Current Status of Country by Country Reporting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OECD public consultation on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting OECD Conference Centre, Paris 19 May 2014 Other Discussion.
Advertisements

Achieve financial growth CPAs & Consultants Current Trend of IRS Transfer Pricing Practices November 8, 2013.
Transparency - The New Normal George Hodgson Deputy Chief Executive STEP Worldwide.
44 th SGATAR MEETING TOPIC 1 Addressing tax administration challenges posed by globalization and erosion of the tax base PREPARED BY MONGOLIA.
Australian American Chamber of Commerce Energy Conference Australian Oil & Gas Fiscal Regime Michael Anderson, Ernst & Young LLP 30 January 2014 – Houston.
The Corporate Laws Amendment Bill, B6/2006. © 2006 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Corporate Laws Amendment Bill, B6/2006 – 29 May 2006 Introduction Presenting.
RMW Law LLP The CRS Regime and its implications for Offshore Trustees STEP Cayman Branch Monday 29 September 2014.
AEoI Ingrid Rensema Vereniging voor Belastingwetenschap april 2015.
Preparing Supervisory Authority and Pension Industry for Risk-based Supervision Nzomo Mutuku Manager, Research & Development Retirement Benefits Authority,
HYBRID MISMATCH ARRANGEMENTS OMLEEN AJIMAL Director of International Tax 21 November 2014.
* Latest developments in EU legislation concerning the financial services are 10th edition * Brussels, 8 December 2005 FEDERATION BANCAIRE DE L’UNION EUROPEENNE.
U.S. Tax Risks Trends James Wall J. H. Cohn LLP. 2 Circular 230 Notice Any tax advice given herein is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be.
1. 2 CVM’s OBJECTIVES u to stimulate the creation of savings and their investment in securities; u to promote the expansion and regular and efficient.
1 The Stock Market Development and Accounting Reform the case of China May 2006 Lu Xiongying Shanghai Stock Exchange 1.
Debt bias and Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)
Doing Business in Mexico (Tax Regime). June, 2010.
Jennifer Kates, Kaiser Family Foundation Eric Lief, Center for Strategic and International Studies/UNAIDS July 2006 International Assistance for HIV/AIDS.
European Commission Taxation and Customs Union 11 Taxing Multinational Corporations: Addressing Transfer Pricing and Cross Border Tax Avoidance Thomas.
Ford Rhodes Sidat Hyder & Co. Chartered Accountants t Transfer Pricing – Trends and Dispute Resolution South Asian Tax Summit 2008 Karachi April.
Implementation of MiFID Legislative Adjustment: New Rules and Regulations Introduced by the New Directive Matjaž Albreht Assistant Director The Slovene.
Tax Administrations in a post BEPS environment
OECD BEPS project & OECD guidance on country by country documentation
Michael H. Plowgian August 9, 2014 FATCA, Extraterritoriality, and the Path to the OECD- Standard on Automatic Exchange of Information (“AEOI”)
© 2012 Central Asian Tax Research Center Vladimir Tyutyuryukov Central Asian Tax Research Center 3 February 2012 Transfer Pricing Regulations in Customs.
USEITI and Federal Income Tax Voluntary Disclosure Curtis Carlson Acting Director Business Revenue Division Office of Tax Analysis June 12, 2013.
Tax Information Exchange: approach of the Member States of the BRICS Pustovalov Evgeny Eurasian Research Centre for Comparative and International Tax Law,
Chapter 1 Electronic Presentations in Microsoft ® PowerPoint ® Prepared by James Myers, C.A. University of Toronto © 2008 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.
Selected Transfer Pricing issues/Advance pricing agreements (APA) in Polish practice (2006 – 2011) Tomasz Michalik Moscow, 3 February 2012.
Joint Forum of Financial Market Regulators Forum conjoint des autorités de réglementation du marché financier Guidelines for Capital Accumulation Plans.
Jacques GOMBEER Auditor General Head, International Income Tax Federal Public Service Finance International Exchange of Information in Direct Tax Matters.
We are dependable and trustworthy knowledge processing partner. Although we are a separate entity, we are an integrated part of your organization, like.
CURRENT TRANSFER PRICING SITUATION IN ARGENTINA Mexico D.F., December 1, 1999.
THAILAND’S EXPERIENCE ON TRANSFER PRICING UN Expert Group Meeting on TP Issues for Developing Countries 14 March 2012.
The IRS Form 990. What is the Form 990 Form 990 is an annual reporting return that certain tax- exempt organizations must file with the IRS. It provides.
UTP & M-3 Updates TEI-IRS Liaison Meeting The Woodlands, TX May 14, 2012.
The BEPS final reports Daniel Szmaragowski
HIPAA History March 3, HIPAA Ruling Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act Passed by Congress.
Webcast title 4/26/2017 Disclaimer
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Exchange of information 11 Initial Directive EU 2011/16/EU as regards administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, covering: exchange of information.
ISSUES AND CHALLENGES FACING TAX ADMINISTRATIONS The perspective of Tax Administrations EU Commission – DG TAXUD – Morgan Guillou 14 April 2015.
Presented by Jay Sanghrajka – Shipleys LLP.  Transfer Pricing – Preliminary  UK Transfer Pricing (TP) Rules – Overview  UK Transfer Pricing filing.
Funds: Transfer Pricing 9 February 2006 J IN -Y OUNG L EE.
The U.S. and the Implementation of BEPS Ivan Strunin Managing Director US Tax, Deloitte APICE Ltd. Hong Kong IFA Seoul May 12, 1016 Copyright © 2016 Deloitte.
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Promoting a Pro-Growth Tax Environment for Global Business.
Tax Planning of International Enterprises Dimensions of tax planning Assistant professor Tomi Viitala.
1 International Tax Avoidance and Evasion 1 - Opening and Introduction Ankara, 7-11 May 2007 MULTILATERAL TAX NETWORK Auditing Multinational Enterprises.
Implementation of BEPS – the Malaysian Scenario
Monthly Board Meeting Prasanna Nathan CEO 20 th April 2014.
Purposes of Exchange of Information Komal Mohindra Global Tax Simplification Team Investment Climate Department July 24, 2012 EOI Workshop – Plantation,
Statistical Business Register Enterprise Groups in Latvia Sarmite Prole Head of Business Register Section Business Statics Department Central Statistical.
Workshop on EOI – Florida, July 2012 __________________________________________________________________________________ Duncan Nicol Director, Tax Information.
Union Budget 2016 – Key Transfer Pricing proposals Customer Care No
The European Commission´s Tax Transparency Package 18 March 2015.
OECD Implements Country-by-Country Reporting Customer Care No
Fight Against Tax Avoidance in the EU
Advanced Transfer Pricing Arrangements
International Aspects of China’s Tax Law
OECD BEPS and Tax Reform
Contents Global transparency initiatives Actions of the European Union
PRELIMINARY BRIEFING: KUWAIT, SWITZERLAND, NETHERLANDS AND LUXEMBOURG
Subject 2 – The Future of Transfer Pricing Austrian Branch Report
Non Financial Reporting: Current Developments at EU level
THE URUGUAYAN EXPERIENCE IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TP
A Long-Term Policy Solution for Taxing Digitalized Business Models
Eliminating Transfer Pricing Arrangements in JV Companies Lessons for Enhancing Local Content November 2018.
FISCAL & BANKING REFORMS IN MOLDOVA
PORTCULLIS NEWS COUNTRY-BY COUNTRY REPORTING, TRANSFER PRICING
The Global Approaches for the Struggle against Tax Treaty Abusive Practices: Selected Examples in BRICS Countries Karina Ponomareva PhD in Law, Assistant.
Action 13 – Three-tiered documentation
Presentation transcript:

Current Status of Country by Country Reporting Tax and Technology Conference: Vienna 9-10 February, 2016 Jeffrey Owens, Director of the WU Global Tax Policy Center Vienna, February 9 – 10, 2016

BEPS action plan: A Recap Endorsed by G20 Heads of State in November 2015

Tax transparency: an overview Exchange of Information (Eol) DTTs/TIEAs Anti-Money Laundering (AML) standards FATCA/OECD Common Reporting Standard (CRS) Tax transparency EU tax transparency package (Rulings/APAs) OECD BEPS actions 12 & 13 FATCA and Intergovernmental Agreement (IGAs) Sector initiatives: Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Dodd-Frank Act Support from political bodies (G20/G8) Enablement from international organisations

The transparency timeline 2009 March – May 2010 March-June 2013 March-June 2014 Feb – Mar 2015 30 January 2014 OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 13  13 February 2014 OECD releases Common Reporting Standards  11 June 2014 Announcement by EC on state aid investigations 9 February 2015 Implementation guidelines for CbCR issued by OECD  18 March 2015 EC proposes for Transparency Package   19 March 2015 EC’s negotiations with Switzerland on landmark tax transparency agreement September 2009 OECD proclaims a “revolution” in transparency and exchange of tax Information 18 March 2010 FATCA signed into law  May 2010 Amendment of OECD Multilateral Convention (Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters)   29 May 2013 Australia introduces a tax bill on public report by ATO for companies with annual income of $100 million or more 13 June 2013 UK launched “Fair Tax Mark” 2003-4 2009 2010 2013 2014 2015-2017 2003 Jul – Sep 2010 June – Dec 2013 Aug – Dec 2014 Sep 2015 – 2017 June 2003 Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) launched 21 July 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act signed into federal law  24 September 2010 US IRS releases final schedule/instructions for Schedule UTP June 2013 EC asks information about tax ruling practice  June 2013 Information request about IP-regimes from the ten EC Member States  31 December 2013 Deadline for EU Member States to transpose country by country reporting obligation for banks under CRD IV into domestic law 13 August 2014 Standard for Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters (OECD)  16 September 2014 Report on BEPS Action 5 (OECD)  17 December 2014 EC extends information enquiry on tax ruling practice to all Member States September 2015: OECD BEPS Action 12 finalized November 2015: Heads of G20 endorse January 2016: MCAA signed in Paris 1 January 2016: Exchange of cross-border tax rulings/ APAs to commence under revised EU Directive on Administrative Cooperation  2016: Early adopting countries begin automatic exchange of tax information using the OECD CRS  2017: First exchange of information under CbCR, using FY2016 data 2004 2004 UK introduces Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS)

Country by Country (CbC) Reporting TP Master file TP Local file CbC report CbC reporting: getting a good look inside What it is: Companies will have to provide tax authorities with country-specific allocation of profits, revenues, employees and assets; worldwide adoption expected by 2017, though specific adoption deadlines will vary by country. What it is not: Not intended as a substitute for a full transfer pricing analysis, nor is it intended for use in formulary apportionment-based adjustments. But it will feed into tax audits. CbC Reporting Why this early focus is needed: Because of the level of complexities involved with cross-border transactions, and data collection and management, many companies are already preparing now, testing and validating processes and technologies. 28

Master file – information required Organizational structure Business description Intangibles Intercompany financial activities Financial and tax positions Structure chart: Legal ownership Geographic location Important drivers of business profit Overall strategy description Financing arrangements for (related and unrelated) lenders Annual consolidated financial statements Supply chain of: Five largest products/ services by turnover Products/services generating more than 5% of sales List of important intangibles and legal owners Identification of financing entities List and description of existing unilateral APAs and other tax rulings Main geographic markets of above products List of important intangible agreements Details of financial transfer pricing policies List and brief description of important service arrangements R&D and intangible transfer pricing policies Functional analysis of principal contributions to value creation by individual entities Details of important transfers Business restructuring/ acquisitions/divestitures during fiscal year Master file CbC report Local file 29

CbC reporting Implementation status Non compliance is a criminal offense in the Netherlands Already implemented Implementation in progress Ireland United States France Italy Japan Mandatory for large UK parented groups only China: Filing due with tax return on 31 May Spain’s group definition based on control Does not include surrogate parent concept Equity rather than stated capital and accumulated earnings OECD BEPS project outcomes: New reporting under Action 13

Action 13:CbC reporting P Consistent with OECD recommendations OECD   OECD Australia China Denmark Finland France Status Adopted legislation on 3 December 2015, to take effect as of 1 January 2016. Draft legislation published Bill approved by parliament on 18 December 2015, to take effect as of 1 January 2016. Draft bill published on 21 December 2015. Who Ultimate Parents of group with revenue of EUR 750 million or greater Threshold of AUD 1 billion (approximately EUR 670 million) Threshold of RMB 5 billion (approximately EUR 705 million)  Threshold of DKK 5.6 billion (approximately EUR 750 million) P When For fiscal years starting in 2016, with filing within 12 months from fiscal year end To be filed together with the annual tax return (due 31 May). Possible to apply for an extension. The government intends for the provisions to be enacted and effective beginning of 2017. Secondary filing rule 1.Local filing or 2.Filing by named “Surrogate Parent” entity Local filing Filing by "next tier parent entity" Local filing Penalties Left to countries General penalty for non compliance General penalty regime. Penalties in the maximum amount of EUR 25,000. Specific penalty regime. Should not exceed EUR 100,000 Consistent with OECD recommendations

Action 13:CbC reporting P Consistent with OECD recommendations OECD   OECD Ireland Italy Japan Mexico Netherlands Status Adopted legislation applicable as of 1 January 2016 Published legislation in the Official Gazette on 30 December 2015, to apply as of 1 January 2016. Draft legislation published on 16 December 2015. Published legislation on 18 November 2015, to apply as of 1 January 2016. Who Ultimate Parents of group with revenue of EUR 750 million or greater P Revenues in excess of JPY100 billion (approximately US$820 million) Revenues in excess of 12 billion pesos (approximately EUR 650 million) When For fiscal years starting in 2016, with filing within 12 months from fiscal year end Proposed to apply to taxable years beginning on or after 1 April 2016 Secondary filing rule 1.Local filing or 2.Filing by named “Surrogate Parent” entity Local filing Penalties Left to countries Penalty applicable for not complying with tax return obligation. Specific penalty between €10,000 and €50,000 may apply. General penalties and presumptive taxation may apply in case of non-compliance. In addition to penalties, non compliant taxpayers may be disqualified from entering into contracts with the Mexican public sector. Criminal penalty for non compliance Consistent with OECD recommendations

Action 13:CbC reporting P OECD Norway Poland Spain United Kingdom   OECD Norway Poland Spain United Kingdom United States Status Published draft legislation for consultation on 2 December 2015. Adopted regulations applicable as of 1 January 2016. Adopted implementing regulations applicable as of 1 January 2016. Enabling legislation adopted. Draft regulations published. Proposed regulations published on 21 December 2015. Who Ultimate Parents of group with revenue of EUR 750 million or greater Revenues in excess of NOK 6.5 billion (approximately USD 730 million) P Threshold of £586 million (approximately EUR 790 million) Revenue of $850 million or greater When For fiscal years starting in 2016, with filing within 12 months from fiscal year end First reporting should be done in 2018 based on figures from 2016. For taxable years beginning on or after the date final regulations are published Secondary filing rule 1.Local filing or 2.Filing by named “Surrogate Parent” entity None Local filing Voluntary local filing Penalties Left to countries General penatly for non compliance. General penalty for non compliance with reporting obligations Specific penalty for non compliance General reporting-related penalties may apply

Who is the reporting entity? Group: Collection of two or more enterprises related through ownership or control such that it is required to prepare consolidated financial statements (or would be so required if publicly traded) Ultimate Parent Any local entity Surrogate Parent Top entity No other entity owns a controlling interest If country of Ultimate Parent does not require CbC reporting for the Group, or Local country is not receiving CbC report from Ultimate Parent jurisdiction Unless the Group appoints Surrogate Parent, and Local country rules allow for Surrogate Parent If country of Surrogate Parent requires CbC reporting and local country has arrangement in place to receive such information from country of Surrogate Parent, and Country of Surrogate Parent and local country both have been informed Files CbC report with tax authority where it is resident Tax authority will share with other countries under information exchange relationships Files CbC report with tax authority where it is resident Tax authority will share with other countries under information exchange relationships Files CbC report with tax authority in each such local country under country’s rules PRIMARY REPORTING SECONDARY REPORTING OECD BEPS project outcomes: New reporting under Action 13

Governments and business will have to learn to live in a transparent environment Exchange of Information (EOI) on request and rapidly moving to automatic C by C and the Master File Disclosure provisions on tax planning schemes Joined up tax administrations Are tax administrations able to use all this information and prepared to be transparent themselves? 30