20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, 2004 Naka Fusion Research Establishment, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Stationary high confinement plasmas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint SEWGs-TFE meeting S. Brezinsek22/07/2008 TF E Impact of N 2 on carbon chemistry in JET S. Brezinsek, Y. Corre and TFE.
Advertisements

Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.
Stability, Transport, and Conrol for the discussion Y. Miura IEA/LT Workshop (W59) combined with DOE/JAERI Technical Planning of Tokamak Experiments (FP1-2)
ASIPP Characteristics of edge localized modes in the superconducting tokamak EAST M. Jiang Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences The.
Standard and Advanced Tokamak Operation Scenarios for ITER
Introduction to Spherical Tokamak
Discussion on application of current hole towards reactor T.Ozeki (JAERI) Current hole plasmas were observed in the large tokamaks of JT-60U and JET. This.
Current Hole and VECTOR Approach to High Beta Steady State Operation Presented by T.Ozeki, JAERI Thank to K.Tobita, S.Nishio, Y.Nakamura, N.Hayashi, T.Fujita.
1 G.T. Hoang, 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Euratom Turbulent Particle Transport in Tore Supra G.T. Hoang, J.F. Artaud, C. Bourdelle, X. Garbet and.
Emmanuel JoffrinXXth Fusion Energy Conference, November The « hybrid » scenario in JET: towards its validation for ITER E. Joffrin, A. C. C. Sips,
T. Nakano, N. Asakura, H. Takenaga, H. Kubo, Y. Miura, S. Konoshima, K. Masaki, S. Higashijima and the JT-60Team Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute,
R Sartori - page 1 20 th IAEA Conference – Vilamoura Scaling Studies of ELMy H-modes global and pedestal confinement at high triangularity in JET R Sartori.
IAEA - FEC2004 // Vilamoura // // EX/4-5 // A. Staebler – 1 – A. Staebler, A.C.C Sips, M. Brambilla, R. Bilato, R. Dux, O. Gruber, J. Hobirk,
Contributions of Burning Plasma Physics Experiment to Fusion Energy Goals Farrokh Najmabadi Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng. And Center for Energy Research.
Physics Issues and Trade-offs in Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA APS April 2002 Meeting.
S. Coda, 46 th APS-DPP meeting, Savannah, 19 Nov S. Coda, 34 th EPS Conf. on Plasma Physics, Warsaw, 5 July 2007 S. Coda, MHD workshop, PPPL, 22.
Energy loss for grassy ELMs and effects of plasma rotation on the ELM characteristics in JT-60U N. Oyama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), M. Takechi 1), A. Isayama.
Steady State High  N Discharges and Real-Time Control of Current Profile in JT-60U T. Suzuki 1), A. Isayama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), S. Ide 1), T. Fujita 1),
Summary Session October 10, 2008 The Joint Meeting of 4th IAEA Technical Meeting on Spherical Tori and 14th International Workshop on Spherical Torus.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
C Gormezano, S Ide ITPA SSO&EP IEA-LT/ ITPA Collaboration 1 Steady State Operation & Energetic Particles Advanced Scenario need the same development path.
Prof. F.Troyon“JET: A major scientific contribution...”25th JET Anniversary 20 May 2004 JET: A major scientific contribution to the conception and design.
Presented by Y. Kamada Large Tokamak Meeting June 2006 JT-60U contribution to ITPA/IEA inter-machine experiments and related study for ITPA/IEA.
H. Urano, H. Takenaga, T. Fujita, Y. Kamada, K. Kamiya, Y. Koide, N. Oyama, M. Yoshida and the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency JT-60U Tokamak: p.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
TOTAL Simulation of ITER Plasmas Kozo YAMAZAKI Nagoya Univ., Chikusa-ku, Nagoya , Japan 1.
JT-60U Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Study on JT-60U Go Matsunaga 松永 剛 Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka, Japan JSPS-CAS Core University Program 2008 in ASIPP.
Advanced Tokamak Regimes in the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment (FIRE) 30th Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics St. Petersburg, Russia.
Initial Exploration of HHFW Current Drive on NSTX J. Hosea, M. Bell, S. Bernabei, S. Kaye, B. LeBlanc, J. Menard, M. Ono C.K. Phillips, A. Rosenberg, J.R.
Development and Contribution of RF Heating and Current Drive Systems to Long Pulse, High Performance Experiments in JT-60U Shinichi Moriyama, Masami Seki,
Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka Fusion Institute H モード周辺プラズマの無次元量解析 Japan Atomic Energy Agency 浦野 創 原子力機構 那珂核融合研究所.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
ITER Standard H-mode, Hybrid and Steady State WDB Submissions R. Budny, C. Kessel PPPL ITPA Modeling Topical Working Group Session on ITER Simulations.
Current Drive for FIRE AT-Mode T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego Workshop on Physics Issues for FIRE May 1-3, 2000 Princeton Plasma Physics.
High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
Global Stability Issues for a Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment UFA Burning Plasma Workshop Austin, Texas December 11, 2000 S. C. Jardin with input from.
1 Instabilities in the Long Pulse Discharges on the HT-7 X.Gao and HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 1126, Hefei,
ASIPP Long pulse and high power LHCD plasmas on HT-7 Xu Qiang.
Current holes at ASDEX Upgrade Presented by O. Gruber for D. Merkl, J. Hobirk, P.J. McCarthy, E. Strumberger, ASDEX Upgrade Team - hardware upgrades for.
E. Doyle (Chair), V. Mukhovatov (Co-chair) for the ITPA Transport Physics Group 2nd IEA Large Tokamak Workshop on Implementation of the ITPA Coordinated.
1Peter de Vries – ITBs and Rotational Shear – 18 February 2010 – Oxford Plasma Theory Group P.C. de Vries JET-EFDA Culham Science Centre Abingdon OX14.
1 13 th ITPA Transport Physics Group Meeting Naka, 1-3 October 2007 V. Mukhovatov ITER Rotation Issues.
Transport in three-dimensional magnetic field: examples from JT-60U and LHD Katsumi Ida and LHD experiment group and JT-60 group 14th IEA-RFP Workshop.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
EJD IAEA H-mode WS,, September 28, Overview Introduction — steady-state performance requirements -Global DIII-D and NSTX progress Plasma control.
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
JT-60U -1- Access to High  p (advanced inductive) and Reversed Shear (steady state) plasmas in JT-60U S. Ide for the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency.
RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
HL-2A Heating & Current Driving by LHW and ECW study on HL-2A Bai Xingyu, HL-2A heating team.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
Approach for a High Performance Fusion Power Source Pathway Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy ARIES Team Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, San.
Confinement & Transport Plan Classical theory of confinement and transport. o Diffusion equation Particle diffusion in a magnetic field.
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
Association Euratom-Cea ITPA CDBM group meeting, St Petersburg, October CRONOS simulations of ITER AT scenarios F. Imbeaux, J.F. Artaud, V. Basiuk,
Heating and current drive requirements towards Steady State operation in ITER Francesca Poli C. Kessel, P. Bonoli, D. Batchelor, B. Harvey Work supported.
Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.
Active Control of Neoclassical Tearing Modes toward Stationary High-Beta Plasmas in JT-60U A. Isayama 1), N. Oyama 1), H. Urano 1), T. Suzuki 1), M. Takechi.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
Simulation of Non-Solenoidal Current Rampup in NSTX C. E. Kessel and NSTX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory APS-DPP Annual Meeting, Savannah, Georgia,
Off-axis Current Drive and Current Profile Control in JT-60U T. Suzuki, S. Ide, T. Fujita, T. Oikawa, M. Ishikawa, G. Matsunaga, M. Takechi, M. Seki, O.
Lower Hybrid Wave Coupling and Current Drive Experiments in HT-7 Tokamak Weici Shen Jiafang Shan Handong Xu Min Jiang HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics,
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
11th IAEA Technical Meeting on H-mode Physics and Transport Barriers" , September, 2007 Tsukuba International Congress Center "EPOCHAL Tsukuba",
N. Oyama, H. Urano, Y. Sakamoto
Integrated Operation of Steady-state Long Pulse H-mode in EAST
20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference,
Evolution of Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge in JT-60U
Modelling of pulsed and steady-state DEMO scenarios G. Giruzzi et al
Presentation transcript:

20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, 2004 Naka Fusion Research Establishment, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Stationary high confinement plasmas with large bootstrap current fraction in JT-60U Y. Sakamoto, T. Fujita, S. Ide, M. Takechi, T. Suzuki, A. Isayama, H. Takenaga, N. Oyama, Y. Kamada and the JT-60 Team Contents Introduction Stationary discharges with nearly full non-inductive CD 1. Weak shear plasma regime 2. Reversed shear plasma regime Summary

JT-60U Introduction Steady-state operation of tokamak: Full CD + large f BS In JT-60U, optimizing advanced tokamak for 10 years High  p H mode (WS regime): Steady-State / Hybrid Reversed shear H mode (RS regime): Steady-state

JT-60U Introduction f BS ~74% Full CD ~2s Concept DEMO High  Higher  f BS ~42% ~4.5s Particle Control W-div.  N H~7&f BS ~51% FullCD ~1.3s High integration near j(r) SS NNB&EC  N =2.7&f BS ~30% for ~7.4s (NTM) p(r) Opt. for NTM NNB&EC High  p H mode (WS regime): Steady-State / Hybrid Reversed shear H mode (RS regime): Steady-state 20th IAEA Steady-state operation of tokamak: Full CD + large f BS In JT-60U; optimizing advanced tokamak for 10 years 19th 18th 17th 16th 15th

JT-60U Introduction f BS ~74% Full CD ~2s Concept DEMO High  Higher  f BS ~42% ~4.5s Particle Control W-div.  N H~7&f BS ~51% FullCD ~1.3s High integration near j(r) SS NNB&EC  N =2.7&f BS ~30% for ~7.4s (NTM) p(r) Opt. for NTM NNB&EC f BS ~23% Full CD ~1.5s LH RS&ITB Sustain f BS ~80% Full CD ~2.7s RS + ELMy H SS RS near j(r) SS f BS ~62% Full CD ~0.8s NNB&LH j(r) Controlability High  p H mode (WS regime): Steady-State / Hybrid Reversed shear H mode (RS regime): Steady-state 20th IAEA Steady-state operation of tokamak: Full CD + large f BS In JT-60U, optimizing advanced tokamak for 10 years 19th 18th 17th 16th 15th

JT-60U Introduction f BS ~74% Full CD ~2s Concept DEMO High  Higher  f BS ~42% ~4.5s Particle Control W-div.  N H~7&f BS ~51% FullCD ~1.3s High integration near j(r) SS NNB&EC  N =2.7&f BS ~30% for ~7.4s (NTM) p(r) Opt. for NTM NNB&EC f BS ~23% Full CD ~1.5s LH RS&ITB Sustain f BS ~80% Full CD ~2.7s RS + ELMy H SS RS near j(r) SS f BS ~62% Full CD ~0.8s NNB&LH j(r) Controlability 20th IAEA Target: Steady-state operation of tokamak: Full CD + large f BS Long sustain (>  R ) Large f BS Full CD 19th 18th 17th 16th 15th High  p H mode (WS regime): Steady-State / Hybrid Reversed shear H mode (RS regime): Steady-state In JT-60U, optimizing advanced tokamak for 10 years

JT-60U Progress of long sustainment of large f BS under nearly full non-inductive CD 1998 Before last IAEA

JT-60U Progress of long sustainment of large f BS under nearly full non-inductive CD Full CD 1998 Before last IAEA

JT-60U Progress of long sustainment of large f BS under nearly full non-inductive CD Achieved region of large f BS has significantly been extended. >2  R  *~0.006 *~

Weak shear plasma regime towards ITER steady state scenario Issue : Avoidance of NTMs Key : Optimization of q profile (q 95 ~4.5) Quite low q 95 ~2.2 (T. Suzuki, EX1-3)

f BS ~45% sustained for ~5.8s (~2.8  R ) under nearly full CD in weak shear plasma JT-60U Scenario: High  p ELMy H-mode (2.4T, 1MA, q 95 ~4.5,  ~0.5) Non inductive CD: P NB inj (co)~4.5MW & P NNB inj ~4MW & Bootstrap (V) (a.u.) Time (sec) (MW) V loop D  div

Duration was limited by NNB f BS ~45% sustained for ~5.8s (~2.8  R ) under nearly full CD in weak shear plasma JT-60U Scenario: High  p ELMy H-mode (2.4T, 1MA, q 95 ~4.5,  ~0.5) Non inductive CD: P NB inj (co)~4.5MW & P NNB inj ~4MW & Bootstrap  N ~2.4,  p ~1.75 were kept constant by feedback control of stored energy Loop voltage is almost zero, Nearly full CD f CD =90-100% for ~5.8s (f BS ~50-43%, f BD ~52-47%) (V) (a.u.) Time (sec) (MW) V loop D  div

JT-60U Scenario: High  p ELMy H-mode (2.4T, 1MA, q 95 ~4.5,  ~0.5) Non inductive CD: P NB inj (co)~4.5MW & P NNB inj ~4MW & Bootstrap No NTM was observed High integrated performance was achieved towards ITER SS f BS ~45% sustained for ~5.8s (~2.8  R ) under nearly full CD in weak shear plasma (V) (a.u.) Time (sec) (MW) V loop D  div

JT-60U Avoidance of NTM by optimization of q(r) NB injection before penetration of current q(r)>1.5 Avoidance of NTM: alignment of  p and q=m/n (3/2, 2/1,..) p(r) and q(r): optimized by feedback control of W dia and injection timing of NBs

JT-60U Avoidance of NTM by optimization of q(r) q(r) became flat in the core q=2 moved outward Avoidance of NTM: alignment of  p and q=m/n (3/2, 2/1,..) p(r) and q(r): optimized by feedback control of W dia and injection timing of NBs

JT-60U Avoidance of NTM by optimization of q(r) Avoidance of NTM: alignment of  p and q=m/n (3/2, 2/1,..) p(r) and q(r): optimized by feedback control (W dia ) and injection timing of NBs q(r)> ~1.5 q=2 at small  p

JT-60U Avoidance of NTM by optimization of q(r) Avoidance of NTM: alignment of  p and q=m/n (3/2, 2/1,..) p(r) and q(r): optimized by feedback control (W dia ) and injection timing of NBs q(r)> ~1.5 q=2 at small  p t=12s

Reversed shear plasma regime with larger bootstrap current fraction Target : Long sustainment (>  R ) large f BS under full CD Issue : ITB control under the plasma with large f BS characterized by strong linkage between p(r) & j(r).

JT-60U f BS ~75% sustained for ~7.4s (~2.7  R ) under nearly full CD in RS plasma Scenario: Reversed shear ELMy H-mode (3.4T, 0.8MA, q 95 ~8.6,  ~0.42) Non-inductive CD: Bootstrap dominant & P NB inj (co)=3.2MW

JT-60U Duration was limited by NB injection. f BS ~75% sustained for ~7.4s (~2.7  R ) under nearly full CD in RS plasma Scenario: Reversed shear ELMy H-mode (3.4T, 0.8MA, q 95 ~8.6,  ~0.42) Non-inductive CD: Bootstrap dominant & P NB inj (co)=3.2MW No strong impurity accumulation Z eff : constant (~3)  N ~1.7,  p ~2.25 by feedback control f CD =95% for ~7.4s (f BS ~75%, f BD ~20%) H 89 ~3, HH y2 ~1.7

JT-60U q and pressure profiles reached stationary condition with f BS ~75% Strong RS (s~-1.5) --> Weaker (s~-0.8) ITB & ETB are formed. ITB radii decrease by change in q(r).

JT-60U q and pressure profiles reached stationary condition with f BS ~75% Strong RS (s~-1.5) --> Weaker (s~-0.8) j BS + j BD agrees well j tot --> j OH is small ITB & ETB are formed. ITB radii decrease by change in q(r). t=12.4s

JT-60U  T i reduction at ITB through rotation control enable long sustainment Reversed shear plasma frequently disrupted at q min ~integer. q min ~4

JT-60U  T i reduction at ITB through rotation control enable long sustainment CTR-NB Reversed shear plasma frequently disrupted at q min ~integer. ITB control by toroidal rotation to avoid disruption for the plasma with strong linkage between p(r) & j(r). ITB control by V T : IAEA 2000 (Y. Sakamoto) In this phase, combination of tang-NB was changed from CO(~3MW)+CTR(~0.8MW) to CO(~3MW) + no CTR. This change drives CO rotation. CO-NB q min ~4

JT-60U  T i reduction at ITB through rotation control enable long sustainment Reversed shear plasma frequently disrupted at q min ~integer. ITB control by V T : IAEA 2000 (Y. Sakamoto) CTR-NB CO-NB q min ~4 ITB control by toroidal rotation to avoid disruption for the plasma with strong linkage between p(r) & j(r).

JT-60U  T i reduction at ITB through rotation control enable long sustainment Reversed shear plasma frequently disrupted at q min ~integer. ITB control by V T : IAEA 2000 (Y. Sakamoto) q min ~4 CTR-NB CO-NB T i at the ITB decreased during V T control. Disruption avoided ITB control by toroidal rotation to avoid disruption for the plasma with strong linkage between p(r) & j(r).

JT-60U Summary Towards steady state operation of tokamak, JT-60U has made significant progress in terms of long sustainment of plasmas with large f BS in two regimes. (1)Weak shear regime High integrated performance plasma with f BS ~45% was sustained for ~5.8s (~2.8  R ) under nearly full non-inductive CD. (2) Reversed shear regime Quite high confinement (HH~1.7) plasma with f BS ~75% was sustained for ~7.4s (~2.7  R ) under nearly full non-inductive CD. ITB control through rotation for the plasma with strong linkage between p(r) & j(r) was demonstrated, which enable long sustainment.