Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
Distributed Generation (DG)
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com Winter 2014 Overview & Recent and Upcoming Market Rule Changes Adam Keech Director, Market Operations.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
John Dumas Director of Wholesale Market Operations ERCOT Operating Reserve Demand Curve.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Economic Demand Response Sheldon Fulton Executive Director, IPCAA November 4, 2008.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
Storage Integration – Look Ahead SCED Issues for ETWG CAES Perspectives Brandon Whittle ETWG Storage Workshop.
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Regulation Energy Management Overview CPUC Energy Storage Workshop March 9, 2011.
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
What Was Learned From the 2015 Transition and Base Residual Auction Results? October 13, 2015 OPSI Annual Meeting CP Auction results – A DR perspective.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
©2003 PJM North American Markets Status APEx Seoul, Korea October 29-31, 2006 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Demand Response Programs: An Emerging Resource for Competitive Electricity Markets Charles Goldman (510) E. O. Lawrence Berkeley.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
AMIT/DSWG Workshop ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Meeting September 30, 2011 Jay Zarnikau, Frontier Associates.
INTEGRATING WIND ENERGY WITH ELECTRIC SYSTEMS ERIC HIRST Consultant in Electric-Industry Restructuring Bellingham, WA December.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
“Look Ahead SCED” Sai Moorty ERCOT November 28, 2011.
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Demand resource emergency energy measurement and verification
Presentation transcript:

Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates LLC 4/13/2012

ERCOT’s Formal DR Products and Programs Load Resources providing RRS – Day-ahead Ancillary Service market clearing prices – 181 Load Resources with 2382 MW of registered DR capacity – Participation in Responsive Reserves capped at 1150 MW Load Resources providing Non Spin – Day-ahead Ancillary Service market clearing prices – 30 minute ramp up time, must operate for at least 1 hour – Little or no participation, presently Controllable Load Resources Providing Regulation – Day-ahead Ancillary Service market clearing prices – Instantaneous response time 2

ERCOT’s Formal DR Products ERS (formerly EILS) – Mandatory response from loads selected to provide the service; ERCOT dispatch – Maximum 8 cumulative hours in contract period (but could be longer, if recall instructions extend longer), can be renewed by ERCOT upon exhaustion – Will soon include non-market generation – Minimum offer size 100 kW – 10 minutes notice – 475 MW from ~900 Load sites 3

ERCOT’s Formal DR Products TDSP Load Management SOP – TDSP instruction – ~150 MW enrolled in TDSP SOPs, size may be doubled for this summer – Requirements depend upon TDSP Typical minimum offer size: approx. 100 kW (varies by TDSP) Typical commitment of 4 hours of unscheduled curtailment + 2 hours of scheduled curtailment (varies by TDSP) Penalty depends upon TDSP Typical notice is 30 minutes to 1 hour, depending on TDSP rules Incentives range from $15/kW to $60/kW depending on TDSP Summer peak hours only, presently 4

Alberta Demand Opportunity Service (DOS) – Mandatory response (like ERCOT’s formal programs) – No minimum size Different from ERS, which requires 100 kW minimum – AESO dispatch (like ERCOT) – Three service types, 7 minute, 1 hour, and standard: DOS 1 Hour, curtail in 1 hour, availability is limited due to system constraints – Similar ramping period to TDSP SOP—some TDSP SOPs offer 1 hour ramping periods – Currently has about 100 MW in participation 5

Alberta Voluntary Load Curtailment Program (VLCP) A minimum 1-hour notice Similar to TDSP SOP—some TDSP SOPs offer a 1 hour ramping period Program is voluntary, participants can decline to curtail load, no minimum size – Different from ERCOT’s formal program in these two respects AESO has identified need for up to 400 MW of voluntary load curtailment Current level of participation is negligible 6

PJM Economic Load Response Program (ELRP) Voluntary program – Perhaps similar to ERCOT’s future Loads in SCED program Participants specify minimum reduction price, shutdown costs, and the minimum duration of the load reduction – Perhaps similar to ERCOT’s future Loads in SCED program Price Mechanism: – Submit a sell offer into the Day-Ahead Market or Real-Time Market, or self schedule that clears – Perhaps similar to ERCOT’s future Loads in SCED program ELRP participation decreased by 57,288 MWh in 2011, compared to the same period in 2010 – Participation levels have been lower due to a number of factors: Lower price levels Lower load levels Improved measurement and verification On 2011’s peak load day, 2,042 MW was registered for ELRP 7

PJM Emergency Load Management Three types of Load Management – Energy Only (Voluntary), Capacity Only (Mandatory), Full Emergency (Mandatory) Interruptible for 10 times from June through September, up to 6 consecutive hours from 12:00 to 20:00 on non-holiday weekdays – Similar to TDSP SOP, where the time period is summer peak hours only, hours committed set by program rules Implement within 2 hours – Participant can specify 1 hour or 2 hour ramping period – Different from ERCOT: ERS specifies 10 minutes and TDSP SOPs have a specific ramping period Curtailment Service Provider (CSP) must have registrations that total >=100 kW – Same as ERS and TDSP SOP Two price mechanisms: – If a participant in the PJM capacity market, participant will make an offer into the auction and receive a Resource Clearing Price – If a participant outside of the PJM capacity market, participant is certified 3 months prior to the Delivery Year and receives a price tied to the zonal capacity charge This option will be eliminated beginning June 1,

PJM Load Management Program Cont’d 9 Table: 2011 Load Management Events Summary for PJM Total registered MW in the Load Management Program – 11,523 MW in 2011/2012 Total zonal monthly capacity credits for CY 2011 – $487,161,575 Underperformance penalties of $5.6 million in 2011

MISO Emergency Demand Response (EDR) Resource-specific ramping offer The participant can specify: – The minimum and maximum amounts of demand reduction – The minimum and maximum number of contiguous hours to be curtailed – The number of hours of advance notice needed to curtail load – Perhaps similar to ERCOT’s future Loads in SCED Participants submit daily offers, receive either the higher of the offer or the locational marginal price (LMP), but offers capped at $3,500/MWh Different from ERCOT – ERS sets price through a pay as bid mechanism 4 months in advance – The TDSP SOP sets the price in advance Approximately 900 MW registered in

CAISO Proxy Demand Resource (PDR) Implemented May 1, 2010 Minimum size is 100 kW, loads may aggregate to achieve threshold – Similar to ERS and TDSP SOP Minimum load reduction and response times based on the bid submitted and the award received – Different from ERCOT ERS and TDSP SOPs set the response times Participants submit bids into the wholesale Day Ahead and/or Real Time market – Perhaps similar to ERCOT’s future Loads in SCED program 11

Conclusion Not much in these programs that ERCOT doesn’t already offer or will offer in the future ERCOT’s Loads in SCED programs will allow loads to respond to prices in the market similar to many of the DR products explored in this presentation ERCOT does not offer DR products that: – Allow for ramping times longer than 1 hour – Allow participants to set their own ramping times – Accommodate aggregated residential (small, temperature-sensitive loads) to the degree they are accommodated in some other markets. 12