doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 1 IEEE TGmc May 2014 Agenda Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 2 Abstract This presentation contains the IEEE TGmc agenda for the May 2014 session.

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 3 TGmc Agenda Attendance reminder: Documents: Monday PM1 –Chair’s Welcome, Status, Review of Objectives, Approve agenda, minutes –Editor’s Report –Timeline and Schedule –Comment resolution Tuesday PM2 –Comment Resolution Thursday PM2 –Comment Resolution, Motions –Plans for July, Schedule, AOB –Adjourn Thursday AM2 –Comment Resolution, motions Tuesday PM1 –Motions – Teleconference comments –Comment resolution Wednesday PM1 –Comment Resolution Monday PM2 –Comment resolution Wednesday PM2 –Comment Resolution – deprecation CIDs, Motions –3GPP Liaison response

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 4 TGmc – Monday PM1 Call Meeting to Order Policies and Procedures, Attendance reminder **IEEE Patent Policy Are there any patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that the participant believes may be essential for the use of that standard? Minute any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. ** Read slide deck *** Note especially items #7 & #11

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 5 Please review the documents at the following links: –IEEE Patent Policy: –Patent FAQ: –Letter of Assurance Form: –Affiliation FAQ: –Anti-Trust FAQ: –Ethics: –802 LMSC P&P: –802 LMSC OM: –802 WG P&P: –IEEE WG OM: operations-manual.docx operations-manual.docx

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 6 Logistics Attendance recording procedures – –Must register before logging attendance –Must log attendance during each 2 hour session Documentation – –Use “TGm” for documents relating to the Revision PAR

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 7 Monday PM1 (continued) Objectives –Comment resolution Approve prior meeting minutes –Beijing minutes: m-revmc-minutes-for-march-2014-beijing.docxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/ m-revmc-minutes-for-march-2014-beijing.docx –Teleconference minutes: m-tgmc-telecon-minutes-april-may-2014.docxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/ m-tgmc-telecon-minutes-april-may-2014.docx Editor’s Report (Adrian Stephens)

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda March 2014 Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)Slide 8 TGmc Plan of Record 20 July 2012 – 12 Sept 2012 – Call for Comment/Input Aug 2012 – NesCom, SASB PAR Approval Sept 2012 – Begin to process input Sept 2012 – 11aa, 11ae integration Jan – First WG Letter ballot - without 11ad Dec 2012 – March/May 2013 – 11ad integration Sept 2013 – Letter ballot on D2.0 Dec 2013 – May 2014 – 11ac, 11af integration – D3.0 in May 2014 July 2014 – Mandatory Draft Review Jul - Aug 2014 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days) Nov 14 – Initial Sponsor Ballot July 2015– WG/EC Final Approval Dec 2015 – RevCom/SASB Approval – Was Sept 2015

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 9 TGmc – Wednesday PM2 CIDs 2423, 2424 – ERP PHY CIDs 2411, 2412 – DSSS deprecation As noted in CID 32,"11b is Poison". Clause 16 devices have the capability of bringing 2.4GHz networks to their knees. 13/0416 (latest is r5 at time of writing comment) shows that there is no technical reason to maintain Clause 16 devices. It is suggested that a note be added to this Clause to indicate that it is now 'out of favor' and that it is likely to be dropped in the (near) future. Add text under heading "Devices supporting the DSSS system are no longer encouraged and likely to be deprecated from this Specification in subsequent revisions" As noted in CID 32,"11b is Poison". Clause 17 devices are coupled to Clause 16 DSSS and as such have the capability of bringing 2.4GHz networks to their knees. 13/0416 (latest is r5 at time of writing comment) shows that there is no technical reason to maintain Clause 16 or 17 devices. It is suggested that a note be added to this Clause to indicate that it is now 'out of favor' and that it is likely to be dropped in the (near) future. Add text under heading "Devices supporting the high rate extention to the DSSS system are no longer encouraged and likely to be deprecated from this Specification in subsequent revisions"

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 10 TGmc – Wednesday PM2 CIDs 2423, 2424 – ERP PHY CIDs 2411, 2412 – DSSS deprecation The standard requires 11n and 11g (i.e., HT and ERP) PHYs to support transmit and receive of all 11b modes. Given the enormous disparity in efficiency between 11b and the OFDM modes, this no longer makes sense as a universal requirement for all products, and any such requirements should be removed, if not necessary to support coexistence. A straightforward way of accomplishing at least some of this is to remove the requirement that ERP PHYs support the 5.5 and 11 Mbps CCK data rates. Since Clause 20 (HT) references Clause 19 (ERP), this would remove 5.5 and 11 Mbps as requirements for HT also. This would not affect the requirment to be able to detect the long or short preamble (1 Mbps and 2 Mbps) and to take appropriate action based on such a detection, thus preserving the current level of coexistence. Delete 5.5 and 11 from list of mandatory data rates for ERP PHY. Also make corresponding changes throughout, including section (P2048 LL30-37) (add 5.5 and 11 to list of exceptions); section (P2054 LL39-40) (delete 5.5 and 11 from list); and Annex B.4.9 (P2307 LL33-37) (remove 5.5 and 11; add new entry ERP1a for 5.5 and 11, optional) The standard requires 11n and 11g (i.e., HT and ERP) PHYs to support transmit and receive of the 11b Short Preamble. This is optional for 11b. This requirement no longer makes sense (if it ever did), as there are legacy deployed devices that do not recognize the short preamble or defer for it, and it seems that most deployed devices do not transmit the short preamble. Remove the sentence beginning "In addition, it is mandatory...". Also make corresponding changes throughout, including section (P2052 LL32-41) (change "three" to "two" and delete short preamble from list; add extra line saying that an ERP STA may support the short preamble); section (P2053 L16) (delete sentence begiining "For the ERP..."); section (P2054 L40) (delete "or short"), and (P2054 L46) (delete "short preamble").

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 11 Work items from Jan, March 2014 Liaison letter to WFA – Brian Hart, Andrew Myles – wfa-on-reducing-use-of-cck-and-dsss.docxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/ m-liaison-to- wfa-on-reducing-use-of-cck-and-dsss.docx –Response expected in July “Should not” behavior text – Sean – recommended-practice.pptx March presentation, straw polls heldhttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/ m-phy- recommended-practice.pptx Usage related text, rather than excision – Menzo, Carlos C March presentation - Graham – and-17-deprecation.docxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/ m-clause-16- and-17-deprecation.docx

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 12 Straw Polls As needed

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 13 Motion – Teleconferences Approve resolutions to comments in comments.xls Tab “Motion MAC-W” comments.xls adhoc-comments.xls Tabs “Gen Motion Telecon April ”, adhoc-comments.xls Moved: Seconded: Result:

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 14 Motion - Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday Comments Approve resolutions to comments in comments.xls Tab “Motion MAC-X” comments.xls adhoc-comments.xls Tab “Gen Motion Waikoloa A ” adhoc-comments.xls Moved: Seconded: Result:

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 15 Motion – Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB199 on P802.11mc D2.0 Instruct the editor to prepare P802.11mc D3.0 incorporating these resolutions and Approve a 20 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11mc D3.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” Moved: Seconded: Result:

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 16 May July Meeting Planning Objectives: WG ballot on D3.0, comment resolution Conference Calls 10am Eastern 2 hour –June 20, July 11 Ad-Hoc meeting – none Schedule review Availability of 11mc in the IEEE store –D2.0 is available; D3.0 after successful ballot

doc.: IEEE /0475r1 Agenda May 2014 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 17 References proposal-for dochttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/ revision-par- proposal-for doc ballot-comments.xlshttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/ m-revmc-wg- ballot-comments.xls