Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 15 – Fast Transients and Rate models Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 15.1 Review Populations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 2.
Advertisements

Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs Valentina Doria Georg Kaegi Methods for Dummies 19/03/2008.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 9 – Coding and Decoding Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 9.1 What is a good neuron model? - Models.
Neural Network of the Cerebellum: Temporal Discrimination and the Timing of Responses Michael D. Mauk Dean V. Buonomano.
Spike Train Statistics Sabri IPM. Review of spike train  Extracting information from spike trains  Noisy environment:  in vitro  in vivo  measurement.
A model for spatio-temporal odor representation in the locust antennal lobe Experimental results (in vivo recordings from locust) Model of the antennal.
Impact of Correlated inputs on Spiking Neural Models Baktash Babadi Baktash Babadi School of Cognitive Sciences PM, Tehran, Iran PM, Tehran, Iran.
Introduction: Neurons and the Problem of Neural Coding Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience, LCN, CH 1015 Lausanne Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
The visual system V Neuronal codes in the visual system.
1 3. Spiking neurons and response variability Lecture Notes on Brain and Computation Byoung-Tak Zhang Biointelligence Laboratory School of Computer Science.
Part II: Population Models BOOK: Spiking Neuron Models, W. Gerstner and W. Kistler Cambridge University Press, 2002 Chapters 6-9 Laboratory of Computational.
Introduction to Mathematical Methods in Neurobiology: Dynamical Systems Oren Shriki 2009 Modeling Conductance-Based Networks by Rate Models 1.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 11 – Continuum models: Cortical fields and perception Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 11.1 Transients.
Rules for Information Maximization in Spiking Neurons Using Intrinsic Plasticity Prashant Joshi & Jochen Triesch { joshi,triesch
Jochen Triesch, UC San Diego, 1 Pattern Formation in Neural Fields Goal: Understand how non-linear recurrent dynamics can.
Feedforward networks. Complex Network Simpler (but still complicated) Network.
The Decisive Commanding Neural Network In the Parietal Cortex By Hsiu-Ming Chang ( 張修明 )
How does the mind process all the information it receives?
Part I: Single Neuron Models BOOK: Spiking Neuron Models, W. Gerstner and W. Kistler Cambridge University Press, 2002 Chapters 2-5 Laboratory of Computational.
How facilitation influences an attractor model of decision making Larissa Albantakis.
Connected Populations: oscillations, competition and spatial continuum (field equations) Lecture 12 Course: Neural Networks and Biological Modeling Wulfram.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 15 – Population Dynamics: The Integral –Equation Approach Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 15.1.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 13 – Membrane potential densities and Fokker-Planck Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 13.1 Review:
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 4 – Reducing detail - Adding detail Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 4.2. Adding detail - synapse.
Bump attractors and the homogeneity assumption Kevin Rio NEUR April 2011.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 3 – Reducing detail : Two-dimensional neuron models Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 3.1 From Hodgkin-Huxley.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 5 NETWORKS of NEURONS and ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 5.1 Introduction.
Introduction to Mathematical Methods in Neurobiology: Dynamical Systems Oren Shriki 2009 Modeling Conductance-Based Networks by Rate Models 1.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 14 – Dynamics and Plasticity Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 14.1 Reservoir computing - Complex.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 9 – Adaptation and firing patterns Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 9.1 Firing patterns and adaptation.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 8 – Noisy input models: Barrage of spike arrivals Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 8.1 Variation.
Correlation-Induced Oscillations in Spatio-Temporal Excitable Systems Andre Longtin Physics Department, University of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 6 Hebbian LEARNING and ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 6.1 Synaptic Plasticity.
Lecture 9: Introduction to Neural Networks Refs: Dayan & Abbott, Ch 7 (Gerstner and Kistler, Chs 6, 7) D Amit & N Brunel, Cerebral Cortex 7, (1997)
Neural codes and spiking models. Neuronal codes Spiking models: Hodgkin Huxley Model (small regeneration) Reduction of the HH-Model to two dimensions.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 8 – Noisy output models: Escape rate and soft threshold Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 8.1 Variation.
Robustness in protein circuits: adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis 1 Information in Biology 2008 Oren Shoval.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © In analyzing the trajectory as time passes, I find that: The trajectory is trying to follow the moving.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 12 – Decision models: Competitive dynamics Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 12.1 Review: Population.
Study on synchronization of coupled oscillators using the Fokker-Planck equation H.Sakaguchi Kyushu University, Japan Fokker-Planck equation: important.
”When spikes do matter: speed and plasticity” Thomas Trappenberg 1.Generation of spikes 2.Hodgkin-Huxley equation 3.Beyond HH (Wilson model) 4.Compartmental.
The Function of Synchrony Marieke Rohde Reading Group DyStURB (Dynamical Structures to Understand Real Brains)
Theoretical Neuroscience Physics 405, Copenhagen University Block 4, Spring 2007 John Hertz (Nordita) Office: rm Kc10, NBI Blegdamsvej Tel (office)
Computing in carbon Basic elements of neuroelectronics Elementary neuron models -- conductance based -- modelers’ alternatives Wiring neurons together.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 9 – Optimizing Neuron Models For Coding and Decoding Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 9.1 What.
Network-level effects of optogenetic stimulation: experiment and simulation Cliff Kerr 1, Dan O'Shea 2, Werapong Goo 2, Salvador Dura-Bernal 1, Joe Francis.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 4 – Reducing detail - Adding detail Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 3.1 From Hodgkin-Huxley to.
Neural Coding: Integrate-and-Fire Models of Single and Multi-Neuron Responses Jonathan Pillow HHMI and NYU Oct 5, Course.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 7 – Variability and Noise: The question of the neural code Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 7.1.
Neuronal Dynamics: Computational Neuroscience of Single Neurons
Neural Synchronization via Potassium Signaling. Neurons Interactions Neurons can communicate with each other via chemical or electrical synapses. Chemical.
Ch 9. Rhythms and Synchrony 9.7 Adaptive Cooperative Systems, Martin Beckerman, Summarized by M.-O. Heo Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National.
Response dynamics and phase oscillators in the brainstem
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 10 – Neuronal Populations Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 10.1 Cortical Populations - columns.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 2 – Biophysical modeling: The Hodgkin-Huxley model Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 2.1 Biophysics.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 4 Reducing detail: Analysis of 2D models Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 3.1 From Hodgkin-Huxley.
Week 1: A first simple neuron model/ neurons and mathematics Week 2: Hodgkin-Huxley models and biophysical modeling Week 3: Two-dimensional models and.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 10 – Variability and Noise: The question of the neural code Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 10.1.
The Neural Code Baktash Babadi SCS, IPM Fall 2004.
Richard Tomsett1,2 Marcus Kaiser1,3,4
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 11 – Variability and Noise: Autocorrelation Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 11.1 Variation of.
Week 5 NETWORKS of NEURONS and ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 5.1 Introduction - networks of neuron - systems for computing.
Neural Oscillations Continued
1011 neurons (105 per mm3) 1015 synapses.
? Dynamical properties of simulated MEG/EEG using a neural mass model
The Brain as an Efficient and Robust Adaptive Learner
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
Exponential and Logarithmic Forms
1011 neurons (105 per mm3) 1015 synapses.
The Brain as an Efficient and Robust Adaptive Learner
Presentation transcript:

Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 15 – Fast Transients and Rate models Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 15.1 Review Populations of Neurons - Transients 15.2 Rate models - Week 15 – transients and rate models

Neuronal Dynamics – Brain dynamics is complex motor cortex frontal cortex to motor output neurons 3 km of wire 1mm Week 15-part 1: Review: The brain is complex

Homogeneous population: -each neuron receives input from k neurons in the population -each neuron receives the same (mean) external input (could come from other populations) -each neuron in the population has roughly the same parameters Week 15-part 1: Review: Homogeneous Population excitation inhibition Example: 2 populations

I(t) Week 15-part 1: Review: microscopic vs. macroscopic microscopic: -spikes are generated by individual neurons -spikes are transmitted from neuron to neuron macroscopic: -Population activity A n (t) -Populations interact via A n (t)

I(t) Week 15-part 1: Review: coupled populations

Populations: - pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of barrel D1 - pyramidal neurons in layer 2/3 of barrel D1 - inhibitory neurons in layer 2/3 of barrel D1 Week 15-part 1: Example: coupled populations in barrel cortex Neuronal Populations = a homogeneous group of neurons (more or less) neurons per group (Lefort et al., NEURON, 2009) different barrels and layers, different neuron types  different populations

Experimental data : Marsalek et al., 1997 Week 15-part 1: A(t) in experiments:light flash, in vivo PSTH, single neurons aligned PSTH, many neurons in V1 (solid) V4 (dashed)

Experimental data : Sakata and Harris, 2009 Week 15-part 2: A(t) in experiments: auditory click stimulus

Experimental data : Tchumatchenko et al See also: Poliakov et al Week 15-part 1: A(t) in experiments: step current, (in vitro)

Week 15-part 1: A(t) in simulations of integrate-and-fire neurons Simulation data : Brunel et al Image: Gerstner et al., Neuronal Dynamics, 2014

Week 15-part 1: A(t) in simulations of integrate-and-fire neurons Simulation data : Image: Gerstner et al., Neuronal Dynamics, 2014

Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 15 – Fast Transients and Rate models Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland Week 15 – transients and rate models Transients are very fast -In experiments -In simulations of spiking neurons Conclusion of part 1

h(t) Input potential Week 15-part 2: Rate model with differential equation I(t)  Differential equation can be integrated!, exponential kernel

A(t) h(t) Input potential Week 15-part 2: Rate model : step current I(t) Example LNP rate model: Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson Spikes are generated by a Poisson process, from rate model

A(t) h(t) Input potential Week 15-part 2: Wilson-Cowan model : step current I(t)

Population of Neurons? Single neurons - model exists - parameters extracted from data - works well for step current - works well for time-dep. current Population equation for A(t) Week 15-part 2: Aim: from single neuron to population -existing models - integral equation

25000 identical model neurons (GLM/SRM with escape noise) parameters extracted from experimental data response to step current I(t) h(t) Input potential simulation data : Naud and Gerstner, 2012 Week 15-part 2: A(t) in simulations : step current

I(t) Rate adapt. optimal filter (rate adaptation) Benda-Herz Week 15-part 2: rate model LNP theory simulation Simple rate model: - too slow during the transient - no adaptation

I(t) Rate adapt. optimal filter (rate adaptation) Benda-Herz Week 15-part : rate model with adaptation simulation LNP theory

Rate adapt. optimal filter (rate adaptation) Benda-Herz Week 15-part 2: rate model Simple rate model: - too slow during the transient - no adaptation Adaptive rate model: - too slow during the transient - final adaptation phase correct Rate models can get the slow dynamics and stationary state correct, but are wrong during transient

h(t) I(t) ? A(t) potential A(t) t population activity Question: – what is correct? Poll!!! A(t) Wilson-Cowan Benda-Herz LNP current Ostojic-Brunel Paninski, Pillow Week 15-part 2: population equation for A(t) ?

optimal filter (rate adaptation) Week 15-part 2: improved rate models/population models Improved rate models a) rate model with effective time constant  next slides b) integral equation approach  chapter 14

h(t) Input potential Week 15-part 2: Rate model with effective time constant I(t)  Ostojic-Brunel, 2011  Shorter effective time constant during high activity

Week 15-part 2: Rate model with effective time constant Ostojic-Brunel, 2011  Shorter effective time constant during high activity  Theory fits simulation very well Image: Gerstner et al., Neuronal Dynamics, CUP 2014

optimal filter (rate adaptation) Week 15-part 2; Conclusions Rate models - are useful, because they are simple - slow dynamics and stationary state correct - simple rate models have wrong transients - improved rate models/population activity models exist

The end Reading: Chapter 15 of NEURONAL DYNAMICS, Gerstner et al., Cambridge Univ. Press (2014)