Slide 1 Achieving National Quality Reporting Progress? Elliott S. Fisher, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences Dartmouth.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

New America Forum April 12, 2010 New America Forum: A First Look at Implementing Health Reform The Delivery System Challenge State Implementation Issues.

Advertisements

Universal and Equal: Ensuring Equity in State Health Care Reform Brian D. Smedley, Ph.D. The Opportunity Agenda

Why Not the Best? A High Performance Health System in Hawaii Hawaii Uninsured Project Fall Forum October 23, 2006 Anne Gauthier Senior Policy Director.

BPHC Quality Improvement Strategy Developing a Culture of Quality throughout the Health Center Program Arkansas Primary Care Association June 15, 2010.

Innovative Approaches in Other States Panel Introduction – May 2, 2003 Lessons from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Workers’ Compensation Health Initiative.

PROVIDER CONSOLIDATION FTC-DOJ Public Workshop on U.S. Health Care Competition Washington, D.C. February 25, 2015 Kenneth W. Kizer, MD, MPH Distinguished.

Shared Decision-making’s Place in Health Care Reform Peter V. Lee Executive Director National Health Care Policy, PBGH Co-Chair, Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure.

Health Care Providers REPORT FROM HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS STAKEHOLDER GROUP Peter Basch, MD Carol Bickford, PhD, RN Jody Pettit, MD.

Improving Quality, Addressing Disparities, and Achieving Equity Language Barriers and Health Care Joseph R. Betancourt, M.D., M.P.H. Director, The Disparities.

BIG DATA AND THE HEALTHCARE REVOLUTION FORD+SSPG 2014.

Value & Coverage Issue Brief Slides A Closer Look at Evidence-Based Performance Measurement.

Building Public Health / Clinical Health Information Exchanges: The Minnesota Experience Marty LaVenture, MPH, PhD Director, Center for Health Informatics.

Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.

From Compartmentalized to Integrated Care Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success. Henry Ford Health.

Strategy and Innovation Workgroup: Recommendations on the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan March 4, 2015 David Lansky, Chair Jennifer Covich,

National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare

1 NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY Subcommittee on Quality Measures for Children's Healthcare in Medicaid and CHIP Overview.

© 2012, The Brookings Institution Current Directions in Quality Measurement Barbara Gage, PhD Fellow, Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at Brookings.

How to determine medicines benefits policy and program needs?

Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.

Meaningful Use: Clinical Quality Measures Dwane J. McGowan 18 th April, 2013.

Where Results Begin. “We don’t have a health care delivery system in this country. We have an expensive plethora of uncoordinated, unlinked, economically.

Panel on Measuring Quality and Value Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality IOM Committee Meeting on Geographic Variation.

Teams and the Learning Healthcare System King C. Li, MD, FRCP(C), MBA Senior Associate Dean, Clinical and Translational Research Isadore Meschan Distinguished.

1 Crossing the Quality Chasm Second Report Committee on Quality of Health Care in America To order:

Coordinated Health Planning Advisory Committee Fox Wetle, Ph.D. Former Advisory Committee Chair Associate Dean of Medicine for Public Health Brown University.

1 Manatt Health Solutions NYS Office of Health Information Technology Transformation Academy Health State Health Research and Policy Interest Group 2008.

Pay for Performance – a critical assessment (using recent Estonian experience) “Improving primary care in Europe and the US: Towards patient- centered,

Uganda Health Information Strategy Eddie Mukooyo, MD, MSc Assistant Commissioner Health Services Dublin, Ireland 13 th September 2010.

A Nationally Endorsed Framework for Measuring and Reporting Culturally Competent Care Nicole W. McElveen, MPH Senior Project Manager,

HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.

HIS Impact Story: Strengthening national HIS through multi-sectoral coordination and collaboration Crispinita A. Valdez Director Information Management.

1 NQF THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM Achieving National Quality Measurement and Reporting Helen Burstin, MD, MPH Senior Vice President, Performance Measures.

Aligning Forces for Quality National Meeting The State of Partnering with States May 9, 2013.

Presentation to: Presented by: Date: Developing Shared Goals in Public Health, Coalition Building, and District Partnership Success Chronic Disease University.

THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM EMPLOYER & HEALTH PLAN INITIATIVES IN HEALTHCARE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & MEDICAL ERROR REDUCTION AUDIOCONFERENCE Sponsored by.

Nash 1 “ Advancing Health Equity through State Implementation of Health Reform” Creshelle R. Nash, MD, MPH Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy.

National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care June 15, 2011 Kana Enomoto Director Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.

The Informed Patient An EU Framework for Action European Health Forum Gastein Peter Singleton Senior Associate, Cambridge University Health.

Presentation to the SAMHSA Advisory Councils

Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide

Health Information Exchange Roadmap: The Landscape and a Path Forward Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration Program Grantee.

DISPARITIES COUNCIL Legislative Working Group Hank J. Porten Steve Shestakofsky Camille Watson.

Virginia Health Innovation Plan 2015: State Innovation Model (SIM) Design December 3, 2015 Beth A. Bortz | President & CEO.

Linking the learning to the National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare Joan Heffernan Inspector Manager Regulation – Healthcare Health Information.

A NEW REIMBURSEMENT STRUCTURE FOR AMERICA ADVANCED DISEASE CONCEPTS.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act The Greens: Elijah, Amber, Kayla, Patrick.

Health Information Technology Summit John Tooker, MD, MBA, FACP Executive Vice President/CEO American College of Physicians Washington, DC October 21,

Primary Care Improvement Infrastructure: The Role of Practice Facilitation Michael L. Parchman, MD MPH MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation AHRQ Annual.

Thomas B. Valuck, MD, JD Medical Officer & Senior Adviser Center for Medicare Management Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CMS’ Progress Toward.

S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.

Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare Implications for Private Payers Robert Galvin October 16, 2006.

ACWG Charge Make recommendations to the Health IT Policy Committee on how HHS policies and programs can advance the evolution of a health IT infrastructure.

Medicare’s Medical Home: Not the Destination, Something More Nancy L. Johnson Senior Public Policy Advisor National Medical Home Summit Philadelphia, PA.

Putting people first, with the goal of helping all Michiganders lead healthier and more productive lives, no matter their stage in life. 1.

National Priorities Partnership © Aligning Efforts to Make Care Safe, Effective & Affordable.

Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT United States Department of Health and Human Services The Nation’s Health IT Agenda:

Thomas B. Valuck, MD, JD Medical Officer & Senior Adviser

The Elements of Health Care Quality and Current Improvement Efforts

Reporting Approaches and Best Practices Jennifer Benjamin NCQA

Compensation Committee 2017 Goals – Updated

Crosswalk of the Recommendations from the Board of Regents Early Childhood Workgroup’s Blue Ribbon Committee & First 1,000 Days on Medicaid Healthy Children:

Diversity and Reform of the aged care system

Lessons and Opportunities of Quality Measurement in Serious Illness

GMHC Board of Directors November 14, 2016

Therapeutic Drug Management Quality Project

Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission

Integrating Evidence into RT Practice: An Important Focus for the Profession Chapter 15 HPR 453.

Dexter W. Shurney, MD, MBA, MPH

Karen Ignagni President & CEO America’s Health Insurance Plans

Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 Achieving National Quality Reporting Progress? Elliott S. Fisher, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences Dartmouth Medical School Senior Associate VA Outcomes Group White River Junction, Vermont CECS Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences

Slide 2 Performance Measurement: Accelerating Improvement IOM Committee on Redesigning Health Insurance Gap between current care and vision of Chasm report remains wide Current system: high and rising costs, poor quality, safety and reliability low Chasm envisioned: safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable and patient centered care Performance measurement is the key to further progress Every approach to performance improvement depends upon measurement Pay-for-performance, consumer engagement, quality improvement initiatives, market-based approaches (competing providers) Recent public and private sector initiatives important, but unlikely to achieve the effective national performance system we need Narrow and timid focus of measurement (technical quality) Multiple measures and systems -- burdensome, duplicative, inconsistent Independence and integrity of data and measures uncertain (limited funding) Measurement system fails to learn from current efforts (success or failures)

Slide 3 Performance Measurement: Accelerating Improvement Recommendations Establish and fund a National Quality Coordination Board Set clear short and long-term goals for improving health care system Designate (or if necessary develop) standardized performance measures Ensure the creation of a data repository system capable of reliable, valid data collection at patient level (capable of rolling up to provider, community) Develop and release useful reports responsive to all stakeholders Identify and fund a research agenda Evaluate over time how performance improves -- and how to improve policy Endorsed a starter measurement set and important new areas Committee endorsed many of the existing consensus based, provider specific measures Endorsed one “new” measure: one year outcomes (mortality and SF-12) and costs for patients with AMI Called for development of new measures: efficiency, longitudinal care, system-level measures and shared accountability

Slide 4 Performance Measurement Where are we now? IOM Redesigning Health Insurance Committee P4P report Recommended moving forward with P4P (as means to learn about payment change) Called for use of quality, costs and patient centered measures Underscored need for ongoing evaluation and “learning system” Congress has not acted on implementation of effective national performance system -- voluntary, consensus based process remains in place National Quality Forum may be stepping into the breach Development of a measurement framework for “efficiency” -- broadly defined to encompass quality, costs and value. Establish national goals for health system improvement (in two pilot areas) Identify gaps in existing measures and call for their development

Slide 5 Performance Measurement Where might we think of going? Consider what would be required to put in place an effective national performance measurement system Comparative effectiveness research infrastructure (RCT and observational) envisioned: (compare treatments, controlling for patient and providers) Performance measurement system is essentially the same (compare providers, controlling for patients and treatments) Well-designed information systems should support both (and policy evaluation as a bonus) Focus of measurement should be carefully considered (what would we really like to know?) Some thoughts… Benefits and risks of current treatments (and how these vary) Meaningful health outcomes (mortality, function, quality of life) Total costs of care Are the goals, processes and incentives of providers aligned with their patients’ values and best interests?