Use the ion stripper in TT2 to increase the emittance and thereby limit the accumulated brightness: Case 1:192 bunches, Accumulated Brightness~134 (192*0.70),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5/3/2015J-PARC1 Transverse Matching Using Transverse Profiles and Longitudinal Beam arrival Times.
Advertisements

Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
A) 80 b) 53 c) 13 d) x 2 = : 10 = 3, x 3 = 309.
July 22, 2005CESRc miniMAC1 Introduction to CESRc Optics M. Billing.
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
E.Benedetto, 30/05/13, LIU-PSB Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam.
5.2 Inverse Function 2/22/2013.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
FFS Issues in the 2011 autumn continuous operation Toshiyuki OKUGI (KEK) 1/13/2011 The 11 th ATF2 project meeting SLAC, USA.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
Yauhen Kot Current Status of XFEL Simulations.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting October 24, 2012 CTF3 Experimental program for end 2012 R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
Specifications for PSB Injection System Upgrade C. Bracco, J. Abelleira on behalf of BTP Acknowledgments: E. Benedetto, C. Carli, V. Dimov, L.M. Feliciano,
Comparison between simulations and measurements in the LHC with heavy ions T. Mertens, R. Bruce, J.M. Jowett, H. Damerau,F. Roncarolo.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Plan in summer shutdown Magnet -SF1FF -Swap of QEA magnet - Multipole field of Final Doublet IP-BSM improvement.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
New emittance monitor beamline
Andreas Jansson, "Quadrupole Pick-ups", LHC BI-Review, November 19-20, Quadrupole Pick-ups  What is a quadrupole pick-up?  PS pick-ups and experimental.
Primary beam production: progress - Extraction from LSS2 - Switching from TT20 at 100 GeV B.Goddard F.Velotti, A.Parfenova, R.Steerenberg, K.Cornelis,
DMS steering with BPM scale error - Trial of a New Optics - Kiyoshi Kubo
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
9/25/2006All experimenters meetingA. Jansson 1 Tevatron Ionization Profile Monitors Andreas Jansson.
E.Benedetto, 1/07/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam dynamics.
PSB-PS TRANSFER AT 2 GEV - CONCEPTS AND OPTICS W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira et al. ABT LIU Review, 20-Nov-15.
Algebra Day 2 Notes Circular and Periodic Functions.
STABILITY STUDIES OF THE PSB-TO-PS TRANSFER W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira With many inputs from: O. Berrig, J. Borburgh, S. Gilardoni, GP di Giovanni, B. Goddard,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Energy deposition as function of intensity and emittance  The damage potential of a beam does not only depend on the total intensity Energy deposition.
LINAC4 transfer line – optics M. Eshraqi, L. Hein, A. Lombardi (BE-ABP) LINAC4 transfer lines : m (from PIMS out to foil); m new line,then.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
Paul drumm, mutac jan Status of Muon Beamline design work Kevin Tilley, RAL, 9th Feb Including Beamline Materials in new revision Reference ('True')
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review
Equation for a Vertical Line and a Horizontal Line
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Space charge studies at the SPS
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
ATF2 IP Tuning Task Simulation Updates
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Towards an NMC lattice for PS2
Изразеното в настоящата презентация мнение обвързва единствено автора и не представлява официално становище на Комисията за финансов надзор Данил Джоргов.
EXHIBIT 1 The Aggregate Demand Curve
Studies for TBT optics measurements in the PSB
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
Monday morning 09:40 Dump fill 2838, integrated ~130 pb-1.
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA)
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Vertical Dogleg Options for the Ion Collider Ring
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
Presentation transcript:

Use the ion stripper in TT2 to increase the emittance and thereby limit the accumulated brightness: Case 1:192 bunches, Accumulated Brightness~134 (192*0.70), Brightness (N b /ε n )=0.70 [10 11 /um], Beta =20 TT2 stripper, Increase ε n from 1.4 to 1.86 [um] Case 2:240 bunches, Accumulated Brightness~134 (240*0.56), Brightness (N b /ε n )=0.56 [10 11 /um], Beta =40 TT2 stripper, Increase ε n from 1.4 to 2.32 [um]

Case 1: (192,0.70) DISP1DISP2ALFA11BETA11 DISP3DISP4ALFA22BETA22 Entry stripper Exit stripper Adjusting the beta function at the stripper to 20m in both horizontal and vertical planes, gives an increase of the normalized emittance from 1.4 um to 1.86 um. The optical functions before and after the stripper: The following magnets are used for the matching of beta =20 m at the stripper (position 208) and for the matching the optical functions at the end of TT10 to the same values as the Q20 optics: NB! The same magnets are also used for case 2 (40m at the stripper), because they give a precise matching (and extra flexibility to change the matching) and can also avoid the maximum current limits of the magnets and power supplies. For comparison, here is the similar table for the Q20 optics QFO165QDE180QFO205QDE207QDE210QFO215QDE220SQFO225SQDE240SQFO375QIID1001QIIF1002QIID1003QIF1004QID1005 K1 [Gradient/Bρ] Current [A] Max Current [A] Max rms Current [A]NA NA QFO165QDE180QFO205QDE207QDE210QFO215QDE220SQFO225SQDE240SQFO375QIID1001QIIF1002QIID1003QIF1004QID1005 K1 [Gradient/Bρ] Current [A] Max Current [A] Max rms Current [A]NA NA

Case 1: (192,0.70) Notice that the optical functions in the majority part of the TT10 line is exactly like the Q20 optics i.e. the matching to 20m is essentially kept in TT2

Case 2: (240,0.56) Adjusting the beta function at the stripper to 40m in both horizontal and vertical planes, gives an increase of the normalized emittance from 1.4 um to 2.32 um. The optical functions before and after the stripper: The following magnets are used for the matching of beta =40 m at the stripper (position 208) and for the matching the optical functions at the end of TT10 to the same values as the Q20 optics: For comparison, here is the similar table for the Q20 optics QFO165QDE180QFO205QDE207QDE210QFO215QDE220SQFO225SQDE240SQFO375QIID1001QIIF1002QIID1003QIF1004QID1005 K1 [Gradient/Bρ] Current [A] Max Current [A] Max rms Current [A]NA NA DISP1DISP2ALFA11BETA11 DISP3DISP4ALFA22BETA22 Entry stripper Exit stripper QFO165QDE180QFO205QDE207QDE210QFO215QDE220SQFO225SQDE240SQFO375QIID1001QIIF1002QIID1003QIF1004QID1005 K1 [Gradient/Bρ] Current [A] Max Current [A] Max rms Current [A]NA NA NB! The power supplies for the magnets in TT2 are in the building 250 and 269, while the power supplies for TT10 are all in BA1. That the power supplies are in different buildings will make the interlock harder to make. However, it is unfortunately not possible to only use the magnets in TT2 – doing so, would leave the resulting currents at the limit and the optics functions at the end of TT10 would not be matched correctly.

Case 2: (240,0.56) Notice that the optical functions in the majority part of the TT10 line is exactly like the Q20 optics i.e. the matching to 40 m is essentially kept in TT2