Janine Wotton, Kristin Welsh, Crystal Smith, Rachel Elvebak, Samantha Haseltine (Gustavus Adolphus College) and Barbara Shinn-Cunningham (Boston University).

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Speech Recognition Julia Hirschberg CS4706 (thanks to John-Paul Hosum for some slides)
Advertisements

Effects of Competence, Exposure, and Linguistic Backgrounds on Accurate Production of English Pure Vowels by Native Japanese and Mandarin Speakers Malcolm.
Coarticulation Analysis of Dysarthric Speech Xiaochuan Niu, advised by Jan van Santen.
18 and 24-month-olds use syntactic knowledge of functional categories for determining meaning and reference Yarden Kedar Marianella Casasola Barbara Lust.
Hillenbrand: Vowels1 The Acoustics and Perception of American English Vowels.
V Telecommunications Industry AssociationTR L.
Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context Snedeker and Trueswell (2003) Psych 526 Eun-Kyung Lee.
Effect of reverberation on loudness perceptionInsert footer on Slide Master© University of Reading Department of Psychology 12.
Nuclear Accent Shape and the Perception of Prominence Rachael-Anne Knight Prosody and Pragmatics 15 th November 2003.
Speaking Style Conversion Dr. Elizabeth Godoy Speech Processing Guest Lecture December 11, 2012.
Auditory Word Recognition
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Perceptual compensation for /u/-fronting in American English KATAOKA, Reiko Department.
Hemispheric asymmetries in the resolution of lexical ambiguity Jeffrey Coney, Kimberly David Evans Presented by Chris Evans May 17, 2006.
Visually-induced auditory spatial adaptation in monkeys and humans Norbert Kopčo, I-Fan Lin, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham, Jennifer Groh Center for Cognitive.
ICA Madrid 9/7/ Simulating distance cues in virtual reverberant environments Norbert Kopčo 1, Scott Santarelli, Virginia Best, and Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.
Effect of roving on spatial release from masking for amplitude-modulated noise stimuli Norbert Kopčo *, Jaclyn J. Jacobson, and Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.
Auditory Objects of Attention Chris Darwin University of Sussex With thanks to : Rob Hukin (RA) Nick Hill (DPhil) Gustav Kuhn (3° year proj) MRC.
Visually-induced auditory spatial adaptation in monkeys and humans Norbert Kopčo, I-Fan Lin, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham, Jennifer Groh Center for Cognitive.
20 10 School of Electrical Engineering &Telecommunications UNSW UNSW 10 Author: Jonathan Jayanthakumar An Analysis of the Role of the First.
Acoustical Society of America, Chicago 7 June 2001 Effect of Reverberation on Spatial Unmasking for Nearby Speech Sources Barbara Shinn-Cunningham, Lisa.
Perceptual Weighting Strategies in Normal Hearing and Hearing Impaired Children and Adults Andrea Pittman, Ph.D. Patricia Stelmachowicz, Ph.D. Dawna Lewis,
1 Improved Subjective Weighting Function ANSI C63.19 Working Group Submitted by Stephen Julstrom for October 2, 2007.
Vowel formant discrimination in high- fidelity speech by hearing-impaired listeners. Diane Kewley-Port, Chang Liu (also University at Buffalo,) T. Zachary.
Perceived prominence and nuclear accent shape Rachael-Anne Knight LAGB 5 th September 2003.
Adaptive Design of Speech Sound Systems Randy Diehl In collaboration with Bjőrn Lindblom, Carl Creeger, Lori Holt, and Andrew Lotto.
Estimates of Global Sea Level Rise from Tide Gauges Sea level trend,
RESPITE - Meeting Saillon Introduction ‘Full Combination’ Subband Approach.
speech, played several metres from the listener in a room - seems to have the same phonetic content as when played nearby - that is, perception is constant.
Calibration of Consonant Perception in Room Reverberation K. Ueno (Institute of Industrial Science, Univ. of Tokyo) N. Kopčo and B. G. Shinn-Cunningham.
Training Phase Results The RT difference between gain and loss was numerically larger for the second half of the trials than the first half, as predicted,
Sound Localization Strategies in Simple and Complex Environments Norbert Kopčo Department of Cybernetics and AI, TU Košice, Slovakia Hearing Research Center.
Phonetic Context Effects Major Theories of Speech Perception Motor Theory: Specialized module (later version) represents speech sounds in terms of intended.
Hearing Research Center
Pitch perception in auditory scenes 2 Papers on pitch perception… of a single sound source of more than one sound source LOTS - too many? Almost none.
Psychophysics and Psychoacoustics
The effects of working memory load on negative priming in an N-back task Ewald Neumann Brain-Inspired Cognitive Systems (BICS) July, 2010.
Speaker Identification by Combining MFCC and Phase Information Longbiao Wang (Nagaoka University of Technologyh, Japan) Seiichi Nakagawa (Toyohashi University.
Scaling Studies of Perceived Source Width Juha Merimaa Institut für Kommunikationsakustik Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Katherine Morrow, Sarah Williams, and Chang Liu Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Listeners weighting of cues for lateral angle: The duplex theory of sound localization revisited E. A. MacPherson & J. C. Middlebrooks (2002) HST. 723.
Room Acoustics DHC 161 March 2, Early sound in a room.
1 Level Acoustics, Eindhoven 2 Eindhoven University of Technology Nicole van Hout 1, 2 Constant Hak 2 Jikke Reinten 2 Heliante Kort 2 Speech Intelligibility.
PHYSICS CLASS ACTIVITY. CLASS ACTIVITY: TUNING FORK FREQUENCY.
Tonal Violations Interact with Lexical Processing: Evidence from Cross-modal Priming Meagan E. Curtis 1 and Jamshed J. Bharucha 2 1 Dept. of Psych. & Brain.
Signal detection Psychophysics.
A STUDY ON PERCEPTUAL COMPENSATION FOR / /- FRONTING IN A MERICAN E NGLISH Reiko Kataoka February 14, 2009 BLS 35.
Quantitative methods and R – (2) LING115 December 2, 2009.
Danielle Werle Undergraduate Thesis Intelligibility and the Carrier Phrase Effect in Sinewave Speech.
~ Sound ~ The Nature of Sound  Speed of Sound  Human hearing  Doppler effect  “Seeing” with sound.
Auditory Perception 1 Streaming 400 vs. 504 Hz 400 vs. 566 Hz 400 vs. 635 Hz 400 vs. 713 Hz A 400-Hz tone (tone A) is alternated with a tone of a higher.
Doppler Effect.
Auditory Localization in Rooms: Acoustic Analysis and Behavior
4aPPa32. How Susceptibility To Noise Varies Across Speech Frequencies
Original analyses All ROIs
Methods in Brain Research: psychophysics
The lexical/phonetic interface: Evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access Bob McMurray Richard N. Aslin Mickey K. TanenMouse.
On the PROCESSING of “might”
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Within a Mixed-Frequency Visual Environment
آشنايی با اصول و پايه های يک آزمايش
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Loudness asymmetry in real-room reverberation: cross-band effects
University of Maryland, College Park
Inference for Distributions
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2009)
EE Audio Signals and Systems
Various Technical Topics on the development of ASEP
New Subjective Weighting Function
New Subjective Weighting Function
Presentation transcript:

Janine Wotton, Kristin Welsh, Crystal Smith, Rachel Elvebak, Samantha Haseltine (Gustavus Adolphus College) and Barbara Shinn-Cunningham (Boston University). Sentence context influences vowel perception in reverberant conditions

Pseudo-anechoic Corner 1m Frequency (Hz) dB Time (ms) 0° H 0° V

gn a tn e t

Hillenbrand, Getty, Clark and Wheeler JASA (5) æε

F1 Hz F2 Hz gn a t n e t Sampled every 6 milliseconds 20 samples 24 samples æ ε

F2 Hz F1 Hz gn a t n e t + noise + noise + reverb Mean and standard deviation of formant values for single vowel utterance

Sentences convolved with impulse responses in either pseudo-anechoic or reverberant conditions Sentence conditions Target word consistent with context e.g. The cattle grazed in the meadow. Target word inconsistent with context e.g. The cattle boiled the water. Target word neutral with context e.g. The cattle went shopping. Stimuli presented dichotically (TDT). Response - subjects type what they hear.

No added noise open ended response N = 23 Significant comparisons 1) Reverberant Vs. pseudo- anechoic 2) Inconsistent condition Vs. others ** 3) Reverberant condition in inconsistent and neutral conditions * * * ** Substitution errors

Sum of errors Reverberant Pseudo-anechoic Number of trials each condition = 23*8 = 184 Number of trials each condition = 23*3*8 = 552

Added noise (S/N -8dB) open ended response N = 6 Significant comparisons 1) More errors in noise than no noise in all conditions 2) More errors in inconsistent than others. ** 3) More errors in inconsistent in reverberation than pseudo-anechoic * * ** Substitution errors

Conclusions 1)Increase the ambiguity of the vowel by adding noise or reverberation and the errors in the inconsistent condition increase. 2) In the consistent condition, noise increases the errors but the addition of reverberation does not. 3)The sentence context becomes more influential if the uncertainty of the vowel choice is increased. 4) The error pattern reveals a shift in bias rather than sensitivity for correctly responding with a consistent sentence.

Added noise 2AFC N = 6