OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20101 The PLM Reference model in the context of SE Scenario #1 V0.6 December 7 th 2010 Gray Bachelor Mike Loeffler OSLC PLM Workgroup.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® IBM Software Group © IBM Corporation WS-Policy Attachment- spec overview Maryann Hondo IBM.
Advertisements

OLSC PLM Workgroup1 DOORS input for OSLC Storyboard V0.2 15/4 Gray Bachelor.
IBM Software Group | Rational software OSLC Support for PLE.
OSLC PLM Workgroup1 Towards detailed use cases and alignment to OSLC V0.2 Gray Bachelor 19 th July 2011.
OSLC ALM-PLM interoperability Workgroup1 OSLC PLM workgroup 2012 Kick off meeting For discussion.
June 5–9 Orlando, Florida IBM Innovate 2011 Integrated Application Lifecycle Management / Product Lifecycle Management for System Development Environments.
Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
OSLC PLM Workgroup1 Analysing the PLM reference model V0.3 Gray Bachelor.
L4-1-S1 UML Overview © M.E. Fayad SJSU -- CmpE Software Architectures Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor Computer Engineering Department, Room #283I.
The Process of Interaction Design. Overview What is Interaction Design? —Four basic activities —Three key characteristics Some practical issues —Who are.
Configuration management. Reasons for software configuration management  it facilitates the ability to communicate  status of documents, coding, changes.
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
Project Name Group Name: Customer: Name of Customer Project Manager: Student Name1 Project Facilitator: Student Name1 Customer Liaison/Domain Expert:Student.
Requirements Analysis 4. 1 Use Case I b504.ppt © Copyright De Montfort University 2000 All Rights Reserved INFO2005 Requirements Analysis Use-Cases.
12 December, 2012 Katrin Heinze, Bundesbank CEN/WS XBRL CWA1: European Filing Rules CWA1Page 1.
Using SysML to Estimate SoS Engineering and Development Effort Jo Ann Lane Tim Bohn COCOMO.
For OSLC PLM Workgroup meeting 7th Dec Analysis of the OSLC Specs and the PLM Reference model in the context of SE Scenario #1 V0.6 December 7 th.
David Chen IMS-LAPS University Bordeaux 1, France
OSLC Working group meeting1 PLM extensions proposal feedback Updated from OSLC workgroup call 18/10/11.
OSLC ALM-PLM interoperability Discussion. OSLC PLM extensions Product Product, Version isVersionOf AMG54556_002 Product, View hasView AMG54556/001-View.
GIT SysML Parametrics Work Presenter GIT Product & System Lifecycle.
OSLC PLM Workgroup visit URL for terms of usage1 Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration OSLC PLM Workgroup Systems Engineering scenario #1 Systems Engineer.
Story 2 Preconditions – Step2.0 AMG54556/002 Top Level HSUVExample released and Open in Teamcenter Rich Client Requirements Manager.
Interfacing Registry Systems December 2000.
Development Process and Testing Tools for Content Standards OASIS Symposium: The Meaning of Interoperability May 9, 2006 Simon Frechette, NIST.
1 UML Basic Training. UML Basic training2 Agenda  Definitions: requirements, design  Basics of Unified Modeling Language 1.4  SysML.
© 2012 IBM Corporation Best Practices for Publishing RDF Vocabularies Arthur Ryman,
Design Management: a Collabortive Design Solution ECMFA 2013 Montpellier, France Maged Elaasar (Presenter) Senior Software Engineer, IBM
June 5–9 Orlando, Florida IBM Innovate 2011 Session Track Template Rainer Ersch Senior Research Scientist Siemens AG ALM-1180.
Unified Modeling Language* Keng Siau University of Nebraska-Lincoln *Adapted from “Software Architecture and the UML” by Grady Booch.
OSLC PLM Workgroup1 ALM-PLM terms Prep for Oct 5th.
Thomas Klement, XBRL Germany, Towards More Semantic Accuracy in the Processing of XBRL Facts 5th October 2006, 1st Technical Meeting.
OSLC PLM Workgroup visit URL for terms of usage1 OSLC PLM Workgroup PLM Scenarios Systems Engineering scenario “Systems Engineer Reacts to Changed Requirements”
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
OLSC PLM Workgroup1 DOORS input for OSLC Storyboard V0.1 Gray Bachelor.
OSLC PLM Reference model April Summary of the OSLC PLM Reference Model V0.4 April 4th 2011 Gray Bachelor Mike Loeffler OSLC PLM Workgroup.
Dictionary based interchanges for iSURF -An Interoperability Service Utility for Collaborative Supply Chain Planning across Multiple Domains David Webber.
EXPRESS/UML aka Part 25 Edition 2 Bath STEP July 2004.
OSLC Core extensions proposal
OSLC PLM Workgroup visit web-site for terms of usage1 Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration OSLC PLM Workgroup Systems Engineering scenario #1 Systems.
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division Development Process and Testing Tools for Content Standards Simon Frechette National Institute of Standards.
OSLC RM 22 nd June 2009 Workgroup meeting
OSLC PLM workgroup workings1 OSLC PLM Spec analysis Consolidation from previous discussions 29/3 inc meeting notes.
© OSLC OSLC PLM Workgroup1 OSLC Core extensions proposal Update of the Core WG proposal V0.9.
Metadata Driven Aspect Specification Ricardo Ferreira, Ricardo Raminhos Uninova, Portugal Ana Moreira Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal 7th International.
Systems Engineering Concept Model (SECM) Status 03/17/2016 John Watson.
® IBM Software Group © 2009 IBM Corporation Viewpoints and Views in SysML Dr Graham Bleakley
International Workshop 28 Jan – 2 Feb 2011 Phoenix, AZ, USA Modeling Standards Activity Team Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Initiative Roger Burkhart.
1 Copyright © 2013 by Lockheed Martin Corporation 8/1/2013 John Watson Lockheed Martin Document Definition and Generation within a SysML Model.
PLM-MBSE integration discussion
CM Spec analysis Markup from discussion 15/3. Summary of the scenario by way of the key business entities & their relationships CR Req Implem System or.
Uwe Kaufmann SysML adoption issues OMG SysML Roadmap WG
SysML/AP233 Mapping Status INCOSE IW MSDS Report Phil Spiby and Allison Feeney 1.
Draft for discussion1 OSLC PLM roadmap discussion Aug 30 th 2011 Rainer Ersch Gray Bachelor V0.4 updated at meeting Aug 30th.
SysML v2 Model Interoperability & Standard API Requirements Axel Reichwein Consultant, Koneksys December 10, 2015.
OSLC PLM Reference model February Summary of the OSLC PLM Reference Model V0.2 February 22 nd 2011 Gray Bachelor Mike Loeffler OSLC PLM Workgroup.
OSLC PLM Workgroup1 Towards detailed use cases and alignment to OSLC V0.1 Gray Bachelor 18 th July 2011.
SysML/AP233 Mapping Status Report to SE DSIG David Price Allison Feeney June 2009.
© 2013 © 2016 Aras aras.com.
Model-based design inspection based on traceability information models and design slicing Shiva Nejati April 15, 2015.
Interface Concepts Modeling Core Team
Systems Engineering Concept Model (SECM) Update
SysML v2 Formalism: Requirements & Benefits
SysML v2 Usability Working Session
SysML 2.0 Model Lifecycle Management (MLM) Working Group
SysML 2.0 – Systems Engineering Process (SEP) Working Group
Systems Engineering Concept Model (SECM) Status Update
System Modeling Assessment & Roadmap Joint OMG/INCOSE Working Group
REC Data Specification and UK Link File Formats
Presentation transcript:

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20101 The PLM Reference model in the context of SE Scenario #1 V0.6 December 7 th 2010 Gray Bachelor Mike Loeffler OSLC PLM Workgroup

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20102 Acknowledgements OSLC PLM Workgroup  Mike Loeffler  Gray Bachelor

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20103 Overview of the PLM Reference Model The objective of the model is to provide a representative description of PLM information related to the scenario Certain standard representations have been selected to address the concerns of Scenario #1  SysML and STEP Due to their ability to represent aspects of context, requirements and system implementation Due to the motive to support modelling

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20104 The PLM reference model to support Scenario #1 Primary concerns  CR – Change Request  Req – Requirement  Context – Product and System context e.g. classification, configuration, effectivity  Implem – Product and System implementation in models and documents CR Req Implem System or product context Controlled config

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20105 Overview of the proposed PLM Reference Model content Based on the OMG SysML education example with enhancements for PLM Main elements  SysML model representations Requirements Diagram Block diagrams  STEP text, xml and OWL representations Example instance  Hybrid SUV Based upon the OMG SysML model with extensions to support the scenario and to provide a viable reference model

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20106 STEP supports PLM representation of System & Product decomposition e.g. AP233

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20107 PLM Reference model can be further built out to support model driven development Base diagram from OMG Applied in the PLM Reference Model

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20108 Summary of the enhancements made to OMG Hybrid SUV example Base OMG SysML modelExtension for OSLC PLM Reference ModelNotes Automotive Domain Breakdown diagram 1.Automotive domain block is versionedContainer not versioned in the model (How implemented in Topcased) Operational Use case diagram No changeNot include on-boarding of energy e.g fuel or battery charging Diagram HSUV Specification Requirements diagram 1.Version annotation to each element – requirement, block 2.Variant requirements 3.Variant requirements associated with implementation variants 4.Variant expressions 1.Satisfies by was in separate diagram 2.There is no recognised standard for variant expressions HSUV Breakdown (Block) diagrams 1.Versioning at the block level 2.Block level annotation for the xml extract Power Sub-system Block Definition Diagram (BDD) & Internal Block Diagrams (IBD) Three variants with appropriate decomposition 1.Version annotation to each element – requirement, block 2.Alternative implementation of the Power Control Unit block The IBD is named Combined Motor Generator Power Control Unit Breakdown diagrams 1.Break out the Calibration and Software to be part of the assembly 2.Version annotation to each element – requirement, block To reflect current practice. Compatibility not addressed e.g. effectivity or explicitly

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/20109 Note The PLM Reference model is proposed for adoption by the OSLC PLM Working Reference as a 1.0

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/ Relevant OSLC Links Systems Engineering Scenario #1  Systems Engineer Reacts to Changed Requirements services.net/bin/view/Main/PlmSystemsEngineeringScenarioSystemsEngineerReactsto ChangedRequirements services.net/bin/view/Main/PlmSystemsEngineeringScenarioSystemsEngineerReactsto ChangedRequirements Proposed PLM Reference Model  Reference model contribution  services.net/bin/view/Main/PlmScenariosGm services.net/bin/view/Main/PlmScenariosGm Existing Specs  Consult the Appendix for related links

OSLC PLM Workgroup 7/12/ For more information Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration PLM Workgroup  Contacts  Dr Rainer Ersch, Siemens  Gray Bachelor, IBM  Mike Loeffler, GM