Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0110r0 January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 1 NGP for 60GHz Date: 2015-1-13 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Framework for MIMO Operation over mmWave Links
Advertisements

mmWave MIMO Link Budget Estimation for Indoor Environment
Submission doc.: IEEE /1202r0 September 2014 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 1 NG60 channel model Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0883r1 Submission July 2010 Slide 1 Comment Resolution for “Spatial Reuse” Subgroup Date: Authors: Thomas Derham, Orange.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0069r0 January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 1 MIMO option for NG60 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Submission doc.: IEEE / 0431 r0 March 2015 Dmitry Cherniavsky, SiBEAM, Inc.Slide 1 Shared MIMO Architecture for ay. Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0340r1 March 2015 Alecsander Eitan, QualcommSlide 1 SC LOS/NLOS Channel Measurements Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0094r0 January 2015 Alecsander Eitan, QualcommSlide 1 SC 64QAM for NG60 Date: Authors:
Channel Sounding for ay
NGP for 60GHz Date: Authors: January 2015 September 2014
July 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 July 2015
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0844r0 Slide 1 Non-linear Multiuser MIMO for next generation WLAN Date: Authors: Shoichi Kitazawa, ATR.
Channel Sounding for ay
Doc.: IEEE /1153r2 Submission November 2009 Carlos Cordeiro, IntelSlide 1 Motivation and Requirements on 60 GHz Beamforming Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0114r0 January, 2014 James Gilb, TensorcomSlide 1 Requirements for Next Generation mmWave Systems Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0364r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Date: Authors: Antenna Array Gain from Measured Data for n/ac.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0627r0 May 2015 Hakan Persson, EricssonSlide 1 Beam Selection for Hybrid MIMO Precoding Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1487r0 November 2014 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 1 NG60 Channel model challenges Date: Authors:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [The Usage of.
Submission doc.: /1320r00 Bo, Sun (ZTE Corp), et al Slide 1 11aj 45GHz Link Budget for use cases discussion Date: Authors: Nov 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
November 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 November 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission September 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 SU-MIMO Configurations for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1094 Overview and discussion about the next steps for ay channel modeling Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0133r0 Submission January 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission November 2015 Thomas Handte, SonySlide 1 Effect of Impairments on the Performance of Non-Uniform Constellations.
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2008 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 VHT 60 GHz Channel Model Recommendation Date: Authors:
Submission Byung-Jae Kwak et al., ETRISlide 1 May 2009 doc.:IEEE /0543r0 Measured Channel Capacity and AoD Estimation for Multi-User MIMO Scenarios.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2016 Assaf KasherSlide 1 Beamforming Training proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE Submission Nov 2014 Link Budget Analysis for 40-50GHz Indoor Usage Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan Liu, Mediatek Inc.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-02/004r0 Submission 23 January, 2001 James P. K. Gilb, Appairent Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Multi-Beamforming in Polarized Channels for 11ay
Submission Greg Breit, Qualcomm, et al. June 2009 doc.:IEEE /0699r0 Slide 1 Multi-User AoD Diversity Measurements Date: Authors:
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
Doc.: IEEE /0935r1 Submission July 2011 Fei Tong, CSRSlide 1 An improved non-compressed beamforming feedback format for 11ac Date:
Antenna Polarization and Beamforming for 11ay
Submission doc.: IEEE /r1 60 GHz Focus Area Date: Slide 1Alecsander Eitan, Qualcomm Jan Authors:
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
WF on UE Beam forming Qualcomm, [] R4-16XXXX. General Antenna Model Antenna consists of Mg x Ng panels, each of them composed of M x N antenna elemnts.
Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
Antenna Polarization Capability Format
EDMG Header Encoding and Modulation
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0496r1 November 2016
Multi-Stage, Multi-Resolution Beamforming Training for ay
Antenna Polarization Capability Format
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
Improvements to enhanced SLS beamforming
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
SC LOS/NLOS Channel Measurements
Locationing Protocol for 11az
Antenna Polarization Capability Format
A Framework for MIMO Operation over mmWave Links
New preamble structure for AGC in a MIMO-OFDM system
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
First Path FTM SFD Text Date: Authors: December 2017
Mutliband-60GHz-Location-Capability-Publishing
Discussion on Rank Adaptation
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
First Path FTM SFD Text Date: Authors: December 2017
Antenna Polarization Capability Format
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 1 NGP for 60GHz Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 2 NG60 features required by the channel model Channel bonding Multiple streams MIMO Multi-users channel (MU-MIMO): focus on DL-MU- MIMO Interference and dense deployment Outdoor channel

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 Most mmWave devices use an antenna array, gaining a narrow beam for both TX and RX, while maintaining same FF as cmWave antennas A pertinent part of the ad standard is the beamforming training, which configures the arrays at the TX and RX for best performance 60GHz channel is characterized by lower diffraction, and consequently, flat line-of-sight (LOS) channels Motivation January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 3

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 Assumptions January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 4 … Patch element antennas ϑ 2.1 us d

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r ad beamforming flow January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 5

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 Intuition: for direction offset of = 0.03°, the received phase difference between antennas #1 and # 32 is ∆ =3° Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) for direction finding of a 32 antennas ULA ad device, around the bore-sight [1] Performance limits January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 6

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 Ambiguity is unavoidable in many common arrays For ad ULA of 2 dipole antennas:  Resulting ambiguity Ambiguity January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 7

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 Cross polarization separation in 60GHz is better than lower frequencies Improved reliability detection of LOS vs NLOS (usually polarity changes for reflections) Requires additional IEs: Request to switch polarity at the TX Grant for request to indicate this switch + the difference between the emitted energy for each polarity Support of polarity January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 8

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 Coordinate convention January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 9 AZ=0  X-pole EL=0,AZ = 90  Y-pole

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 PLOS: 0 means NLOS with high probability 15 means LOS with high probability Implementation dependent values Ambiguity: Number of additional possible directions due to ambiguity/grating lobes Should add several possible directions to each report, with MMSE per direction AZ/EL According to CRB, resolution should be <1/128 degrees. MMSE Should be defined per direction (each ambiguous direction has separated MMSE) ROLL Add orientation to the measurement, including ROLL/AZ/EL. Each with its own MMSE Add polarization switch request/grant Pack FTM in the BRP frame, both BRP-RX and BRP-TX Suggested additions to the NGP January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 10

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 Suggested primitives January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 11 NameSizeTypeValid range Description Alignment1 ByteInteger0-3 0: coordinates aligned to cardinal coordinates 1: device coordinates 2: local AP coordinates 3: vendor specific PLOS1 ByteInteger[0-15] 0 means NLOS with high probability 15 means LOS with high probability Implementation dependent values Ambiguity1 ByteInteger[0-125] Number of additional possible directions due to ambiguity AZ2 Bytes Azimuth in resolution of 1/2^7 degrees, -180:180-1/2^7 The azimuth in degrees fix point with 9 bits integer and 7 bits fraction MMSE AZ1 Byte The standard deviation of azimuth measurement error [dB] 0,1,…,255 The standard deviation of the measured AZ, in dB as: MMSE AZ = 51-10*log10( E(AZ-AZ_physical_neglect_ambiguity) 2 ). MMSE AZ=0 means that AZ can be ignored EL2 BytesElevation in 1/2^7 degrees,-90:90 The elevation in degrees fix point with 9 bits integer and 7 bits fraction MMSE EL1 Byte The standard deviation of elevation measurement error [dB] 0,1,…,255 The standard deviation of the measured AZ, in dB as: MMSE EL = 51-10*log10( E(EL-EL_physical_neglect_ambiguity) 2 ). MMSE EL=0 means that EL can be ignored ROLL1 Byte The direction of the received electrical field, resolution of 2 degrees The roll in multiples of 2 degrees MMSE ROLL1 ByteThe error of the measured roll direction The standard deviation of the measured ROLL, in dB as: MMSE ROLL = 51-10*log10( E(ROLL- ROLL_physical_neglect_ambiguity) 2 ). MMSE ROLL=0 means that ROLL can be ignored

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 8 Bytes per direction Variable number of ambiguities entries Minimum size 31 Bytes: dense array [ ] ad Maximum size 1023 Bytes: sparse uniform array [2-20] ad Suggested primitive [cont.] January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 12 i=1,…, Ambiguity NameSizeTypeValid rangeDescription AZ[i]2 BytesAzimuth in resolution of 1/2^7 degrees,-180:180-1/2^7The azimuth in degrees fix point with 9 bits integer and 7 bits fraction MMSE AZ[i]1 ByteThe standard deviation of azimuth measurement error [dB] 0,1,…,255The standard deviation of the measured AZ, in dB as: MMSE AZ = 51-10*log10( E(AZ-AZ_physical_neglect_ambiguity) 2 ). MMSE AZ=0 means that AZ can be ignored EL[i]2 BytesElevation in 1/2^7 degrees,-90:90The elevation in degrees fix point with 9 bits integer and 7 bits fraction MMSE EL[i]1 ByteThe standard deviation of elevation measurement error [dB] 0,1,…,255The standard deviation of the measured AZ, in dB as: MMSE EL = 51-10*log10( E(EL-EL_physical_neglect_ambiguity) 2 ). MMSE EL=0 means that EL can be ignored ROLL[i]1 ByteThe direction of the received electrical field, resolution of 2 degrees 0-360The roll in multiples of 2 degrees MMSE ROLL[i]1 ByteThe error of the measured roll direction0-255The standard deviation of the measured ROLL, in dB as: MMSE ROLL = 51-10*log10( E(ROLL- ROLL_physical_neglect_ambiguity) 2 ). MMSE ROLL=0 means that ROLL can be ignored

Submission doc.: IEEE /0110r0 [1] Leshem, A. and Van der Veen, A.-J, “Bounds and algorithm for direction finding of phase modulated signals,” Proceedings of 9th IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing, Portland, OR, 1998 References January 2015 Amichai Sanderovich, QualcommSlide 13