PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) MODELING OVERVIEW & DAILY MODE COMPONENTS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROCESS-BASED, DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS New generation Source waters and flowpaths Physically based.
Advertisements

C2 NWS Snow Model. C2 Snow Model Terms  SWE - Snow water equivalent  AESC - Areal extent of snow cover  Heat Deficit - Energy required to bring the.
Introduction to runoff modeling on the North Slope of Alaska using the Swedish HBV Model Emily Youcha, Douglas Kane University of Alaska Fairbanks Water.
The NAM Model. Evaporation Overland flow The excess rainfall is divided between overland flow and infiltration.
Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)
Modeling Rainfall Runoff and Snowmelt in the Pine Flat Watershed By Rachael Hersh-Burdick USACE Water Management Sacramento District UC Davis Civil and.
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3 George H. Leavesley, Research Hydrologist, USGS, Denver, CO.
Onondaga County Regional Stream Simulation Study Dan Coyle Major Prof. – Dr. Hassett MPS Degree.
Use of Multi-Model Super-Ensembles in Hydrology Lauren Hay George Leavesley Martyn Clark * Steven Markstrom Roland Viger U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources.
Arctic Land Surface Hydrology: Moving Towards a Synthesis Global Datasets.
Hydrologic/Watershed Modeling Glenn Tootle, P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Hydrology and Water Resources Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept. Physically-based Distributed Hydrologic Modeling.
Crops to be Irrigated Factors for consideration
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
MODELING OF COLD SEASON PROCESSES Snow Ablation and Accumulation Frozen Ground Processes.
WaterSmart, Reston, VA, August 1-2, 2011 Steve Markstrom and Lauren Hay National Research Program Denver, CO Jacob LaFontaine GA Water.
Great Valley Water Resources Science Forum
National Weather Service River Forecast System Model Calibration Fritz Fiedler Hydromet 00-3 Tuesday, 23 May East Prospect Road, Suite 1 Fort.
El Vado Dam Hydrologic Evaluation Joseph Wright, P.E. Bureau of Reclamation Technical Services Center Flood Hydrology and Meteorology Group.
Ag. & Biological Engineering
USGS Watershed Model Evolution – RRM(1972) to GSFLOW(2012) USGS Watershed Model Evolution – RRM(1972) to GSFLOW(2012) George Leavesley, USGS Retired and.
AWRA Water Resources Conference Jacksonville, FL, November Modeling of Watershed Systems Lauren Hay Steve Markstrom Steve Regan.
PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) MODELING OVERVIEW & DAILY MODE COMPONENTS.
Streamflow Predictability Tom Hopson. Conduct Idealized Predictability Experiments Document relative importance of uncertainties in basin initial conditions.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Analysis of Evaporation Basic Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009 LMRFC.
Preliminary Results of Global Climate Simulations With a High- Resolution Atmospheric Model P. B. Duffy, B. Govindasamy, J. Milovich, K. Taylor, S. Thompson,
Coupling of Atmospheric and Hydrologic Models: A Hydrologic Modeler’s Perspective George H. Leavesley 1, Lauren E. Hay 1, Martyn P. Clark 2, William J.
These notes are provided to help you pay attention IN class. If I notice poor attendance, fewer notes will begin to appear on these pages 1.
LL-III physics-based distributed hydrologic model in Blue River Basin and Baron Fork Basin Li Lan (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower.
Integration of SNODAS Data Products and the PRMS Model – An Evaluation of Streamflow Simulation and Forecasting Capabilities George Leavesley 1, Don Cline.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS J28 Earth Science for National Action on Climate Change Canada Water Accounts AET estimates for.
WUP-FIN training, 3-4 May, 2005, Bangkok Hydrological modelling of the Nam Songkhram watershed.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) SNOW MODELING OVERVIEW.
San Juan Basin. San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2) Upper ( ) Middle ( ) Lower ( ) San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2)
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Evapotranspiration Partitioning in Land Surface Models By: Ben Livneh.
Adjustment of Global Gridded Precipitation for Orographic Effects Jennifer Adam.
Understanding hydrologic changes: application of the VIC model Vimal Mishra Assistant Professor Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Gandhinagar
PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) SNOW MODELING OVERVIEW.
Additional data sources and model structure: help or hindrance? Olga Semenova State Hydrological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia Pedro Restrepo Office.
A Soil-water Balance and Continuous Streamflow Simulation Model that Uses Spatial Data from a Geographic Information System (GIS) Advisor: Dr. David Maidment.
Potential for medium range global flood prediction Nathalie Voisin 1, Andrew W. Wood 1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental.
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
1 Understanding Sources of Error and Uncertainty NOAA’S COLORADO BASIN RIVER FORECAST CENTER.
Parameterisation by combination of different levels of process-based model physical complexity John Pomeroy 1, Olga Semenova 2,3, Lyudmila Lebedeva 2,4.
PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) STORM-MODE COMPONENTS.
Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw
Fritz Fiedler Calibration 2290 East Prospect Road, Suite 1 Fort Collins, Colorado National Weather Service River Forecast System Cooperative Program.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Scenario generation for long-term water budget.
Surface Net SW Radiation Latitude Clouds Albedo Source Reanalysis for
Performance Comparison of an Energy- Budget and the Temperature Index-Based (Snow-17) Snow Models at SNOTEL Stations Fan Lei, Victor Koren 2, Fekadu Moreda.
General Introduction. Developed by USGS Freely available via Internet
Hydrological Simulations for the pan- Arctic Drainage System Fengge Su 1, Jennifer C. Adam 1, Laura C. Bowling 2, and Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1 Department.
ENVI 412 Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurement Dr. Philip B. Bedient Rice University.
TOP_PRMS George Leavesley, Dave Wolock, and Rick Webb.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
1 WaterWare description Data management, Objects Monitoring, time series Hydro-meteorological data, forecasts Rainfall-runoff: RRM, floods Irrigation water.
Nathalie Voisin1 , Andrew W. Wood1 , Dennis P. Lettenmaier1 and Eric F
Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
150 years of land cover and climate change impacts on streamflow in the Puget Sound Basin, Washington Dennis P. Lettenmaier Lan Cuo Nathalie Voisin University.
Hydrology CIVL341.
Forests, water & research in the Sierra Nevada
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
GHOST (Generic Hydrologic Overland-Subsurface Toolkit)
Presentation transcript:

PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM (PRMS) MODELING OVERVIEW & DAILY MODE COMPONENTS

BASIC HYDROLOGIC MODEL Q = P - ET  S Runoff Precip Met Vars Ground Water Soil Moisture Reservoirs Basin Chars Snow & Ice Water use Soil Moisture Components

SUGGESTED REGERENCE ON WATERSHED MODELING - Overview chapters on basic concepts - 25 Models, each a chapter with discussions of model components and assumptions

PRMS

PRMS Parameters original version

PRMS Parameters MMS Version

PRMS Features Modular Design Deterministic Distributed Parameter Daily and Storm Mode Variable Time Step User Modifiable Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis

SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS LUMPED MODELS LUMPED MODELS - No account of spatial variability of processes, input, boundary conditions, and system geometry DISTRIBUTED MODELS DISTRIBUTED MODELS - Explicit account of spatial variability of processes, input, boundary conditions, and watershed characteristics QUASI-DISTRIBUTED MODELS QUASI-DISTRIBUTED MODELS - Attempt to account for spatial variability, but use some degree of lumping in one or more of the modeled characteristics.

TOPMODEL GRID-BASED MODELS - Explicit grid to grid - Statistical distribution ----(topgraphic index) Distributed Approaches

Fully Coupled 1-D unsat and 3-D sat flow model

HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE UNITS (HRUs)

Distributed Parameter Approach Hydrologic Response Units - HRUs HRU Delineation Based on: - Slope - Aspect - Elevation - Vegetation - Soil - Precip Distribution

HRUs

HRU DELINEATION AND CHARACTERIZATION Polygon Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs) Grid Cell Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs)

Grid Complexity

3rd HRU DIMENSION

PRMS

MODEL DRIVING VARIABLES - TEMPERATURE - PRECIPITATION - max and min daily - lapse rate varied monthly or daily - spatial and elevation adjustment - form estimation

MODEL DRIVING VARIABLES - SOLAR RADIATION - measured data extrapolated to slope-aspect of each HRU - when no measured data, then estimated using temperature, precip, and potential solar radiation - max daily temperature procedure - daily temperature range procedure

Max Temperature-Elevation Relations

TEMPERATURE tmax(hru) = obs_tmax(hru_tsta) - tcrx(mo) tmin(hru) = obs_tmin(hru_tsta) - tcrx(mo) tcrx(mo) = [ tmax_lapse(mo) * elfac(hru)] - For each HRU where elfac(hru) = [hru_elev - tsta_elev(hru_tsta)] / tmax_adj(hru)

Precipitation-Elevation Relations

Mean Daily Precipitation Schofield Pass (10,700 ft) vs Crested Butte (9031 ft) MONTH Mean daily precip, in.

Precipitation Gage Catch Error vs Wind Speed (Larsen and Peck, 1972) Rain (shield makes little difference) Snow (shielded) Snow (unshielded)

Precipitation Gauge Intercomparison Rabbit Ears Pass, Colorado

PRECIPITATION - DEPTH hru_precip(hru) = precip(hru_psta) * pcor(mo) pcor(mo) = Rain_correction or Snow_correction For each HRU

PRECIPITATION - FORM (rain, snow, mixture of both) For each HRU RAIN tmin(hru) > tmax_allsnow tmax(hru) > tmax_allrain(mo) SNOW tmax(hru) <= tmax_allsnow

PRECIPITATION - FORM (rain, snow, mixture of both) For each HRU Precipitation Form Variable Snowpack Adjustment MIXTURE OTHER prmx =adjmix_rain(mo) tmax(hru) - tmax_allsnow (tmax(hru) - tmin(hru) * []

Precipitation Distribution Methods (module) Manual (precip_prms.f) Auto Elevation Lapse Rate (precip_laps_prms.f) XYZ (xyz_dist.f) PCOR Computation

Manual PCOR Computation

Auto Elevation Lapse Rate PCOR Computation For each HRU hru_psta = precip station used to compute hru_precip [ hru_precip = precip(hru_psta) * pcor ] hru_plaps = precip station used with hru_psta to compute precip lapse rate by month [pmo_rate(mo)] hru_psta hru_plaps

PCOR Computation pmn_mo padj_sn or padj_rn elv_plaps Auto Elevation Lapse Rate Parameters

adj_p = pmo_rate * Auto Elevation Lapse Rate PCOR Computation For each HRU snow_adj(mo) = 1. + (padj_sn(mo) * adj_p) if padj_sn(mo) < 0. then snow_adj(mo) = - padj_sn(mo) pmo_rate(mo) = pmn_mo(hru_plaps) - pmn_mo(hru_psta) elv_plaps(hru_plaps) - elv_plaps(hru_psta) hru_elev - elv_plaps(hru_psta) pmn_mo(hru_psta)

XYZ Distribution

San Juan Basin Observation Stations 37 XYZ Spatial Redistribution of Precip and Temperature 1. Develop Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) equations (in XYZ) for PRCP, TMAX, and TMIN by month using all appropriate regional observation stations.

Precipitation-Elevation Relations

XYZ Distribution Exhaustive Search Analysis - Select best station subset from all stations - Estimate gauge undercatch error for snow events - Select precipitation frequency station set

XYZ Spatial Redistribution 2. Daily mean PRCP, TMAX, and TMIN computed for a subset of stations (3) determined by the Exhaustive Search analysis to be best stations 3. Daily station means from (2) used with monthly MLR xyz relations to estimate daily PRCP, TMAX, and TMIN on each HRU according to the XYZ of each HRU Precip and temp stations

2-D Example XYZ and Rain Day Frequency Elevation Mean Station Precipitation P1 P2 P3 Precipitation in the frequency station set but not the mean station set Precipitation in the mean station set Mean station set elevation Slope from MLR

Application of XYZ Methodology Chesapeake Bay Subdivide the monthly MLRs by Sea Level Pressure (SLP) patterns using a map-pattern classification procedure Sea Level Pressure Patterns Low SLP High SLP

Application of XYZ Methodology Chesapeake Bay PRCP subdivided by SLP Low SLP High SLP Sea Level Pressure Patterns Mean Daily PRCP (mm/day) Mean Daily Precipitation

SOLAR RADIATION where orad is observerd sw radiation pot_rad and pot_horad are computed from hru slope, aspect, & latitude - Missing orad is computed by either - obs_tmax - SolarRad relation - [obs_tmax - obs_tmin] --> sky cover --> SolarRad relation For each HRU swrad(hru) = ( pot_rad(hru) / pot_horad ) * orad /cos_slp(hru)

Degree-Day Solar Radiation Estimation Procedure (non precip day) For days with precip, daily value is multiplied by a seasonal adjustment factor

Temperature-Range Radiation Estimation Procedure (non precip day) For days with precip, daily value is multiplied by a seasonal adjustment factor ccov = ccov_slope(mo) * (obs_tmax – obs_tmin) + ccov_intcp(mo) ccovtmax - tmin orad/pot_rad = crad_coef + (1. – crad_coef) * [(1. – ccov)** crad_exp] crad_coef and crad_exp from Thompson, 1976, WRR

DRIVING VARIABLE INPUT SOURCES Point measurement data Radar data Satellite data Atmospheric model data

RADAR DATA NEXRAD vs S-POL, Buffalo Creek, CO

Satellite Image for Snow-Covered Area Computation

Statistical Downscaling: Predictors (daily data from NCEP re-analysis) total column precipitable water 500 hPa geopotential height meridional component of wind (from 500 hPa height field) Predictands precipitation occurrence wet-day amount (PRCP) (NWS obs.; 3 station ave.) Calibration Period ( )Validation Period ( ) Multiple Linear Regression by season (DJF, MAM, JJA, SON)

Statistical Downscaling: Multiple Linear Regression by season (DJF, MAM, JJA, SON) Calibration Period ( )Validation Period ( ) Predictands temperature (TMAX, TMIN) (NWS obs.; 3 station ave.) Predictors (daily data from NCEP re-analysis) mean sea level pressure zonal component geostrophic wind at sea level total column precipitable water 500 hPa geopotential height

Dynamical Downscaling RegCM2 (Giorgi et al., 1993, 1996)  Period:  Boundary conditions: NCEP Reanalysis  52 km grid (Lambert conformal projection)

Representative Elevation of Atmospheric Model Output based on Regional Station Observations

Nash-Sutcliff Coefficient of Efficiency Scores Simulated vs Observed Daily Streamflow

Animas River, CO Simulated Q with station data (S_3) and downscaled data (N_ds) from NCEP reanalysis

PRMS

INTERCEPTION net_precip = [ hru_precip * (1. - covden)] + (PTF * covden) PTF = hru_precip - (max_stor - intcp_stor) Throughfall Losses from intcp_stor Rain - Free water surface evaporation rate Snow - % of potet rate for sublimation Net precipitation PTF = 0. if [ hru_precip <= (max_stor - intcp_stor)] if [ hru_precip > (max_stor - intcp_stor)]

PRMS

Various Concepts of ET vs Soil Moisture

Transpiration vs Soil Moisture Content and Weather Conditions

Potential Evapotranspiration (potet) - Pan Evaporation - Hamon - Jensen - Haise potet(hru) = epan_coef(mo) * pan_evap potet(hru) = hamon_coef(mo) * dyl 2 * vdsat potet(hru) = jh_coef(mo) * (tavf(hru) - jh_coef_hru) * rin

Computed ET (AET) as function of PET and Soil Texture PRMS to PRMS/MMS SMAV = soil_moist SMAX = soil_moist_max RECHR = soil_rechr REMX = soil_rechr_max

Actual Evapotranspiration (actet) - f ( antecedent conditions, soil type) - Taken first from Recharge Zone & then Lower Zone - actet period ( months transp_beg to transp_end) transp_beg - start actet on HRU when  tmax_sum(hru) > transp_tmax(hru) transp_end - end actet

Mirror Lake, NH GW - ET Relations

PRMS

SOIL ZONE Recharge Zone (soil_rechr_max) Lower Zone excs (soil_moist > soil zone field capacity) sroff soil_moist_max (rooting depth) soil_to_gw excs - soil_to_gw to subsurface reservoir to ground-water reservoir

Soil Texture vs Available Water- Holding Capacity

SOIL MOISTURE ACCRETION - DAILY MODE - STORM MODE infil(hru) = net_precip(hru) - sroff(hru) Point Infil (fr) fr = dI/dt = ksat * [1. + (ps /  fr)] Areal Infil (fin) qrp = (.5 * net_precip 2 / fr ) net_precip < fr qrp = net_precip - (.5 * fr) Otherwise fin = net_precip - qrp

PRMS

STREAMFLOW Integration of a variety of runoff generation processes Surface Runoff Subsurface Flow (Interflow) Baseflow

ANIMAS RIVER, CO SURFACE GW SUBSURFACE PREDICTED MEASURED

EAST FORK CARSON RIVER, CA SUBSURFACE GW SURFACE

PRMS

SURFACE RUNOFF MECHANISMS

Variable-Source Area Concept

Contributing Area vs Basin Moisture Index

SURFACE RUNOFF (SRO) Contributing-Area Concept - Linear Scheme (by HRU) - Non-linear Scheme (by HRU) ca_percent = carea_min + [(carea_max - carea_min) ca_percent = smidx_coef * 10. (smidx_exp * smidx) where smidx = soil_moist(hru) + (net_precip(hru) / 2.) sroff(hru) = ca_percent * net_precip(hru) * (soil_rechr/soil_rechr_max)]

Surface Runoff Contributing Area vs Soil Moisture Index (nonlinear approach)

Surface Runoff Contributing Area vs Soil Moisture Index (nonlinear)

PRMS

SUBSURFACE FLOW = IN - (ssrcoef_lin * S) - dS dt IN Subsurface Reservoir ssr_to_gw = ssr2gw_rate * S ssrmax_coef () ssr2gw_exp -----(ssrcoef_sq * S 2 )

PRMS

GROUND-WATER FLOW gwres_flow= gwflow_coeff * soil_to_gw + ssr_to_gw Ground-water Reservoir gwres_sink = gwsink_coef * gwres_stor gwres_stor

Qbase = gwflow_coef x gwres_stor Q0Q0 QtQt Q t = Q 0 e -kt gwflow_coef = k Estimating GW Reservoir Parameters Daily recharge SEP fits interannual variation in Q base outflow inflow

3rd HRU DIMENSION

Relation of HRUs and Subsurface and GW Reservoirs Surface ( 6 hrus ) Subsurface ( 2 reservoirs ) Ground water (1 reservoir)