Doc.: IEEE 802.22-07/0129r2 Submission March 2007 David Mazzarese, Samsung ElectronicsSlide 3 802.22.1 Beacon Frame Options IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0570r0 Submission Zander LEI, I2R Singapore December 2007 Slide 1 Beacon Structure Requires Shorter Sensing Windows for the IEEE
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0049r0 Submission Zander LEI, I2R Singapore January 2007 Slide 1 Proposed Beacon Design vs. Baseline Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission July Cheng Shan, Samsung Electronics Slide 1 Distributed SCH Design IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0209r3 Submission Aug Sangbum Kim, Samsung Electronics Slide 1 Managing SCW Regular Pattern IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /00463r0 Submission Zander LEI, I2R Singapore Sept 2007 Slide 1 Beacon Design Comparison for the IEEE Standard Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0050r0 Submission January 2007 Monisha Ghosh, PhilipsSlide 1 Low PAPR Binary Preamble Design IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission March 2007 Wu Yu-Chun, Huawei HisiSlide 1 FEC on Sync Burst and PSDU for the IEEE P Wireless RANs.
Doc.: IEEE /0032r0 Submission January 2007 Slide 1 Soo-Young Chang, Huawei Technologies Interference Detection Using Preambles for Sensing IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE /0179r0 Submission April 2007 Wu Yu-Chun, Huawei HisiSlide 1 CRC_Length_and_FEC_gain_of_PSDU for the IEEE P Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE xxxxr0 Submission May 2008 Chang-Joo Kim, ETRISlide 1 [ TPC Equation ] IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc: IEEE /0102r0 Submission March 2008 Slide 1 HuaweiLiu Jinnan Huawei Hisi Optimization of Channel Distribution Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0125r0 Submission July 2006 Slide 1 Huawei Interference Detection for Sensing IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0503r0 Submission October 2007 Wendong Hu, STMicroelectroncisSlide 1 Parallel Data Services and Spectrum Sensing with Cognitive Channel.
Doc.: IEEE /0220r0 Submission March 2005 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide Liaison Report Atlanta Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0022r0 Submission January 2007 Wu Yu-Chun, Huawei HisiSlide 1 Enhanced Beacon Sync Frame for the IEEE P Wireless RANs.
Doc.: IEEE /0038r0 Submission May 2005 Paul Thompson, Paul Thompson Associates, LLCSlide 1 WRAN Base Station Class Proposal IEEE P Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /0042r0 Submission January 2008 Wu Yu-Chun, Huawei HisiSlide 1 Simulation Results for TG1 according to Draft 2.0 IEEE P Wireless.
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE WG Status Report – July 2005
FEC on Sync Frame for the
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
WRAN Protocol Reference Model(PRM)
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Report to WG on TG1 Progress at the March Plenary, 2007
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Complex Beacon Pros and Cons
Effect of FCH repetition on the detection of FCH and MAP
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
Fractional Bandwidth Usage
On Coexistence Mechanisms
WRAN Protocol Reference Model(PRM)
[Comparison between CDMA Code and Contention-based Access]
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
IEEE WG Opening Report – March 2007
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
Binary Preamble Sequence Set
Common Quiet Times for Spectrum Sensing
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2008
Binary Preamble Sequence Set
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
Annex on TG1 detection for draft
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Common Quiet Times for Spectrum Sensing
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0129r2 Submission March 2007 David Mazzarese, Samsung ElectronicsSlide Beacon Frame Options IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chairhttp://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf Carl R. StevensonCarl R. Stevenson as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at >

doc.: IEEE /0129r2 Submission March 2007 David Mazzarese, Samsung ElectronicsSlide 4 Abstract The possible beacon frame sizes are presented according to different levels of security and error-correction coding, based on the current security proposal and rate ½ FEC proposal. The impact of respective lengths of the beacon frame and the WRAN superframe is analyzed in terms of the latency before the WRAN can schedule a long quiet period without interrupting the superframe preamble.

doc.: IEEE /0129r2 Submission March 2007 David Mazzarese, Samsung ElectronicsSlide 5 Signature CRC #3 Channel Map PSDU (except channel map) (in the clear) Certificate CRC #2 CRC # ( ) bytes (92.5 ms ms = 95 ms) 2 Signature PSDU (except channel map) (in the clear) CRC #2 CRC # bytes (88.3 ms ms = 90.8 ms) Signature PSDU (except channel map) (in the clear) CRC #2 CRC # bytes (59.2 ms ms = 61.7 ms) PSDU (except channel map) (in the clear) CRC # bytes (22.5 ms ms = 25 ms) CRC #3 2 Channel Map 5 CRC #2 2 PSDU (except channel map) (in the clear) CRC # bytes (16.6 ms ms = 19.1 ms) Signature Channel Map PSDU (except channel map) (in the clear) Certificate CRC #2 CRC # ( ) bytes (65 ms ms = 67.5 ms) 2 Pros and consFEC on PSDU (and CRC) FEC on PSDU + Sign (and CRC) FEC on PSDU + Sign + Certif (and CRC) Beacons can authenticate 131 bytes = ms 187 bytes = ms 222 bytes = ms No channel Map 126 bytes = ms 177 bytes = ms 212 bytes = 180 ms Beacons can’t authenticate 98 bytes = 85 ms 156 bytes = ms n/a Beacons can’t authenticate No channel Map 91 bytes = 79.1 ms 142 bytes = ms n/a No security 47 bytes = 42.5 ms n/a No security No channel Map 40 bytes = 36.7 ms n/a Quiet period length With FEC on PSDU only, no authentication at keep-out distance, but the important information to protect incumbents can be recovered. 1 Slot (sync burst): without FEC: 2.5 ms with FEC: 3.3 ms Frame structures without FEC (March 2007)

doc.: IEEE /0129r2 Submission March 2007 David Mazzarese, Samsung ElectronicsSlide 6 Constraints on latency of quiet period scheduling according to the respective lengths of the beacon and of the superframe As long as the quiet period length is smaller than one superframe length (158 ms without SCH), the WRAN does not need to interrupt the superframe preamble to schedule a quiet period, but it needs to wait until the desired part of the beacon frame does not interrupt the superframe preamble. If D+P < S, the quiet period can be scheduled in the current superframe (it is assumed that B < S) Otherwise the minimum number of superframes to wait for before scheduling a quiet period is WRAN Superframe SCH Beacon Frame B D SH Quiet period P

doc.: IEEE /0129r2 Submission March 2007 David Mazzarese, Samsung ElectronicsSlide 7 Mean and Maximum Latency Beacon frame Quiet period ms159.2 ms 36.7 msMean latency: 36 ms Max latency: 160 ms 85 msMean latency: 122 ms Max latency: 320 ms msMean latency: 11 sec Max latency: infinite Some cases from slide 5

doc.: IEEE /0129r2 Submission March 2007 David Mazzarese, Samsung ElectronicsSlide 8 Signature CRC #3 Channel Map PSDU (except channel map)Certificate CRC #2 CRC # bytes + RTS/ANP period = ms 2 Beacon blockRequired quiet period length Mean latency before being able to schedule Max latency before being able to schedule (it takes one more superframe to detect the beacon) PHR + MSF ms29 ms160 ms (1 superframe) PHR + MSF 1 + MSF ms87 ms320 ms (2 superframes) PHR + MSF 1 + MSF 2 + MSF ms142 ms320 ms (2 superframes) RTS/ANP Slot: 4 bytes 3.3 ms Frame structure with FEC (11 April 2007) MSF 1 (34 bytes after FEC with puncturing) MSF 2 (no FEC, stronger CRC) MSF 3 (no FEC, stronger CRC) For comparison, if MSF 2 was also protected by FEC with rate 1/2, the quiet period for MSF1 and MSF2 would be ms and the beacon would be ms. This would lead to a max latency of 8 superframes (1280 ms), and a mean latency of 4 superframes (514 ms). PHR 2 1 byte PHY header + 1 bytes (e.g. padding)