Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas S OLAR E VENTS TOWARDS THE E ARTH IN 2002 B.Schmieder (1), N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin (1), K. Bocchialini (2), M. Menvielle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Space Weather User Needs Related to Solar Observations Eamonn Daly and Alexi Glover ESA Space Environments and Effects Section ESTEC, The Netherlands.
Advertisements

On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal phenomena On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal.
Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
Extreme CME Events from the Sun Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Extreme Space Weather Events (ESWE) workshop, Boulder, CO May 14-17, 2012.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Space Weather Causes and Consequences An introduction to Space Weather What is it? Where does it come from? Who is impacted? Rodney Viereck NOAA Space.
Towards a European Infrastructure for Lunar Observatories Bremen, Wednesday 23 rd March 2005 A 3D cosmic ray detector on the Moon X. Moussas University.
Progenitors to Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejections: Filaments and Sigmoids David McKenzie, Robert Leamon Karen Wilson, Zhona Tang, Anthony Running Wolf.
Solar Activities and Halloween Storms Ahmed Hady Astronomy Department Cairo University, Egypt.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
Solar Activity and VLF Prepared by Sheila Bijoor and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global AWESOME.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
M. Menvielle and A. Marchaudon ESWW2 M. Menvielle (1) and A. Marchaudon (2) (1) Centre d’études des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires UMR 8615 IPL/CNRS/UVSQ.
Geospace Variability through the Solar Cycle John Foster MIT Haystack Observatory.
Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.
The Dangers of Solar Storms and Solar Cycles.  For every 1 million atoms of hydrogen in the entire sun  98,000 atoms of helium  850 of oxygen  360.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Space Weather in Ionosphere and Thermosphere Yihua Zheng For SW REDI 2013.
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Olga Khabarova Heliophysical Laboratory, Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS (IZMIRAN), Moscow, Russia
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
On the February 14-15, 2011 CME-CME interaction event and consequences for Space Weather Manuela Temmer(1), Astrid Veronig(1), Vanessa Peinhart(1), Bojan.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Global Simulation of Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth's Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Tatsuki Ogino Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory.
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
Solar and STP science with AstroGrid Silvia Dalla School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Manchester A PPARC funded project.
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
WG3: Extreme Events Summary N. Gopalswamy & A. Vourlidas.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
IAGA Symposium A12.2 Geomagnetic networks, computation and definition of products for space weather and space climate Melbourne, Australia, 2011 GLOBAL,
The Space Weather Week Monique Pick LESIA, Observatoire de Paris November 2006.
Improving Space Weather Forecasts Using Coronagraph Data S.P. Plunkett 1, A. Vourlidas 1, D.R. McMullin 2, K. Battams 3, R.C. Colaninno 4 1 Naval Research.
Solar weather consists of the Sun’s effects upon its planetary system and the solar activities it causes. Solar activities, such as flares and CMEs, form.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
Xie – STEREO SWG – Dublin – March 2010 Low Mass Coronal Mass Ejections Missed by STEREO A/B or LASCO and Associated ICMEs H. Xie 1,2, O. C. St. Cyr 2,
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Correlation of magnetic field intensities and solar wind speeds of events observed by ACE. Mathew J. Owens and Peter J. Cargill. Space and Atmospheric.
Summary Using 21 equatorial CHs during the solar cycle 23 we studied the correlation of SW velocity with the area of EIT CH and the area of NoRH RBP. SW.
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
A tool for improved space weather predictions: the CME expansion speed. Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau Germany Instituto Nacional.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
Solar Origins of the October November 2003 Extreme Events N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC SHINE 2004 WG3 Thursday, June 1 Big Sky, Montana Photo.
1 SPACE WEATHER SPACE WEATHER. 2 Causes of space weather Space weather is caused mainly by storms and eruptions in our volatile Sun sending potentially.
17 th November, 2005STEREO/Solar-B Workshop 1 Related Solar Imaging and Near-Earth In-situ Observations of an ICME A. N. Fazakerley 1, L.K. Harra 1, J.L.
Multi-Point Observations of The Solar Corona for Space weather Acknowledgements The forecasting data was retrieved from NOAA SWPC products and SIDC PRESTO.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
Manuela Temmer Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Austria Tutorial: Coronal holes and space weather consequences.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Solar Events towards the Earth in 2002
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
. Multipoint, galactic cosmic ray observations associated with a series of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: the case study of June 2015 A. Papaioannou1,
Forbush and GCRDs First rigorous experimental observation of Cosmic Ray Flux Decrease was obtained by S. E. Forbush in , after deep statisitcal.
Introduction to Space Weather
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas S OLAR E VENTS TOWARDS THE E ARTH IN 2002 B.Schmieder (1), N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin (1), K. Bocchialini (2), M. Menvielle (3), A. Chambodut(4), D. Fontaine(1),B. Grison (5),C. Lathuillère (6), A. Marchaudon(7), M. Pick(8), F. Pitout(7), S.Régnier(9), N. Vilmer (8), Y. Zouganelis(1) ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Back and Forth method It is a classical method to follow a solar event towards the Earth and see its geoeffectiveness. Many case studies exist (i.e. Hanuise et al, 2006), some statistics have been performed selecting only halo CMEs (Gopalswamy et al, 2009, Cid et al, 2012) We propose a statistical analysis covering one year (2002) to investigate the link between SSC (Storm Sudden Commencement), detected by the magnetic observatories on the ground and the Coronal Mass ejection (CME). The method is back and forth to find the correct association of events ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Starting point #1 SSC May at 10:18 UT By using the geomagnetic indices (Dst, SYM-H…) SSC Storm Sudden Commencement = compression of the magnetosphere indicating the arrival of the shock. Date; Amplitude; Quality ( :18; 78 nT; 2) Dst (hour) et SYM-H (1 mn) variations related to the annular magnetospheric currents of the horizontal magnetic component at the Earth surface Value of the minimum; Classification (-109; Intense Storm ) nT SSC day of the year 142 : 22 May ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Starting point # 2 Sun: search of CME SOHO :13 UT AR 9948 EIT : 30.4 nm EIT : 19.5 nm Location (881,-319 arcsec) and characteristics of the source region (AR, Filament,Flare) LASCO/SOHO CME : speed, altitude, acceleration, time of exit of the field of view (150 4km/s, 28 Rs, -10.4, 06:50 UT ) ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

X ray Flux measured by GOES W/m 2 C Class ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Radio bursts in the Solar Wind at L1 Type II: associated with a shock Type IV: associated by a CME, important ejection ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Interplanetary Medium at L1 : ACE Satellite Characteristics of the observations: ICME (Interplanetary CME) or NOT ? t _ssc ICME : increase of V t1: shock t2 : start of the ICME t3 : end of the ICME ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Ionospheric radars SuperDARN : Polar Cap potential through the pole SSC Maximum value of the PCP (85-95) Maximum time after the SSC (01:15) Nb of points (quality) ( ) ESWW12 Ostende November 2015 Global convection maps

Thermosphere : Measurements of the satellite CHAMP (400 km) The measurements are normalised by a quiet time model Coef. = 2 => augmentation de 100% of the density. Weak signal for Dst >-15 otherwise the density increases by a factor 1.5 to 2.5 (good agreement with the study of Krauss et al (2015) ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Some results obtained in one year of measurements (2002) during the cycle 23 maximum From – 35 SSC identified in 2002 – 51 CME with an identified solar source (if no halo CME has been identified we search for a partial CME) – Characterisation of the perturbation recorded at L1 before the SSC – Geomagnetic indices – Ionosphere (Super Darn, Thermosphere CHAMP) – Only a few of in situ magnetosphere observations (Cluster operated until July 2002) ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Some results Association YES/NOT with CME  SSC – propagation in a time window ~1 to 5 days (ballistic propagation ballistic between 300 km/s and 1500 km/s) – When there is an association, work on the model of propagation using a drag model. If you know the velocity at the starting point and the velocity at the arrival the drag coefficient Ss can be determined with more precision. – Using empiric models does not give better results ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Comparison SSC at L1 Characteristics at L1 Nb Mean SSC amplitude > 35 nT Large Dst -200<.<-100 nT Intense storms Medium Dst -100<.< -50 nT Moderate storms Weak Dst > -50 nT Weak storms ICME 17 7**8**45 CIR-SIR * OTHER (SW) UNCLEAR ICME Total 31 *** * Co rotating interaction region (SIR visible in more than one rotation) ** Only two events with large amplitude (> 35 nT) correspond to large Dst (not link to the shock but to the compression) *** 31 for 35 SSC because 4 pairs of sscs ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Characteristics of 35 SSC sources: 51 CME and solar source Type of SSC origin1 Solar source multi sources No solar souce Total CMEH66 CMEN55 2 CMEN,H ; 3 sources CIR -SIR55 No ID55 Total ESWW12 Ostende November 2015 With 4 false detections (ICME not detected in L1) 26 Halo CMEs only 16 impacted the Earth with SSCs. 25

Propagation speed CME at L1 After identification, drag coefficient for a drag model Coefficient (10-7 km-1) >1.5 Case Number Only 23 cases of ejections have been considered. No correlation with the speed May be some correlation with the mass ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

Conclusions and perspectives (1) From the Sun to the Earth Association CME – SSC: One year of data during the solar maximum; Relatively low number for a good statistic Results: variable 35 SSC 51 CME ESWW12 Ostende November 2015

25 from the 35 SSC associated with CME and identified solar source; 4 CIR; 5 unclear 11 SSC clear identified with one ICME 14 of the 25 SSC are due to multiple CMEs (can explain the « unclear » case at L1) L1 : 19 ICME identifiable 5 SSC with no identified solar source (no CME neither CIR) Speed model have to be upgraded ESWW12 Ostende November 2015 Conclusions and perspectives (2)

Conclusions and perspectives (3) The 2002 data are in a data base (1996_2007) at ias.u-psud.fr which should publish in a paper (in preparation) We need to increase the statistic base: – To complete the results in 2002 with results of other papers. – To use a data base – To complete with data of new satellites in operation since 2007 (STEREO..) Future study : SSC without CME Atelier Météo Meudon juin 2015 NCW

Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas Thank for your attention Acknowledgment: PNST.

Vitesse de propagation CME vers L1 Après identification, calcul du coefficient de freinage dans le modèle avec freinage: Coefficient (10-7 km-1) >1.5 Nb cas10841 Le calcul n’a pu se faire que sur 23 cas Pas de corrélation trouvée avec la vitesse d’éjection  regarder la masse ESWW12 Ostende November 2015