Parameter [units]Tune-up beam"low" chargehigh currenthigh charge Kin. injection energy [MeV]2.0 – 3.02.0-3.02.02.0-3.0 Maximum beam energy [MeV]16 – 2016-20.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Dmitry Kayran R&D: G5 test and Commissioning Plan Eduard Pozdeyev, Dmitry Kayran BNL R&D ERL Review February 17-18, 2010 R&D.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Diagnostics and commissioning on ERLP Yuri Saveliev ASTeC CONFORM Project: EMMA Design Review Workshop February 2007, Daresbury Laboratory.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
THE SMALL ISOCHRONOUS RING PROJECT AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY J. Alberto Rodriguez.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
ERL YAG & OTR Profile Monitors D. Gassner, E. Pozdeyev Outline AP Requirements OTR YAG Profile type breakdown ERL Layout Types of 6-way crosses.
TUPD02 BEAM DIAGNOSTICS FOR THE ESS BLM BPM Trans Profile Bunch Shape BCM Preliminary System Count A. Jansson, L. Tchelidze, ESS AB, Lund, Sweden Hybrid.
Does the short pulse mode need energy recovery? Rep. rateBeam 5GeV 100MHz 500MWAbsolutely 10MHz 50MW Maybe 1MHz 5MW 100kHz.
4th Electron-Ion Collider Workshop, Hampton University, May BNL R&D ERL and Coherent Electron Cooling test at RHIC Outline Goals of R&D ERL.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) Update November 17, 2014.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
F Specifications for the dark current kicker for the NML test facility at Fermilab S. Nagaitsev, M. Church, P. Piot, C.Y. Tan, J. Steimel Fermilab May.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Progress of SRF and ERL at Peking University Lu Xiangyang Institute of Heavy Ion Physics Peking University.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
FFAG Accelerators for Proton Driver Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France April 12-17, 2007.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Injector Commissioning Masanori Satoh (Accelerator Laboratory, KEK) for the Injector Linac Commissioning Group The 20th KEKB Accelerator Review Committee,
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
G5 Design Review, April 24, 2009 Gun to 5cell Cavity Test: Overview Dmitry Kayran G5 test Design Review April,
October, 2009 Internal Review Beam Instrumentation David Gassner.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
Optimization Objectives Top Level Questions 10 MeV – Incorporate studies on operability, cost etc. 50 MeV – More stringent beam specs  Optimize 50 MeV.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Source, FLS2012 M. Shimada A), T. Miyajima A), N. Nakamura A), Y. Kobayashi A), K. Harada A), S. Sakanaka A), R. Hajima B)
Construction, Commissioning, and Operation of Injector Test Facility (ITF) for the PAL-XFEL November 12, 2013 S. J. Park, J. H. Hong, C. K. Min, I. Y.
Notes from Tom’s visit 1. Controls is under-staffed 2. Common Diagnostics platforms (BPM, FCT, DCCT, BLM,…) 3. Where possible, ‘Smart’ Diagnostics, running.
Estimates of required MPS reaction time In the merger (at the centers of respective 20deg dipoles and in between 2 lenses) rms R=250 um In the
High intensity electron beam and infrastructure Paolo Valente * INFN Roma * On behalf of the BTF and LINAC staff.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
12 GeV CEBAF.
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
Cornell Injector Performance
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Injector Setup for G0 and HAPPEX & Lessons Learned
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
JLEIC electron injection demo
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Hall A Beam Parameters Table
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Parameter [units]Tune-up beam"low" chargehigh currenthigh charge Kin. injection energy [MeV]2.0 – Maximum beam energy [MeV]16 – Bunching freq [MHz] / Bunch charge [nC] / 0.75 Average beam current [mA]10 -7 – Bunch parameters at 2.5 MeV  x /  y, normalized, [mm-mrad] 1/1 – 2/22/2 6/6 Bunch length, full/rms, [ps]~60-120/20-40 ~80-150/30-55 Energy spread, full/rms, dE/E / / / Bunch parameters at 20 MeV  x /  y, normalized, [mm-mrad] 1/1-2/22/2 6/6 Bunch length, full/rms, [ps]~60/ /40~120/40 ~150/55 Energy spread, full/rms, dE/E0.06/ /0.015 Machine Parameters

AP requirements (High Energy Ring) ParameterExpected Value / RangeAccuracyResolutionComments Beam Loss (localized) 50 nA (trip level) / nA (range) 20%0.5 nA BLM trip level is 50 nA. Factor of 50 down required for smooth transition during laser frequency increase. Laser specs are not completely clear at this point. Beam Position Transverse, 1 st -time tuning Full aperture, Bunch rep. rate 1 Hz 500 μm50 μmFlags could be used to bring the beam around. Transverse, Regular Operations/Tuning Aperture: ±1.5 cm, ≥10 Hz, two beams 100 μm20 μm Ideally, position of accel./decel. beams simultaneously. Ability to operate with bunch trains. Refresh rate not lower than 1 Hz. Ability to improve accy. by averaging. accel./decel. phase±90° / 360°1°1°0.25° Beam Profile Beam emittance2 – 10 μm, norm30%0.1 μm, normε=2 μm is nominal. Quad/Sol. scan. See next line. Transverse Beam Profile Size (rms): mm. (Aprt. ±1.0 cm) 10% (LP)5 μm (LP) High resolution is required for quad scan and beam matching in the low power (LP) mode. In the high power regime (HP), lower accy./res. can be sufficient. Beam Halo Profile30% 1 ppm of max. densityA set of scanner wires with a BLM? Longitudinal profile psec10 psec2 psecRequired at LP and HP. Energy spread (dE/E)1% (rms)1e-32e-4Required at LP and HP. Current/Charge per bunch Current (Ops.)0 – 500 mA1% 0.1% at I=500 mA / 0.25 μA at I=0 mA Lower range needed for tuning (see next page) Tot. Current Loss< 1 μA (expected)1%0.25 μARequires nulling feedback, nulling cur. in both DCCTs Bunch charge 0.1 – 5 nC, 1 Hz – 10 MHz 5%0.1% (at 5 nC) Resolution of 0.1% is desirable for RHIIC II R&D. 1% will be sufficient for ERL. Other HOM power BTFImpedance measurements? Kicker in the injector? M56 (over 2 arcs)±20 cm10%0.5 cmLongitudinal BTF. Non-linear terms too.

AP requirements (Low Energy Injection Transport / Dump) ParameterExpected Value/RangeAccuracyResolutionComments Beam Loss (localized) 0.5 μA (trip level) / μA (range) 20%5 nA BLM trip level is 0.5 μA. Factor of 50 down required for smooth transition during laser frequency increase. Beam Position Transverse, 1 st -time tuning Full aperture, Bunch rep. rate 1 Hz 500 μm50 μmFlags could be used to bring the beam through Transverse, Regular tuning and Operations Aperture: ±1.5 cm, ≥10 Hz 200 μm50 μm Ability to operate with bunch trains. Refresh rate not lower than 1 Hz. accel. phase1°1°0.25° Beam Profile Beam emittance2 – 10 μm, norm30%0.1 μm, norm Pepper pot in the injection line. Projected emittance will be larger than the slice emittance. Transverse Beam Profile Size (rms): mm.5% (LP)20 μm (LP) Required in the low power (LP) only. In the high power regime (HP), position will be sufficient. Beam Halo, measure/remove Full apperture,20% 1 nA, assuming 2π scraper A factor of 10 better resolution is required for RHIC II R&D. Current/Charge per bunch Current (Tuning)0 - 1 μA5%0.5 nARing BLM tuning will require damping 50 nA locally. Current (Ops.)0 – 500 mA1% 0.1% at I=500 mA / 0.25 μA at I=0 mA Bunch charge0.1 – 5 nC, 1 Hz -10 MHz5%0.1% (at 5 nC) Resolution of 0.1% is desirable for RHIIC II R&D. 1% will be sufficient for ERL. Ghost bunches~10 10 MHz20%1 10 MHzMust be measured separately from main bunches. Other Gun HOM excitation Beam position at the chicane BPMs as afunction of beam current/ bunch rep. rate? BTFImpedance measurements. Kicker in the injector?