Doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/0618r1 Submission July 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 TGu Down Selection Procedure Notice: This document has been.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission January 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Definitions and Terminology Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1006r0 Submission September 2005 Andrew McDonald, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Initial Network Selection Concept Notice: This document.
Suggested TGu Down Selection
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: March 2006 March 2006
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGu Motions Date: Authors: September 2006 September 2006
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: March 2006 March 2006
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: September 2005
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 March 2006
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
Selection Procedure Recommendation
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: November 2006 November 2006
Authentication Cluster
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Authentication Cluster
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Document Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 November 2005
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
November Opening Report
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
3GPP2 Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: January 2006 January 2006
TGu liaisons Date: Authors: March 2006 March 2006
January Opening Report
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 May 2007
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2005 May 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGu Down Selection Procedure
TGu Motions Date: Authors: September 2006 September 2006
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
TGu Motions Date: Authors: March 2006 March 2006
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0618r1 Submission July 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 TGu Down Selection Procedure Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0618r1 Submission July 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 2 Abstract This document provides some initial thoughts on the down selection procedure for TGu. It is based in part on the TGn selection process (03/665r9)

doc.: IEEE /0618r1 Submission July 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 3 Background TGu addresses a number of different technical areas in order to facilitate interworking with external networks –For example, some aspects may be protocol related, others are API issues The complete functional requirements are being captured in 05/279r15. They are grouped according to technical areas referred to as “clusters”.

doc.: IEEE /0618r1 Submission July 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 4 Definitions Functional Requirements: A list of mandatory features, performances and behaviors of the amendment. Cluster: the set of functional requirements for a particular technical area. Complete Proposal: A proposal that does not violate the PAR and meets all of the Functional Requirements associated with a Cluster. All complete proposals shall disclose how the Functional Requirements are met. Partial Proposal: A proposal that does not violate the PAR but is not complete i.e. addresses a subset of the requirements in a Cluster. All partial proposals should disclose which Functional Requirements they meet and how they meet them.

doc.: IEEE /0618r1 Submission July 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 5 Process (part I) Step 1: Adopt Terms and Definitions Step 2: Adopt Functional Requirements Procedure Start Step 3: Issue Call for Proposals

doc.: IEEE /0618r1 Submission July 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 6 Process (part II) Step 4: Initial Presentation of Proposal For each cluster: Mergers? Step 5: Carry out mergers etc. Step 6: Discard Unmerged Proposals (partial) >1 Proposal? Step 7: Elimination Procedure Step 8: Confirmation Vote <75%? Step 9: No Vote Resolution Step 10: Combine Cluster Proposals Step 11: Internal Review >75%? Step 12: Vote on whether to forward to WG Step 13: Forward to WG for LB Y N Y Y N N N Y

doc.: IEEE /0618r1 Submission July 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 7 Process Notes Step 9: includes getting comments from no voters etc. Step 10: can start once one or more clusters have been addressed (i.e. a single solution for a particular cluster has been selected and confirmed). Step 11: includes checking all mandatory requirements have been met. At the start of each meeting; the latest draft document produced by editor should be confirmed, plus have a confirmation vote to approve the latest draft.