CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICH Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria (RAAPAC) Overview and Update Robert H. King, Sr. Office of Pharmaceutical.
Advertisements

1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
1 The critical challenge facing banks and regulators under Basel II: improving risk management through implementation of Pillar 2 Simon Topping Hong Kong.
ISO 9001 : 2000.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
Options for Regulation and the Impact of Regulation on the Marketplace 29 November 2005 Alan Kent
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
What’s New in the FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate and Risk Based Systems Inspection Rick Perlman Chair Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Division ASQ.
Perspectives on New Paradigms of Risk and Compliance in Pharmaceutical Development: Quality by Design, PAT, and Design Space David J. Cummings OPS Quality.
ISO 9001 Interpretation : Exclusions
Configuration Management
Quality System Model ICH Q10
Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science July 20-21, 2004 Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
Lecture 3 Strategic Planning for IT Projects (Chapter 7)
1 Quality Management for 21 st Century S. Srinivasan CEO & Managing Director Matrix Laboratories Limited.
Final Report on Process Analytical Technology (PAT) and Manufacturing Science Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office of Pharmaceutical Science,
Regulatory requirements and benefits converting to Continued Process Verification.
ONDQA Perspective on Post Approval Changes Eric P. Duffy, PhD Director, Division of Post-Market Evaluation, ONDQA, CDER, FDA Public Meeting: Supplements.
1 Revisions to 21 CFR Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application PhRMA Perspective FDA Public Meeting – 7 Feb 2007.
FDA’s Perspective Continued - Where We Are ?. GMP Task Groups.
Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT.
Growth and Success through Partnering & Outsourcing.
WHAT IS ISO 9000.
Quality By Design - A Generic Industry Perspective
Delivering a Modern Effective Pharmaceutical Quality System
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
Justina A. Molzon, MS Pharm, JD
Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard CWA 15793:2008
N By: Md Rezaul Huda Reza n
ISO 9000 and Public Awareness and Information Session 22 February 2006 Owen Glave, MBA-TQM.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
Software Quality Assurance Lecture 4. Lecture Outline ISO ISO 9000 Series of Standards ISO 9001: 2000 Overview ISO 9001: 2008 ISO 9003: 2004 Overview.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Introduction to ISO 9001:2000.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Strategic Plan Kidsafe NSW Inc.. ‘A Safer World for Kids’ Kidsafe NSW Inc.
1 PAT and Biological Products Tom Layloff FDA-SGE Management Sciences for Health The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily.
FDA’s Perspective on the “Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century” Initiative David J. Horowitz, Esq. Director, CDER/FDA, Office of Compliance Advisory.
Assessing the influence on processes when evolving the software architecture By Larsson S, Wall A, Wallin P Parul Patel.
1 An Update on ICH Guideline Q8 – Pharmaceutical Development FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science: 5 Oct 2006 Dr John C Berridge Senior Regulatory.
PhRMA Perspective on FDA Final Report FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences October 20, 2004 G.P. Migliaccio, Pfizer Inc.
Risk-Based CMC Review - OGD Perspective Gary J. Buehler, R.Ph. Director Office of Generic Drugs July 21, 2004 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science.
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
10:00 A.M. – Noon 7 June 2004 ICH Quality Plenary Meeting.
Progress in FDA’s Drug Product Quality Initiative Janet Woodcock, M.D. November 13, 2003.
1 Office of Pharmaceutical Science on Jon Clark FDA/CDER/OPS Associate Director for Policy Development.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Subcommittee of the ACPS Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. ACPS Meeting October 22, 2002.
ICH Quality Topics Update
1 A Seminar On Pharmaceutical Outsourcing A Seminar On Pharmaceutical Outsourcing.
Comparability Protocols Nancy Sager Associate Director, QIS-Chemistry FDA/CDER/OPS.
Second Meeting of the FDA/ACPS Process Analytical Technology: Closing Remarks Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
FDA’s Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science The Subcommittee on Process Analytical Technologies (PAT): Closing Remarks Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy.
Drug Quality Regulations for the 21 st Century PhRMA Perspective Manufacturing Subcommittee Meeting – May 21, 2003 Gerry Migliaccio Pfizer Inc.
Use of Risk-based Approach for Regulating CMC Changes to Approved Applications FDA Public Meeting February 7, 2007.
Examining Drug Quality Regulation Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Public Meeting on 21 CFR February,
FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July 22-23, 2008 Introduction and Update Helen N. Winkle Director, Office of.
VICH Training Strategy Steven D. Vaughn, DVM Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
The Benefits of VICH to VICH Member Countries and Regions DONALD A. PRATER, DVM Director, U.S. FDA Europe Office Office of International Programs Office.
Total Quality Management Pharmaceuticals. MEDICINE/pharmaceuticals Medicine / Brand/ Product.
An Update on ICH Guideline – Pharmaceutical Development
Quality Metrics for better Quality Compliance
Pharmaceutical Quality in the 21st Century
FDA GUI Summary of Contract Manufacturing Arrangement for Drugs: Quality Agreements November This summary was prepared by the Rx-360.
Quality System.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Overview June 10, 2006.
Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER.
Presentation transcript:

CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA

CDER / Office of Compliance Why A Harmonized Approach to A Comprehensive, Modern and Robust Quality System? (Why ICH Q10?) Improve quality of pharmaceutical products Improve CGMP compliance Facilitate continual improvement Necessary for implementation & effective utilization of: –Quality By Design (Q8 Pharmaceutical Development) –Risk Management (Q9 Pharmaceutical Risk Management) –Effective knowledge transfer CAPA Change control Review and Inspection –Demonstrating state of control Ability to manage movement within the design space

CDER / Office of Compliance ICH Q10 Continuous Learning and Improvement –Much learning takes place through process experience –Our 21 st Century Regulatory System will facilitate this improvement –Flexibility –Management and Performance based regulation

CDER / Office of Compliance ICH Q10 EWG Mission To establish a new tripartite guideline describing the model for an effective quality system needed to establish and maintain a state of control that can ensure the realisation of a quality drug product and facilitate continual improvement over the product life cycle.

CDER / Office of Compliance Q10 is Optional Q10 is intended to describe an approach to developing an effective quality system. A firm may choose to adopt certain elements of Q10, all of Q10 or an alternate approach to a quality system. The extent to which Q10 or any other quality system approach is adopted may depend on a firm’s existing quality system as well as the size and complexity of operations. The design, implementation and demonstration of an effective Quality System can create a basis from flexible regulatory approaches.

CDER / Office of Compliance Q10 Scope Drug substance (small and large molecule) operations Drug product operations Throughout the product lifecycle, including pharmaceutical development, technology transfer and manufacturing.

CDER / Office of Compliance Q10 Basis Customer requirements Aligned with ISO, EU GMP,Q7A,FDA Quality Systems Guidance Bridges GMPs in various regions to a common approach for quality systems Prevent delays of introductions of new and stoppages of existing medicines Removes impediments to modernizing products and processes paralleling other industries which have made strides in quality culture and implementation

CDER / Office of Compliance Q10 Areas to Cover Common terminology Definition and maintenance of the Quality System The role of management including senior management Identification of performance indicators, management of trends to determine effects on processes and products Effective change control processes

CDER / Office of Compliance Quality System Elements Product Realization –Provide a manufacturing process capable of consistently producing a medicinal product of the quality required to meet customer requirements. Continual Improvement –Facilitate and control product quality improvements, process variability reduction, innovation, and quality system enhancements, thereby managing the risks related to product quality and the quality system.

CDER / Office of Compliance Continual Improvement Two Facets –Product quality –Quality System effectiveness

CDER / Office of Compliance Q10 and Q8 Processes for pharmaceutical development (Q8 or equivalent) are key linkages to product realization within the Pharmaceutical Quality System. Q8 provides the process understanding that serves as the basis for continual improvement.

CDER / Office of Compliance Q10 and Q9 The Quality System should encourage and facilitate the use of Quality Risk Management (Q9) approaches throughout the system. The design and application of processes within the Quality System should be based on appropriate risk management principles and methods

CDER / Office of Compliance Outsourcing The Quality System and management responsibilities should extend to the oversight, control and review of outsourced operations. The contract manufacturer or service provider may have an independent Quality System that links to a firm’s Quality System The contract manufacturer or service provider may operate within a firm’s Quality System.

CDER / Office of Compliance Expected Benefits Technical Innovation Post-approval changes that can be managed through internal change management processes. Design Space, Control Strategy and PAT New approaches to process validation that benefits from lifecycle improvements including Continuous Quality Verification where feasible Meaningful investigations Effective CAPA

CDER / Office of Compliance Q10 Construction Issues in play: Following ISO Structure Implementing Change Control Relationship to FDA final Guidance of Quality Systems Relationship of Quality System to the Pharmaceutical Life Cycle Depth and Level of Detail

CDER / Office of Compliance Q10 Construction cont’d Issues in play: Fit with overall Q8 and Q9 strategy and plan for implementation As part of implementation, the plan for regulatory relief Inspections Submission of manufacturing supplements

CDER / Office of Compliance Work Plan Currently being drafted by Expert Working Group Hope to achieve Step 2 consensus in Spring 2007

CDER / Office of Compliance Conclusions An international harmonized approach to the manufacturing quality of pharmaceuticals Change control empowered to the manufacturer within design space and with a robust quality system More efficient manufacturing and regulatory processes.