NuMI Horn Alignment Cross-hair System NuMI Horn Alignment Cross-hairs Target Hall Instrumentation Review November 18, 2002 David Ayres Argonne National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Advertisements

MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England.
Linac4 BPM and Phase Pickup L. Søby08/ LINAC4 Beam Position, Phase and intensity Pick-ups.
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MARS flux simulations - update Sergei Striganov Fermilab August 12, 2009.
LBNE Target Hall Instrumentation Bob Zwaska January 27, 2010.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
NuMI DOE Review May 25, 2004 Commissioning Page 1 NuMI Commissioning Overview CD-4 Goals Planning Pre-commissioning activities Commissioning Summary.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
NuMI Horn Construction and Testing
Fermilab Neutrino Beamline to DUSEL Mike Martens Fermilab PAC November 3, 2009.
NuMI Run II meeting Nov. 4, 2004 NuMI Target Hall Jim Hylen Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Status / Plan 8 slide introduction to target hall 9 slide list of status.
NUMI NuMI Review of the Infrastructure – W, G & V 20 July 2001 WBS Page 1 1 Infrastructure Review - W.B.S Water Systems Water Systems –Upstream.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
IPBSM status and plan ATF project meeting M.Oroku.
Apex Target Marco Oriunno, April 23, Design and fabrication by: Marco Oriunno, Dieter Walz, Jim McDonald, Clive Field, Douglas Higginbotham, and.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Debbie Harris Sacha Kopp, Commissioning Workshop 1    Beam Monitoring Hadmon will see remnant protons Muon Monitors see whatever escapes beam.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 12, 2001 Infrastructure: Radiation Safety Page 1 Technical Components NuMI Beamline Radiation Safety Issues Radiation Safety.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
All Experimenters’ Meeting November 03, 2014 Photo by Greg Vogel.
November 18, 2002Richard Talaga1 Target Hall Instrumentation NuMI Neutrino Beam Devices Instrumentation Review Instrumentation &Communication Overview.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Status Update of Ongoing Efforts for NuMI Horn 1 Stripline Redesign and Horn Change Out Kris E. Anderson All Experimenter’s Meeting 06-Jul-2015.
Comissioning the NuMI Beam at Fermilab with Ion Chamber Arrays D. Indurthy, R. Keisler, S. Kopp, S. Mendoza, M. Proga, Z. Pavlovich, R. Zwaska Department.
NuMI NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction July 30, 2003 Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction Air system for.
NuMI NBI03 November 7-11, 2003 FNAL thin beam windows Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 FNAL experience with thin beam windows Issue is: Survival of window in high.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 – The MICE Experiment2 - The.
Main Injector Lambertson Aperture Scans David Johnson and Ming-Jen Yang March 17, 2006.
F NuMI Beamline Accelerator Advisory Committee Presentation May 10, 2006 Mike Martens Fermilab Beams Division.
The Stripping Foil Test Stand in the Linac4 Transfer Line
Photon Flux Control Liping Gan UNCW. Outline PrimEx-  experiment requirement Tagged photon Procedure to obtain the number of tagged photons Relative.
All Exp Mtg July 7, 2008 NuMI-MINOS Status Report – Laura Loiacono FAR DETECTOR: FD live time was 95.7% for cosmics last week (ROP7 problems reported at.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
IP instrumentation configuration for Autumn 2010 ATF2 runs Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK 2010 / 7/ 1 10 th ATF2 project meeting.
NuMI NBI2003 November 7-11, 2003 NuMI Target Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Status, Testing, Support Module At NBI’02: Beam test results of Medium.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
Status of E14 G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK. E14 Experiment Step-by-step approach to precise measurement of Br( K L    ) KEK-PS E391a J-PARC E14 (Step-1) J-PARC.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
NUMI Flexible Joint/Floating Clamp WBS Power Supply System Level 3 Manager Nancy Grossman FNAL July 10, 2001.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.
NUMI Primary Beam Review August 14, 2001 NUMI PRIMARY BEAM INSTRUMENTATION Multiwires, Loss Monitors, Toroids Gianni Tassotto.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
MARS15 Studies of Impact of LBNF Target/Horn Optimization on the Hadron Absorber 6 th High Power Targetry Workshop Merton College, Oxford April 12, 2016.
LBNE Hadron Monitor and Target Hall Instrumentation Bob Zwaska February 4, 2014.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
Beamline for the LBNE Project Heidi Schellman for the LBNE collaboration.
Characterization of muon beam in T2K with emulsion detectors A. Ariga, T. Ariga, C. Pistillo AEC-LHEP University of Bern 1.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
Primary Design Parameters July 13,2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Besides design specifications driven by physics and Main Injector beam parameters, significant.
T980 STATUS AND CHANGES FOR
SLAWG #15 ZS fiducialisation and alignment today
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Luminosity Monitor Status
of secondary light ion beams
Geometry of experimental setup for studies of inverse kinematics reactions with ROOT Students*: Dumitru Irina, Giubega Lavinia-Elena, Lica Razvan, Olacel.
Use of Beam Loss Monitor type detectors in CNGS muon station
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

NuMI Horn Alignment Cross-hair System NuMI Horn Alignment Cross-hairs Target Hall Instrumentation Review November 18, 2002 David Ayres Argonne National Laboratory WBS co-Manager Outline Description, specifications Status and remaining work Summary

NuMI NuMI Project Review of WBS Instrumentation November 18, 2002 D. Ayres Page 2 Cross-hair Alignment System The cross hairs are three sets of horizontal and vertical strips of aluminum attached to the ends of Horn 1 and Horn 2 Horizontal and vertical scans are performed with the low intensity proton beam across each set of cross hairs (target/baffle out) Protons scattered by cross hairs are detected by Beam Loss Monitors (BLMs) downstream of Horns 1 and 2 «BLMs read out through ACNET «BLMs offset from beam centerline by 30 cm to avoid damage during high intensity running Each set of cross hairs is offset from beam centerline by +2.5 mm or –2.5 mm, both horizontally and vertically «To distinguish the signals from different sets during scans «To avoid damage by high intensity beam The upstream end of Horn 1 cannot have cross hairs but its location will be determined by scanning the neck of the horn inner conductor

NuMI NuMI Project Review of WBS Instrumentation November 18, 2002 D. Ayres Page 3 Target/Baffle/Horn-1 Cross-hair Geometry Water tank Stripline Baffle Target Target/Baffle Module Horn 1 Module Horn 1 Carrier Horn 1 neck Cross hair #1 BLM #1 Target and Baffle move out of beam for cross-hair scan

NuMI NuMI Project Review of WBS Instrumentation November 18, 2002 D. Ayres Page 4 Cross-hair Geometry for Horns 1 and 2

NuMI NuMI Project Review of WBS Instrumentation November 18, 2002 D. Ayres Page 5 Cross-hair System Simulations MARS beam heating calculations determined that cross hairs made of 1-mm wide aluminum strips would not overheat during full intensity running « NuMI-882, Byron Lundberg GEANT simulations determined the thicknesses of cross hairs needed to give good scan signal-to-noise ( ) in BLMs: #1 and #3 are 12 mm thick, #2 is 36 mm thick « NuMI-864, Debbie Harris The NuMI-864 GEANT simulation also showed that «A scan of the Horn 1 neck gives exellent signal-to-noise (>10) «During normal running, cross hair scattering causes less than 0.2% changes in neutrino flux and in the ratio of near/far detector event rates

NuMI NuMI Project Review of WBS Instrumentation November 18, 2002 D. Ayres Page 6 Cross-hair System Specifications Proton beam instrumentation and control should permit scans at low intensity (10 12 protons/pulse),  3.5 mm at cross hairs,  12 mm at Horn 1 neck. Beam scans should determine Horn 1 and Horn 2 transverse locations to at least  0.5 mm and  1.0 mm respectively. BLM response should be stable and sensitive to rate changes of ~5% at intensities expected during scans (10 7 particles/cm 2 /10 12 protons/spill). Additional material in the beam (beyond that assumed in NuMI-864) will degrade signal-to-noise ratio in scans. Cross-hair material should not effect neutrino flux significantly (<1%). Cross-hair and BLM locations, materials are chosen to ensure survival during full intensity beam running. BLMs should be able to measure beam-pulse timing and targeting efficiency as a backup for target Budal monitor (after initial calibration against Budal monitor).

NuMI NuMI Project Review of WBS Instrumentation November 18, 2002 D. Ayres Page 7 Cost and Schedule The cross-hair task is approximately on schedule The cost estimate (CR #156, Feb. 2002) still seems OK

NuMI NuMI Project Review of WBS Instrumentation November 18, 2002 D. Ayres Page 8 Status and Remaining Work Complete engineering of cross-hair mechanical structures «Complete engineering design and drawings «Repeat simulations with final cross-hair and BLM configurations and locations «Recheck calculation of beam heating with final geometry Build and test prototype cross hair sets «Check mechanical stability during pulsing on Horn 2 in MI-8 during Spring 2003 «Test Horn 1 cross hairs in MI-8 during Summer 2003 Build and install three production sets of cross hairs

NuMI NuMI Project Review of WBS Instrumentation November 18, 2002 D. Ayres Page 9 Summary Cross-hair and BLM designs are advanced enough to ensure that specifications are easily met We have a practical plan for completing the engineering, prototyping, testing and construction of the cross-hair system on time and on budget BLMs may provide partial backup for Budal monitor functions after beam commissioning