What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September 8, /8/2014 Margarita Pillado -- Faculty Accreditation Coordinator -- Los Angeles Pierce College 1.
Advertisements

1 Preparing for Institutional Self Study Dr. Barbara Beno, President Dr. Steve Maradian, Vice President 20 June 2008.
Fall 2013 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges D ISCUSSION WITH E XPERTS.
1 Preparing for Institutional Self Study Dr. Deborah G. Blue, Vice President Mr. Jack Pond, Vice President Fall 2005.
Faculty WASC Information Session January 18, 2011.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
A Presentation for Peralta Community College District Governing Board By Thomas E. Henry, PCCD Fiscal Adviser November 10,
ACCREDITATION UPDATE: PREPARING FOR THE OCTOBER 2014 VISIT.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
1 Cosumnes River College’s Institutional Self Study Norv Wellsfry Fall 2007.
The Faculty Leadership Role on Accreditation Julie Bruno, Sierra College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Chris Hill, Grossmont College Richard Mahon, Riverside.
March 23, 2009 Accreditation and Trusteeship: What Every Board Should Know A Presentation for Rancho Santiago CCD By Barbara Beno, President ACCJC.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Accreditation in a Multi-College District Accreditation Institute Academic Senate for California Community Colleges February 11, 2012, 1:00-2:00pm John.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
Accreditation Hot Topics Marcy Alancraig - Cabrillo College Janet Fulks - Bakersfield College.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
The Process of Accreditation
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Meeting Accreditation Challenges. WASC Standards Standard I: Evaluation, integrated planning, implementation, and re- evaluation to verify and improve.
1 Preparing for Institutional Accreditation Evaluation Dr. Barbara Beno, President Deborah G. Blue, Vice President Dr. Lily Owyang, Associate Vice President.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Standard III Resources Effective Practices in Accreditation ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA Cheryl Aschenbach, ASCCC At-large.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
The Infrastructure of Accreditation: The Department of Education and The Regional Accreditors ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Classified Leadership Institute 2016 Hope Ell Theresa Rees Misty Burruel Sherrie Guerrero ACCREDITATION, PROGRAM REVIEW, AND THE CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONAL.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
2018 Institution Self Evaluation Report (ISER) Joanne Whitaker and Sunny Pai Co-Chairs for ISER September 12, 2016.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
MSJC Accreditation Classified Professional Day – March 22,2017
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Committee Orientation
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
All About Resources: Standard III
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
Zaida O’Connor, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, College of the Canyons
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
ISER Committee Presentations
MISSION VISION VALUES Planning Retreat
Accreditation 2016 A student’s guide.
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Academic Senate The ISER What you need to know. 9/19/2018
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation is a voluntary process of quality review that institutions agree to undergo periodically. The accrediting commission with responsibility for accreditation in various regions are legally recognized by the federal government.

How is Center to College Status Conducted?  Basic Phases:  Candidacy (ACCJC)  Needs Study (CCCCO)  Initial Accreditation (ACCJC)  We’re a college!

Internal Evaluation (Self-Evaluation) The institution engages in comparing itself to Accreditation Standards, writes an internal evaluation report, develops its own plans for improvement where needed, and submits the written analysis to the Accrediting Commission.

Self- Improvement Whether the institution meets the current Accreditation Standards or not, about self-improvement and each institution uses the recommendations of the external evaluation team and the Commission to guide changes that make their educational quality better.

Format of the Internal Evaluation Introduction Organization of Self Evaluation Process Organizational Information Certification of Continued Institutional Compliance with 20 Eligibility Requirements. Responses to Recommendations from the Most Recent Educational Quality and Institutional Effectiveness Review (Self Evaluation) – eight recommendations Structure of the Institutional Analysis (Standards)

Analysis of Each Standard  The following three elements should guide the structure of the analysis of each of the Standards:  Descriptive Summary  Self Evaluation  Actionable Improvement Plans

Commission Requirements for Evidence Student Achievement Data Evidence of Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment of Outcomes Evidence of Quality Program Review Evidence of Quality Student Support Services Evidence of Financial Performance and Integrity Evidence of Compliance with other Areas Related to Federal Requirements. Distance Education and Correspondence Education Public Information Campus Sites

The ACCJC Accreditation Standards consists of four fundamental standards, each divided into subsections, that describe the best practices for education quality and institutional effectiveness.

Standard I Institutional Mission and Effectiveness  Mission  Improving Institutional Effectiveness

Standard I: Institutional Mission and Effectiveness A. Mission The institution has a statement of mission that defines the institution’s broad educational purposes, its intended student population, and its commitment to achieving student learning. 1. The institution establishes student learning programs and services aligned with its purposes, its character, and its student population. 2. The mission statement is approved by the governing board and published. 3. Using the institution's governance and decision-making processes, the institution reviews its mission statement on a regular basis and revises it as necessary. 4. The institution’s mission is central to institutional planning and decision making.

Standard II Student Learning Programs and Services  Instructional Programs  Student Support Services  Library and Learning Support Services

Standard III Resources  Human Resource  Physical Resource  Technology Resources  Financial Resources

Standard IV Leadership and Governance  Decision-making Roles and Processes  Board  Administrative Organization

Resources ACCJC Website – Accreditation Reference Handbook Manual for Institutional Self Evaluation Guide to Evaluating Institutions Guide to Evaluating Distance Education and Correspondence Education College Website