Summary of QARTOD and Recent Workshops on QA/QC March 9-10, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECOOP Meeting March 14-21, 2005 ECOOP WP7 Pierre-Yves LE TRAON Better use of remote sensing and in-situ observing systems for coastal/regional seas Objective.
Advertisements

SIO 210: I. Observational methods and II. Data analysis (combined single lecture) Fall 2013 Remote sensing In situ T, S and tracers Velocity Observing.
NOS – National Ocean Service NWS – National Weather Service What is QARTOD? IOOC DMAC Steering Team Second Meeting January 2012 Washington, D.C.
Pierre Jaccard1 MyOcean Quality Control for Ferryboxes MyOcean Tutorial, NERSC, Bergen.
Argo a year ago. 500 floats. Regional coverage only.
Review and Rating Discharge Measurements David S. Mueller Office of Surface Water March 2010.
Argo Real-time Quality Control Process NOAA/AOML: Y.-H. DANESHZADEH, R. MOLINARI, R. SABINA, C. SCHMID CIMAS/UM: E. FORTEZA, X. XIA, H. YANG.
QARTOD III November 2-4, 2005 QARTOD – IOOS DMAC Relationship Julie Bosch NOAA Coastal Data Development Center QARTOD III November 2–4, 2005.
IOOS, NOAA and HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD
QARTOD III Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA Quality Control, Quality Assurance, and Quality Flags Mark Bushnell, NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS November.
QARTOD III November 2-4, 2005 Metadata in the IOOS Community Julie Bosch NOAA Coastal Data Development Center QARTOD III November 2–4, 2005.
DATA INTEGRATION DEMONSTRATION QA/QC Focus Quality Assurance of Real Time Ocean Data QARTOD II Feb 28-March 2, 2005 National Federation Of Regional Associations.
QARTOD II Currents and Waves IN-SITU WAVE GROUP Kent Hathaway, Moderator QARTOD II February 28 – March 2, 2005.
QARTOD 2: Remote Currents Working Group Definitions: Level 1 – refers to radials Level 2 – refers to total vectors Level 3 – refers to higher level data.
QARTOD II Currents and Waves In-Situ Currents: Breakout Group Report Out QARTOD II February 28 – March 2, 2005.
2 nd international Conference for GODAR-WESTPAC JODC, Japan Coast Guard, Tokyo 2004.
Update on Salinity Data Workshop and OpenIOOS Pushing for “Interoperability” Jim Boyd NOAA Coastal Services Center Quality Assurance of Real Time Oceanographic.
Progress Towards a Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System for the Southeast (SEACOOS) Harvey Seim / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University.
1 Satellite & In Situ Salinity (SISS) Working Group: Current Status and Future Plans Yi Chao, Co-Chair (Jacqueline Boutin, Co-Chair) Aquarius Science Meeting.
Remote Currents: HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
First Data Management Training Workshop, February, 2007, Oostende, Belgium 1 Quality control checks description First Data Management Training Workshop.
Quality Control Standards for SeaDataNet Review status at 1 st Annual Meeting (March 2007) Review developments over last year Current status Future work.
Work Package 2 / 3 TECHNOLOGICAL & PROCEDURAL HARMONISATION FixO3 General Assembly 14 th to the 16 th October 2014, Heraklion-CRETE ESTOC, PLOCAN,
Towards a Standard for Real-time Quality Control Procedures for in situ Ocean Waves Richard Bouchard 1 and Julie Thomas 2 1.NOAA’s National Data Buoy Center.
Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg – Richard Assmann Observatory The GCOS Reference Upper Air Network.
Brief Review of Lecture 1 Understanding Science, Oceanography, Physical Oceanography Descriptive or Dynamical Approaches Eulerian or Lagrangian techniques.
NOAA PORTS ® Partnerships MARACOOS Annual Meeting 12/15/2011 Darren Wright Maritime Services Program Manager.
Mike Botts – August Supporting QA/QC for Ocean Observations using Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) and SensorML August 2008 Mike Botts (UAH), Tony Cook.
Testing the US Integrated Ocean Observing System Data Discovery and Distribution Infrastructure with Real-World Problems Derrick Snowden 1, Rich Signell.
JCOMM Data Buoy Cooperation Panel October 16, 2006 National Data Buoy Center 2006 Review: A Year of Growth Paul F. Moersdorf, PhD, Director.
Workshop on QC in Derived Data Products, Las Cruces, NM, 31 January 2007 ClimDB/HydroDB Objectives Don Henshaw Improve access to long-term collections.
EMI INFSO-RI SA2 - Quality Assurance Alberto Aimar (CERN) SA2 Leader EMI First EC Review 22 June 2011, Brussels.
Salinometer Thermosalinograph (TSG) CTD
Performance Measures For Climate Observations Message & Manage Neil Christerson James Shambaugh Planning and Programming Division, CPO/OAR June 26, 2012.
Inter-comparison and Validation Task Team Breakout discussion.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
® Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011 QUAlity aware VIsualisation for the Global Earth Observation system of systems GEOVIQUA workshop February, the.
SCCOOS Goals and Efforts Within COCMP, SCCOOS aims to develop products and procedures—based on observational data—that effectively evaluate and improve.
SEADATANET Kick-Off Meeting Heraklion 8-10 June 2006 National Institute of Geophisics and Volcanology, Italy (INGV) SEADATANET Joint Reasearch Activities.
1 NOAA IOOS Program Data Integration Framework (DIF) Project Overview Adapted from a brief to the NOAA Data Management Committee August 6, 2008 by Jeff.
Carolinas Coast: A One-Stop Shop for Marine Observations in the Carolinas Funded by the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration Southeast Atlantic.
Automated Weather Observations from Ships and Buoys: A Future Resource for Climatologists Shawn R. Smith Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies.
Topics describe the Data Buoy Cooperation Panel (DBCP) –aims, –achievements and –Challenges network status developments of data buoy technology JCOMM.
DATA QUALITY CONTROL Julie Thomas Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) Scripps Institution of Oceanography CI Design Workshop October 2007 La.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 In Situ SST for Satellite Cal/Val and Quality Control Alexander Ignatov.
Bob Keeley Marine Environmental Data Service Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans Ottawa, Canada Jun, 2006 SeaDataNet Meeting.
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ® ) IOOS ® Biological Observations Data Project A Multi-Agency Effort to Enable Access to Biological Observations.
1 Implementing QA/QC Standards for In Situ Ocean Sensors Using OGC-Sensor Web Enablement a.k.a. QARTOD to OGC a.k.a. Q2O Project Status Brief to NOAA IOOS.
Challenges in user provided quality control information for real time temperature and ocean currents Jeff Donovan and Vembu Subramanian University of South.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Aquarius Validation Data System Overview and Status Algorithm Workshop March 21-22, 2007 John Gunn Earth.
Cal/Val for physics MED-MFC internal meeting CMCC-INGV-SOCIB Lecce E. Clementi, INGV.
1 1 Arctic and North Seas Products Coordinated by IMR P17, Helge Sagen JRA 8.
Waves Formalize data dictionaries QC What is required to formalize? Defining quality assurance requirements Validating sensors In situ Currents Start data.
NOAA IOOS SOS Implementations in 2008 Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NOAA IOOS Program DIF Sr Systems Architect.
The ESA call for the 9 th Earth Explorer mission (EE9)
QA4EO in 10 Minutes! A presentation to the 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting.
ICWG: CGMS-43, May 2015, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Status report on the International Clouds.
CARPE DIEM 4 th meeting Critical Assessment of available Radar Precipitation Estimation techniques and Development of Innovative approaches for Environmental.
US IOOS ® Zdenka Willis Director, US IOOS. Programmatic year Awards Administration Transition.
RTOFS Monitoring and Evaluation Metrics Avichal Mehra MMAB/EMC/NCEP/NWS.
Data Sharing and Data Quality of Ocean Currents and Temperature: Towards an Operational Data Management System for the Southeast Region Southeast Regional.
SeaDataNet Technical Task Group meeting JRA1 Standards Development Task 1.2 Common Data Management Protocol (for dissemination to all NODCs and JRA3) Data.
Quality Assurance of Real-Time Oceanographic Data
Data aggregation and products generation in the Mediterranean Sea
Data Sharing and Data Quality of Ocean Currents and Temperature:
Jeff Donovan and Vembu Subramanian University of South Florida
Challenges in Centralized Aggregated Data Quality Control
US IOOS®, NDBC, CO-OPS Partnership Discussion
Project Status Brief to NOAA IOOS Program February 18, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Summary of QARTOD and Recent Workshops on QA/QC March 9-10, 2006

QA and QC Quality Assurance (QA) steps that you take beforehand (sensors calibration, maintenance intervals, robust data communication)‏ Quality Assurance (QA) steps that you take beforehand (sensors calibration, maintenance intervals, robust data communication)‏ Quality Assessment steps you take to characterize error and uncertainty (define calibration drifts, error stats or s/n ratios)‏ Quality Assessment steps you take to characterize error and uncertainty (define calibration drifts, error stats or s/n ratios)‏ Quality Control (QC) steps you take after assessment to support the delivery of high quality data (format checksum, timely arrival, threshold checks, nearest neighbor, climatology, and model checks, generation of data flags, verification of user satisfaction)‏ Quality Control (QC) steps you take after assessment to support the delivery of high quality data (format checksum, timely arrival, threshold checks, nearest neighbor, climatology, and model checks, generation of data flags, verification of user satisfaction)‏

QARTOD Workshops QARTOD I – December 2003 –General QA/QC flags be defined –Specific test used for QA/QC be defined –Pros and cons of existing standards discussed QARTOD II – February/March 2005 –Discipline specific metadata needs identified –Waves, in-situ currents, remote currents

Q-III Intended Goals Fast and accurate assessment of the quality of the data streaming from the IOOS partner system Fast and accurate assessment of the quality of the data streaming from the IOOS partner system Operational data aggregation and assembly from distributed data source Operational data aggregation and assembly from distributed data source Trustworthy and consistent quality descriptions for every observation distributed Trustworthy and consistent quality descriptions for every observation distributed Develop quality descriptions for parameters such as waves, currents, wind, sea surface temperature and salinity. Develop quality descriptions for parameters such as waves, currents, wind, sea surface temperature and salinity.

Actually Accomplished Build upon work done at QARTOD-II for waves, in situ currents, remote currents and add CTDs and Chlorophyll work groups Build upon work done at QARTOD-II for waves, in situ currents, remote currents and add CTDs and Chlorophyll work groups Identify/refine specific tests Identify/refine specific tests Identify specific QC details that need to be captured as part of the metadata in each breakout group Identify specific QC details that need to be captured as part of the metadata in each breakout group

Breakout Groups Waves Waves In-situ currents (ADCP)‏ In-situ currents (ADCP)‏ CTDs CTDs Remote currents (HF Radar)‏ Remote currents (HF Radar)‏ (Chlorophyll)‏ (Chlorophyll)‏

In-situ Currents (ADCP) Group Created and refined lists of parameters, metadata, and checks (pass, caution, fail) that are required and then recommended. Created and refined lists of parameters, metadata, and checks (pass, caution, fail) that are required and then recommended. SEACOOS data dictionary and SEACOOS ontology on MMI used extensively in metadata controlled vocabulary that was generated in this breakout. SEACOOS data dictionary and SEACOOS ontology on MMI used extensively in metadata controlled vocabulary that was generated in this breakout.

Required and Recommended parameters (ADCP)‏ Level 1 Red (required)‏ Pitch/Roll/Heading UVW (Vertical velocity/ Horizontal Velocity)‏ Echo Amplitude/Intensity Echo Amplitude/Intensity Correlation Magnitude Correlation Magnitude

Required and Recommended parameters (ADCP)‏ Level 2 Yellow (recommended)‏ Bit status (Built In Test) - diagnostics Battery voltage (V1 & V2) two batteries Water temperature Pressure Timestamp Std deviation of speeds Transmit current - amount of current transmitted per ping, related to battery voltage Correlation coefficient - derived parameter from correlation magnitude, across beams Speed of sound (derived)‏ signal to noise level Surface (or bottom) reflection/ detection Percent solutions - number of beams used Percent good pings (PGP)‏ Error velocity - four beam disagreement indicator check sum

CTD Group Built on Salinity Workshop and early QARTOD where temperature was addressed. Built on Salinity Workshop and early QARTOD where temperature was addressed. Methods of collection (profiling from ship, moored, profiling floats, fixed platforms, gliders, expendables)‏ Methods of collection (profiling from ship, moored, profiling floats, fixed platforms, gliders, expendables)‏ Directly measured (cond, temp, press)‏ Directly measured (cond, temp, press)‏ Derived parameters (salinity, depth, density)‏ Derived parameters (salinity, depth, density)‏ Other potential parameters other sensors that can be on CTDs (dissolved oxygen, optical sensors, position). Other potential parameters other sensors that can be on CTDs (dissolved oxygen, optical sensors, position). No brainer test (range, climatology, gradient, spiking routines, comparison)‏ No brainer test (range, climatology, gradient, spiking routines, comparison)‏ Other tests Other tests Required and recommended tests for each measured parameter Required and recommended tests for each measured parameter Definitions (climatology, range tests, gradient tests, nearest neighbor, etc)‏ Definitions (climatology, range tests, gradient tests, nearest neighbor, etc)‏ Next Steps (need follow up meeting, identify other participants for follow up, review and cross reference salinity workshop report)‏ Next Steps (need follow up meeting, identify other participants for follow up, review and cross reference salinity workshop report)‏

Remote Currents (HF Radar) Group HFR Holy Grail is to help verify and test ocean circulation model nowcasts and forecasts HFR Holy Grail is to help verify and test ocean circulation model nowcasts and forecasts If no QA/QC, congress will pull funding for IOOS HF Radar If no QA/QC, congress will pull funding for IOOS HF Radar Level 1 Errors: Influence radial velocity (spectral freq, SNR, Geophysical contribution, eg spatial variability)‏ Level 1 Errors: Influence radial velocity (spectral freq, SNR, Geophysical contribution, eg spatial variability)‏ Level 2 Errors: Influence total velocity (geometry of site, number and variability of radials w/in total velocity)‏ Level 2 Errors: Influence total velocity (geometry of site, number and variability of radials w/in total velocity)‏ Goal is to have standard algo’s for NOAA operations. Goal is to have standard algo’s for NOAA operations. Interactive session and informal talks on fundamental sources of uncertainty Interactive session and informal talks on fundamental sources of uncertainty Need more error analyses Need more error analyses Need documentation from vender for error estimate and SNR. Collaborate with vendors. Need documentation from vender for error estimate and SNR. Collaborate with vendors. Next steps: specific QC tests and metadata still need to be hashed out. Next steps: specific QC tests and metadata still need to be hashed out.

QARTOD web site

Future of QARTOD Do we need QARTOD-IV? Do we need QARTOD-IV? –Address quality assurance practices –Sharing libraries/cookbooks of tests and procedures (develop community algorithm library)‏ –How to disseminate metadata (SOAP/ XML used in salinity exercise)‏ –Relationship of QARTOD with Ocean.US DMAC WHOI might be able to host Q-IV in either May or September, 2006 WHOI might be able to host Q-IV in either May or September, 2006

Salinity Data Best Practices Workshop Concept grew directly out of QARTOD II Concept grew directly out of QARTOD II Focused specifically on one IOOS core variable Focused specifically on one IOOS core variable Data quality, metadata, and transport Data quality, metadata, and transport Small group with dissemination to wider audience for feedback Small group with dissemination to wider audience for feedback Process as important as the immediate results Process as important as the immediate results Should be a “portable” process for others to implement Should be a “portable” process for others to implement

Salinity Data Management Best Practices Workshop Goals Implement a process to create “best practices” for managing in-situ real-time and near-real-time salinity data Implement a process to create “best practices” for managing in-situ real-time and near-real-time salinity data Capture the best practices in a written document and submit to Ocean.US/DMAC with the intent of having them adopted for use and improvement by the IOOS community Capture the best practices in a written document and submit to Ocean.US/DMAC with the intent of having them adopted for use and improvement by the IOOS community Document the “process” for these workshops and share freely so that other groups might address other IOOS core variables Document the “process” for these workshops and share freely so that other groups might address other IOOS core variables

Salinity Data Best Practices Workshop Results Data quality discussion produced required and recommended criteria tests and agreement on flags Data quality discussion produced required and recommended criteria tests and agreement on flags Metadata discussion produced required and recommended elements list Metadata discussion produced required and recommended elements list Transport discussions produced agreement to develop a “light” SOAP XML schema (working group in progress on this task)‏ Transport discussions produced agreement to develop a “light” SOAP XML schema (working group in progress on this task)‏ Workshop report URL: Workshop report URL:

Salinity Data Best Practices Workshop URL