Isolating Transcription Factors that Bind to the CD4 Promoter Matthew C. Surdel and Sophia D. Sarafova Davidson College Biology Department I. Background.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I. Background and Observations CD4 and CD8 cells are essential in immune system function. Both are classified as T- cells and derive from a common precursor,
Advertisements

CD4 is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on the cell surface of thymocytes and mature T- lymphocytes with helper function. T-cells develop in the.
Chapter 4: recombinant DNA
I. Background and Observations  CD4SP and CD8SP T cells are essential to immune system function and derive from a common thymocyte precursor  Previous.
Isolation and Characterization of Cellular Complexes Containing the Histone Deacetylase SIRT1 Vincent Lew Howard Hughes Medical Institute Fellowship Mentor:
Determining the Existence of a Second Promoter in the CD4 Gene With Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Louisa Wall and Sophia Sarafova Biology Department, Davidson.
MCB 317 Genetics and Genomics MCB 317 Topic 10, part 2, A Story of Transcription.
Construction, Transformation, and Prokaryote Expression of a Fused GFP and Mutant Human IL-13 Gene Sequence Lindsay Venditti, Department of Biological.
Manufacture of Human Interleukin 13 Protein Using a Prokaryotic Expression System Ryan Rupp, York College of Pennsylvania, Department of Biological Sciences.
Determining if the fused product of Botox A and GFP can be used to observe the binding patterns of Botulinum toxin A. Felicia Yothers Department of Biological.
Electro Mobility Shift Assay EMSA Band Shift Assay Gel Shift Assay
Lecturer: David. * Reverse transcription PCR * Used to detect RNA levels * RNA is converted to cDNA by reverse transcriptase * Then it is amplified.
BioIntelligence Lab Reaction discovery enabled by DNA-templated synthesis and in vitro selection Matthew W. Kanan, Mary M. Rozenman, Kaori Sakurai, Thomas.
Applications & Analysis DNA Gel Electrophoresis 1.
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY IN ACTION In this project, students will use what they have learned in the previous courses to complete a larger multi-step molecular.
Affinity chromatography based strategies “Fishing for partners” Immunoprecipitation approaches The TAP TAG system Two hybrid assay.
Molecular techniques for the study of the interaction between……..
From: Fast chromatin immunoprecipitation assay
Figure 3. Kinetics effects of the C domain on ER–EREc binding
by Hanna S. Radomska, Anne B
Volume 116, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
The Role of Transcription Factor PU
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
The RNA World of the Nucleolus: Two Major Families of Small RNAs Defined by Different Box Elements with Related Functions  Andrey G Balakin, Laurie Smith,
Contribution of VH Gene Replacement to the Primary B Cell Repertoire
Presented by: Ihsan Ullah M Imran Sharif
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Jesper T Troelsen, Jørgen Olsen, Jette Møller, Hans SjÖstrÖm 
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Substance P Enhances the Production of Interferon-induced Protein of 10 kDa by Human Keratinocytes in Synergy with Interferon-γ  Naoko Kanda, Shinichi.
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (April 1998)
Sp1 Is Required for Glucose-Induced Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 Gene  Tao Li, Liqun Bai, Jing Li, Suzu Igarashi,
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
I-Cheng Ho, Martin R Hodge, John W Rooney, Laurie H Glimcher  Cell 
Qiujie Jiang, Yasushi Matsuzaki, Kehua Li, Jouni Uitto 
Adam C Bell, Adam G West, Gary Felsenfeld  Cell 
A Tripartite Protein Complex with the Potential to Couple Synaptic Vesicle Exocytosis to Cell Adhesion in Brain  Stefan Butz, Masaya Okamoto, Thomas C.
Volume 116, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Novel Fluorescent Ligase Detection Reaction and Flow Cytometric Analysis of SYT-SSX Fusions in Synovial Sarcoma  Robyn Gaffney, Artemis Chakerian, John.
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (November 2004)
A T Cell–Specific Enhancer in the Interleukin-3 Locus Is Activated Cooperatively by Oct and NFAT Elements within a DNase I–Hypersensitive Site  Kym N.
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Role of the regulatory domain of the EGF-receptor cytoplasmic tail in selective binding of the clathrin-associated complex AP-2  Werner Boll, Andreas.
Leslie A. Bruggeman, Scott H. Adler, Paul E. Klotman 
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
Ketoconazole Suppresses Prostaglandin E2-Induced Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Human Epidermoid Carcinoma A-431 Cells  Naoko Kanda, Dr., Shinichi Watanabe 
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
The Basis for IL-2-Induced IL-2 Receptor α Chain Gene Regulation
Regulation of the Melanoma Cell Adhesion Molecule Gene in Melanoma: Modulation of mRNA Synthesis by Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate, Phorbol Ester, and.
Regulation of the Expression of Peptidylarginine Deiminase Type II Gene (PADI2) in Human Keratinocytes Involves Sp1 and Sp3 Transcription Factors  Sijun.
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Defining the Regulatory Elements in the Proximal Promoter of ΔNp63 in Keratinocytes: Potential Roles for Sp1/Sp3, NF-Y, and p63  Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara.
FoxB protein binds directly to the cis-regulatory element of the Bra gene. FoxB protein binds directly to the cis-regulatory element of the Bra gene. (A)
TNF Regulates the In Vivo Occupancy of Both Distal and Proximal Regulatory Regions of the MCP-1/JE Gene  Dongsheng Ping, Peter L. Jones, Jeremy M. Boss 
Asymmetric Redundancy in CD4 Silencer Function
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (April 1998)
Characterization of the complex formed at the Fra-1 RCE1.
Interaction of Cdx1 and Cdx2 with the putative Cdx-binding sites of the human DSC2 promoter. Interaction of Cdx1 and Cdx2 with the putative Cdx-binding.
BHLHB2 is part of a protein–DNA complex associated with the proximal E-box element of Bdnf promoter 4. BHLHB2 is part of a protein–DNA complex associated.
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Presentation transcript:

Isolating Transcription Factors that Bind to the CD4 Promoter Matthew C. Surdel and Sophia D. Sarafova Davidson College Biology Department I. Background and Observations CD4 and CD8 cells are essential in immune system function. Both are classified as T-cells and derive from a common precursor, but only CD4 cells express the Cd4 gene. CD4 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that modulates the T-cell receptor signal and therefore the magnitude of the immune response. Having the correct amount and timing of Cd4 expression is essential for the proper development and function of the CD4 cells. Not surprisingly, Cd4 expression is a highly controlled process; regulatory elements found to date include a promoter (containing four binding sites – P1-P4), a silencer, a mature enhancer, and a thymocyte enhancer. In the promoter region, the proteins that bind to the P1, P2, and P4 regions have been identified, while P3 remains unknown as shown in Figure 1. Previous research has shown a protein-DNA complex formation specific to the P3 sequence that does not form with the D06 sequence, which differs by only four base pairs from the P3 site but reduces promoter function by 80% (Figure 2 and data not shown). Furthermore it has been shown that this protein-DNA complex does not appear when using CD8 nuclear extract (Figure 2C), implying that CD8 cells may not contain this protein. To further understand the control of Cd4 expression we wish to isolate and identify transcription factors that bind to the P3 site of the Cd4 gene promoter region. DNA affinity chromatography and SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) were used to identify proteins that bound to the P3 DNA sequence, but not the D06 sequence. To ensure specificity of the transcription factor of interest we used the D06 mutant sequence as a specific competitor to P3 and vice versa. This protein would be the second transcription factor specific to CD4 cells identified to date. Figure 1 (Sarafova and Siu, 2000) Figure 2 (Sarafova and Siu, 2000) II. Goal To isolate and identify the putative transcription factor that binds to the promoter region of the Cd4 locus at the P3 site. III. Approach To purify the protein of interest, we used the known region from the Cd4 locus (P3) and a mutant form of that region (D06) that does not bind the protein we are looking for. A Preparing DNA on Streptavidin Coated Beads B DNA Affinity Chromatography and SDS-PAGE Annealing DNA Strands - Heat to 95° C and gradually cool to 4° C, Store at -20° C Phosphorylation of 5’ Ends of ds DNA using T4 Polynucleotide Kinase Mix and ligate biotinylated pieces with non-biotinylated pieces using T4 DNA Ligase + Attach DNA to streptavidin coated beads by streptavidin and biotin interaction Wash beads with 1 X G/B Binding Buffer I Add AKR1G1 nuclear extract solution - containing unlabeled P3 or D06 as specific competitor, salmon sperm as non-specific competitor, spermidine, buffer, and water Proteins attach to DNA Spin beads to from pellet, remove supernatant containing proteins that did not bind or that bound to the specific and non- specific competitors Wash with 1X G/B Binding Buffer I and then with 1X G/B Binding Buffer I with 0.25M NaCl to remove any loose proteins Elute proteins with 1M NaCl containing 1X G/B Binding Buffer I Separate beads by centrifugation Run proteins on SDS Gel For results, see Figure 3 Recover Beads IV. Results After successful completion of DNA affinity chromatography and SDS-PAGE, three distinct bands were seen (A, B and C in Figure 3). These bands represent proteins that were pulled down using DNA affinity chromatography with the P3 sequence that were absent when D06 was used indicating specificity for the P3 sequence (shown in Figure 3). This result leads us to the conclusion that by this approach there are at most three proteins that bind to the P3 region but not the D06 region, any or all of which may be involved in transcription. V. Future Directions Immediate future o Bands will be cut out and sent to a company to do protein identification using liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry o Results will be interpreted to ensure the protein is in fact present in CD4 cells and may control expression of Cd4 Long term o Characterize proteins and determine expression patterns (especially regarding CD4 and CD8 cells) o Study possible differences in modification such as phosphorylation Acknowledgements This research was made possible by Merck/AAAS Biochemistry Internship Program. We thank Karen Bernd, Karen Bohn, Doug Golann, Cindy Hauser, Karmella Haynes, Barbara Lom, Erland Stevens, Gary Surdel, Peter Surdel, and the National Institute of Health for their help and support. References Gadgil, H., Luis, J.A., Jarrett, H.W Review: DNA Affinity Chromatography of Transcription Factos. Analytical biochemistry. 290, Sarafova, S., Siu, G Control of CD4 gene expression: connecting signals to outcomes in T cell development. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 32: Sarafova, S., Siu, G Precise arrangement of factor-binding sites is required for murine CD4 promoter function. Nucleic Acids Research. Vol. 28 No Wada, T., Watanabe, H., Kawaguchi, H DNA Affinity Chromatography. Methods in enzymology. 254: Figure 2. Biochemical analysis of the P3 site. (A) The P3 sequence from the CD4 promoter is aligned with the consensus sequences for CREB-1 and NF-1. The two half sites of each consensus are underlined. Mutant D06, which causes a significant decrease of promoter activity (84%), is shown, aligned to the wild-type sequence. (B) EMSA of the P3 with CD4+CD8- D10 cell extract. Two complexes are indicated with a filled arrow and with a thin arrow. Non-radioactively labeled competitors are indicated above the lanes and are used in fold molar excess. The sequence of the competitors is the same as in (A). (C) EMSA with extracts from five different cell lines and the P3 probe. The cell lines and their developmental stage are indicated above each lane. Complexes are labeled with arrows as in (B). Figure 1. A schematic diagram of the CD4 promoter and its binding factors. P1, P2, P3 and P4 are the functionally important binding sites. The distance between the four binding sites is shown in base pairs. The known binding factors for each site are indicated. Figure 3 Three specific bands of 70kDa appear in the presence of P3 but not D06 DNA ss DNA 5’ 3’ 5’ overhangs are complimentary, allowing for ligation to occur P3D06P3D06 A C B 69 - MW Marker KDa Step 5Step 4