Comparison of deterministic and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis including SAD/SED Ivo Kodeli, SG39 Meeting, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PMBR steady-state and Coupled kinetics core thermal-hydraulics benchmark test problems PBMR (Pty) Ltd. – NRG – Penn State Univ. – Purdeu Univ. - INL.
Advertisements

Combined evaluation of PFNS for 235 U(n th,f), 239 Pu(n th,f), 233 U(n th,f) and 252 Cf(sf) (in progress) V.G. Pronyaev Institute of Physics.
-1- IAEA-ICTP Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies ICTP – Trieste, Italy, May 2008 Gas-Cooled Reactors – International.
ITER Computational Shield Benchmark IAEA TM on Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices. Vienna, October 31 – November 2, 2007 U. Fischer,
SABR REACTOR CORE & TRITIUM BREEDING BLKT W. M. Stacey Georgia Tech September, 2009.
EMERALD1: A Systematic Study of Cross Section Library Based Discrepancies in LWR Criticality Calculations Jaakko Leppänen Technical Research Centre of.
Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.
Characterization of the Engineering Test Reactor at the INL for Final Disposition TRTR 2007 J. R. Parry Irradiation Test Programs INL.
SABR FUEL CYCLE C. M. Sommer, W. M. Stacey, B
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Simulation of βn Emission From Fission Using Evaluated Nuclear Decay Data Ian Gauld Marco Pigni.
Studies of ADS by means of JINR Nuclotron Martin Suchopár Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Department of Nuclear Reactors,
Examination and Improvement of SHEM multigroup energy structure Tholakele P. Ngeleka Radiation and Reactor Theory, Necsa, RSA Ivanov Kostadin, Levine Samuel.
Evaluation and Use of the Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum and Spectra Covariance Matrices in Criticality and Shielding I. Kodeli1, A. Trkov1, R. Capote2,
U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR Current Status of the NJOY Nuclear Data Processing Code System and Initial ENDF/B-VII Data Testing Results Presented.
Computer Program Service Progress Report for 2008 Juan Manuel Galán 18 th Meeting of the Executive Group of the Data Bank Management Committee.
USE OF VVER SPENT FUELS IN A THORIUM FAST BREEDER P. Vértes, KFKI Atomic Energy Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary 17 th AER Symposium Yalta,
Nuclear Data for ADS and Transmutation Joint TREND/SANDAT proposal for FP6 ADOPT- Meeting, Dec E. Gonzalez-Romero (CIEMAT) Introduction Sensitivity.
1 IL SISTEMA DI CALCOLO MODULARE ERANOS (EUROPEAN REACTOR ANALYSIS OPTIMIZED SYSTEM) CORE CALCULATIONS.
MA and LLFP Transmutation Performance Assessment in the MYRRHA eXperimental ADS P&T: 8th IEM, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 9-11, 2004 E. Malambu, W.
1 How accurately can we calculate neutrons slowing down in water J-Ch Sublet, D. E. Cullen*, R. E. MacFarlane** CEA Cadarache, DEN/DER/SPRC, Saint.
An Overview of What’s New in SCALE 5 S. M. Bowman, D. F. Hollenbach, M. D. DeHart, B. T. Rearden, I. C. Gauld, and S. Goluoglu Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Activities in the Area of Partitioning and Transmutation Alexander Stanculescu Nuclear Energy Department Nuclear.
Nuclear Fuels Storage & Transportation Planning Project Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies Nuclear Energy Criticality Safety Assessment for As-loaded Spent.
Simulations of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) Aleksander Polanski Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia. The Andrzej Soltan Institute for.
2nd International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor applications September 29th – October 2nd, 2009 Tuesday 29 th of September
1 Low Neutron Energy Cross Sections of the Hafnium Isotopes G. Noguère, A. Courcelle, J.M. Palau, O. Litaize CEA/DEN Cadarache, France P. Siegler JRC/IRMM.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED | 1 LA-UR LANL Experience using.
© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1 Compensating Effects due.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory PREPRO Accomplishments Dermott “Red” Cullen Presented at the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Technical Conference.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
J. C. Neuber1 International Conference for Spent Fuel Management from Nuclear Power Reactors, IAEA, Vienna 31/05 – 04/06/2010 Advances in Burnup Credit.
UAM-2006, Pisa, 28 April Sensitivity / Uncertainty Analysis Tools Available from the NEA Data Bank E. Sartori, Ivo Kodeli.
AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR A HIBRID REACTOR (SUB-CRITICAL FACILITY COUPLED WITH AN ACCELERADOR) Sergio A. Pereira and Adimir dos Santos.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency On the Compensating Effects in the Evaluated Cross Sections of 235 U A. Trkov, R. Capote International Atomic Energy.
FAST MOLTEN SALT REACTOR –TRANSMUTER FOR CLOSING NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ON MINOR ACTINIDES A.Dudnikov, P.Alekseev, S.Subbotin.
ThEC13, Geneva, 28th-31st Oct., 2013 C. H. Pyeon, Kyoto Univ. 1 Cheolho Pyeon Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, Japan
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR-10-draft Slide 1 ENDF/B-VII.0 Data Testing of 233 U/Th ICSBEP Benchmarks.
Benchmarks for Data Testing of Iron China Nuclear Data Center(CNDC) China Institute of Atomic Energy(CIAE) P.O.Box ,Beijing , P.R.China.
Activities Nuclear Data Service Yolanda Rugama OECD/NEA.
Re-analysis of the RRR/SEG Experiments Andrew Hummel Idaho National Laboratory SG39 Meeting NEA Paris, December 4, 2015.
Short Update on Deliverables K. Yokoyama M. Ishikawa Japan Atomic Energy Agency Dec 4, 2015WPEC SG39, Institute Curie, Paris, France1.
Workshop On Nuclear Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies, ICTP , A. Borella1 Monte Carlo methods.
Update on sensitivity coefficient precise computations E. Ivanov WPEC/Sg. 39 Meeting December 4, , Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, France.
UCN Source at the NCSU PULSTAR Reactor Bernard Wehring and Albert Young North Carolina State University International Workshop on Neutron-Antineutron Transition.
Presentation for WPEC/SG39 meeting, 2015 Nov.30 th to Dec. 4 th Paris, France 1/20 A Stress Test on 235 U(n, f) in adjustment with HCI and HMI benchmarks.
© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1 WPEC/SG39 Short updates on.
1 FRENCH ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISION (CEA) - NUCLEAR ENERGY DIVISION Nuclear Data Needs, SG26, NEA data bank, 3 May 2006CEA/DER Cadarache Centre Gérald Rimpault.
Monte-Carlo calculations in reactor design G.B. Bruna FRAMATOME-ANP.
Lesson 8: Critical experiments and Validation. Critical Experiments.
Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Techniques in Monte Carlo Codes for Multi-Region Criticality Calculations Bradley T. Rearden Douglas E. Peplow Oak Ridge.
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK 3 rd Year PhD student Actinide Breeding and Reactivity Variation in a Thermal.
School of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering North-West University
RESULTS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW PROMPT FISSION NEUTRON SPECTRA DATA IN ROSFOND Gennady Manturov, IPPE 2nd RCM Prompt Fission Neutron Spectra, December.
1st Meeting of WPEC Subgroup 26 (May 3, 2006) Proposed Agenda 9:00-9:30 Objectives of the meeting, methodology and relation with HPRL (M.Salvatores, G.Palmiotti,
ADS Activities at Argonne National Laboratory Yousry Gohar Argonne National Laboratory Proton Accelerators for Science and Innovation Workshop FERMILAB,
Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section.
Extented scope and objectives
Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
of the Muse-4 Experiments with the JEF-2.2 and JEFF-3.1 libraries
7/21/2018 Analysis and quantification of modelling errors introduced in the deterministic calculational path applied to a mini-core problem SAIP 2015 conference.
Paul Scherrer Institut
AMSTRAMGRAM AMélioration de la Section Thermique de capture l’Américium 241 par Mesure intéGRAle dans MINERVE P. Leconte CEA (SPRC/LEPh) A. Gruel, B.
Overview of Serpent related activities at HZDR E. Fridman
Susan Hogle, Julie G. Ezold
Pebble Bed Reactors for Once Trough Nuclear Transmutation
Sensitivity analysis in burnup calculations with Monte Carlo
Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants
Improvements of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System (NFCSS) at IAEA
I.Hill, J.Dyrda, N.Soppera, M.Bossant
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of deterministic and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis including SAD/SED Ivo Kodeli, SG39 Meeting, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

 eff sensitivity comparison SUSD3D/SERPENT SG39, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

 eff sensitivity SUSD3D/SERPENT

 eff SAD sensitivity SUSD3D/SERPENT

SNEAK-7A & -7B sensitivity code benchmark exercise (UAM project) SG39, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

V. Mastrangelo, I. Kodeli, E. Sartori, Proposal of a Benchmark for Stochastic and Deterministic Analyses of Nuclear Data Sensitivities and Uncertainties, UAM Workshop, Pisa, April 2006 Fast reactor benchmarks SNEAK-7A & 7B (Karlsruhe Fast Critical Facility), re-evaluated using detailed 3-D models in the framework of the International Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments (IRPhE) project, were proposed to test and compare state-of-the-art cross section sensitivity and uncertainty codes. Reference: NEA/NSC/DOC(2006)1 March 2009 Edition – IRPhE Handbook (Evgeny Ivanov, IRSN, CNAM, IPN)  Calculate the sensitivity of k eff and  eff to the nuclear cross sections and the corresponding uncertainties.  Compare and analyse results from different methods and codes for consistency and identify and explain discrepancies. SG39, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

SNEAK-7A and -7B fast critical experiments (detailed&simplified 3D models). SNEAK-7A core unit cell consisted of one PuO 2 -UO 2 pellet (26,6% PuO 2 and 73,4% UO 2 ) and one graphite platelet. Radial and axial blankets were loaded with metallic depleted UO 2 plates. In SNEAK-7B the graphite platelets were replaced by U nat O 2 platelet. The effective core radii of SNEAK-7A & 7B were cm and cm. SG39, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

Model SNEAK 7ASNEAK 7B k eff  k eff k eff  k eff 1 Detailed 3D model with stretched platelets (a) (b) (a) (b) 2 3D simplified model with homogenized core regions of fuel elements (c) (c) RZ two-dimensional model (c) (c) (a) Measured k eff. (b) Combined experimental uncertainty (c) Equal to experimental value + (calculated simplified model – calculated more detailed model) SNEAK 7ASNEAK 7B  eff Cf source measurements ± 5% ± 5%  eff – noise analysis ±6% ±6%  eff – benchmark values ±5% ±6% SG39, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

Contributed solutions Winfried Zwermann: XSUSA Manuele Aufiero: SERPENT2 GPT extended Victor Mastrangelo/W. Zwermann: TSUNAMI 3D Yannick Peneliau, Cyrille De Saint Jean: PARIS & ERANOS Evgeny Ivanov: MCNP6 Ivo Kodeli: SUSD3D SG39, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

k eff and  eff sensitivity: Winfried Zwermann, GRS: XSUSA/TWODANT, direct perturbation method, 2D Cross sections: ENDF/B-VII Manuele Aufiero, LPSC/CNRS: SERPENT2 with extended GPT option, 2D, Cross sections: JEFF 3.1.1, probability tables Ivo Kodeli, IJS Ljubljana Neutronic and sensitivity code: SUSD3D with PARTISN/TWODANT/THREEDANT Cross sections: 33-group ENDF/B-VII.0, S 8 P 3, processed by NJOY99 2D and 3D models Evgeny Ivanov, IRSN (ongoing) MCNP6 k eff sensitivity: Victor Mastrangelo (retired from CNAM and IPN-Orsay) Neutronic and sensitivity code: TSUNAMI-3D; Cross sections: 238-group ENDF/B-VII, P 5 S 8 Yannick Peneliau, Cyrille De Saint Jean, CEA Cadarache Neutronics & sensitivity codes: ERANOS and PARIS; 2D model Cross sections: Ecco+Sn2d with JEFF and ENDF/B-VII (33 groups) Sensitivities to cross-sections, total nu-bar and fission spectra Computational Methods and Procedures SG39, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

SNEAK-7A & -7B (SUSD3D–TSUNAMI3D- PARIS/ERANOS-XSUSA–SERPENT-MCNP5) Model SNEAK 7ASNEAK 7B k eff - directk eff - adjointk eff - directk eff - adjoint SUSD3D (simplified 3D) ( ) SUSD3D (2D, P 5 ) TSUNAMI3D (3D) ±8pcm ±400pcm ±2pcm ±100pcm SERPENT (2D) ±3pcm not needed MCNP6 (detailed 3D) ±2pcm not needed ±1pcm not needed Measured ±290pcm ±350pcm SG39, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

SNEAK-7A SAD/SED Sensitivity (k-eff)

CONCLUSIONS Validation of beta-eff sensitivities calculated by SUSD3D and SERPENT: excellent/good agreement for Jezebel, Flattop-Pu and SNEAK-7A, including SAD/SED sensitivities. SNEAK-7A & 7B inter-comparison exercise of XS sensitivity and uncertainty codes (UAM project). Several solutions were received using deterministic and stochastic codes (SUSD3D, XSUSA, SERPENT, ERANOS, PARIS, TSUNAMI, MCNP6), different modelisation of the geometry (2D/3D). Good consistency between the sensitivities, both integral values and sensitivity profiles. Constrained PFNS sensitivity depends on spectra used, unconstrained should be provided to be used in adjustment Berenice – in cooperation with CEA. SG39, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015

Analysed benchmarks from ICSBEP and IRPhE SNEAK-7A & -7B: MOX fuel reflected by metallic depleted U. Jezebel: bare sphere of 239 Pu metal, cm radius Skidoo (Jezebel-23): bare ~98.1% 233 U sphere; Popsy (Flattop-Pu): ~20-cm natural U reflected 239 Pu sphere; Topsy (Flattop-25): ~20-cm natural U reflected 235 U sphere; Flattop-23: ~20-cm natural U reflected 233 U sphere; Big Ten: 10% enriched U with U-reflector, cylinder r=41.91cm, h=96.428cm; ZPPR-9: MOX core with sodium cooling, depleted U blanket. -I. Kodeli, Sensitivity and uncertainty in the effective delayed neutron fraction (β eff ), Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 715 (2013)70-78 WPEC SG39, NEA, Issy-les-Moulineaux, May 19, 2015