Hybrid designs - directions and potential 1 Alessandro D’Elia, R. M. Jones and V. Khan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Advertisements

Choke-mode Damped X-band Structure for CLIC Main Linac Hao ZHA, Jiaru SHI CERN Sep 27, 2011 Jiaru Shi, LCWS11 Workshop, Granada1.
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
ABSTRACT We report on the suppression of long-range wakefields in the main linacs of the CLIC collider. This structure operates with 2π/3 phase advance.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
July Alexej Grudiev, Improvement of CLIC structure. Possible improvement of the CLIC accelerating structure. From CLIC_G to CLIC_K Alexej.
4th CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), 26 th - 28 th May Alternate Means of Wakefield Suppression in CLIC Main Linac Roger M. Jones, Vasim Khan,
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS Vasim Khan
Vasim Khan 4th Annual X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN /36 CLIC_DDS & Test Structure V. Khan, A. D’Elia, R. Jones A.
1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS Vasim Khan. 24 cells No interleaving 48cells 2-fold interleaving ∆fmin = 32.5 MHz ∆tmax =30.76 ns ∆s = 9.22 m 24 cells No interleaving.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN AND FORTCOMING Vasim Khan & Roger Jones V. Khan LC-ABD 09, Cockcroft Institute /14.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /21 CLIC_DDS_HPA study
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /24 CLIC_DDS study
WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN THE MAIN LINACS OF CLIC Vasim Khan The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and Technology, Daresbury, Warrington, WA4 4AD.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
DDS limits and perspectives Alessandro D’Elia on behalf of UMAN Collaboration 1.
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
Structures design R&D program Alessandro D’Elia-UMAN/CI and CERN On behalf of Roger M. Jones 1.
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev.
RF structure design KT high-gradient medical project kick-off Alberto Degiovanni TERA Foundation - EPFL.
New RF design of CLIC DB AS Alexej Grudiev, BE-RF.
SRF CAVITY GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION FOR THE ILC WITH MINIMIZED SURFACE E.M. FIELDS AND SUPERIOR BANDWIDTH The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and.
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator A.Grudiev.
CLIC crab cavity design Praveen Ambattu 24/08/2011.
PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.
Recent high-gradient results, rf testing, places and plans Steffen Döbert, CLIC Workshop, Test facilities High gradient results Future testing.
The CLIC accelerating structure development program Walter Wuensch CARE05 23 November 2005.
Sensitivity of HOM Frequency in the ESS Medium Beta Cavity Aaron Farricker.
WP 9.2 DDS Status, R.M. Jones, 25 th Oct 2010, WebEx Phone-in, Geneva 1 WP 9.2: DDS Status Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The University of Manchester.
Optimisation of single bunch linacs for possible FEL upgrades Alexej Grudiev, CERN 6/02/2014 CLIC14 workshop.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
1 Design and objectives of test accelerating structures Riccardo Zennaro.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
ELI and other things A. D’Elia 1. C-BAND STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-BUNCH RF LINACS: ELI_NP PROPOSAL Bunch charge 250 pC Number of bunches 40 Bunch distance.
Damped and Detuned Structures for CLIC The University of Manchester The Cockcroft Institute 4/10/2013I.Nesmiyan1 Acknowledgements to colleagues at CERN,
A. D’Elia 1,2,3, T. Higo 4, V. F. Khan, R.M. Jones 1,2, A. Latina 3, I. Nesmiyan 1,2, G. Riddone 3 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of.
Damping intense wake-fields in the main Linacs and PETS structures of the CLIC Linear Collider Vasim Khan: 1 st year PhD Student Supervisor: Dr. Roger.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
Test Accelerating Structures Designs, Objectives and Critical Issues
New test structures for CLIC (RF design)
Vasim Khan & Roger Jones
A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
NC Accelerator Structures
CLIC_DDS study
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators
Review of rf structure test results
Developments on Proposed
Summary of the test structure design
Testing Infrastructure, Program and Milestones
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
TCLIA/TCTV transverse impedance simulation
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Progress in the design of a damped an
Presentation transcript:

Hybrid designs - directions and potential 1 Alessandro D’Elia, R. M. Jones and V. Khan

Outline 1.Conventional DDS limitations 2.A Hybrid Design as a possible CLIC_DDS_B 3.Single cell studies 4.Full structure designs and related wakefield damping 5.CLIC_G + Rect. Manifold studies 6.Conclusions 2

CLIC_DDS_A: regular cell optimization The choice of the cell geometry is crucial to meet at the same time: 1.Wakefield suppression 2.Surface fields in the specs CLIC_DDS_A- 8 Fold Interleaving Cell shape optimization for fields DDS1_CDDS2_E 3 CLIC_DDS_A-Single

A new approach: a Hybrid Structure for CLIC_DDS_B 4 WGD_Structure + DDS_Structure = Hybrid Structure

First steps on the Hybrid Structure 5 Erf distribution of the dipolar frequencies as in DDS Very high coupling of first dipolar band from cell to manifold via slot as in WGDS + The Erf distribution of the dipolar modes prevent to these modes to add in phase and this will result in a rapid decay of the wakefield in the short time scale; a high coupling will help when the mode will start to recohere in a longer time scale First three dipole bands are shown in the picture above; encircled is the avoided crossing region which is related to the coupling: here is ~1GHz in DDS_A was <200MHz

Some preliminary calculation 6 The following calculations refer to Str#3 (see Slide#39) V/[pc mm m] s (m) Damped (Q=270) Undamped (Q=6500) No interleaving V/[pc mm m] s (m) Damped (Q=600) Undamped (Q=6500) 2-Fold interleaving V/[pc mm m] s (m) Damped (Q=270) Undamped (Q=6500) 2-Fold interleaving

Summary table for new CLIC structure prototypes StructureCLIC-G-CDRCLIC-GCLIC-MCLIC-NCLIC-OCLIC-P Average loaded accelerating gradient [MV/m]100 RF phase advance per cell [rad]2π/3 Average iris radius to wavelength ratio Input, Output iris radii [mm]3.15, , , , , 1.94 Input, Output iris thickness [mm]1.67, 1.00 Input, Output group velocity [% of c]1.65, , , , , 0.53 First and last cell Q-factor (Cu)5536, 5738 First and last cell shunt impedance [ MΩ/m] 81, 103 Number of regular cells26 Structure active length [mm] Bunch spacing [ns]0.5 ns Filling time, rise time [ns]67, , , , , , 38.9 Number of bunches in the train Total pulse length [ns] Bunch population [10 9 ] Peak input power [MW] RF-to-beam efficiency [%] Maximum surface electric field [MV/m] Max. pulsed surface heating temperature rise [K] Maximum Sc [MW/mm 2 ] , , 6.9 P/C [MW/mm] , , 2.27 Luminosity per bunch X-ing [10 34 /m 2 ] Figure of Merit [10 25 %/m 2 ]

Basic Cell Parameters First CellLast Cell a (mm) L (mm) t (mm)40.7 eps22 b (mm) vg (%) fsyn (GHz) ksyn (V/[pc mm m]) g=L-t L b t/2 eps*t/2=elip First CellLast Cell

Cell 1 with manifold 9 Geometric Parameters b (mm) WGW (mm) 6 WGH (mm) 5 SlotH (mm) 2.5 Geometric Parameters b (mm) WGW (mm) 6 WGH (mm) 5 SlotW (mm) 3.5

Proposed 1 st Cell WGW SlotW WGH SlotH Parameters a (mm) 4.04 L (mm) t (mm) 4 eps 2 b (mm) WGW (mm) 6 WGH (mm) 5 SlotW (mm) 3.5 SlotH (mm) 3 Htot (mm) fsyn (GHz)  (GHz) Htot 10

Last Cell with Manifold 11 Geometric Parameters WGW (mm)6 WGH (mm)5 SlotH (mm) Fsyn (GHz) Vg (%)

Proposed 1 st and Last cells WGW SlotW WGH SlotH ParametersFirst Cell Last Cell Big Av. Cross Last Cell Big Band a (mm) L (mm) t (mm)40.7 eps222 b (mm) WGW (mm)666 WGH (mm)555 SlotW (mm) SlotH (mm) Htot (mm) fsyn (GHz)  (GHz) Vg (%) R/Q (k  /m) ksyn (V/[pC m mm]) Htot 12

Procedure adopted to build the full structure Build 1 st, Mid and Last Cells Distribute the frequencies in Erf fashion Optimize Erf sigma minimizing the wake on the first trailing bunch Use this sigma to distribute iris radii and thicknesses Tune the correct monopole frequency using cavity radius 13

First, Last and Mid cell parameters (Big Band) WGW SlotW WGH SlotH ParametersFirst Cell Mid Cell (Cell#14) Last Cell (Cell#27)* a (mm) L (mm) t (mm) eps222 b (mm) WGW (mm)666 WGH (mm)555 SlotW (mm) SlotH (mm) Htot (mm) fsyn (GHz)  (GHz) Vg (%) R/Q (k  /m) ksyn (V/[pC m mm]) Htot * This is used only to optimize the Erf 14

From 3 cells to the full structure From First, Mid and Last cell fsyn’s and kicks, we enforce a Gaussian distribution of Kdn/df as a function of f (for the details, please refer to Vasim’s PhD thesis or Roger Jones papers). The wake is  Kdn/df. Kick Distribution Fsyn Distribution 2 Kdn/df Wake envelope 15

Best n Best n=3.64   =

Geometrical parameters of the cells from Erf a 26 = SlotW 26 = t 26 = b will be used to tune the cell and SlotH will change accordingly to have Htot constant 17

Wakefield Str#1 (Large Band) 18 V/[pc mm m] s (m) Damped (Q=1350) Undamped (Q=6500) “Uncoupled” Wake NB: Reconstructed wake  Only 1 st Dipole band

Impedance Full Transverse Impedance (all dipoles) Transverse Impedance (First two dipole bands) 19 Peak Number

First, Last and Mid cell parameters (Big Av. Cross.) WGW SlotW WGH SlotH ParametersFirst Cell Mid Cell (Cell#14) Last Cell (Cell#27)* a (mm) L (mm) t (mm) eps222 b (mm) WGW (mm)666 WGH (mm)555 SlotW (mm) SlotH (mm) Htot (mm) fsyn (GHz)  (GHz) Vg (%) R/Q (k  /m) ksyn (V/[pC m mm]) Htot * This is used only to optimize the Erf 20

Wakefield Str#2 (Large Av. Crossing) GdfidL Reconstructed wake (only 1 st Dipole Band) 21 V/[pc mm m] s (m) Damped (Q=156) Undamped (Q=6500) “Uncoupled” Wake

Impedance Full Impedance First Dipole Impedance 22 Peak Number

What’s wrong? Design strategy is not correct to ensure Erf distribution on dipoles!!! 23 Non Erf distribution ~ Erf distribution Samples Str#1 Str#2 Peak Number

New strategy Fix First, Mid and last cell Optimize  Vary “a” and “t” accordingly to Erf with previous  Find out 7 fiducial values (4 + the 3 already found for 1 st, Mid and Last cell) in order to get fsyn vs “a/t/b” Get the distribution of fsyn corrected by ksyn Then optimize again  of the distribution of fsyn Known fsyn evaluated from Mathematica in the previous point, go back to fsyn vs “a/t/b” to find the geometrical parameters of the full structure 24

Detailed Procedure 25  in Re-optimize Sigma

First, Last and Mid cell parameters (Str#3) WGW SlotW WGH SlotH ParametersFirst Cell Mid Cell (Cell#14) Last Cell (Cell#27)* a (mm) L (mm) t (mm) eps222 b (mm) WGW (mm)666 WGH (mm)555 SlotW (mm)333 SlotH (mm) Htot (mm) fsyn (GHz)  (GHz) Vg (%) R/Q (k  /m) ksyn (V/[pC m mm]) Htot * This is used only to optimize the Erf 26

Optimized theoretical Fsyn vs Fsyn HFSS simulations for regular cells 27 Max  F=5MHz =1MHz

Wakefield: Comparison Str#2 and Str#3 28 Str3 Str2

Wakefield GdfidL Reconstructed wake (only 1 st Dipole band) 29

Impedance Full Impedance First Dipole Impedance 30 Peak Number

Comparison: Str3 coupled and uncoupled Coupled (reconstructed wake from GdfidL) Uncoupled It seems that the coupling changes the nature of the wake in the early meters 31

Is Q distribution playing a role? Uncoupled Q distribution plays a marginal role 32 Coupled

Let’s go back to Kdn/df (1) From Fsyn distribution we get dn/df, then we multiply by the kicks and we would expect to get a Gaussian-like distribution Uncoupled-DDS_A Coupled-DDS_A 33

Let’s go back to Kdn/df (2) Uncoupled-Str3 Coupled-Str3 34 First Dipole Impedance

What is the problem? 35 First Dipole Impedance Uncoupled Uncoupled with all 27 Fsyn’s Uncoupled with only 16 Fsyn’s

CLIC_G + Rect. manifold Linear tapering Cell parameters: CLIC_G Tapering: CLIC_G i.e. linear 36

WW=7.5 WH =6.5 Wpos=14.5 Wpos WW WH 37

38

39

H-H Boundary condition HFSS single cell simulations E-H Boundary condition 40 H-H Boundary condition E-H Boundary condition Hybrid DDS Hybrid “CLIC_G”

Conclusions We have shown that an average Q<200 can be achieved with this structure with a bandwidth ranging from 2.4-3GHz However strong coupling results in a change of the nature of dipole distribution The next step is to analyze the structure for a moderate damping (as in NLC, Q~ ) in order to preserve the nature of Erf distribution We have shown that with a Q<600, with 2-fold interleaving a good damping can be anyway achieved Further studies are needed but the structure looks promising 41

Additional slides 42

43