ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Kinematic Constraints, Composite Joints – 3.3 October 6, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems: Chapter 6 November 1, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
Advertisements

ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.3 February 18, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison Discontent is the first necessity of.
Mechanics of Machines Dr. Mohammad Kilani
ABSOLUTE MOTION ANALYSIS (Section 16.4)
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Outline: Introduction Link Description Link-Connection Description
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Kinematic Constraints, Composite Joints – 3.3 October 4, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Cam-Follower Constraints – 3.3 Driving Constraints – 3.5 October 11, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison.
PLANAR RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION & ROTATION
PHY205 Ch14: Rotational Kin. and Moment of Inertial 1.Recall main points: Angular Variables Angular Variables and relation to linear quantities Kinetic.
RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION & ROTATION (Sections )
RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION & ROTATION
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems (Gears) Cam-Followers and Point-Follower 3.4.1, September 27, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Ch. 16: Rigid Body Kinematics
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Matrix Algebra – 2.2 Review of Elements of Calculus – 2.5 Vel. and Acc. of a point fixed in.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Matrix Algebra – 2.2 September 13, 2011 Dan Negrut University of Wisconsin-Madison © Dan Negrut,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
MAE 242 Dynamics – Section I Dr. Kostas Sierros.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Th, Sept. 08 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
PLANAR RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION & ROTATION
Kinematics of Rigid Bodies
Two-Dimensional Rotational Dynamics 8.01 W09D2 Young and Freedman: 1.10 (Vector Product), , 10.4, ;
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Singular Configurations of Mechanisms 3.7 October 26, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
MAE 242 Dynamics – Section I Dr. Kostas Sierros.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 11, , 6.1.4, 6.2, starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 1, 2011 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2011.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
ENGR 214 Chapter 15 Kinematics of Rigid Bodies
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Linear Algebra 2.1 through 2.4 Tu, Sept. 07 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.3 February 16, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “Courage is fear holding on a minute.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
MOTION RELATIVE TO ROTATING AXES
PLANAR KINEMATICS OF A RIGID BODY
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Vel. And Acc. of a Fixed Point in Moving Frame Basic Concepts in Planar Kinematics February.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Basic Concepts in Planar Kinematics 3.1, 3.2 September 18, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 October 19, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 September 30, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Review of Differential Calculus 2.5, 2.6 September 11, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems March 31, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison Quote.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 10, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Composite Joints – 3.3 Gears and Cam Followers – 3.4 February 17, 2009 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
PLANAR RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION & ROTATION
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 08, , 6.1.4, 6.2, starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 16, , starting 6.3 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 6, 2011 Equilibrium Analysis & Inverse Dynamics Analysis ME451 Wrap.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
Introduction Sometimes, a body has simultaneously a motion of rotation and translation, such as a wheel of a car, a sphere rolling (not slipping) on the.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 9, 2010 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2010.
Two-Dimensional Rotational Dynamics W09D2. Young and Freedman: 1
Two-Dimensional Rotational Dynamics 8.01 W09D2 Young and Freedman: 1.10 (Vector Product), , 10.4, ;
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 Start Position, Velocity, and Acc. Analysis 3.6 February 26, 2009 © Dan Negrut,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Start Position, Velocity, and Acc. Analysis 3.6 October 21, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Composite Joints – 3.3 Gears and Cam Followers – 3.4 October 5, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Absolute Constraints 3.2 September 20, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ME751 Advanced Computational Multibody Dynamics Section 9.4 February 23, 2010 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME751, UW-Madison “When You Come to a Fork in the Road,
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Constraints 3.3 September 23, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Chapter 17 Rigid Body Dynamics. Unconstrained Motion: 3 Equations for x, y, rotation.
Two-Dimensional Rotational Dynamics 8.01 W09D2
VECTOR MECHANICS FOR ENGINEERS: DYNAMICS Seventh Edition Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr. Lecture Notes: J. Walt Oler Texas Tech University CHAPTER.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 4, 2010 Chapter 6 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems December 9, 2010 Solving Index 3 DAEs using Newmark Method © Dan Negrut, 2010.
RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION & ROTATION (Sections )
KINEMATICS OF RIGID BODY
Direct Manipulator Kinematics
Analytical and Applied Kinematics
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems
RIGID BODY MOTION (Section 16.1)
Presentation transcript:

ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Relative Kinematic Constraints, Composite Joints – 3.3 October 6, 2011 © Dan Negrut, 2011 ME451, UW-Madison “I want to put a ding in the universe.” Steve Jobs TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A AAAAA

Before we get started… Last Time Discussed relative constraints x, y,  relative constraints distance constraint For each kinematic constraint, recall the procedure that provides what it takes to carry out Kinematics Analysis  Identify and analyze the physical joint  Derive the constraint equations associated with the joint  Compute constraint Jacobian  q  Get  (RHS of velocity equation)  Get  (RHS of acceleration equation, this is challenging in some cases) Today Covering relative constraints: Revolute, translational, composite joints, cam-follower type constraints Skipping gears Assignment, due in one week 3.3.2, 3.3.4, MATLAB + ADAMS 2

Revolute Joint Step 1: Physically imposes the condition that point P on body i and a point P on body j are coincident at all times Step 2: Constraint Equations  (q,t) = ? Step 3: Constraint Jacobian  q = ? Step 4: = ? Step 5:  = ? 3

Translational Joint Step 1: Physically, it allows relative translation between two bodies along a common axis. No relative rotation is allowed. Step 2: Constraint Equations  (q,t) = ? Step 3: Constraint Jacobian  q = ? Step 4: = ? Step 5:  = ? 4 NOTE: recall notation

Attributes of a Constraint [it’ll be on the exam] What do you need to specify to completely define a certain type of constraint? In other words, what are the attributes of a constraint; i.e., the parameters that define it? For absolute-x constraint: you need to specify the body “i”, the point P that enters the discussion, and the value that x P should assume For absolute-y constraint: you need to specify the body “i”, the point P that enters the discussion, and the value that y P should assume For a distance constraint, you need to specify the “distance”, but also the location of point P in the LRF, the body “I” on which the LRF is attached to, as well as the point of coordinates c 1 and c 2 How about an absolute angle constraint? Think about it… 5

The Attributes of a Constraint [Cntd.] Attributes of a Constraint: That information that you are supposed to know by inspecting the mechanism It represents the parameters associated with the specific constraint that you are considering When you are dealing with a constraint, make sure you understand What the input is What the defining attributes of the constraint are What constitutes the output (the algebraic equation[s], Jacobian, ,, etc.) 6

The Attributes of a Constraint [Cntd.] Examples of constraint attributes: For a revolute joint: You know where the joint is located, so therefore you know For a translational join: You know what the direction of relative translation is, so therefore you know For a distance constraint: You know the distance C 4 7

Example Consider the slider-crank below. Come up with the set of kinematic constraint equations to kinematically model this mechanism Use the Cartesian (absolute) generalized coordinates shown in the picture 8

Example – Different ways of modeling the same mechanism for Kinematic Analysis 9 Approach 1: bodies 1, 2, and 3 Approach 2: bodies 1 and 3 Approach 3: bodies 1 and 2 Approach 4: body 2

Errata: Page 67 (sign) 10 Page 68 (unbalanced parentheses, and text) Page 73 (transpose and sign) Page 73 (perpendicular sign, both equations)

Composite Joints (CJ) Just a means to eliminate one intermediate body whose kinematics you are not interested in 11 Revolute-Revolute CJ Also called a coupler Practically eliminates need of connecting rod Given to you (joint attributes): Location of points P i and P j Distance d ij of the massless rod Revolute-Translational CJ Given to you (joint attributes): Distance c Point P j (location of revolute joint) Axis of translation v i ’

Composite Joints One follows exactly the same steps as for any joint: Step 1: Physically, what type of motion does the joint allow? Step 2: Constraint Equations  (q,t) = ? Step 3: Constraint Jacobian  q = ? Step 4: = ? Step 5:  = ? 12

We will skip Gears (section 3.4) 13

Gears Convex-convex gears Gear teeth on the periphery of the gears cause the pitch circles shown to roll relative to each other, without slip First Goal: find the angle , that is, the angle of the carrier 14 What’s known: Angles  i and  j The radii R i and R j You need to express  as a function of these four quantities plus the orientation angles  i and  j Kinematically: P i P j should always be perpendicular to the contact plane

Gears - Discussion of Figure (Geometry of gear set) 15

Gears - Discussion of Figure (Geometry of gear set) 16 Note: there are a couple of mistakes in the book, see Errata slide before

Example: Gear 1 is fixed to ground Given to you:  1 = 0,  1 =  /6,  2 =7  /6, R 1 = 1, R 2 = 2 Find  2 as gear 2 falls to the position shown (carrier line P 1 P 2 becomes vertical) 17

Gears (Convex-Concave) Convex-concave gears – we are not going to look into this class of gears The approach is the same, that is, expressing the angle  that allows on to find the angle of the Next, a perpendicularity condition using u and P i P j is imposed (just like for convex-convex gears) 18

Example: Gear 1 is fixed to ground Given to you:  1 = 0,  1 =  /6,  2 =7  /6, R 1 = 1, R 2 = 2 Find  2 as gear 2 falls to the position shown (carrier line P 1 P 2 becomes vertical) 19

Rack and Pinion Preamble Framework: Two points P i and Q i on body i define the rack center line Radius of pitch circle for pinion is R j There is no relative sliding between pitch circle and rack center line Q i and Q j are the points where the rack and pinion were in contact at time t=0 NOTE: A rack-and-pinion type kinematic constraint is a limit case of a pair of convex-convex gears Take the radius R i to infinity, and the pitch line for gear i will become the rack center line 20

Rack and Pinion Kinematics Kinematic constraints that define the relative motion: At any time, the distance between the point P j and the contact point D should stay constant (this is equal to the radius of the gear R j ) The length of the segment Q i D and the length of the arc Q j D should be equal (no slip condition) Rack-and-pinion removes two DOFs of the relative motion between these two bodies 21

Rack and Pinion Pair Step 1: Understand the physical element Step 2: Constraint Equations  (q,t) = ? Step 3: Constraint Jacobian  q = ? Step 4: = ? Step 5:  = ? 22

End Gear Kinematics Begin Cam-Follower Kinematics 23

Preamble: Boundary of a Convex Body Assumption: the bodies we are dealing with are convex To any point on the boundary corresponds one value of the angle  (this is like the yaw angle, see figure below) 24 The distance from the reference point Q to any point P on the convex boundary is a function of  : It all boils down to expressing two quantities as functions of  The position of P, denoted by r P The tangent at point P, denoted by g

Cam-Follower Pair Assumption: no chattering takes place The basic idea: two bodies are in contact, and at the contact point the two bodies share: The contact point The tangent to the boundaries 25 Recall that a point is located by the angle  i on body i, and  j on body j. Therefore, when dealing with a cam- follower, in addition to the x,y,  coordinates for each body one needs to rely on one additional generalized coordinate, namely the contact point angle  : Body i: x i, y i,  i,  i Body j: x j, y j,  j,  j

Cam-Follower Constraint Step 1: Understand the physical element Step 2: Constraint Equations  (q,t) = ? Step 3: Constraint Jacobian  q = ? Step 4: = ? Step 5:  = ? 26