 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
Advertisements

WBS 2.08 Extinction Independent Design Review of Mu2e 5/3/11 Eric Prebys L3 Manager for Extinction.
Fermilab Accelerator Complex in the Near Term: Muon Physics Program Eric Prebys Accelerator Physics Center FNAL.
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
Nufact09-IIT 107/24/2009 Project X and a Muon Facility at Fermilab Milorad Popovic FNAL.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
F Tevatron Software Digital Receiver Beam Line Tuner Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Instrumentation Meeting July 13, 2005.
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Opportunities for Experiments Based on Stored Muon Beams at Fermilab Milorad Popovic Jean-Francois Ostiguy Fermilab August, 2014.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
Mu2e Extinction and Extinction Monitoring (2.09) Lehman CD-1 Review of Mu2e June 6-7, 2012 Eric.Prebys Extinction L3 Manager Dr. Smith: We’re doomed! Maureen:
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
SNuMI (>1MW) SNuMI 1 Motivations for SNuMI The neutrino experimental program for the next decade –NOνA (long baseline νμ→νe search) –MINERνA (Main Injector.
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2014 Lecture 20 - Cooling 2 Anti-protons are created by hitting a target with an energetic proton.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Muon Beams for Particle Physics Ajit Kurup Winter Seminar March 2010.
Eric Prebys, FNAL HB2012, Beijing, China.  Representing the Mu2e Collaboration  24 Institutions  ~120 Collaborators  This talk has direct contributions.
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
G-2 accelerator and cryo needs Mary Convery Muon Campus Review 1/23/13.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Eric Prebys Accelerator Physics Center Fermilab *Very much a work in progress 7/24/09.
Eric Prebys Accelerator Physics Center Fermilab 7/30/09.
March 2, 2011 TJRPhysics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools 1 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. This is the current list − Please help us to complete.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
Mu2e Mu2e CD-2 Review Template Eric Prebys Extinction October 21-24, 2014.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
Mu2e and Project X, September 3, 2008 E Prebys Background: Proton Economics in Project X Era* Assume  9mA*1ms = 5.3x10 13 protons/linac “blast”  Main.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
1 Beam Extinction and Monitoring at the Upcoming Mu2e Experiment Ryan J. Hooper on behalf of the Mu2e Collaboration DPF 2015 August 5th, 2015.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
What we have now – the Pbar source 1 1/23/2013 J. Morgan.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Overview of Project X ICD and RD&D Plans David Neuffer material from Paul Derwent & Sergei Nagaitsev (AAC Meeting, February 3, 2009)
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Extinction Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab: Giovanni Onorato, Fermilab - INFN Lecce – Universita’ G. Marconi Mu2e Member Institutions: Boston University; Brookhaven.
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab Finding a needle in a trillion haystacks Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology APS Meeting – April 2013.
Ferrite measurements of Mu2e AC dipole Summer Student Meeting August 25, 2010 Student: Evgeny Bulushev, NSU Supervisor: George Velev, TD\Magnet Systems.
Simulation of Extinction Channel Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Large Booster and Collider Ring
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x (bend) plane: uniform normalized emittance of 30  m  y plane: Guassian normalized emittance of 2.5  m  Simulated entire beam line for high amplitude tails, based on MARS simulation of slow extraction  Measured transmission as a function of normalized deflection angle (up to 10 8 initial particles per point)  The Mu2e experiment has been proposed at Fermilab to search for the conversion into an electron of a muon which has been captured by a nucleus. – The muon can decay via the exchange of a virtual particle with the nucleus, resulting in a two body decay. – This produces the striking experimental signature of a mono-energetic electron, carrying most of energy associated with the muon's rest mass. – Occurs in the standard model via virtual neutrino mixing at a rate of (out reach of any presently conceivable experiment) – Experiment aims to measure with a sensitivity of An improvement of four orders of magnitude over previous experiments. Sensitive to a broad range of new physics.  A key component of the experimental technique is the proton beam structure. – The beam consists of short (250 ns FW) proton bunches with 8 GeV kinetic energy. – These produce muons, which are in turn transported and captured on a nuclear target. – The proton bunches are separated by approximately 1.7  sec. – During this time, the captured muons either decay normally or potentially convert into electrons. – The experimental search takes place in this time between the bunches.  Most of the experimental backgrounds are prompt with respect to the muon production, transport and capture. – Very important that beam between the bunches is suppressed to the level or less. – Bunch production should produce extinction at the level. – Active suppression in the beam line should produce an additional suppression1. – To limit radiation damage and activation, less than 1% of in-time beam should be lost. Out-of-Time Beam Extinction in the Mu2e Experiment E.J. Prebys and S. Werkema, Fermilab, Batavia, IL ABSTRACT The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab will search for the conversion of a muon to an electron in the field of an atomic nucleus with unprecedented sensitivity. The experiment requires a beam consisting of proton bunches 250 ns FW long, separated by 1.7  sec, with no out-of-time protons at the fractional level. Satisfying this "extinction" requirement is very challenging. The formation of the bunches is expected to result in an extinction on the order of The remaining extinction will be accomplished by a system of resonant magnets and collimators, configured such that only in-time beam is delivered to the experiment. Our simulations show that the total extinction achievable by the system is on the order of , with an efficiency for transmitting in-time beam of 99.6%.  105 MeV e - Work supported under DOE contract DE-AC02-07CH11359 Motivation Bunch Formation  8 GeV beam from the Fermilab Booster is injected in the Recycler (8 GeV storage ring made with permanent magnets).  A 2.5 MHz RF system rebunches it.  These bunches are transferred one at a time to the 8 GeV “Delivery Ring” (formerly the Antiproton Debuncher).  From the Delivery ring, the beam is resonantly extracted.  The 1.7  sec period of the Delivery ring gives the beam the required structure. Beam Line Extinction  A magnet (or set of magnets) will deflect the out-of-time beam.  A collimator will be placed in the beam line so that only in time beam will be transmitted.  The magnet produces a shift in phase space, corresponding to a lateral deflection 90° later in phase advance, where a collimator is located.  If the admittance A of the collimator is matched to the maximum bounding emittance of the beam, we can define a normalized deflection angle: such that AC Dipole Waveforms  The stored energy in the AC dipole magnets is minimized by going to long, low field magnets, located in regions with a waist in the non-bend plane and the highest possible betatron function in the bend plane.  For our beam line, the highest  and longest reasonable length were found to be 250 m and 6 m, respectively, leading to the following design in the collimation region. Related Poster  E. Prebys, et al, “Extinction Monitoring in the Mu2e Experiment” (MOPWI017) Status and Plans  Mu2e has been granted CD-2 approval by the DOE – Preparing for CD-3 review in early 2016  Civil construction and magnet fabrication have begun.  Planning for beam in early 2020s Center of beam at edge of collimator 100% of beam hits collimator Extinction Angle Beam Line Optics 90° Admittance: 50  m  col : 3.15 m half-gap: 4.1 mm Jaw: Tungsten  The AC Dipole system uses two harmonics  300 kHz (half bunch frequency) to sweep out-of-time beam into collimators  4.5 MHz (15 th harmonic): to reduce slewing of in-time beam to maximize transmission  Magnets consist of 6 identical 1 m segments, with three for each frequency, running at the following peak fields, which were optimized for transmission of in-time beam Simulation  An ESME Simulation was done for bunch formation in the Recycler and in the Delivery Ring. Total fraction outside of ±125 ns: 2.1x10 -5 Results  Convoluted transmission function with optimized AC dipole waveform to obtain transmission vs. time.  Convoluted this with simulated bunch distribution to obtain in and out of time transmission. Fraction outside of ±125 ns: Efficiency for in-time beam: 99.6%  Meets Mu2e Requirements