2 nd Supervisory Board Package 3.1 Summary OUTLINE University Secondment PACMAN alignment bench 25/09/2015 by Iordan Doytchinov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solomon William KAMUGASA
Advertisements

Silvia Zorzetti. PACMAN CLICScientific ProjectThe Team PACMAN (Particle Accelerator Components Metrology and Alignment to the Nanometer Scale) Ph.D. training.
CSIR CMM AUDIT PROGRAMME - RESULTS AND LESSONS LEARNT Speaker : F. J. van der Walt
Integrating a Short Range Laser Probe with a 6-DOF Vertical Robot Arm and a Rotary Table Theodor Borangiu Anamaria Dogar
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, A. HERTY, A. MARIN, M. ACAR PERMANENT MONITORING OF THE LHC LOW BETA TRIPLETS: LATEST RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES.
Measuring the magnetic axis of quadrupoles by a stretched wire Domenico Caiazza CLIC Workshop 2015.
Alignment Strategy for Light Source Facilities LCLS Case Catherine LeCocq SLAC 03/31/08.
Yurii Levashov LCLS Undulator Fiducialization October 20, 2005 *Work supported in part by DOE Contract DE-AC02-76SF LCLS.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Physics.
Robert Ruland Intra Girder Assembly and Alignment - October 20, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 Intra.
A Laser Based Alignment System for the CLIC project
Pre-alignment solutions applied to girders 1/19 Sylvain GRIFFET, 06/07/2010.
PACMAN Workshop OUTLINE Introduction ESR 3.1 Challenges - Stability budget and Precision Mechanical Design - Precision Assembly of MBQ and BPM - System.
역운동학의 구현과 응용 Implementation of Inverse Kinematics and Application 서울대학교 전기공학부 휴먼애니메이션연구단 최광진
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
H. SCHMICKLER Alignment challenges for a future linear collider.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for {JPSS Algorithm} Presented by Date.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Iordan Doytchinov ESR3.1, WP3 1.
HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.
Vasileios Vlachakis Early Stage Researcher 1.3, Work Package 1 Mid-Term Review 28-19/05/2015.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
H. MAINAUD DURAND PACMAN WP1 OUTLINE Tasks & role of associated partner Plans for training.
High Resolution Models using Monte Carlo Measurement Uncertainty Research Group Marco Wolf, ETH Zürich Martin Müller, ETH Zürich Dr. Matthias Rösslein,
1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
STATUS of the final PACMAN bench integration PACMAN meeting 11/06/2015 Hélène Mainaud Durand.
Objective Read World Uncertainty Analysis CMSC 2003 July Tim Nielsen Scott Sandwith.
DBQ support – motorization and performance upgrade Mateusz Sosin EN/MEF-SU.
J. A. Thornby 1,2, R. J. Sanders 2,3, R. Hyde-Moxon 3 1 Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL 2 WMG, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL 3 METRIS,
ESR 3.1 Introduction Iordan Doytchinov
Vasileios Vlachakis Early Stage Researcher 1.3, Work Package 1 Mid-Term Review 28-19/05/2015.
Robotics Systems Robotics CIM Introduction to Automation
The AstraZeneca Research Grant Nigeria
Status of training program N. Catalán Lasheras
Validation of the Measurement Performance of a 3-D Vision Sensor by means of a Coordinate Measuring Machine Giovanna Sansoni1, Simone Carmignato2, Enrico.
New ISO standards Christfried Pumm Wenzel Präzision
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fiducials Requirements Fabien Rey ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group ACCELERATOR TECHNICAL BOARD 23/09/2015.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group Interface Workshops for ESS Warm-Linac: ISrc - LEBT.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
Fiducialisation and initial alignment of components for CLIC Mateusz Sosin on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC Workshop 2015.
PACMAN Error Inventory OUTLINE The PACMAN task The Inventory of contributors The Evaluation Method Critical Areas Outcome 08/10/2015 by Iordan Doytchinov.
SUM ESR ESR ESR ESR ESR ESR ESR ESR (TBC)
3 Months Viva OUTLINE What is CLIC and PACMAN projects - Why PACMAN - what is the PACMAN challenge? What is project 3.1 of PACMAN PhD Thesis - Thesis subject.
Requirements concerning the interface linking the BPM to the quadrupole M. Wendt, S. Zorzetti.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
Status of physics analysis Fabrizio Cei On Behalf of the Physics Analysis Group PSI BVR presentation, February 9, /02/2015Fabrizio Cei1.
PACMAN : technical objectives Hélène Mainaud Durand.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
BRAINSTORMING ON LASER BASED SOLUTIONS FOR CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, BE/ABP/SU, 09/02/2010 Status of the study CLIC pre-alignment.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team Status on CLIC pre-alignment studies.
NCSLI 2007 In House Capability of an Optical CMM Calibration for any Company Shawn Mason Boston Scientific.
Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
PACMAN impact on future module design
Vasileios Vlachakis 28-19/05/2015 Mid-Term Review
Recent developments on micro-triangulation
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
OUTLINE Accelerator Pre-alignment background
Ddd 4-Slides Challenge Silvia Zorzetti.
WP1 Metrology & Alignment
Welcome to the National Physical Laboratory
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
LCLS Undulator Fiducialization
Network Design What is network design? What are the methods?
Results of the 1st year of the program Title
Accuracy and comparability of xCT measurements
Results of the 1st year of the program Title
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Presentation transcript:

2 nd Supervisory Board Package 3.1 Summary OUTLINE University Secondment PACMAN alignment bench 25/09/2015 by Iordan Doytchinov

University 2  1 st year University review passed.  Advancing literature review for thesis. Topics in state of art literature reviewed: PhD title: “Measurement Uncertainty Budget for future particle accelerators alignment bench” -Standards for Uncertainty Evaluation, GUM, ISO, ASME as applied to various metrology systems -Error budgets in precision machine design -Uncertainty budgets in Metrology CT evaluation systems -Uncertainty budgets in Articulated CMM arms Uncertainty Evaluation -Uncertainty budgets in Task Specific CMM Uncertainty Evaluation, The Virtual CMM’s During Secondment as part of project assigned -Current state of art in accelerator pre-alignment uncertainty budgets papers Gap of knowledge

Secondment 3 2) Registration B to C Experiments Clamp common fiducial Requirements: U(A-B) <= 300 µm? U(B-C) <= 100 µm at real time? Fluoroscopy and CT Surgical robot Planned trajectory Location on bone A C 1)Registration of location of A to B Experiment B 1 st June – 11 th of September 3+ months

Secondment Measurement Traceability? Metrology systems 1 st June – 11 th of September 3+ months -Reviewed relevant ISO, ASME and state of art -Developed artefacts and measurement methods for uncertainty evaluation via the ‘substitution method’ of both arm and CT -Written Monte Carlo Error based error budget MATLAB tool. errorEncoders Q2 and Q3 = +- 3 arc minutes or deg (at Q mean = 280deg) (Gaussian distribution) errorEncoders Q4, Q5, Q6 = +- 6 arc minutes or +-0.1deg (at Q mean 60deg) (Gaussian distribution Polar Coordinates future design error propagation of angle based Gaussian errors: Up to 6DoF with 3DoF wrist joint at the end of the polar coordinate x,y,z arm errorEncoders Angles = +- 6 arc minutes or +-0.1deg (at Q mean 60deg) (Gaussian distribution error on Linear Encoder = +-1 micro meter STDX = mm STDY = mm STDY = mm Error PCT VS CMM Zehatz Fiducial Error CT VS CMM Zehatz Fiducial Error PCT VS CMM Iordan Fiducial +- 3 to +-6 arc minutes or deg Gaussian distribution angle Err. STD Y = mm

5 PACMAN alignment bench BPM axis determination Wire Sensor GUM Supplement 1, 2008 ISO GPS part 2 Reproduction  Version 1 of Error sources completed by 2 nd of October  To apply Virtual CMM and ‘substitution’ method with artefacts to study CMM Uncertainty (both with none contact and tactile sensor of CMM.  Highest error sources expected: -Thermal Issues -Magnetic influence -Uncertainties based on methodology  To perform series of experiments in order to map the PDE distributions of the biggest contributors. To evaluate various measurement strategies expected uncertainty

Thank you for listening 6