Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Market Trials Outage Scheduling Qualifications Weekly Update February 18, 2010.
Advertisements

ERCOT Nodal Protocols Telemetry Requirements Proposal
Outage Coordination Overview D.W. Rickerson ERCOT Outage Supervisor 12/1/2008.
Real-Time Transmission Congestion Management & Market Effects
11/08/2005 Ken Donohoo How Does NMMS meet the Nodal Protocol Requirements John Adams 3/23/2006.
October 22, 2007 TPTF Meeting Early Delivery Systems Status Update and Forecast Daryl Cote/John Webb/John Hall.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Requirement Documents November 7, 2006 Sai Moorty MMS Project.
03/22/07 TPTF meeting ICCP Quality Codes Bill Blevins/Frank Kendall.
QSE/RE Transmission Facilities Outage Coordination Workshop.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Market Trials and Data Verification ROS Meeting By Steve Grendel, ERCOT Thursday, 01/11/2007.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy Management System Requirement Documents December 5, 2006 Jay Dondeti EMS Project.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Review and Request for Approval May 2007 John Webb.
NPRR514, Seasonal Generation Resource Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2013 Amanda Frazier.
SIMPLE TRANSMISSION OUTAGE. Nodal Protocol Definition 2.26 Simple Transmission Outage A Planned Outage or Maintenance Outage of any Transmission Element.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
1 ERCOT Nodal Protocols Telemetry Requirements. 2 Protocol References Telemetry TAC will establish TASK force and approve a telemetry criteria.
1 Cutover Market Call December 01, :30 AM.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris November 3, 2011.
Transmission Outage Process April Purpose In compliance with the Protocols and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Operating Guides,
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC September 2 nd, 2010.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Release 3 – WebEx Conference July 10, 2007.
© Property of ERCOT /17/20041 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Adams November 17, 2004.
January 21, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Initial Approach Discussion.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
– 1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Electrical Buses – 2Texas Nodal Electrical Bus Definition as Proposed in NPRR 63 Electrical Bus A physical transmission element.
Network Model Management System (NMMS)
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
1 State Estimator performance. 2 State of Technology Many metrics have been proposed for measuring State Estimator performance.. PI = min Σ( Z – h i (x))^
1 Readiness Scorecard – May ‘10 NATF Brandon McElfresh Nodal Readiness and Transition May 4, 2010.
NDSWG Report June 16, NDSWG Report Regular meeting held May 16 in Taylor Telemetry / State Estimator Update Naming Convention Electrical Bus Designation.
ERCOT Guideline for Interim Updates to the Network Operations Model Excerpted from the “Modeling Expectations” whitepaper D.W. Rickerson.
1 Market Trials Update NATF May 4, 2010.
Model load frequency Discussion John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Rob Bevill January 5, 2012.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Cutover Update NATF 2 November Today’s Agenda Reminders Program Status 24 Hour LFC Test Update Cutover Update Soft Launch 2 November 2010NATF.
Nodal Readiness Plan Update Ron Hinsley Update for TAC November 3, 2005.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting NATF Sep 29, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
Telemetry and State Estimator Standards Network Data Support Working Group June 16, 2006.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Integrated ERCOT Readiness and Transition (IRT) TPTF – December 4 th, 2006 ERCOT Qualification.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS Market Trials Approach Wednesday, November 29, 2006.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
Retail Workshop ERCOT Nodal Update October 06, 2010.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Text reason for Deviation from Defined High Sustained Limit/Low Sustained Limit John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
NPRRs 705NPRR Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process. In the Resource Interconnection Handbook,
1 Market Trials Update NATF January 5, 2010.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
PRS Workshop- NPRR755/NOGRR154 WAN communications of Critical Market Data and Agency-Only QSE Feb 29, 2016.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
WRUC – Long Lead Time Commitments QSE Manager’s Working Group ERCOT Operations March 23, 2016.
RELIABILITY AND OPERATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE Report to TAC Austin, TX December 1, 2011 Kenneth A. Donohoo, P.E. Chairperson Oncor Electric Delivery Company.
Texas Nodal Electrical Buses and Outage Scheduling.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Approach March 2007.
August 11, 2008 TPTF EDS Sequence and Durations Discussion Daryl Cote.
Nodal Planning Go Live Austin, TX February 3, 2011
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
Settlement Update Austin Rosel ERCOT February 27, 2017.
Texas Nodal EMS Forced Outage Detection Business Requirements Document Carlos Gonzalez-Perez – August 21st,
Presentation transcript:

Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment

The Zonal World’s “One Hour Rule” Currently, QSE’s and TSP’s are allowed to operate transmission level breakers and switches within a one hour period to: Open/close generator disconnect switches associated with a resource coming on or off line. Open/close transmission line breakers associated with a scheduled line outage. Open/close autotransformer high side and low side breakers associated with a scheduled autotransformer outage. Open/close breakers for unscheduled maintenance problems (pressure alarms, lubrication checks, fault clearing tests, etc).

OS = Subname AT1 01/18/ – 1600 Doble

OS = FSUBTSUB05 01/18/ – 1600 Line Maintenance

In the Nodal Environment Nodal has new EMS and Network functions such as DAM, DRUC, HRUC, SCED and Forced Outage Detection with links to the Outage Scheduler function. The question is: in Nodal, will QSEs and TSPs schedule equipment outages to open/close breakers and switches to place resources, transformers and transmission lines in and out of service as they currently do? Or, will all supplemental breaker and switch operations associated with a resource, transformer and line outage also need to be entered in the Outage Scheduler?

Some of the “Or” impacts will be: Approximately % increase in the number of outages in the Outage Scheduler. Increased workload and complexity for entities entering outages. Increased workload and complexity for ERCOT Outage Coordinators evaluating and approving outages. Increased workload and complexity for ERCOT and entity Real Time Operators monitoring outages and entering actual outage times in the OS. Confusion for market participants evaluating outages for CRR or other purposes, etc. Inability for Resources and TSPs to operate their equipment for real time issues (i.e pressure alarms, lubrication tests, etc.)

Subname AT1 01/18/ – 1600 Doble0750 Subname SW70101/18/ – 1600 Doble0755 Subname SW70201/18/ – 1600 Doble0755 Subname Bkr10101/18/ – 0800AT10723 Subname Bkr10201/18/ – 0800AT10725 Subname Bkr10301/18/ – 0800AT1etc……. Subname Bkr10401/18/ – 0800AT1 Subname Bkr20101/18/ – 0800AT1 Subname Bkr20201/18/ – 0800AT1 Subname Bkr20301/18/ – 0800AT1 Subname Bkr10101/18/ AT1 Subname Bkr10201/18/ AT1 Subname Bkr10301/18/ AT1 Subname Bkr10401/18/ AT1 Subname Bkr20101/18/ AT1 Subname Bkr20201/18/ AT1 Subname Bkr20301/18/ AT1

Generation Substation Example

Continuous Telemetry of the Status of Breakers and Switches (1) Each TSP and QSE shall provide telemetry, as described in this subsection, to ERCOT on the status of all breakers and switches used to switch any Transmission Element or load modeled by ERCOT. Each TSP and QSE is not required to install telemetry on individual breakers and switches, where the telemetered status shown to ERCOT is current and free from ambiguous changes in state caused by the TSP or QSE switching operations and TSP or QSE personnel. Each TSP or QSE shall update the status of any breaker or switch through manual entries, if necessary, to communicate the actual current state of the device to ERCOT, except if the change in state is expected to return to the prior state within one minute. If in the sole opinion of ERCOT, the manual updates of the TSP or QSE have been unsuccessful in maintaining the accuracy required to support State Estimator performance to a TAC-approved predefined standard as described in Section , State Estimator Performance Standard, ERCOT may request that the TSP or QSE install complete telemetry from the breaker or switch to the TSP or QSE, and then to ERCOT. In making the determination to request installation of additional telemetry from a breaker or switch, ERCOT shall consider the economic implications of inaccurate representation of Model Loads in LMP results versus the cost to remedy. (2) ERCOT shall measure TSP or QSE performance in providing accurate data that do not include ambiguous changes in state and shall report the performance metrics on the MIS Secure Area on a monthly basis. Nodal Protocol 3 Wording for possible NPRR

(3) Unless there is an emergency condition, a TSP or QSE must obtain approval from ERCOT to purposely open a breaker or switch unless that breaker or switch is shown in a Planned Outage in the Outage Scheduler, or the device will return to its previous state within thirty (30) one minutes. Also, a TSP or QSE must obtain approval from ERCOT before closing any breaker or switch, except in response to a Forced Outage, or an emergency, or the device will return to its previous state within thirty (30) one minutes. (4) ERCOT shall monitor the data condition codes of all breakers and switches showing loss of communication or scan function in the Network Operations Model. When the telemetry of breakers and switches is lost, ERCOT shall use the last known state of the device for Security Analysis as updated by the Outage Scheduler and through verbal communication with the TSP or QSE. ERCOT’s systems must identify probable errors in switch or breaker status and ERCOT shall act to resolve or correct such errors in a timely manner as described in Section 6, Adjustment Period and Real-Time Operations. (5) ERCOT shall establish a system that provides alarms to ERCOT operators when there is a change in status of any monitored transmission breaker or switch, and an indication of whether the device change of status was planned in the Outage Scheduler. ERCOT operators shall monitor any changes in status not only for reliability of operations, but also for accuracy and impact on the operation of the Security Constrained Economic Dispatch functions and subsequent potential for calculation of inaccurate LMPs.