MACDADI: A Methodology for Systematically and Transparently Achieving Breakthrough Quality Professor: John Haymaker Student: John Chachere 1

Breakthrough Quality is a CIFE Goal How do you define breakthrough quality? CIFE members’ top priority is breakthrough quality. To chart a course, we must know where we’re going. 2

Charts Written Reports Verbal Accounts Presentations Breakthrough Quality is a CIFE Goal How do you define breakthrough quality? We propose a process and tools for team consensus 3 Residents Investors Builders Engineers Meetings Milestones Design Tasks Sustainability Resident Comfort Maintainability Aesthetic Appeal Energy Performance Craftsmanship

The Big Idea: MACDADI Decision Maker Stakeholders Engineers Decision Maker Stakeholders Engineers MACDADI 4 Typical Process Proposed Process MACDADI, Multi-Attribute Collective Decision Analysis of Design Initiatives, adapts Management Science tools for the AEC Industry to help teams collaboratively choose the best building configurations. We propose to determine whether MACDADI is: Simple  More Clear Transparent  More Procedurally Fair Systematic  More Comprehensive

Pilot: Stanford’s Green Dorm Feasibility Study Focus MACDADI Pilot: Process and Tools 5 Pilot: Stanford Green Dorm Feasibility Study Identify Design Options Identify Stake- holders Evaluate Options’ Impacts Weight Prefer- ences Choose Best Options Weight Stake- holders Identify Decision Maker Identify Design Team Explore Options’ Merits Identify Project Goals

Identify Design Options Identify Stake- holders Evaluate Options’ Impacts Weight Prefer- ences Choose Best Options Weight Stake- holders Identify Decision Maker Identify Design Team Explore Options’ Merits Identify Project Goals Identify Project Team Decision maker tells us which stakeholders to satisfy 6 Designers provide options and their impacts on goals MACDADI communicates and integrates these data Stakeholders tell us what goals the facility can fulfill StudentsEng. FacultyEng. School University

Identify Design Options Identify Stake- holders Evaluate Options’ Impacts Weight Prefer- ences Choose Best Options Weight Stake- holders Identify Decision Maker Identify Design Team Explore Options’ Merits Identify Project Goals Identify Stakeholders’ Goals 7

Weight Stakeholders’ Preferences 8 Living Laboratory : 33% Environmental Performance : 30% Economy: 9% Desirable Housing: 28% Community 7% H20Cycle 7% Material Use 9% Economy 9% R: Materials 3% Indoor Environment 13% Demonstration 13% R: Process 2% R: Water 4% R: Sensing 3% Learning 8% Zero Carbon 14% R: Structure 2% R: Energy 5% R: Vehicle 1% Identify Design Options Identify Stake- holders Evaluate Options’ Impacts Weight Prefer- ences Choose Best Options Weight Stake- holders Identify Decision Maker Identify Design Team Explore Options’ Merits Identify Project Goals … it will be beneficial … thank you for the good design of the survey. Jonas, Stanford Undergraduate Student

Identify Design Options This is great!!! Truly integrative design!!! Ken Kortkamp PE, LEED AP Sherwood Design Engineers 9 Identify Design Options Identify Stake- holders Evaluate Options’ Impacts Weight Prefer- ences Choose Best Options Weight Stake- holders Identify Decision Maker Identify Design Team Explore Options’ Merits Identify Project Goals

Estimate Options’ Impacts 10 Identify Design Options Identify Stake- holders Evaluate Options’ Impacts Weight Prefer- ences Choose Best Options Weight Stake- holders Identify Decision Maker Identify Design Team Explore Options’ Merits Identify Project Goals

Calculate Options’ Benefits to Stakeholders 11 Identify Design Options Identify Stake- holders Evaluate Options’ Impacts Weight Prefer- ences Choose Best Options Weight Stake- holders Identify Decision Maker Identify Design Team Explore Options’ Merits Identify Project Goals

Choose the Best Options Baseline Green Living Lab CommunityLearning Indoor EnvironmentExperimentation DemonstrationZero Carbon H20CycleMaterial Use Economy “Wow, this is really great. I think this really might make the difference in helping us decide the final scope, which in my experience here, is the hardest part of any project.... Thanks so much for taking this on- I really hope it can be a model for making these kinds of decisions on all jobs.” Laura Goldstein Project Manager Stanford University 12 Identify Design Options Identify Stake- holders Evaluate Options’ Impacts Weight Prefer- ences Choose Best Options Weight Stake- holders Identify Decision Maker Identify Design Team Explore Options’ Merits Identify Project Goals

MACDADI: A Methodology for Systematically and Transparently Achieving Breakthrough Quality Professor: John Haymaker Student: John Chachere MACDADI can help you define breakthrough quality! 13