Keeping Our Air Clean Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County Presentation to: CCMPO – February 17, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Advertisements

Transportation Conformity Basics Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Item #16 California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Rider 8 Technical Workgroup Development. Introduction - Rider 8 Program for Ozone 74 th State Legislative Session authorized and budgeted to assist areas.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
California Air Quality Governance Bart Croes, Chief Research Division
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
IDEM OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PRIORITIES FOR Accomplishments In 2003 Achieved federal approval of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit.
PM 2.5 Advance Path Forward Transportation Advisory Committee June 12, 2014.
EPA Air Policy Perspectives Presentation to 2 nd Workshop on Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants (ICAP) Chapel Hill, NC 21.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
Bay Area Emission Reduction Strategies June 4, 2008 Jean Roggenkamp Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
Environmental Protection Division 1 AWMA Georgia Air Update August 10, 2007 Heather Abrams, Branch Chief.
Emissions Inventory and Air Quality Planning National Urban Air Quality Workshop Lahore, Pakistan December 13, 2004.
CCRPC Board Training Climate & Brownfields September 19, 2012 Julie Potter, Senior Planner.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report OVERVIEW Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments October.
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1 Programmatic New Source Review November 2, 2005 Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report Presentation for the Potomac Watershed Roundtable Stuart A. Freudberg Director, Environmental Programs Metropolitan.
1 DESTINATION 2030 Update KRCC TransPol and TransTac Meeting Scoping Results Criteria Alternatives May 22, 2008.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
Colchester Avenue Corridor Plan Ward 1 NPA Meeting March 10, 2010.
Chittenden County Climate Action Planning CCRPC Board Presentation February 15, 2012 Julie Potter, Senior Planner.
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
Air Quality Public Advisory Committee (AQPAC) Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments January 26, 2009 www.
1 Improving Air Quality in the Metro. Washington Region Phil Mendelson, Chair Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee October 19, 2006.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Clean air act Drafted in 1963 Amended in 1963, 1965, 1970, 1977, 1990 It is national.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency March 2, 2011 John Seltz.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization Communities working together to meet Chittenden County’s transportation needs 30 Kimball Ave., Suite.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
South Central Louisiana June 30, What is the Advance Program? What are the Program benefits What’s it mean to this area? How can it help us stay.
1 Mobile Sources Work Group Final Report - PM 2.5 SIP Brian Newbacher Dir. of Public Affairs, AAA Chair, Mobile Sources Work Group June 12, 2007 NOACA.
Air Pollution Control Program Regulation Update Presented to City Council Public Safety and Health Subcommittee Mamie Colburn, M.S, R.S. Missoula.
Today’s Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Total $6.5 million 17 research concepts 2.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
EPA Air Policy Priorities
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Environmental Protection Agency
Congressional Clean Air Act Forum
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.
GMT NextGen Update CVRPC TAC
Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.
Budget and Planning Update
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Presentation transcript:

Keeping Our Air Clean Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County Presentation to: CCMPO – February 17, 2010

Agenda 1.Overview of air quality study 2.Highlight report contents 3.Implications of EPA’s proposed new ozone standard 4.Obtain Board acceptance of report

Air Quality Project 1.Joint Work Program Task for CCMPO and CCRPC; funded by CCMPO 2.Work done by CCRPC and CCMPO staff

Air Quality Project 3.Guided by Air Quality Advisory Committee with broad range of expertise: CCMPO and CCRPC board members CCMPO TAC members VTrans and FHWA staff CCTA, CATMA, UVM TRC grad student S. Burlington Planning Director, Smart Growth Vermont GBIC/LCRCC, Burlington Electric VT Dept. of Health

Reasons for this Study The Clean Air Act sets national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for common air pollutants. Areas that don’t meet the NAAQS (“non-attainment areas”) have additional regulatory requirements: Plans to return to compliance with mandatory programs Emission budgets for stationary and mobile sources Modeling to demonstrate plans will work Conformity review - have to demonstrate that all new transportation projects conform with the plan Significant regulatory burden and costs for state, MPO, businesses, local governments.

Chittenden County levels of ozone and fine particulates (PM 2.5) are close to the NAAQS. EPA plans to tighten the ozone standard. Chittenden County may no longer comply. How can we be proactive and stay in compliance ? Source: US Environmental Protection Agency

Goals of this Study 1.Identify strategies that can be employed within Chittenden County to improve air quality and aid in maintaining compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) 2.Document the impacts on Chittenden County if air quality fails to meet the NAAQS 3.Document the regulatory process and requirements associated with non-attainment of the NAAQS 4.Document the interconnected relationship between air quality, energy use and climate change

Work Product Study report: Keeping Our Air Clean – Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County. Work product is a report identifying a range of possible strategies – it is not a plan. Report has been extensively reviewed, revised, and approved by: Air Quality Advisory Committee Transportation Advisory Committee

Report Highlights 1.Identifies sources of ozone and fine particulate pollution in Chittenden County. Major local emission sources are: On-road vehicles Non-road equipment Residential wood combustion Fossil fuel combustion 2.Identifies wide range of strategies, grouped by who could implement them: Individuals Employers Municipalities Regional organizations (CCMPO and CCRPC) 3.Priority recommendations for CCMPO and CCRPC

Identified Strategies Individual Strategies Transportation Home and Recreation Employer Strategies Employee Transportation Employer Operations

Identified Strategies Municipal Strategies Municipal Plans and Policies Zoning and Regulations Municipal Infrastructure Regional Strategies Regional Transportation Planning Land Use Planning Energy and Climate Action Planning Air Quality Education and Outreach Program

Priority Regional Recommendations Regional Strategy 4 – Work with VTrans, employers and TDM and transit service providers to expand and enhance Transportation Demand Management services in Chittenden County Regional Strategy 13 – Develop and implement a regional Energy and Climate Action Plan that includes air quality strategies as well as energy and climate strategies Regional Strategy 14 – Develop and implement a regional education and outreach program to increase understanding and change behaviors that adversely affect air quality

TAC Review of Report 1.Presented in December Concurrent public comment period. 2.Extensively discussed January Revisions to address TAC and public comments Edits to update and clarify points New strategies 4.TAC approved February 2010

Next Steps 1.Acceptance by CCMPO and CCRPC boards 2.Expand Advisory Committee to address related energy and climate action tasks. 3.Start work on recommended strategies (multi-year effort)

Questions? Board Action to Accept Report