolute charge measurements using laser setup Pavel Bažant,
FED 9U Analog Characterization Stefanos Dris CERN & Imperial College.
CMS FED Testing Update M. Noy & J. Leaver Imperial College Silicon Group.
FED Temperature Measurements: Greg Iles31 March FED temperature measurements –Will components on FED exceed operating temperature in CMS? Analogue.
Normal Distribution Learning about.... introduction what is distribution? the distribution of a data set is the description of how the data is spread.
 Sensor (S)–converts arbitary physical quantity into electric signal  Adaptor (A)–provides signal amplification to a required level; expands a dynamic.
ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ (22Δ802) Β΄ ΕΞΑΜΗΝΟ Καθηγητής Πέτρος Π. Γρουμπός  Ώρες Γραφείου: Τετάρτη Πέμπτη Παρασκευή 11:00- 12:00 Γραφείο: 1.
Lecture Notes / PPT UNIT III
ARUN MUCHHALA ENGINEERING COLLEGE- DHARI [ ] ANALOG ELECTRONICS Prajapati Omprakash rd ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT ANALOG ELECTRONICS.
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
PreShower Characterisations
Fundamentals of Electric Circuits Chapter 5
B.Sc. Thesis by Çağrı Gürleyük
L. Ratti, M. Manghisoni Università degli Studi di Pavia INFN Pavia
Created by Art Kay Presented by Peggy Liska
Optical links in the 25ns test beam
Clustering-based Studies on the upgraded ITS of the Alice Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Predicting the In-System Performance of the CMS Tracker Analog Readout Optical Links Stefanos Dris CERN & Imperial College, London

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Introduction 10 million channels in the CMS Tracker read out by ~ analog optical links. Electronic, optoelectronic, and optical components making up the readout links will vary in gain. What spread in gain and dynamic range from link to link can we expect in the final system as a result? Will system specifications be met? We are now in a position to find out by simulation based on real production test data. Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation Specifications Results Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Analog Readout Optical Links Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation Specifications Results Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Simulation Simulation: LLD Data LLD has four gain settings, allowing a certain amount of gain equalization of the optical links in the final system. Introduction The Tracker Optical LinksSimulationSpecifications Results Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Simulation Simulation: Laser Tx Data Introduction The Tracker Optical LinksSimulationSpecifications Results Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Simulation Simulation: AOH Data Introduction The Tracker Optical LinksSimulationSpecifications Results Conclusions Calculated AOH efficiency, using LLD and Laser Tx data

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Simulation Simulation: Patch Panels Introduction The Tracker Optical LinksSimulationSpecifications Results Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Simulation Simulation: Receiver Data Introduction The Tracker Optical LinksSimulationSpecifications Results Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Simulation Simulation: Load Resistor Resistors used have 1% tolerance. Assumed a 4σ Gaussian distribution. The load resistor offers another handle in tuning the gain of the optical link. The ARx12 contains a current mode amplifier that converts the optical power into an electrical current. This is changed into a voltage by the load resistor. The current value is 100 , but is not frozen. Introduction The Tracker Optical LinksSimulationSpecifications Results Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Simulation: Method Use Inverse Transform Method to obtain random sample from each component PDF. Multiply each sample together to get overall optical link gain. 4 LLD settings  4 link gains. Choose one of the four link gains according to switching algorithm. Repeat 1 million times. Introduction The Tracker Optical LinksSimulationSpecifications Results Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Specifications Single-ended gain MinTypicalMax V/V At nominal LLD setting 1, no switching V/VWith LLD switching Target link gain = 0.8V/V This corresponds to 80 ADC counts per electrons from the detectors. Data is digitized, and there are 8bits of information for the signal. At the target gain, electrons can be transmitted with 8bits. Assumption: –For 320μm detectors, 1MIP = electrons –For 500μm detectors, 1MIP = electrons Therefore, for thin detectors, 3.2MIP signals can be transmitted without clipping using 8bits (2MIPs for thick detectors). Introduction The Tracker Optical Links SimulationSpecifications Results Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions ‘Single gain’ (no switching) distributions are roughly Gaussian. Gain 0 distribution tail exceeds 0.8V/V target. These links cannot be set to a lower setting. ‘Switching algorithm simply selects LLD gain setting which results in overall link gain closest to 0.8V/V. Switching is like cutting through ‘single gain’ distributions and selecting the slices centered on the target 0.8V/V.

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions ‘Single gain’ (no switching) distributions are roughly Gaussian. Gain 0 distribution tail exceeds 0.8V/V target. These links cannot be set to a lower setting. ‘Switching algorithm simply selects LLD gain setting which results in overall link gain closest to 0.8V/V. Switching is like cutting through ‘single gain’ distributions and selecting the slices centered on the target 0.8V/V. Possible to estimate ‘hard limits’ of the switched distribution by calculation. Average gain ~0.775V/V. 99.9% of the links will have gains from 0.64 to 0.96V/V.

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Dynamic Range Analog data is digitized by 10-bit ADC, but 2 MSBs are discarded later. Dynamic Range: Maximum signal size in electrons that can be transmitted without clipping using 8bits. Can translate this value into MIPs for both thin (320μm) and thick (500μm) detectors. Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Optical link output signal size in ADC bits, as a function of the input from the detectors in electrons. Solid line corresponds to the typical (target) gain value of 0.8V/V. Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Optical link output signal size in ADC bits, as a function of the input from the detectors in electrons. Solid line corresponds to the typical (target) gain value of 0.8V/V. 2 MSBs of the 10-bit ADC are discarded, therefore 8bits available to accommodate the signals. Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Optical link output signal size in ADC bits, as a function of the input from the detectors in electrons. Solid line corresponds to the typical (target) gain value of 0.8V/V. 2 MSBs of the 10-bit ADC are discarded, therefore 8bits available to accommodate the signals. At link gain = 0.8V/V, signals up to electrons can be transmitted without clipping ( e - /8bits). Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Shaded area corresponds to minimum and maximum link gains determined by the simulation. Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Shaded area corresponds to minimum and maximum link gains determined by the simulation. Minimum dynamic range = ~ e - /8bits Maximum dynamic range = ~ e - /8bits Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Shaded area corresponds to minimum and maximum link gains determined by the simulation. Minimum dynamic range = ~ e - /8bits Maximum dynamic range = ~ e - /8bits Knowing the distribution of the gain, we can calculate the distribution of the dynamic range. 99.9% of the links will have a dynamic range from ~ to e - /8bits. Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results For thin detectors (320μm), 1MIP=~25 000e - Hence at 0.8V/V gain, the system can transmit ~3.2MIPs/8bits without clipping. 99.9% of the links will have a dynamic range from ~2.65 to 4 MIPs/8bits Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results For thick detectors (500μm), 1MIP=~39 000e - Hence at 0.8V/V gain, the system can transmit ~2.1 MIPs/8bits without clipping. 99.9% of the links will have a dynamic range from ~1.7 to 2.6 MIPs/8bits Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Real System Data 123 Tracker End Cap system optical links in test beam. Relative agreement between simulation and real data. ‘Single gain’ distributions of the real system are a few percent higher than in simulation, with larger spread. This is most likely due to electronic components on either side of the optical link which were not simulated. Upper and lower limits of both switched distributions are almost identical – not surprising, given same switching algorithm is used and the dominant effect of gain settings 0 and 1 in both cases. Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Previous Study Uniform component distributions assumed. Typical LLD gain setting was thought to be 1, now it is 0. Larger range of gains than those predicted with real production data. –Due to low-end tail of Gain 3 distribution. –Hence, low-gain links could not be compensated as well as high-gain links (the opposite of the current situation). Ignoring the Gain 3 low-end tail, the extents of the spread are the same as in current simulation. Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Load Resistor In addition to the switchable LLD, there is a second handle on the gain of the full optical link. The Load Resistor value can still be changed to shift the ‘single gain’ distributions. 100Ω Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Load Resistor In addition to the switchable LLD, there is a second handle on the gain of the full optical link. The Load Resistor value can still be changed to shift the ‘single gain’ distributions. 90.9Ω Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Load Resistor In addition to the switchable LLD, there is a second handle on the gain of the full optical link. The Load Resistor value can still be changed to shift the ‘single gain’ distributions. 80.6Ω Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Results Load Resistor In addition to the switchable LLD, there is a second handle on the gain of the full optical link. The Load Resistor value can still be changed to shift the ‘single gain’ distributions. 75Ω Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation SpecificationsResults Conclusions

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Conclusions Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation Specifications ResultsConclusions A model has been developed for the CMS Tracker analog optical link and used in a Monte Carlo simulation to assess the performance that can be expected in the final system. The specifications will be met for every one of the links. The gains of the links will lie between 0.64 and 0.96V/V, i.e. 32% of the specified switched gain spread. The ‘single gain’ (non switched) distributions are slightly higher in mean than expected, due to higher gains in the laser transmitter and LLD, as well as low insertion loss of the connectors. This means the typical setting for the LLD is gain 0. The model can be used to demonstrate the effect of changing the values of readout components (e.g. the receiver’s load resistor). We could tailor the positions of the single-gain distributions to achieve a typical LLD setting of 1, or change the shape of the distribution to something more desirable. Different switching algorithms can be tested. Components of the readout system (not part of the optical link) can be added to achieve even more realistic results. Temperature effects on the AOH can also be included.

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Conclusions Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation Specifications ResultsConclusions A model has been developed for the CMS Tracker analog optical link and used in a Monte Carlo simulation to assess the performance that can be expected in the final system. The specifications will be met for every one of the links. The gains of the links will lie between 0.64 and 0.96V/V, i.e. 32% of the specified switched gain spread. The ‘single gain’ (non switched) distributions are slightly higher in mean than expected, due to higher gains in the laser transmitter and LLD, as well as low insertion loss of the connectors. This means the typical setting for the LLD is gain 0. The model can be used to demonstrate the effect of changing the values of readout components (e.g. the receiver’s load resistor). We could tailor the positions of the single-gain distributions to achieve a typical LLD setting of 1, or change the shape of the distribution to something more desirable. Different switching algorithms can be tested. Components of the readout system (not part of the optical link) can be added to achieve even more realistic results. Temperature effects on the AOH can also be included.

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Conclusions Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation Specifications ResultsConclusions A model has been developed for the CMS Tracker analog optical link and used in a Monte Carlo simulation to assess the performance that can be expected in the final system. The specifications will be met for every one of the links. The gains of the links will lie between 0.64 and 0.96V/V, i.e. 32% of the specified switched gain spread. The ‘single gain’ (non switched) distributions are slightly higher in mean than expected, due to higher gains in the laser transmitter and LLD, as well as low insertion loss of the connectors. This means the typical setting for the LLD is gain 0. The model can be used to demonstrate the effect of changing the values of readout components (e.g. the receiver’s load resistor). We could tailor the positions of the single-gain distributions to achieve a typical LLD setting of 1, or change the shape of the distribution to something more desirable. Different switching algorithms can be tested. Components of the readout system (not part of the optical link) can be added to achieve even more realistic results. Temperature effects on the AOH can also be included.

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Conclusions Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation Specifications ResultsConclusions A model has been developed for the CMS Tracker analog optical link and used in a Monte Carlo simulation to assess the performance that can be expected in the final system. The specifications will be met for every one of the links. The gains of the links will lie between 0.64 and 0.96V/V, i.e. 32% of the specified switched gain spread. The ‘single gain’ (non switched) distributions are slightly higher in mean than expected, due to higher gains in the laser transmitter and LLD, as well as low insertion loss of the connectors. This means the typical setting for the LLD is gain 0. The model can be used to demonstrate the effect of changing the values of readout components (e.g. the receiver’s load resistor). We could tailor the positions of the single-gain distributions to achieve a typical LLD setting of 1, or change the shape of the distribution to something more desirable. Different switching algorithms can be tested. Components of the readout system (not part of the optical link) can be added to achieve even more realistic results. Temperature effects on the AOH can also be included.

CERN & Imperial College Stefanos Dris 15/9/2004 Conclusions Introduction The Tracker Optical Links Simulation Specifications ResultsConclusions A model has been developed for the CMS Tracker analog optical link and used in a Monte Carlo simulation to assess the performance that can be expected in the final system. The specifications will be met for every one of the links. The gains of the links will lie between 0.64 and 0.96V/V, i.e. 32% of the specified switched gain spread. The ‘single gain’ (non switched) distributions are slightly higher in mean than expected, due to higher gains in the laser transmitter and LLD, as well as low insertion loss of the connectors. This means the typical setting for the LLD is gain 0. The model can be used to demonstrate the effect of changing the values of readout components (e.g. the receiver’s load resistor). We could tailor the positions of the single-gain distributions to achieve a typical LLD setting of 1, or change the shape of the distribution to something more desirable. Different switching algorithms can be tested. Components of the readout system (not part of the optical link) can be added to achieve even more realistic results. Temperature effects on the AOH can also be included.