Submission doc.: IEEE 11/13-0141-01-00ak Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 802.1Qbz–802.11ak Solutions: Station Subsetting Issue Date: 2013-01-17.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/ ak-r0 March 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Changes to 802.1Q required by 802.1Qbz Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/ ak July 2013 Finn and Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 P802.1Qbz + P802.11ak Proposed Division of Work Date:
Cisco Confidential 1 bz-nfinn-soln-station-subset-0113-v02.pdf Solutions for P802.1Qbz / P802.11ak: Station subset issue Norman Finn January, 2013 Version.
CSCI 465 D ata Communications and Networks Lecture 20 Martin van Bommel CSCI 465 Data Communications & Networks 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0938r1 August 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Service mapping between the ISS and Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-15/0454r0 March 2015 SubmissionSlide 1, Mark Hamilton, Spectralink Some more DS architecture concepts Date: Authors: Sli de 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0076r0 January 2013 Reachable Address Message for Relay Date: Authors: Jafarian, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Oct 12, 2004CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 Virtual LANs Network Protocols and Standards Autumn
Doc.: IEEE /1323r0 November 2012 Submission Relays for ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Internetworking Different networks –Different bit rates –Frame lengths –Protocols.
Jan 10, 2008CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 Virtual LANs Network Protocols and Standards Winter
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/ ak December 2012 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Problem list for P802.1Qbz / P802.11ak point-to-point model Date:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1213r0 September 2014 SubmissionSlide 1 Mark Hamilton, Spectralink AP Architectural concepts, and Distribution System Access Function.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide Qbz–802.11ak Solutions: Station Subsetting Issue Date:
Doc.: IEEE /2233r0 Submission July 2007 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Wireless Bridge Common Practices Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/0562r4 November 2014 SubmissionSlide 1Norman Finn, Cisco Systems, Mark Hamilton, Spectralink ak and 802.1AC Convergence Function.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1449r0 Decmeber 2012 Yan Zhuang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Virtual Wireless Port based Bridging Date: Authors:
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ICND v2.3—1-1 Configuring Catalyst Switch Operations Introducing Basic Layer 2 Switching and Bridging Functions.
Doc.: IEEE /0065r2 Submission January 2011 Ivan Pustogarov, IITP RASSlide 1 GCR for mesh Date: January 2011 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/ ak May 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 P802.1Qbz + P802.11ak Proposed Division of Work Date: Authors:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/0221r2 Mar 2013
Doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: Authors:
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 7 Spanning-Tree Protocol Cisco Networking Academy.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0589r2 July 2012 Donald Eastlake 3rd, Huawei R&D USASlide 1 General Links Date: Authors:
VLAN V irtual L ocal A rea N etwork VLAN Network performance is a key factor in the productivity of an organization. One of the technologies used to.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/ ak May 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 P802.1Qbz + P802.11ak Proposed Division of Work Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0246r2 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC Corp. 1F, 6-3 Baoqiang Road, Xindian district, New Taipei City,
Wireless LANs Prof. F. Tobagi MAC Management 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0867r0 July 2014 Donald Eastlake, HuaweiSlide 1 A Subsetting and EPD Approach Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide Qbz–802.11ak Solutions: Architecture Issue Date: Authors:
Chapter 19 Binding Protocol Addresses (ARP) A frame transmitted across a physical network must contain the hardware address of the destination. Before.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide Qbz–802.11ak Solutions: Tagging Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0110r8 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: May, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0061r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Response frame transmission interval Date:
Doc.: IEEE r Submission November 2004 Bob Beach, Symbol TechnologiesSlide 1 Fast Roaming Using Multiple Concurrent Associations Bob.
Doc.: IEEE /1288r1 Submission November 2010 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 Frame Format for GroupID Management Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1063r0 Submission Nov 2005 Jon Edney, NokiaSlide 1 The Lock-out Problem - an Analysis Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /2491r00 Submission September 2007 D. Eastlake (Motorola), G. Hiertz (Philips)Slide 1 WLAN Segregated Data Services Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/ ak May 2013 Finn and Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 P802.1Qbz + P802.11ak Proposed Division of Work Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/ ak-r1 July 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Comparison of Receiver Subset Techniques Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/ ak January 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Problem list for P802.1Qbz / P802.11ak point-to-point model Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0526r1 May 2013 Donald Eastlake, HuaweiSlide 1 Sub-Setting Date: Authors:
Cisco Confidential © 2013 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Cisco Networking Training (CCENT/CCT/CCNA R&S) Rick Rowe Ron Giannetti.
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission Interference Signalling Enhancements Date: xx Mar 2010 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0110r7 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: April, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE l2r Submission Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/ ak May 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 P802.1Qbz + P802.11ak Proposed Division of Work Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/0562r0 May 2014 SubmissionSlide 1Norman Finn, Cisco Systems, Mark Hamilton, Spectralink ak and 802.1AC Convergence Function Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1162r0 September 2012 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide Q Bridge Baggy Pants Explanation Date: Authors:
Data Link Layer.
Doc.: IEEE /1299r0 Submission Dec 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 BSS Transition Improvements Date: xx Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/0562r7 November 2015 SubmissionSlide 1Norman Finn, Cisco Systems, Mark Hamilton, Spectralink ak and 802.1AC Convergence Function.
Doc.: IEEE e Submission July 2009 Andy Summers, Skip Ashton, EmberSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /0615r0 Submission May 2008 Naveen K. Kakani, Nokia IncSlide 1 Multicast Transmission in WLAN Date: Authors:
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Portal and 802.1AC Convergence Function
Virtual Wireless Port based Bridging
doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Mike Moreton
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Proposal for IEEE 802.1CQ-LAAP
Proposal for IEEE 802.1CQ-LAAP
1/1/2019<month year> doc.: IEEE
Portal and 802.1AC Convergence Function
MAC Address Acquisition Protocol
Measurement reporting in TGh
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
September 2006 doc.: IEEE /1351r0 September 2006
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide Qbz–802.11ak Solutions: Station Subsetting Issue Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 2 Abstract A solution is presents a mechanism using multicast Receiver Addresses to solve one of the problems, that of transmitting a frame to a subset of the stations attached to an Access Point, described in Document 11/ (Finn).

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Station Subset Problem AP sends the “same” multicast from X to stations behind station/bridges A through E. But, tagging differences and VLAN translations result in three different resultant frames, and at least three transmissions: VID 6 (A and B), VID 7 (C), and untagged (D and E). How do we send each one to the right subset of stations? Slide 3Norman Finn, Cisco Systems Jan 2013 AP/B B CD X E tagged with VID 6 or 7 untagged A 6 6 7

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak ALTERNATIVE 1: FOUR ADDRESS FORMAT Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 4

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Alternative 1: Four address format defines four addresses for every frame: Receiver Address: Which station(s) (AP or non-AP) should receive frame. Destination Address: Destination address in original MAC service request. Source Address: Source address in original MAC service request. Transmitter Address: Which station (AP or non-AP) that transmitted frame. Typically, AP and non-AP stations use only three addresses per frame, by using formats that combine two addresses into a single 6-byte field: UP TO AP: Receiver (the AP), Destination, Source = Transmitter (non- AP). FROM AP: Receiver = Destination (non-AP), Source, Transmitter (the AP). Which, of course, is the root of the “reflection” problem. Slide 5Norman Finn, Cisco Systems Jan 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Just use all four addresses! If you simply use all four addresses for exactly the purpose described in , this problem can be solved. The key is the definition of the Receiver address: Receiver Address: Which station(s) should receive frame, And to notice that the Receiver Address can be a multicast address. Each non-AP (or AP) station attached to the transmitting AP “subscribes to” (accepts frames containing) some multicast Receiver Addresses (the right ones) and discards frames with other multicast Receiver Addresses (the wrong ones). Slide 6Norman Finn, Cisco Systems Jan 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak ALTERNATIVE 2: n-2009 A-MSDU Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 7

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak IEEE Std n-2009 A-MSDU The A-MSDU described in n is a three-address frame (on the outside) that carries any number of encapsulated frames. The encapsulated data frames’ Destination and Source addresses are internal to the frame, and not used in the outer three address fields. The outer Source/Transmitter address can be used by a transmitting non-AP station bridge to discard reflections, using the Source address of the reflected frame, in exactly the same way it discards them, now. The outer Destination and Receiver addresses are always the AP/Bridge on frames sent towards the AP, and the Destination/Receiver address on frames sent by the AP is a multicast address denoting some subset of the non-AP stations. Slide 8Norman Finn, Cisco Systems Jan 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak BOTH ALTERNATIVES Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 9

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak For either alternative, 2 issues to settle: The AP and its attached stations have to agree on what to use for the multicast Receiver (four-address alternative) or Receiver/Destination (A-MSDU alternative) addresses. We have to make sure that existing non-AP stations will not do the wrong thing when they receive frames containing multicast Receiver addresses that are not the broadcast address. Slide 10Norman Finn, Cisco Systems Jan 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Receiver multicast addresses There is a protocol described in IEEE Std 802.1BR for distributing a mapping between multicast MAC addresses and a list of delivery ports (e.g. for non-AP stations S1, S2, …): Distributing the vectors has problems with delays that are similar to the delay problems when distributing MAC address mappings in the proposal by Zhuang and Wang (document ). These problems can be minimized by suitable rules regarding what kinds of changes can be made to the vector list. Slide 11Norman Finn, Cisco Systems Jan 2013 MAC addressS1S2S3S4S5S6S7… C2-XX-00-01YYNNYNY… C2-XX-00-05YYYNYYY… C2-XX-00-12NNNYYNN… ………………………

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Old non-AP stations One easy solution, very similar to what is often done, today: Non-AP stations that expect frames without a VLAN tag, and that do not understand multicast Receiver addresses, use different SSIDs, one per VLAN. Non-AP stations that understand VLAN tags, but do not understand the new multicast Receiver addresses, can all go on one SSID, different from the above (but could use the above SSIDs. New non-AP stations that understand multicast Receiver addresses, whether bridges or not, must go on one SSID, different from all of the above. Some day, when all stations understand multicast Receiver addresses, only the last SSID is needed. Slide 12Norman Finn, Cisco Systems Jan 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak No Free Lunch It was mentioned in the architecture solutions deck (see references) that bridging makes no demands on an AP for behaviors not already exhibited by many APs. The use of multicast Receiver addresses does introduce a new behavior. Before, the AP used destination MAC address and VLAN ID to select the security association on which to transmit a frame. Now, the AP must do the above, but must also use that information, plus the ingress port (security association ID), in order to select the Receiver MAC address. Slide 13Norman Finn, Cisco Systems Jan 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak DETAILS: VECTOR DISTRIBUTION RULES Jan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 14

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ ak Multicast vector distribution rules The AP generates and maintains a list of addresses and distribution vectors as shown in the table, above. Each non-AP station maintains only a vector with one bit per multicast Receiver address (they are all in a relatively small range), stating whether that station accepts frames with that address, or not. Bits for unknown addresses are 0. It does not bother to remember the vectors. When a vector is created, changed, or deleted, the AP sends messages to update the stations as necessary, and retransmits as necessary, until all notified stations have acknowledged the update. A vector can be used by the AP before the acknowledgements are received (or even before the notifications are sent), due to these rules: A station can be added, but never removed, from an existing address’s vector. A vector can be deleted, and after all ACKs are received, the address can be redefined with any value. With these rules, when the vectors change, extra frames will likely be discarded, but none will be relayed when they should not be. Slide 15Norman Finn, Cisco Systems Jan 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11/ akJan 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 16 References This presentation is also available at: nfinn-soln-station-subset-0113-v01.pdf nfinn-soln-station-subset-0113-v01.pdf It attempts to answer one of the questions raised by: 00ak-issues-list-for-p802-1qbz-p802-11ak-point-to- point-model.pptx 00ak-issues-list-for-p802-1qbz-p802-11ak-point-to- point-model.pptx This presentation refers to another in a series of solutions to issues, the one on architecture issues: nfinn-soln-architecture-0113-v01.pdf nfinn-soln-architecture-0113-v01.pdf