Equity and Sustainability. Roseland and Equity North/South comparison … fairness The developed nations need to consider ‘our own poor’ … Definitional:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
Frameworks for Moral Arguments
Ethics and Social Responsibility CHAPTER 5. Copyright © 2008 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. 2 Learning Objectives.
ERE3: Ethics Foundations –Why is ethics so important? –Alternative views, including the standard economic position Time dimensions –Discounting –Sustainability.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:
Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, And Decision-Making Guidelines
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 5E Carroll & Buchholtz Copyright ©2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All.
John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.
Ethics DEFINITIONS Values Morals Ethics Ethical dilemma
Normative Ethical Theory Jim Okapal Asst. Professor of Philosophy Missouri Western State University.
Thomas Hobbes ( ) l Fear of others in the state of nature (apart from society) prompts people to form governments through a social contract l State.
Business Ethics/Corporate Social Responsibility Overview.
A Theory of Justice. “What is justice?” The Code of Hammurabi (Babylon, 18 th c. BCE) Judaism, Christianity, Islam: scales (balance, regulation, harmony),
Andrea Wellenstein, Jill Kollmann, Heather Lammers, and Britni Klein Monday at 1:30-4:30 Ethical Theories Presentations April 6 th, 2010.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Ethical Decision-making Craig Dunn, Ph.D. MEET U.S. program.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
 Rawls was influenced by Kant and Aristotle  An American Philosopher  Wrote the Following: A Theory of Justice, Political Liberalism, The Law of Peoples,
Ethics of Administration Chapter 1. Imposing your values? Values are more than personal preferences Values are more than personal preferences Human beings.
BAM321 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Session 7 Business and Management.
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Business Ethics Week 3. Article on: You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means: Visual Imagery and Moral Judgment Visual imagery and Moral judgement –
Justice & Fairness Approach LP: Ethical Theories Presentation By: Nelita, Brandon Keshia,Jennifer Section: Tuesday 5:30 April 1, 2008.
PAPER 3 REMINDERS. THREE SECTIONS Critical Thinking Moral Reasoning Tentative solution.
Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 5E Carroll & Buchholtz Copyright ©2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Bioethics Defined The study of ethical and moral issues related to the practice of medicine The study of moral conduct, right and wrong, Thus by definition.
Kantian Ethics: Rights Approach Ethical Theories Presentation Prepared by: Nicole George Julie Bublitz Bee Vang Section: Thursday, 8:30 March 26, 2008.
John Rawls A Theory of Justice PULSE – April 16, 2013.
LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE GONDA YUMITRO. LIBERTY Liberty is the ultimate moral ideal. Individuals have rights to life, liberty, and property that.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
Is the pure free market distribution of wealth and income fair and just?
Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.
Arguments against the Market  Engels complains that free market is completely wasteful.  This is also a utilitarian argument. It leads crisis after crisis.
Justice and Economic Distribution
Utilitarian Theory of Ethics Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist approach to judging moral behavior. Consequentialist hold that –consequences count.
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.
Rationality in Decision Making In Law Nisigandha Bhuyan, IIMC.
Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
Kantian Ethics Good actions have intrinsic value; actions are good if and only if they follow from a moral law that can be universalized.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
© 2012 Wanda Teays. All rights reserved. Rawls, like Kant, is a Deontological Ethicist. He emphasizes moral duty and obligations, rather than end goals.
Ethics Topic 3.
Political theory and law
John Rawls’ theory of justice
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher
Theories of justice.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Ethics in Research.
Three Dimensions of Justice
MODULE 3 By: Chris Martinez.
A Review of Principles DR. K. Smith, PharmD, MPH.
John Rawls Theory of Justice.
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Presentation transcript:

Equity and Sustainability

Roseland and Equity North/South comparison … fairness The developed nations need to consider ‘our own poor’ … Definitional: incorporates an ‘inescapable’ commitment to social equity …

Why Equity? Why is social equity a dimension of sustainability?

What is Equity? Normative: something we ought to have Distributional and rights-based ethics

Ethical Systems and Equity Equity is usually defined as fairness Two kinds of fairness –Procedure: procedural ethics (rights-based) –Outcome: consequential ethics (utilitarian and or distributive eg. Rawls)

Fairness in Procedure Participation in decision-making Democratic governance at the national level Representation at all levels, stakeholder participation at local levels

Fairness in Outcome Consequential idea of fairness Distributional Social systems with ethical consequence –Economics –Planning, public administration and law

Ideas of Equity Utilitarianism and equity … –Greatest good for the greatest number –But in most operational definitions, it is the sum not the distribution that is calculated Libertarian ethics also have distributional content e.g. Nozick (morally relevant) Rawl’s ‘Justice as Fairness’

Liberal Ethics Free, equal and autonomous person Kantian categorial: Do not do to another Individual ultimate object of moral concern – it makes a difference to choose to live a life worth living –There are different ideas of the good –The individual as source of change Procedural involvement, choice, equality

Rawls’ Principles Attempt to combine rights-based with consequential theories (can’t have one without the other) First principle: Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive system of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar system of liberty for all

Rawls’ Second Principle Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged … Equal distribution of both liberties and goods … unless an unequal distribution is to the advantage of those least favored

Question 1. What are the consequential and procedural norms in current planning and development practice? 2. What are the consequential and procedural norms in SC in the readings we have done so far?

Environmental Equity Currently, environmental equity and inequity approximates larger patterns of social equity and inequity Environmental justice movement, national and international Two elements to equity: participation and distribution

Intergenerational Equity Sounds solely utilitarian/consequential Where is the dimension of autonomy? ‘dictatorship of the present’ … Jefferson “the earth belongs in usufruct to the living” (implies no right to harm)

Next Class Presentations: Urban Community Redev. and Big Ideas Community: Readings for next week Putnam 1995 Bowling Alone –on reserve or online Blanco 1995 Community and the Four Jewels of Planning –On reserve (articles, from a book)