Convergence And Trust in Earth and Space Science Data Systems Ted Habermann, NOAA National Geophysical Data Center Documentation: It’s not just discovery...

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Draft Standard for the CF Metadata Conventions Cheryl Craig and Russ Rew UCAR.
Advertisements

The Model Output Interoperability Experiment in the Gulf of Maine: A Success Story Made Possible By CF, NcML, NetCDF-Java and THREDDS Rich Signell (USGS,
1 Data Dictionary for the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Information System (WIS) Oct 2008 “Build to Share”
Integrating NOAA’s Unified Access Framework in GEOSS: Making Earth Observation data easier to access and use Matt Austin NOAA Technology Planning and Integration.
Connecting HDF And ISO Metadata Ted Habermann, NASA/ESDIS Hook Hua, Barry Weiss, NASA/Jet Propulsion Lab Mike Folk, Gerd Heber, Elena Pourmal, The HDF.
Data Discovery 1.Data discovery systems 2.TDS and metadata 3.NcISO services.
Ted Habermann – NOAA GEO-Integrated Data Environment (IDE)
NOAA Metadata Update Ted Habermann. NOAA EDMC Documentation Directive This Procedural Directive establishes 1) a metadata content standard (International.
Documentation Developments Ted Habermann, NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC Adoption of ISO Metadata Standards - Crossing the Chasm Facilitating the Transition Documentation.
Metadata (for the data users downstream) RFC GIS Workshop July 2007 NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC Documentation.
Quick Unidata Overview NetCDF Workshop 25 October 2012 Russ Rew.
Interoperability ERRA System.
Implementation of Model Data Interoperability for IOOS: Successes and Lessons Learned Rich Signell USGS Woods Hole, MA / NOAA Silver Spring USA Model Data.
Unidata’s TDS Workshop TDS Overview – Part II October 2012.
Interoperable Documentation Ted Habermann, NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC NCAR Earth Observing Laboratory, June 2010 Links: GEO-IDE Wiki:
Larger GIS Community Can answer: –Local questions at small extents Spatial and temporal extents limited –Global questions at low resolution (while ignoring.
Unidata TDS Workshop TDS Overview – Part I XX-XX October 2014.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Management of Oceanographic time-series data at the Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center.
Mid-Course Review: NetCDF in the Current Proposal Period Russ Rew
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A vision for a global community Linda Gundersen Director Science Quality and Integrity US Geological.
Accomplishments and Remaining Challenges: THREDDS Data Server and Common Data Model Ethan Davis Unidata Policy Committee Meeting May 2011.
The netCDF-4 data model and format Russ Rew, UCAR Unidata NetCDF Workshop 25 October 2012.
1 Global Systems Division (GSD) Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) NextGen Weather Data Cube Chris MacDermaid October, 2010.
Archival Information Packages for NASA HDF-EOS Data R. Duerr, Kent Yang, Azhar Sikander.
Metadata Implementation Ted Habermann NOAA National Geophysical Data Center Documentation: It’s not just discovery... 50% change in global average Why?
1 NOAA IOOS Program Data Integration Framework (DIF) Project Overview Adapted from a brief to the NOAA Data Management Committee August 6, 2008 by Jeff.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
GEO-IDE Community Building and Best Practices Process GEO-IDE Standards Process Denver Post, Sunday, 9 April 2006.
Documentation from NcML to ISO Ted Habermann, NOAA NESDIS NGDC.
Sharing Metadata Recommendations Ted Habermann, John Kozimor Earth Science The HDF Group 1 John Farley Raytheon.
IODE Ocean Data Portal – from data access to integration platform Sergey Belov, Tobias Spears, Nikolai Mikhailov International Oceanographic Data and Information.
EarthCube Building Block for Integrating Discrete and Continuous Data (DisConBB) David Maidment, University of Texas at Austin (Lead PI) Alva Couch, Tufts.
Workshop Resources.
Geospatial Interoperability Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NASA Geospatial Interoperability Office.
IOOS Data Services with the THREDDS Data Server Rich Signell USGS, Woods Hole IOOS DMAC Workshop Silver Spring Sep 10, 2013 Rich Signell USGS, Woods Hole.
THREDDS Catalogs Ethan Davis UCAR/Unidata NASA ESDSWG Standards Process Group meeting, 17 July 2007.
LTER Data Management Margaret O’Brien Santa Barbara Coastal Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Project Santa Barbara Channel Biodiversity Observation.
Unidata’s TDS Workshop TDS Overview – Part I July 2011.
® GEOSS AIP 5 Water SBA Update HDWG June 2012 Matt Austin NOAA Stefan Fuest KISTERS Jochen Schmidt NIWA.
Documenting UAF Data Ted Habermann NOAA/NESDIS/National Geophysical Data Center.
DRAFT EDMC Procedural Directives NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee 12/3/2015 1
WGISS and GEO Activities Kathy Fontaine NASA March 13, 2007 eGY Boulder, CO.
Creating Good Documentation NOAA National Geophysical Data Center
The Unified Access Framework for Gridded Data … the 1 st year focus of NOAA’s Global Earth Observation Integrated Data Environment (GEO-IDE) Steve Hankin,
Space Observations Ocean Observations Land Surface Observations Atmospheric Observations Environmental Data at NOAA.
Open Geospatial Consortium Overview and why we are adopting the standards.
1 US National Spatial Data Infrastructure: Common Standards and System Interoperability GITA-JAPAN 14 th Conference 5 November 2003 Alan R. Stevens, PhD.
DOC / NOAA / NMFS / SWFSC / ERD
End-to-End Data Services A Few Personal Thoughts Unidata Staff Meeting 2 September 2009.
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
New Dog You Met Conventions Ted Habermann NOAA EDMC May 2012 Data needs to be in tools Document.
The Earth Information Exchange. Portal Structure Portal Functions/Capabilities Portal Content ESIP Portal and Geospatial One-Stop ESIP Portal and NOAA.
A Draft Standard for the CF Metadata Conventions Russ Rew, Unidata GO-ESSP 2009 Workshop
OGC Web Services with complex data Stephen Pascoe How OGC Web Services relate to GML Application Schema.
1 2.5 DISTRIBUTED DATA INTEGRATION WTF-CEOP (WGISS Test Facility for CEOP) May 2007 Yonsook Enloe (NASA/SGT) Chris Lynnes (NASA)
Interoperability Day Introduction Standards-based Web Services Interfaces to Existing Atmospheric/Oceanographic Data Systems Ben Domenico Unidata Program.
NOAA IOOS SOS Implementations in 2008 Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NOAA IOOS Program DIF Sr Systems Architect.
Update on Unidata Technologies for Data Access Russ Rew
SDI 4.0 Crowd-sourcing, Gov-sourcing Geographic Data via Open Geosynchronization Raj R. Singh Director, Interoperability Programs Open Geospatial Consortium.
NOAA EDMC Ocean Observatories Initiative Cyberinfrastructure Karen Stocks OOI CI Data Curator University of California, San Diego Ocean Observatories.
CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.
OGC Interoperability Experiment Frank Klucznik Georgia Tech Research Institute January 2013.
R2R ↔ NODC Steve Rutz NODC Observing Systems Team Leader May 12, 2011 Presented by L. Pikula, IODE OceanTeacher Course Data Management for Information.
Can Data be Organized for Science and Reuse?
RDA US Science workshop Arlington VA, Aug 2014 Cees de Laat with many slides from Ed Seidel/Rob Pennington.
Big Earth Data Initiative (BEDI) Metadata Improvement: Case Studies
Common Framework for Earth Observation Data
Introduction to the WMO/OGC Hydrology Domain Working Group
A Case Study for Synergistically Implementing the Management of Open Data Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications.
Presentation transcript:

Convergence And Trust in Earth and Space Science Data Systems Ted Habermann, NOAA National Geophysical Data Center Documentation: It’s not just discovery... 50% change in global average Why?

O&M 1.0 WXXM 1.0 CSML 1.0 Unidata CDM CSML 2.X Unidata CDM Aligned with Unidata CDM Aligned with O&M 2.0 WXXM Builds on CSML 3.X (XML encoding) (Binary encoding) O&M 1.0 WXXM 1.1 WXXM 2.X O&M 2.0 CSML 3.X Convergence: Data

The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC®) membership has approved the OGC Network Common Data Form(netCDF) Core Encoding Standard, and netCDF Binary Encoding Extension Standard - netCDF Classic and 64-bit Offset Format as official OGC standards.

Data and Information: End-to-End Process Data ProducersConsumersCommunity InformationKnowledgeWisdom Variables and Properties Multiple Dialects Persistence vs. Transport Standards and Conventions Spiral Development Spatial/Temporal Data Systems Data to Information Concept Mapping Hierarchical Organizations Training Evolution Many concepts have been well developed and successfully implemented to achieve (or at least improve) data interoperability. Can the same concepts facilitate interoperable information?

Documentation Repository ISO 19115, , and extensions Documentation Repository ISO 19115, , and extensions THREDDS netCDF DIF, FGDC, Data.Gov DIF, FGDC, Data.Gov SensorML WCS, WMS, WFS, SOS ISO KML Documentation in Multiple Dialects Convergence

Multiple Dialects: THREDDS Data Server THREDDS Catalog THREDDS Catalog file1.nc file2.nc file3.nc file4.nc file1.nc file.nc file2.nc file.nc THREDDS Catalog THREDDS Catalog THREDDS Catalog THREDDS Catalog Extract Data OPeNDAP WMS WCS NcML ISO ACDD and Metadata Server

Documentation in Three Dialects ISO ACDD NcML wiki/index.php?title=NcISO group/ncisometadata

TIME Disruption Convergence: Community Era of Ferment: high risks, uncertainty, considerable waste and no interoperability Selection The community grows. The rate of progress increases because community energy is focused. Developments are supportive and cumulative. PROGRESSPROGRESS

TIME netCDF 1988 NetCDF - COARDS - CF Climate-Forecast Conventions PROGRESSPROGRESS The CF Conventions are very well supported by the community and by tools. They make it easy for new groups to use netCDF effectively. COARDS 1995

TIME ISO Adoption by US Agencies PROGRESSPROGRESS We are at a critical point. The ISO Metadata Standards are being adopted by many U.S. Agencies, but no conventions have been developed. The future is uncertain. ?

Convergence: Community GOES-R: NOAA and NASA Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Metadata Joint Action Committee The Joint Action Group recommends that the Federal departments and agencies adopt ISO and SensorML as weather observation metadata standards and participate in the process of implementing those standards across the national weather enterprise. Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Metadata Joint Action Committee The Joint Action Group recommends that the Federal departments and agencies adopt ISO and SensorML as weather observation metadata standards and participate in the process of implementing those standards across the national weather enterprise. Chapter VI - Other Post Award Requirements and Considerations 4. Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results b. Investigators are expected to share with other researchers, at no more than incremental cost and within a reasonable time, the primary data, samples, physical collections and other supporting materials created or gathered in the course of work under NSF grants. Grantees are expected to encourage and facilitate such sharing. AMS Metadata Policy Working Group Recommendations: The AMS should adopt ISO and SensorML as the metadata standards for the Nationwide Network of Networks. In coordination with other organizations within the broader atmospheric and oceanic sciences community, the AMS should provide opportunities for its members to become better educated on the nomenclature, structure, and implementation of metadata and the standards recommended above. The AMS should establish a permanent committee to serve as a body of experts … to provide advice to organizations working to implement a Nationwide Network of Networks and to coordinate with the Federal Committee for Integrated Observing Systems (CIOS). AMS Metadata Policy Working Group Recommendations: The AMS should adopt ISO and SensorML as the metadata standards for the Nationwide Network of Networks. In coordination with other organizations within the broader atmospheric and oceanic sciences community, the AMS should provide opportunities for its members to become better educated on the nomenclature, structure, and implementation of metadata and the standards recommended above. The AMS should establish a permanent committee to serve as a body of experts … to provide advice to organizations working to implement a Nationwide Network of Networks and to coordinate with the Federal Committee for Integrated Observing Systems (CIOS).

A Documentation Consortium DOC NSF NASA USGS DOE A consortium is an association of two or more organizations to participate in a common activity or pooling their resources for achieving a common goal: to enhance the exchange, understanding and use of Earth-systems data across disciplinary and international boundaries. Initially to coordinate and facilitate the transition to effective use of ISO Documentation Standards. A consortium is an association of two or more organizations to participate in a common activity or pooling their resources for achieving a common goal: to enhance the exchange, understanding and use of Earth-systems data across disciplinary and international boundaries. Initially to coordinate and facilitate the transition to effective use of ISO Documentation Standards. Standards Training Tool Adoption & Development

Designated Communities - Users Data preservation is communicating with the future

What Makes Data Trustworthy?

Questions?