Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep-9-2006 Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
Advertisements

1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
NuMI Radiation and Environmental Protection NBI th International workshop on Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation September 5-9, 2006 Mike Martens.
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
Global Design Effort - CFS for Asian Single Tunnel Configuration Design Progress Masanobu Miyahara KEK.
1 Radiation Safety Aspects of the Linear Collider B. Racky, A. Leuschner, N. Tesch Radiation Protection Group TeV Superconducting Linear Accelerator.
Target system for hadron & neutrino beam lines at J-PARC Contents Introduction of J-PARC Target and Target system for hadron beam line Target system for.
1 T2K Beam Operation Summary (earthquake recovery and beamline survey) NBI 2012 T. Ishii (KEK) for the T2K beam group.
Radiological Aspects of ILC Hee-Seock Lee Pohang Accelerator Laboratory 2 nd Workshop of Korean ILC at PAL.
NUMI NuMI Review of the Infrastructure – W, G & V 20 July 2001 WBS Page 1 1 Infrastructure Review - W.B.S Water Systems Water Systems –Upstream.
1 Further Demands on beam Intense, Intense, Intense, ….Intense, Intense, Intense, …. –Very far detector, extremely small cross section, search small osci.
Neutrino target station at JPARC Contents Introduction Radiation (detail: talked by Oyama) Support system & maintenance Cooling system Schedule Yoshikazu.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 12, 2001 Infrastructure: Radiation Safety Page 1 Technical Components NuMI Beamline Radiation Safety Issues Radiation Safety.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
JPARC- Decay Volume M.Sakuda (KEK) 11 November Decay Volume Requirements Design 2. Construction Status 3. Summary and schedule In collaboration.
Q&A on T2K construction of beam line near detectors budget collaboration (contribution from each) T2KK.
Future upgrade of the neutrino beam-line for multi-MW beam 5 th Hyper-Kamiokande open Vancouver July Yuichi Oyama (KEK) (for T2K neutrino.
11 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK Jan.8, 2008 J-PARC PAC.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
NuMI NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction July 30, 2003 Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Air System Review Introduction Air system for.
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
Radiation safety evaluation for “KAMABOKO” Main Linac Tunnel KEK-APL : T.Sanami, S.Ban KEK-ACC : A.Enomoto, M.Miyahara ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 27, 2001 Target Hall Shielding Review Page 1 Target Hall Shielding Review Radiation Safety Coordinator Nancy Grossman FNAL.
N_TOF Technical Report INTC, CERN 21 May 2007 P. Cennini AB-ATB n_TOF Technical Coordinator Status of the old Target Removal Status of the old Target Removal.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Secondary beam production facility layout discussions SBLNF meeting 5 th Dec M. Calviani, A. Ferrari, R. Losito (EN/STI) H. Vincke (DGS/RP)
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
WP2 progress on safety E. Baussan EUROnu CB Meeting Monday 10th & Tuesday 11th June 2011 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
T2K radioactive drainage treatment Nov Geneva Yuichi Oyama (KEK)
BooNE / NuMI Rad. Protection NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) Radiation Protection for Mini-BooNE & NuMI 18 March, 2002 Mini-BooNE inputs from Peter Kasper.
Radiation Protection Considerations for the CDR Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
Horns, Hadron production etc. (from hadron production to neutrino beam) A.K.Ichikawa KEK 200/9/26 Study on horns Changing -beam energy Hadron.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Shielding Workshop R. Casey Activation Issues for NSLS-II March 28, 2007.
T2K Remote Handling T. Sekiguchi (KEK) on behalf of Tada (KEK) 2012/11/10.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
EURISOL DS Task meeting Orsay, 07 Janvier Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
T2K radiation shield and waste Aug Yuichi Oyama (KEK) Revised on Oct
The target handling concept of the pbar- separator at FAIR M. Helmecke, V. Gostishchev, R. Hettinger, K. Knie 6th High Power Targetry Workshop Oxford.
Status of the FAIR pbar target: Target handling study (M. Helmecke)
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
KEK Radiation Related Topics neutrino beam construction subgroup Yuichi Oyama (KEK) and target monitor subgroup for.
Radiation protection studies for the ESS Activation issues AD seminar Michał Jarosz , Lund.
Future Neutrino Beam in J-PARC Tetsuro Sekiguchi IPNS, KEK 2013/11/12NNN2013, Kavli IPMU1.
Beam Dump Hall Volume Beam Dump Meeting at SLAC May S.Ban
Heating and radiological
J-PARC NU Radioactive Waste Treatment
Studies on Energy Deposition and Radiation for the 4horn system
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
T2K water drainage / exhaust air
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
CFS consideration on the Main Dump and around
Beam dump for J-Parc neutrino facility
CEPC Radiation and Shielding
Presentation transcript:

Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday to me!

Summary of Regulations H < 0.25  Sv/h for free access area ● for soil around buildings H < 5mSv/h (line loss) andH < 11mSv/h (point loss) H < 12.5  Sv/h for control area ● (Human access limit is < 1mSv/week) ● Radioactive waters can be disposed to outside (ocean) if the radioactivity is less than 30Bq/cc. ● Radioactive gas (air/Helium) can be ventilated to environment if the radioactivity is less than 5mBq/cc. ● The design of neutrino beamline must satisfy following radiation level.

Overview ● Studies on Proton Beamline, Target Station, Decay Volume, Beam Dump/Muon Pit and access tunnels were already discussed in the previous NBI workshops. See ● After a hundred times of iterations between geometry change and radiation calculation, the final design were almost fixed. They were reported in the individual talks. ● Works on radiation protection are essentially adjustments of radiation shielding thickness. The calculations are based on the MARS simulation and other utilities. ● In my talk, I would like to concentrate on management of cooling waters and Air/Helium.

Cooling Water Systems(1) Target Station Primary cooling water system Secondary cooling water system Third cooling water system Heat exchanger ● Primary cooling waters are highly radio-activated when they travel the beam surroundings. They are circulated only in the underground control area during 20 days of beam period. ● They must be disposed to outside (ocean) after the beam stop. They are serious radioactive sources when they pass the heat exchanger. ●

Cooling Water Systems(2) Primary cooling water system Secondary cooling water system Third cooling water system Heat exchanger Beam dump Decay Volume To Target Station cooling water system To Beam Dump cooling water system Top view Side view

After one cycle (20 days) of 0.75MW beam operation, radio- activated primary cooling waters should be disposed to ocean. For this purpose, concentration of radioactivity in the water must be less than 30Bq/cc. Requirements for cooling water When primary cooling waters pass the heat exchanger during beam period, radiation level from radio-activated waters should not exceed the requirements from the regulation. They are H < 12.5  Sv/h for control area, and H < 0.25  Sv/h for free access area (B) (A)

Radio-activation of cooling water ● Radioisotopes are produced from Oxygen in H 2 O. Neutrons from the beam with energy larger than ~20MeV break the O nuclei O 8 Several kinds of isotopes with Z O 8 and N O 8 are made as spallation products. ● Nominal cross sections are ~30mb. They are 3 He, 7 Be, 11 C, 13 N, 15 O, 14 O, 16 N, 14 C. ● Production rate of the radioisotope is obtained from (neutron flux) x (cross section) x (volume of water).

E(MeV)lifetime comments 3H3H ymain obstacle in disposal 7 Be0.478 (10%)53.3dremoved by ion filters 11 C0.511x220m 13 N0.511x210m 15 O0.511x22m 14 O2.370s 16 N67s 14 C ydecay rate is negligible Isotopes generated in cooling water In the disposal scenario, 3 H is the dominant radioactive source. During the beam operation, 11 C, 13 N, 15 O, 14 O, 16 N in the heat exchanger are the radiation sources. (B) (A) Radiation sources in heat exchanger Negligible after a few hours of cooling

(GBq)E(MeV)lifetime H(  Sv/h) 11 C x220m16 / N x210m15 / O x22m13 / O s110 / N40067s27 / 6 Radioactive water in heat exchanger (a) (b) (b) H < 0.25  Sv/h (a) H < 12.5  Sv/h Example : Beam dump and Decay volume (a) / (b), floor thickness = 20cm, time from beam exposure = 30sec Thick floor concrete is effective for 11 C, 13 N, 15 O ● 11 C : 16  Sv/h (20cm)  0.02  Sv/h (60cm) Long travel time of water is effective for 16 N ● 16 N : 27  Sv/h (30sec)  0.03  Sv/h (100sec) From simulations of all radioisotopes, we conclude that concrete thickness 70cm and travel time 100sec are needed. ● All short-life radioisotopes are in (production rate) = (decay rate) equilibrium. ●

● After 20 days of beam operation, we wait several hours. All radioisotopes with short lifetime decay. To ocean Appropriate volume of radio-active waters are moved to the dilution tank, and mixed with fresh waters. The radioactivity in of the diluted waters is measured. Fresh waters Dilution tank DP tank Disposal procedure of radioactive water ● Primary cooling waters are moved to DP tank. The water volume is small (< 10m 3 ), but it is highly radio-activated (100~500Bq/cc). The waters are disposed to the outside (ocean) if the radiation is less than 30Bq/cc. (3) (2) (1) ● Repeat process (1)~(3) until the DP tank become empty. It takes 2 days for one cycle. Radio-activated water

Target StationDecay Volume Beam Dump To ocean Fresh waters Dilution tank DP tank To ocean Fresh waters Dilution tank DP tank 0.5Decay Volume (u) 0.1Norm. Cond. Mag. 1.0x3Horn x 3 5.0Upstream Total 1.4Target Station 3 H (GBq)component 0.4Decay Volume (d) 1.2Downstream Total 0.8Beam Dump 3 H (GBq)component 5.0GBq1.2GBq 60m 3 40m 3 5.0GBq 30Bq/cc ~170m 3 1.2GBq 30Bq/cc ~ 40m 3 1cycle/20days 3cycles/20days Summary of cooling water disposal

Radio-activation of Air/Helium ● Radioactive gas (Air/Helium) can be ventilated to environment if radioactivity is less than 5mBq/cc. If the radiation level exceeds this requirement, it must be ventilated by mixing with fresh air. ● The dominant radioactive source in air is 3 H. They are spallation products from 16 O/ 14 N and neutrons with energy larger than 20MeV. The process is almost the same as the case of the cooling waters. ● Production rate of 3 H from Helium is smaller than that from air:  He ~  Air /25. It is because He nuclei is hard to break.

Ventilation procedure (Target Station) ● ● We are planning to make a ventilation system of 13000m 3 /h capability in the target station. ● After 20 days 0.75MW beam operation, radio- activation of air in service pit, machine room, radioactive storage are less than mBq/cc. They can be ventilated without mixing with fresh air. It takes less than 1 hour. Radio-activation of cooling air for the iron shielding, Helium in target station and decay volume are more than 1Bq/cc. They must be ventilated by mixing with fresh air. It takes about 2 days after 20days beam. Even after one year of operation, it takes less than one month. ● Air in the surface building is always ventilated even in the beam period.

component volume (m 3 ) Neutron fluence (/p/cm 2 ) Radio- activation (Bq/cc) Total tritium (Bq) Ventilation time(h) Surface building   realtime Service pit230 5   x (direct) U.g. machine room330 5   x (direct) radioactive storage780 5   x (direct) Iron cooling ~ 5  x10 -5 ~2.61.6x (mixed) TS Helium135 2  x (mixed) DV Helium  x (mixed) 0.75MW, 20days operation Summary of Air/Helium ventilation in Target Station  air =30mb,  He ~  air /25

Summary Calculations of radiation shielding were almost done. ● Management of cooling waters and Air/Helium are established for beam operation period as well as for their disposal/ventilation. ● Lunch time!

Supplements

Arc Section 1W/m line loss Final Focusing 0.25kW point loss Preparation Section 0.75kW point loss Radiations in the Proton Beamline Following energy loss are assumed from our experience. ● Regulations H < 0.25  Sv/h at surface boundary of the concrete ● Soil Concrete H < 5mSv/h (line loss) and of the Soil H < 11mSv/h (point loss) at

A B C D Sub Tunnels ● We have 4 sub tunnels to access the beam line. ● Radiation level were examined by 2 independent calculations for all tunnels. H < 0.25  Sv/h for free access area and H < 11mSv/h for soil. ●

Sub Tunnel A MCNP, no 20MeV cut, ×2 Beam 750W point loss 0.10  Sv/h 8500  Sv/h  Sv/h 0.17  Sv/h 0.14  Sv/h 6700  Sv/h 0.63  Sv/h 4.53  Sv/h 1.07  Sv/h 2.36  Sv/h 13.5  Sv/h 19.2  Sv/h 0.34  Sv/h 0.67  Sv/h Nominal error is from 5% to 20% H < 0.25  Sv/h for free access area H < 11mSv/h for soil

Sub Tunnel B 10W point loss 2.4mSv/h (20% error) MCNP, no 20MeV cut, ×2 exec041203/201,202 Beam 2.6  Sv/h 3.4  Sv/h 4.8  Sv/h 6.4  Sv/h 9.4  Sv/h 14.4  Sv/h 22.0  Sv/h 38.2  Sv/h 80.0  Sv/h  Sv/h  Sv/h 1.6  Sv/h  Sv/h H < 0.25  Sv/h for free access area H < 11mSv/h for soil ● Complicated simulations were executed for all facilities very carefully.

● From end of 2007 to spring 2008, we must install super- conducting magnets in the downstream of proton beam line. Commission of 50GeV ring has been started. ● If we install temporal radiation shielding and possible maximum energy loss is adjusted to be 100W, radiation level in the working area is less than 0.25  Sv/h. ● Moving magnet installation schedule to 2008 summer shutdown is also under consideration. Radiation in the Proton beam line during the commission of 50GeV main ring Install super-conducting magnet in this region temporal radiation shielding < 0.25  Sv/h 100W (Concrete blocks of 1m thickness)

Service pit H < 25mSv/h Machine room H<0.35mSv/h Control area (Inside building) H < 12.5  Sv/h Free access area H < 0.25  Sv/h Bottom Soil H < 1.6mSv/h Storage area A few mSv/h North Soil H < 0.04mSv/h South Soil H < 0.03mSv/h Radiation dose during beam operation Fence 0.75MW operation

Service pit H ~ 2  Sv/h Storage area H ~ 0.1  Sv/h Hot lab. H ~ 0.02  Sv/h 30 days operation and one day cooling Machine room H ~ 0.03  Sv/h Residual dose after beam stop

Determination of the control area boundary by MCNP Surface building 0.25  Sv/h Top view We need 10m between the surface building and the fence ● Neutron sources are defined on the floor, and the dose above the floor is adjusted to be 12.5  Sv/h. ● 12.5  Sv/h

Open the shielding 3m Requirement for the boundary during the maintenance 0.25  Sv/h MCNP is used.  -ray source are ● defined on the Al tunnel surface. 0.75MW 1-year operation, 1-day cooling Radiation from residual dose in the tunnel is satisfactory small. ● 0.4Sv/h

Residual dose of the Target/Horn ● Residual dose of 3cm  x 90cm Carbon Graphite target (in a Al container) and 1 st magnetic horn is calculated. + DCHAIN-SP + 7 Be life 50GeV 0.75MW proton Target Horn (1)(Sv/h)(2)(Sv/h)(1)(Sv/h) 1 day month year year8.3x x year year x QAD-CGGP2 (1)NMTC/JAM(nmtclib95) + cross section(9mb) (2)Hadron fluence(MARS) After 1 year operation ● Horn must be kept in the storage for more than 10 years.

Aluminum 0.2m Concrete 1m Iron 2.2m 22  Sv/h 0.56Sv/h 0.65Sv/h 0.1  Sv/h Residual dose of the Shielding ● ● Residual dose of the shielding calculated by MARS (1 year operation, 1 day cooling, 0.75MW) ● Further calculation is needed after the “scenario” is fixed. Use of Al surface reduce the radiation about one order of magnitude.

Calculation of Decay Volume Shielding As the target station, virtual cylindrical geometry is used in the MARS calculation. ● m downstream of target station He Concrete 5.5m 5mSv/h log(H(mSv/particle)) Concrete thickness (m) 5.0 ~ 5.9m of concrete and additional ~ 6m of soil are needed to satisfy concrete and soil surface condition ●

End