Date: 2013/9/25 Author: Mikhail Ageev, Dmitry Lagun, Eugene Agichtein Source: SIGIR’13 Advisor: Jia-ling Koh Speaker: Chen-Yu Huang Improving Search Result.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date: 2013/1/17 Author: Yang Liu, Ruihua Song, Yu Chen, Jian-Yun Nie and Ji-Rong Wen Source: SIGIR12 Advisor: Jia-ling Koh Speaker: Chen-Yu Huang Adaptive.
Advertisements

Learning to Suggest: A Machine Learning Framework for Ranking Query Suggestions Date: 2013/02/18 Author: Umut Ozertem, Olivier Chapelle, Pinar Donmez,
Temporal Query Log Profiling to Improve Web Search Ranking Alexander Kotov (UIUC) Pranam Kolari, Yi Chang (Yahoo!) Lei Duan (Microsoft)
Psychological Advertising: Exploring User Psychology for Click Prediction in Sponsored Search Date: 2014/03/25 Author: Taifeng Wang, Jiang Bian, Shusen.
Modelling Relevance and User Behaviour in Sponsored Search using Click-Data Adarsh Prasad, IIT Delhi Advisors: Dinesh Govindaraj SVN Vishwanathan* Group:
Date : 2013/05/27 Author : Anish Das Sarma, Lujun Fang, Nitin Gupta, Alon Halevy, Hongrae Lee, Fei Wu, Reynold Xin, Gong Yu Source : SIGMOD’12 Speaker.
DOMAIN DEPENDENT QUERY REFORMULATION FOR WEB SEARCH Date : 2013/06/17 Author : Van Dang, Giridhar Kumaran, Adam Troy Source : CIKM’12 Advisor : Dr. Jia-Ling.
WSCD INTRODUCTION  Query suggestion has often been described as the process of making a user query resemble more closely the documents it is expected.
Toward Whole-Session Relevance: Exploring Intrinsic Diversity in Web Search Date: 2014/5/20 Author: Karthik Raman, Paul N. Bennett, Kevyn Collins-Thompson.
Searchable Web sites Recommendation Date : 2012/2/20 Source : WSDM’11 Speaker : I- Chih Chiu Advisor : Dr. Koh Jia-ling 1.
1 Learning User Interaction Models for Predicting Web Search Result Preferences Eugene Agichtein Eric Brill Susan Dumais Robert Ragno Microsoft Research.
Improving relevance prediction by addressing biases and sparsity in web search click data Qi Guo, Dmitry Lagun, Denis Savenkov, Qiaoling Liu
Evaluating Search Engine
WebMiningResearch ASurvey Web Mining Research: A Survey Raymond Kosala and Hendrik Blockeel ACM SIGKDD, July 2000 Presented by Shan Huang, 4/24/2007.
Ryen W. White, Microsoft Research Jeff Huang, University of Washington.
WebMiningResearchASurvey Web Mining Research: A Survey Raymond Kosala and Hendrik Blockeel ACM SIGKDD, July 2000 Presented by Shan Huang, 4/24/2007 Revised.
University of Kansas Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dr. Susan Gauch April 2005 I T T C Dr. Susan Gauch Personalized Search Based.
Overview of Search Engines
© Cheltenham Computer Training 2001 Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 - Slide No 1 Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 Advanced Level Course.
Web Usage Mining with Semantic Analysis Date: 2013/12/18 Author: Laura Hollink, Peter Mika, Roi Blanco Source: WWW’13 Advisor: Jia-Ling Koh Speaker: Pei-Hao.
1 Context-Aware Search Personalization with Concept Preference CIKM’11 Advisor : Jia Ling, Koh Speaker : SHENG HONG, CHUNG.
 An important problem in sponsored search advertising is keyword generation, which bridges the gap between the keywords bidded by advertisers and queried.
10 Adding Interactivity to a Web Site Section 10.1 Define scripting Summarize interactivity design guidelines Identify scripting languages Compare common.
Understanding and Predicting Graded Search Satisfaction Tang Yuk Yu 1.
Improving Web Search Ranking by Incorporating User Behavior Information Eugene Agichtein Eric Brill Susan Dumais Microsoft Research.
1 Mining User Behavior Mining User Behavior Eugene Agichtein Mathematics & Computer Science Emory University.
When Experts Agree: Using Non-Affiliated Experts To Rank Popular Topics Meital Aizen.
CIKM’09 Date:2010/8/24 Advisor: Dr. Koh, Jia-Ling Speaker: Lin, Yi-Jhen 1.
WebMining Web Mining By- Pawan Singh Piyush Arora Pooja Mansharamani Pramod Singh Praveen Kumar 1.
Hao Wu Nov Outline Introduction Related Work Experiment Methods Results Conclusions & Next Steps.
A Probabilistic Graphical Model for Joint Answer Ranking in Question Answering Jeongwoo Ko, Luo Si, Eric Nyberg (SIGIR ’ 07) Speaker: Cho, Chin Wei Advisor:
Features and Algorithms Paper by: XIAOGUANG QI and BRIAN D. DAVISON Presentation by: Jason Bender.
Understanding and Predicting Personal Navigation Date : 2012/4/16 Source : WSDM 11 Speaker : Chiu, I- Chih Advisor : Dr. Koh Jia-ling 1.
Web Document Clustering: A Feasibility Demonstration Oren Zamir and Oren Etzioni, SIGIR, 1998.
Date: 2013/8/27 Author: Shinya Tanaka, Adam Jatowt, Makoto P. Kato, Katsumi Tanaka Source: WSDM’13 Advisor: Jia-ling Koh Speaker: Chen-Yu Huang Estimating.
Intent Subtopic Mining for Web Search Diversification Aymeric Damien, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu, Shaoping Ma State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology.
Implicit User Feedback Hongning Wang Explicit relevance feedback 2 Updated query Feedback Judgments: d 1 + d 2 - d 3 + … d k -... Query User judgment.
ON THE SELECTION OF TAGS FOR TAG CLOUDS (WSDM11) Advisor: Dr. Koh. Jia-Ling Speaker: Chiang, Guang-ting Date:2011/06/20 1.
From Social Bookmarking to Social Summarization: An Experiment in Community-Based Summary Generation Oisin Boydell, Barry Smyth Adaptive Information Cluster,
Improving Classification Accuracy Using Automatically Extracted Training Data Ariel Fuxman A. Kannan, A. Goldberg, R. Agrawal, P. Tsaparas, J. Shafer Search.
Binxing Jiao et. al (SIGIR ’10) Presenter : Lin, Yi-Jhen Advisor: Dr. Koh. Jia-ling Date: 2011/4/25 VISUAL SUMMARIZATION OF WEB PAGES.
LOGO Finding High-Quality Content in Social Media Eugene Agichtein, Carlos Castillo, Debora Donato, Aristides Gionis and Gilad Mishne (WSDM 2008) Advisor.
Qi Guo Emory University Ryen White, Susan Dumais, Jue Wang, Blake Anderson Microsoft Presented by Tetsuya Sakai, Microsoft Research.
Date : 2013/03/18 Author : Jeffrey Pound, Alexander K. Hudek, Ihab F. Ilyas, Grant Weddell Source : CIKM’12 Speaker : Er-Gang Liu Advisor : Prof. Jia-Ling.
CSKGOI'08 Commonsense Knowledge and Goal Oriented Interfaces.
Finding Experts Using Social Network Analysis 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence Yupeng Fu, Rongjing Xiang, Yong Wang, Min.
A Classification-based Approach to Question Answering in Discussion Boards Liangjie Hong, Brian D. Davison Lehigh University (SIGIR ’ 09) Speaker: Cho,
Xinyu Xing, Wei Meng, Dan Doozan, Georgia Institute of Technology Alex C. Snoeren, UC San Diego Nick Feamster, and Wenke Lee, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Date: 2012/08/21 Source: Zhong Zeng, Zhifeng Bao, Tok Wang Ling, Mong Li Lee (KEYS’12) Speaker: Er-Gang Liu Advisor: Dr. Jia-ling Koh 1.
Date: 2013/6/10 Author: Shiwen Cheng, Arash Termehchy, Vagelis Hristidis Source: CIKM’12 Advisor: Jia-ling Koh Speaker: Chen-Yu Huang Predicting the Effectiveness.
Post-Ranking query suggestion by diversifying search Chao Wang.
More Than Relevance: High Utility Query Recommendation By Mining Users' Search Behaviors Xiaofei Zhu, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng, Yanyan Lan Institute of.
Headings are defined with the to tags. defines the largest heading. defines the smallest heading. Note: Browsers automatically add an empty line before.
Date: 2012/11/29 Author: Chen Wang, Keping Bi, Yunhua Hu, Hang Li, Guihong Cao Source: WSDM’12 Advisor: Jia-ling, Koh Speaker: Shun-Chen, Cheng.
1 Adaptive Subjective Triggers for Opinionated Document Retrieval (WSDM 09’) Kazuhiro Seki, Kuniaki Uehara Date: 11/02/09 Speaker: Hsu, Yu-Wen Advisor:
LINDEN : Linking Named Entities with Knowledge Base via Semantic Knowledge Date : 2013/03/25 Resource : WWW 2012 Advisor : Dr. Jia-Ling Koh Speaker : Wei.
Multi-Aspect Query Summarization by Composite Query Date: 2013/03/11 Author: Wei Song, Qing Yu, Zhiheng Xu, Ting Liu, Sheng Li, Ji-Rong Wen Source: SIGIR.
By Pamela Drake SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION. WHAT IS SEO? Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of affecting the visibility of a website or a.
TO Each His Own: Personalized Content Selection Based on Text Comprehensibility Date: 2013/01/24 Author: Chenhao Tan, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Bo Pang Source:
SEMANTIC VERIFICATION IN AN ONLINE FACT SEEKING ENVIRONMENT DMITRI ROUSSINOV, OZGUR TURETKEN Speaker: Li, HueiJyun Advisor: Koh, JiaLing Date: 2008/5/1.
Identifying “Best Bet” Web Search Results by Mining Past User Behavior Author: Eugene Agichtein, Zijian Zheng (Microsoft Research) Source: KDD2006 Reporter:
1 FollowMyLink Individual APT Presentation First Talk February 2006.
{ Adaptive Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval Yuanhua Lv and ChengXiang Zhai (CIKM ‘09) Date: 2010/10/12 Advisor: Dr. Koh, Jia-Ling Speaker: Lin,
Predicting Short-Term Interests Using Activity-Based Search Context CIKM’10 Advisor: Jia Ling, Koh Speaker: Yu Cheng, Hsieh.
1 Context-Aware Ranking in Web Search (SIGIR 10’) Biao Xiang, Daxin Jiang, Jian Pei, Xiaohui Sun, Enhong Chen, Hang Li 2010/10/26.
QUERY-PERFORMANCE PREDICTION: SETTING THE EXPECTATIONS STRAIGHT Date : 2014/08/18 Author : Fiana Raiber, Oren Kurland Source : SIGIR’14 Advisor : Jia-ling.
Improving Search Relevance for Short Queries in Community Question Answering Date: 2014/09/25 Author : Haocheng Wu, Wei Wu, Ming Zhou, Enhong Chen, Lei.
Date : 2013/1/10 Author : Lanbo Zhang, Yi Zhang, Yunfei Chen
Date: 2012/11/15 Author: Jin Young Kim, Kevyn Collins-Thompson,
Information Retrieval and Web Design
Presentation transcript:

Date: 2013/9/25 Author: Mikhail Ageev, Dmitry Lagun, Eugene Agichtein Source: SIGIR’13 Advisor: Jia-ling Koh Speaker: Chen-Yu Huang Improving Search Result Summaries by Using Searcher Behavior Data

Outline Introduction Behavior-biased snippet generation Text-based snippet generation Inferring relevant text fragment from search behavior Experiment Data collection and experiment setup result Conclusion 2

Include the desired information directly Provide sufficient information for the user to distinguish An ideal snippet would include the text fragment where user focused his attention Introduction 3 Improve snippet generation for informational queries

Following the literature on snippet quality, snippets must satisfy: Representativeness Readability Judgeability Not to replace the existing text-based snippet generation approaches, but rather to add additional evidence. Present a new approach to improving result summaries by incorporating post-click searchers behavior data. Introduction 4

Outline Introduction Behavior-biased snippet generation Text-based snippet generation Inferring relevant text fragment from search behavior Experiment Data collection and experiment setup result Conclusion 5

Behavior-biased snippet generation 6 Generate candidate fragments (use a strong text-only baseline) Infer the document fragments of interest to the user (based on user examination data) Generate the final behavior-biased snippet (BeBS)

Make three key assumption: Primarily target informational queries Assume that document visits can be grouped by query intent Assume that user interactions on landing pages can be collected by a search engine or a third party Behavior-biased snippet generation 7

For a given query we first select all the sentences that have at least one match of query terms. Extend the method of Metzler and Kanungo by adding additional features. Train a Gradient Boosting Regression Tree model(GBRT) on a subset of training query-URL pairs to predict snippet fragment scores. Text-biased snippet generation 8

9

Collect searcher interactions on web pages Adapt the publicly available EMU toolbar for Firefox browser, that is able to collect mouse cursor movement. After the html page is rendered in the browser, modifies the document DOM tree, so that each word is wrapped by a separate DOM element tags. Inferring relevant text fragments from search behavior 10

For each page visit we know the searcher’s intent the search engine query that user issued the URL the contents of the document the bounding boxes of each word in HTML text the log of behavior actions ( mouse cursor coordinates, mouse clicks, scrolling, an answer to the question that the user found ) Behavior-biased snippet generation 11

Focus on capturing user’s behavior associated with focused attention, not contain any document or query information. Inferring relevant text fragments from search behavior 12

Train the GBRT model on the training set of the labeled document fragments. Training set (stemming and stopword removal) Inferring relevant text fragments from search behavior 13 label The answer that user submitted is correct The answer shares words with the fragment1 The answer shares no word the fragment 0

Combine the text-based score TextScore(f) for candidate fragment with the behavior-based score BScore(f), infer from the examination data. TextScore(f) value in the range[1,5] Bscore(f) value in the range[0,1] Behavior-biased snippet generation system 14

Outline Introduction Behavior-biased snippet generation Text-based snippet generation Inferring relevant text fragment from search behavior Experiment Data collection and experiment setup result Conclusion 15

The participants were recruited through the Amazon Mechanical Turk. The participants played a search contest “game” consisting of 12 search questions to solve. 98 users 1175 search sessions 2289 page visits 508 distinct URLs 707 different query-URL pairs Data collection and experimental setup 16

Prediction of fragment interestingness 10-fold cross validation(disjoint) ROUGE Result 17

Text-based baseline Result 18

BeBS system λ affects two characteristics of the algorithm: Snippet coverage: the ratio of the snippets produced by the behavior- biased algorithm Snippet quality: judgeability, readability, representativeness, via manual assessments Result 19

BeBS system Result 20

Behavior feature Result 21

Outline Introduction Behavior-biased snippet generation Text-based snippet generation Inferring relevant text fragment from search behavior Experiment Data collection and experiment setup result Conclusion 22

Presented a novel way to generate behavior-biased search snippets. Method was primarily targeted informational queries, an important consideration is how to generalize approach to a wider class of queries. Approach is not necessarily limited to desktop-based computers with a mouse. Conclusion 23