G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal For Improvement to the Current ICAP Market Markets Committee October 12, 2004 Ken Bekman Con Edison Energy.
Advertisements

Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Summary of Proposed Market Rules For Transition Period Price-Responsive Demand and Active Demand Resources in the Forward Capacity Market Henry Yoshimura,
Brookfield Renewable Energy Group. Focusing on Renewable Power Generation and Transmission Conceptual discussion how to integrate renewable resources under.
03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
Al McBride MANAGER, AREA TRANSMISSION PLANNING Existing Import Interfaces: Transmission Transfer Capabilities and The Calculation of Tie Benefits DECEMBER.
Amendment 3/5 Workshop.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Connecticut’s Energy Future Connecticut Energy Advisory Board Conference Hartford, Connecticut December 2, 2004 Kevin Kirby Vice President, Market Operations.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. COLD SNAP Overview of Proposed Options for Winter 2004/2005.
Energy supply forecast Presentation to Connecticut’s Energy Future Conference by Bridgett Neely, London Economics International LLC December 2, 2004 Hartford,
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
1 Enhancing the Role of Renewable Energy in California Robert A. Laurie Commissioner California Energy Commission Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting.
Economic Transmission Case Study: Champlain Wind Link Vermont System Planning Committee March 10, 2010.
Long Term Study Task Force Update to ETWG ERCOT Long-Term Study: Scenarios, New Software, and Emerging Technology Assumptions January 27, 2012.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
ISO New England Regional Update Wholesale Electricity Markets & State Energy Policy Seminar Connecticut Business & Industry Association December 14, 2010.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
1 Non-Transmission Alternatives to Reduce Local Congestion Costs Bill Bojorquez June 3, 2004.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
WINDPOWER 2003 Austin, TX May 18-21, 2003 Session 4A: Regulatory Issues Monday May 19, :40-5:00 pm Wind Generation Interconnection to Transmission.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform Stakeholder Meeting February 19, 2009.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Electric Energy Issues and the Region Connecticut Business and Industry Association Stamford, Connecticut December 2, 2004 Kevin Kirby Vice President,
Bulk Power Transmission System
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
ERCOT PROGRESS REPORT Board of Directors Austin, Texas October 15, 2002.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
S PIEGEL & M C D IARMID New England’s Forward Capacity Market: How Did We Get Here and Where Are We Going? Scott H. Strauss APPA Legal Seminar Cambridge,
RPS Bidders Workshop May 11, RPS Bidders Workshop Guidance for Inputs to PPA May 11, 2007.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
Update on the North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative January 30, 2007 For the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the North Carolina Public.
1 Energy/Compost Facility Action Plan City Council Meeting July 2, 2012.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Black Start Service in New England System Operator’s Perspective Robert B. Burke ISO New England Inc. July 23, 2002 IEEE - Chicago, Illinois.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
Connecting the Dots in New England: NEPOOL’s IMAPP Initiative
Carbon Free Energy with Storage 2017 JOINT REQUEST FOR OFFERS
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Briefing on 2017 CAISO Policy Initiatives Roadmap
The Future of Demand Response in New England
December 9, 2005 Allison DiGrande, External Affairs Department, ISO/NE
New England Resource Adequacy
Marginal Cost Pricing: Why Is It Important? Have We Achieved It?
FERC Order in Devon Power LLC, et al. ER
ICAP Issues Massachusetts Roundtable February 16, 2001
Market Design in New England
Alternative ICAP Proposal
IECR Incremental Step Size
Comments on New England Regional State Committee*
The Seller’s Webinar will begin promptly at 1:03
Presentation transcript:

G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003 Danielle Powers Principal Analyst, Markets Design

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 2 Anticipated RFP Schedule RFP IssuedNovember 28, 2003 Final Bids SubmittedDecember 30, 2003 Contract NegotiationsMid – Late January 2004 Winning Bidders SelectedJanuary 30, 2004 Contract(s) ExecutedFebruary 6, 2004

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 3 Early Notification of RFP Issuance Letter of Intent sent 10/29/03 to NEPOOL Committee Members –Participants, Markets, Reliability, Tariff Early Interest Letter sent 10/31/03 to NEPOOL Participants and Other Interested Parties –Up to 300 MW or more of quick-start peaking capacity –Intent to have capacity available by June 1, 2004 –Allows for later in service dates –Four year contract term with an option to extend for one year

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 4 Proposed New Generation Capacity in CT NameFuelCapacity–MWIn Service Date–Yr Millstone 3 Upgrade*Nuclear Milford PowerGas Meriden**Gas/Oil Kleen Energy***Gas/Oil Total1696 *Doesn’t have 18.4 approval. **Construction halted but to resume in ***Hasn’t started construction.

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 5 Major CT Transmission Projects Project Cost $ millions Earliest In-Service Date Increase in Area Import Capability 345 Phase I Plumtree to Norwalk 200 Nov MW (SWCT) 345 Phase II Beseck to Norwalk MW (SWCT) Lake Rd. Transmission Reconfiguration TBD2005 Transfers Lake Rd into CT 345 Millbury (MA)–Card St ~800 MW (CT) Haddam None

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 6 Three Scenarios of Uncertainty in Project In-service Dates Scenario 1: – “Best”: Milford in 2004; Phase I 345 in 2006 Scenario 2: – “2 Yr Delay”: Milford in 2006; Phase I 345 in 2008 Scenario 3: – “Worst”: Delay beyond 2008

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 7 Summary of SWCT Needs: Best Case: 200 MW covers max need for 2 years 2 Yr Delay: 300 MW covers average need for , and max need for No need in 2008 Worst Case Delay: 300 MW covers min need through 2008

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 8 RFP Basic Concepts Solicitation for up to 300 MW or more of quick-start capacity Four year contract term with an option to extend for one year –Service to commence on or about June 1, 2004 –Quantity and locational specifics as determined by ISO-NE planning Resource Characteristics –10-minute or 30 –minute quick-start peaking capacity –Can be available as early as June 1, 2004 and as late as May 31, 2008 –Need not be available for the entire contract term

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 9 RFP Basic Concepts (Cont’d) Structured as an RFP – not an auction –Resources selected will be paid as bid –Assumes that locational ICAP is implemented to value existing resources –No additional compensation for existing generators from this process - existing generators will receive revenues from existing markets and the LICAP market Bidders can offer pricing for single or multiple year contract terms Generators must offer a capacity price and an “expected energy price” (for evaluation purposes) Demand Response Resources/Emergency Generators must offer a capacity price only

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 10 Eligible Resources New peaking capacity Incremental peaking capacity at existing resources Demand response resources Emergency generation

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 11 New and Incremental Peaking Capacity Not required to enroll in the ISO-NE LRP Treated as ordinary generating assets in the market Minimum size = 100 kW 10 or 30 minute response time Fully permitted resources –Must be listed as an ICAP resource –Must offer in Day Ahead and Real Time energy markets

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 12 New and Incremental Peaking Capacity (Cont’d) Emergency-only permitted resources –Must enroll in the ISO-NE Demand Response Program – Will be given ICAP credit in accordance with the Demand Response Program

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 13 Demand Response Resources / Emergency Generators Must enroll in the ISO-NE Demand Response Program Will be given ICAP credit in accordance with the Demand Response Program Required to reduce load in 10 or 30 minutes Minimum load reduction = 100 kW

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 14 Anticipated Proposal Pricing Generators – New and Incremental Peaking Capacity –Will be paid for capacity monthly and will be paid the applicable nodal price when dispatched –Any revenues received in the ICAP market will be netted from ICAP revenues due under the contract Demand Response Resources/Emergency Generators –Will be paid for capacity monthly and will be paid for load reductions in accordance with the ISO-NE Demand Response Program –Any revenues received in the ICAP market will be netted from ICAP revenues due under the contract

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 15 Proposal Requirements Bidder Background –Business specifics –NEPOOL participant or arrangements with a NEPOOL participant Financial Viability –Letter of credit or satisfaction of NEPOOL’s financial insurance policy Resource Information

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 16 Proposal Requirements (Cont’d) Proposal pricing –All proposed resources must have an associated capacity price –Generators must submit an expected energy price –Bidders can provide increments of capacity on a yearly basis – not required to submit full bid amounts in all years –Alternative pricing structures are encouraged Model contract exceptions Litigation, penalties and defaults

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 17 Evaluation Criteria Amount procured will reflect a balance of capacity needed, system and market uncertainties, and prices Proposed resources will be evaluated based on the costs associated with technically feasible projects Generating resources with full environmental permits will be evaluated more favorably than those with emergency-only permits Other evaluation criteria: –resource permitting and likelihood –interconnection requirements/transmission upgrades, if any –financial viability –exceptions to the model contract

G 200 L 200 G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND 18 Market Rule Changes/Cost Allocation Proposed change to Market Rule 1 Appendix E – Load Response Program –Allows ISO-NE to issue RFPs and enter into contracts to maintain reliability in regions that ISO-NE has determined may have potential critical power supply reliability problems Costs incurred pursuant to RFPs will be allocated and charged to network load in the same manner as fixed RMR Resources –In proportion to monthly network load within the CT reliability region (Sec 6.4.4(c) of Market Rule 1)