Internet2 Engineering Issues IBM T J Watson :: Hawthorne Guy Almes 25 July 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology and Administrative Coordination Issues Pacific Rim Networking Workshop Guy Almes Manoa Valley, Oahu 22 February 2002.
Advertisements

IPv4 Depletion IPv6 Adoption 3 February /8s Remaining.
DirectAccess Infrastructure Planning and Design Published: October 2009 Updated: November 2011.
Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative 11 January 2001 CSG Meeting.
14 July 2000TWIST George Brett NLANR Distributed Applications Support Team (NCSA/UIUC)
Internet2 A Project of the University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development VIEWNET April 1998.
1 A Course-End Conclusions and Future Studies Dr. Rocky K. C. Chang 28 November 2005.
The Future of the Internet Jennifer Rexford ’91 Computer Science Department Princeton University
TF-NGN TERENA General Assembly Roberto Sabatino Copenhagen, 23 October 2003.
Internet2 Update R/D and Infrastructure Guy Almes Internet2 Project NANOG Meeting Dearborn — 9 June 1998.
Internet2 Engineering Update  Guy Almes Internet2 Chief Engineer  Educom Meeting Minneapolis — 30 October 1997.
Innovating the commodity Internet Update to CENIC 14-Mar-2007.
The Campus as key to Internet2 Engineering Atlanta Guy Almes 30 May 2000.
WUNCA 19th Tech Meeting UniNet Network Update WUNCA 19th July 3, 2008 By UniNet NOC Team
IPv6 Deployment Plan The Global IPv6 Summit 2001.
Internet2 Engineering and Abilene Update Westnet Meetings :: Boulder Guy Almes 29 June 2001.
Internet2: Technology Innovation and Distributed Infrastructure Guy Almes Internet2 Project NANOG Meetings Denver — February 1, 1999.
1 Deployment of IP Multicast in Campus Infrastructures Kevin Almeroth UC--Santa Barbara
Internet2 Engineering and University Researchers Nacogdoches Guy Almes 30 March 2001.
R. Hobby, UC Davis Internet2 General Meeting Internet 2 Campus Networking Workshop Russ Hobby, Director Advanced Networked and Scientific Applications.
1 Update Jacqueline Brown University of Washington APAN Meeting Busan, Korea 29 August 2003.
The Research and Education Network: Platform for Innovation Heather Boyles, Next Generation Network Symposium Malaysia 2007-March-15.
Advances in Multicast - The Promise of Single Source Multicast (SSM) (with a little on multicast DOS) Marshall Eubanks Multicast Technologies
BEHAVE BOF (Behavior Engineering for Hindrance AVoidancE) Cullen Jennings Jiri Kuthan.
The Singapore Advanced Research & Education Network.
 End to End Performance Initiative Russ Hobby HENP Networking Working Group Meeting, Ann Arbor, Michigan 26 October 2001.
1 October 2001  End to End Performance Initiative.
ESnet Site Coordinators Committee (ESCC): IPv6 Activities & Directions Phil DeMar (ESCC Chair) HEPix IPv6 Workshop (CERN) June 22, 2011.
Interdomain multicast routing with IPv6 Stig Venaas University of Southampton Jerome Durand RENATER Mickael Hoerdt University Louis Pasteur - LSIIT.
ASCR/ESnet Network Requirements an Internet2 Perspective 2009 ASCR/ESnet Network Requirements Workshop April 15/16, 2009 Richard Carlson -- Internet2.
Interdomain IPv6 multicast Stig Venaas UNINETT. PIM-SM and Rendezvous Points Interdomain multicast routing is usually done with a protocol called PIM-SM.
Internet2 IPv6 Update Heather Boyles, APAN IPv6 Task Force 2007-January-23.
1 Internet2 K20 SEGPs and IP Multicast Joanne Hugi Computing Center University of Oregon.
Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative or Why Fat Pipes aren’t Enough Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development 16 May 2001 See
Advanced Networks: The Past and the Future – The Internet2 Perspective APAN 7 July 2004, Cairns, Australia Douglas Van Houweling, President & CEO Internet2.
IPv6 Operation Study Group in Japan March 5, 2002 Akihiro Inomata/Fujitsu Limited Chair of IPv6 Operation Study Group.
Deploying IPv6, Now Christian Huitema Architect Windows Networking & Communications Microsoft Corporation.
End-to-End Performance Initiative March 9, 2001 Internet2 Spring Member Meeting.
Internet2 End-to-End (e2e) Performance Initiative Laurie Burns Steve Corbató Internet2 Fall Member Meeting Atlanta, Georgia October 31, 2000.
Internet2 and Cyberinfrastructure Russ Hobby Program Manager,
End-to-End Performance Initiative Russ Hobby May 30, 2001 Internet2 Campus Workshop Atlanta, Georgia.
6 February 2004 Internet2 Priorities 2004 Internet2 Industry Strategy Council Douglas Van Houweling.
Internet2 Background AARnet-Internet2 Workshop :: Sydney Guy Almes 10 October 2001.
IPv6 Site Renumbering Gap Analysis draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-01 draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-01 Bing Liu(speaker), Sheng Jiang, Brian.E.Carpenter,
1 © 2004 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number Presentation_ID Early vs. Cautious IPv6 deployment Issues and trade-offs Tony Hain Cisco.
Internet2/Abilene Perspective Guy Almes and Ted Hanss Internet2 Project NASA Ames -- August 10, 1999.
IPv6 and the US higher education and research networking community Doug Van Houweling President and CEO, Internet2
Implementing Advanced Services Today – Routing & Multicast ken lindahl Chair, Internet2 Routing Working Group Campus Focused Workshop.
1 Paul Davis Executive Director, GrangeNet Australian Experience of a National IPv6 Network for Research.
Advanced research and education networking in the United States: the Internet2 experience Heather Boyles Director, Member and Partner Relations Internet2.
End to End Performance Initiative . Context for E2E Performance High performance backbones are in place Now, under certain conditions within particular.
Spring 2004 Internet2 Member Meeting NLR Service Center Update Dave Jent Indiana University.
Abilene Update SC'99 :: Portland :: 17-Nov-99. Outline Goals Architecture Current Status NGI Peering International Peering Multicast.
Internet2 Engineering Challenges Campus Engineering Workshop, Houston Guy Almes 10 April 2002.
George Brett, Janet Brown, Basil Irwin NLANR Team Members Update on the National Laboratory for Applied Network Research Internet2 Fall Meeting Atlanta,
05 October 2001 End-to-End Performance Initiative Network Measurement Matt Zekauskas, Fall 2001 Internet2 Member Meeting Network Measurement.
Internet2. Yesterday’s Internet  Thousands of users  Remote login, file transfer  Applications capitalize on underlying technology.
Internet2 Applications & Engineering Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development.
IPv6 Adoption Status and Scheduling for Sustainable Development 24 July 2012 Nate Davis Chief Operating Officer, ARIN.
Internet2 Engineering  Guy Almes Internet2 Chief Engineer  Internet2 Advisory Committee Chicago — 4 September 1997.
Implementing Advanced Services Today: IPv6 Atlanta Guy Almes on behalf of the Internet2 IPv6 WG 30 May 2000.
Measurements on Internet2
The Campus as key to Internet2 Engineering
Introducing Novell IPv6 Stack
Campus Focused Workshop on Advanced Networking
Abilene International Peering: Advanced Services Update
Internet2 Spring Member Meeting
The Campus as key to Internet2 Engineering
IPv6 in Internet2 This is a general overview presentation about Internet2. Internet2 is a consortium, led by US universities, which is recreating the partnership.
Advanced Services – IPv6
Presentation transcript:

Internet2 Engineering Issues IBM T J Watson :: Hawthorne Guy Almes 25 July 2001

Internet2 Engineering Objectives A Provide our universities with superlative networking: • Performance • Functionality • Understanding A Make superlative networking strategic for university research and education

Engineering: Advanced Functionality A Multicast A IPv6 A QoS A Measurements A Support for End-to-End Performance

Internet2 Multicast A Multicast Working Group • Kevin Almeroth, Univ California Santa Barbara, chair A Encouraging more pervasive high-quality deployment of native IP multicast throughout the Internet2 infrastructure A Fighting fires A Keeping an eye on SSM A Clarifying the application story

Internet2 Multicast Architecture A PIM-SparseMode • multicast routing within an Autonomous System • quite scalable • notion of rendezvous points A MBGP • between Autonomous Systems A MSDP • Source Discovery

Longer-term WG Issues A Scalability (what happens if it does catch on?) A Exploring the role of Source-Specific Multicast

Could SSM be Enough? A 'Classic' Multicast • Group has global significance • A user creates, joins, sends to g • Others can join, then send to and/or listen to g • MBGP, PIM-SM, MSDP triad A Source Specific Multicast • Group has local significance • A user 's' creates, sends to • Others can subscribe to, then list to • No need for MSDP (or allocation of values)

Implications of SSM A Simplify Multicast Routing / Addressing • No need for global class-D address allocation • No need for source discovery A Complicates 'few-to-few' applications • Define all the members of the application-level group • Both a burden and an opportunity A Allows better Security, Scalability A Requires new version of IGMP

Multicast Summary A Full functionality supported now A Deployment steadily increasing A Some international peering, e.g., CA*net3 A Performance excellent A Scalability? A Applications?

Internet2 IPv6 A IPv6 Working Group • Dale Finkelson, Univ Nebraska, chair A Build the Internet2 IPv6 infrastructure A Educate campus network engineers to support IPv6 A Explore the Motivation for IPv6 within the Internet2 community

IPv6 Infrastructure A vBNS and Abilene both support IPv6 A Abilene IPv6 with IPv6/IPv4 • Four 'backbone' nodes: Cisco 7200 " Atlanta, Pittsburgh, Denver, and Indianapolis • Managed by the Abilene NOC A IPv6 WG: address allocation and engineering coordination

Education / Training Goals A IPv6 hands-on workshop • Lincoln, Nebraska; 17 May 2001 • starting from scratch, build an IPv6 network, including routers, hosts, DNS tools and various transition tools, ending up with a functional IPv6 network fully interconnected to the global Internet. A Materials from this workshop will be available to enable gigaPoPs and others to use in their own workshops.

Explore IPv6 Motivation A Why should our users, campus decision- makers, and community generally care about IPv6? • IPv6 preserves the classic end-to-end transparency of the Internet architecture • improved support for mobility • key for IPsec • key for the scalability of the Internet A The answers must be pragmatic.

Engineering: End-to-End Performance

The Current Situation A Our universities have access to an infrastructure of considerable capacity • examples of 240 Mb/s flows A End-to-end performance varies widely • but 40 Mb/s flows not always predictable • users don't know what their expectations should be A Note the mismatch

Threats to End to End Performance A BW = C x packet-size / ( delay x sqrt(packet-loss )) (Mathis, Semke, Mahdavi, and Ott, CCR, July 1997) A Context: • Network capacity • Geographical distance • Aggressive application

Threats to End to End Performance A Fiber problems • dirty fiber • dim lighting • 'not quite right' connectors

Threats to End to End Performance A Fiber problems A Switches • horsepower • full vs half-duplex • head-of-line blocking

Threats to End to End Performance A Fiber problems A Switches A Inadvertently stingy provisioning • mostly communication • happens also in international settings

Threats to End to End Performance A Fiber problems A Switches A Inadvertently stingy provisioning A Wrong Routing • asymmetric • best use of Internet2 • distance

Threats to End to End Performance A Fiber problems A Switches A Inadvertently stingy provisioning A Wrong Routing A Host issues • NIC • OS / TCP stack • CPU

Perverse Result A 'Users' think the network is congested or that the Internet2 infrastructure cannot help them A 'Planners' think the network is underutilized, no further investment needed, or that users don't need high performance networks

Promising Approaches A Work with key motivated users A 'Shining a flashlight' on the problem A Measurements A Divide-and-Conquer A Understanding Application Behavior A Getting it right the first time

Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative A Very recently hired / deployed staff • Cheryl Munn-Fremon, initiative director • Russ Hobby, chief technical architect • George Brett, chief information architect A $1.5M budgeted by Internet2

Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative A Distributed measurement infrastructure • Enable rapid effective understanding of why an instance of end-to-end performance is limited • Make the work of PERF participants rewarding • Enable initiation of tests by PERF participants A Teams of performance analysis specialists (PERF) A Dissemination of best practices

Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative A Distributed measurement infrastructure A Teams of performance analysis specialists (PERF) • members at campuses, gigaPoPs, backbones • socially and technically coordinated • committed to effecting radical change A Dissemination of best practices

Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative A Distributed measurement infrastructure A Teams of performance analysis specialists (PERF) A Dissemination of best practices • Identify key techniques, tools, and 'best practices' • Make them common • Work toward widespread / routine excellent user experiences • Improve the reputation / status of network engineers

Anticipated Partners A NLANR: DAST, MOAT, and NCNE A Web100 Project A Abilene partners A Leading campuses and gigaPoPs A Internet2 corporate members

Access to Key Resources A Optical telescopes in Hawaii A CRAFT Project A PACI Supercomputer Facilities A CERN