STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

EEMC Calibration in 2004 MIP signature w/ SMD Absolute gains for SMD, pre/post-shower, towers HV setup scheme for 2005 running Jan Balewski, IUCF Joint.
X. DongAug. 5th, 2010 RNC Group Meeting 1 Barrel Time-Of-Flight In Run10 Xin Dong Many thanks to the TOF group.
Identification of Upsilon Particles Using the Preshower Detector in STAR Jay Dunkelberger, University of Florida.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.
Non-photonic electron production in STAR A. G. Knospe Yale University 9 April 2008.
Cynthia HadjidakisTerzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE Detection of photons and electrons in EMCAL Photons, Electrons and  0 at large p T Identification.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.
28 February, 2003 STAR Collaboration meeting Status of the dE/dx calibration Yuri Fisyak.
1 The Study of D and B Meson Semi- leptonic Decay Contributions to the Non-photonic Electrons Xiaoyan Lin CCNU, China/UCLA for the STAR Collaboration 22.
1 Shower maximum detector (SMD) is a wire proportional counter – strip readout detector using gas amplification. SMD is used to provide a spatial resolution.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Some notes on ezTree and EMC data in MuDst Marco van Leeuwen, LBNL.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
The status of high p T Non-photonic electron-hadron correlations in AuAu 200GeV collisions Wenqin Xu University of California, Los Angeles For the STAR.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Commissioning for the run Review of last.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.
Victor Ryabov (PNPI) for the PHENIX Collaboration QM2005 Budapest Aug,06, First measurement of the  - meson production with PHENIX experiment at.
Stephen Trentalange UCLA DIS04 1 Inclusive Jet Asymmetries from STAR Analysis Update Stephen Trentalange for the STAR Collaboration.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
PHOS offline status report Dmitri Peressounko ALICE offline week,
The Electromagnetic Calorimeter – 2005 Operation J. Sowinski for the Collaboration and the Builders Indiana Univ. Michigan State Univ. ANL MIT BNL Penn.
Quarkonium Physics with STAR Mauro Cosentino (University of Sao Paulo/BNL)
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
 -bin Number Tower Calibration (ch/GeV) Desired E T matched gain s  =1.0  =2.0 from electrons slopesMIPs EEMC Towers Calibration Run 3 p+p Used 4 methods.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Non-photonic electron production in p+p collisions at √s=200 GeV Xiaozhi Bai for the STAR collaboration Central China Normal University University of Illinois.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
ϒ measurements in p+p collisions at √s = 500 GeV with the STAR experiment Leszek Kosarzewski, for the STAR Collaboration Warsaw University of Technology,
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
STAR Collaboration meeting, Nantes Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC analysis update Just to remember … What we have done.
E-EMC developments and plan Jan Balewski IUCF, Indiana Detector status Run 3 goals Calibration Software status STAR Analysis Meeting BNL, October
Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry and Cross Section of Inclusive  0 Production in Polarized p+p Collisions at 200 GeV Outline  Introduction  Experimental.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Jan 8, 2007 BNL.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
D.Arkhipkin, Y. Zoulkarneeva, Workshop of European Research Group on Ultra relativistic Heavy Ion Physics March 9 th 2006 Transverse momentum and centrality.
Abstract Abdul-Salam 5, D. Arkhipkin 2, S. Chatopadhyay 4, T.M. Cormier 5, W. Dong 1, S. Guertin 1, M.M. de Moura 3, A. Pavlinov 5, A. Stolpovsky 5, A.
Outline Motivation The STAR/EMC detector Analysis procedure Results Final remarks.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
1 A Study On Photonic Electrons In The Endcap EMC  Purity of electrons from MC simulation & real data  Reconstructed photonic electrons Naresh Subba,KSU.
 -jet measurements Table of Contents:  Motivation  Preliminary QA of  -trigger Data  Shower Shape Analysis  Experimental Challenges  Summary  
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
EEMC STAR Jan Balewski, IUCF, Indiana STAR Collaboration Meeting MSU, August 2003 Upper Structure Mounted 8/1/2003 Run 3 hardware calibration.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
Elena Bruna Yale University
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
High-pT Identified Charged Hadrons in √sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current capabilities –Status of software Update on EMC analysis –Transverse energy –Electron identification –  0 spectrum in pp First view into dAu data –Calibration –  0 –Electrons, etc…

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 2 Hardware installed … Heavy-ion run –12 modules instrumented –( ,  ) ~ (1.0, 1.2) pp run –22 modules instrumented –( ,  ) ~ (1.0, 2.2) dAu run –60 modules instrumented –( ,  ) ~ (1.0, 2  ) –2400 (~2300 good) towers

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 3 EMC (L0) trigger High-p t trigger (High Tower) –Photons, electrons and  0 –Highest tower in patch –150 ( good) trigger patches 4 x 4 towers (  ) ~ (0.2, 0.2) Highest tower in patch (HT) –0.5 GeV energy resolution –About x100 enhancement at 5 GeV Patch sum trigger –Sum over 16 towers –16 bits->6 bits convertion Linear lookup table –Extremely high threshold –Need to replace (working on) –New LUT in place about 2 hours to program Patch trigger is being tested Jet trigger –Waiting for the patch sum

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 4 What is alive Towers –About 100(68)/2400 dead or noisy 1 bad digitizer board (32) channels (replaced) 68 noisy/dead channels HV is set to zero for all of them –3 dead crates (power supply failures) Replaced during accesses SMD –3/60 modules not working 1/3 bad FEE 2/3 need access inside the detector to diagnose –Some individual channels Some we know are dead –Zero pedestal and no readout Some are noisy

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 5 EMC software Many modifications since last year –New database scheme New tables (pedestals, calibration, status) –Smaller than lest year –Reduced access time »From 15 minutes -> 30 seconds –Online calibration and monitoring –Embedding and simulations –Emc on muDST

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 6 EMC Reconstruction flow Three makers –StEmcADCtoEMaker Converts ADC to calibrated energy for all EMC sub- detectors –Gets calibration and pedestal tables from STAR DB –StPreEclMaker Finds clusters in all EMC sub-detectors –StEpcMaker Matches EMC clusters  EMC Point All StEvent based –They can run at analysis level using.event.root or muDst as input –This is necessary to allow clustering with different thresholds for different analysis

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 7 EMC online software Calibration and pedestal –Pedestals are calculated on the fly from real data New pedestal tables are save every 6 hours (if there is data available) –Online MIP calibration Events from event pool Project L3 tracks with p > 1.2 GeV into EMC towers Used to monitor gain shift on EMC Need about 2 M minibias events

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 8 EMC embedding Embedding (2 steps) –TPC embedding ->.event.root and.geant.root TPC embedding is necessary only for charged particles embedding (there is no need for TPC embedding if  0, for example) Need to enable reconstruction of EMC real data on chain. –EMC embedding Clear clusters and points Mixes EMC hits by adding the hits energies and ADC’s from tow different input files Reconstruct hits and points after mixing the hits gets input from.event.root, muDst, emcMuDst,.geant.root –EMC association Associates MC tracks with clusters and points Done on the fly with the embedding Simulations –Real pedestal and gain are taken into account

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 9 EMC on muDST EMC is fully implemented –Saves all tower ADC’s Just to save disk space If tower energy is necessary need to run some reconstruction during analysis (very fast) –Saves Pre-Shower and SMD hits above some threshold –Saves all EMC clusters Default thresholds, but can be re-reconstructed on the fly if different thresholds are necessary. –Saves all EMC points Based on clusters thresholds but can be re- reconstructed –StEvent object can be re-created on the fly Necessary if new clusters and points are needed

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 10 Update on EMC analysis AuAu run –Transverse energy measurement Paper being written –Electron identification pp run –  0 spectrum –Electron identification with SMD dAu run –First look at the data…

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 11 Physics going on… Transverse energy Transverse energy analysis –Electromagnetic transverse energy Hadronic background –Use TPC tracks to subtract hadronic energy deposited on EMC –Hadronic profile obtained from real data –Correction due to long lived neutral hadrons –Hadronic transverse energy from TPC –Writing a paper Marcia

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 12 Transverse energy (cont)

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 13 Electron identification in STAR TPC information –Momentum of the track –dE/dX For electron selection For hadronic background estimation –Number of dE/dX points EMC information –Distance from the projected track to the center of an EMC tower –Energy of the tower Dataset –Minimum bias AuAu ~ 2 M events –Central AuAu ~ 150 k events –|z vertex | < 20 cm

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 14 EMC information (towers only) p/E cut distance to the center of the tower cut Hadronic background estimation Hadronic suppression factor ~ 20 for efficiency ~ 0.5

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 15 Putting all results together (TPC + EMC) Minimum bias AuAu

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 16  0 reconstruction (invariant mass spectra)  0 reconstruction with pp data –SMD present Still needs better understanding of uniformity and gain –High tower trigger Improve statistics –Low EMC occupancy Smaller background Steve Trentalange Dylan Thein and Alex Stolpovsky

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 17  0 spectrum High tower trigger A lot of corrections still to be done (trigger bias, efficiencies, etc) Only 10% of full EMC acceptance Corrections are still being studied Steve Trentalange Dylan Thein and Alex Stolpovsky

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 18 dAu run – Calibration (I) Relative gain equalization –Used to adjust HV to have same gain in transverse energy Important for trigger uniformity

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 19 dAu – Calibration (II) MIP calibration –Project high-p tracks into EMC p > 1.2 GeV/c 3x3 towers isolation –About 1 M minimum bias events needed

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 20 dAu – Electron identification dE/dX + Tower –Electron peak is visible Needs more statistics for calibration No track quality cuts dE/dX + Tower + SMD –Neural Net software (Julia and Dmitry) Software already on repository Long way to go –understand matching with SMD »Residuals »SMD efficiency

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 21 dAu –  0 reconstruction Invariant mass spectrum –pt > 1.5 GeV –At least one of the SMD’s present –Vertex found (no cut) –No track projected to EMC point –Peak at the right position –Peak with better than last year? 19 MeV –27 MeV from last year pp Needs more statistics This is just the start… Alex Stolpovsky

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 22 Final comments EMC hardware –½ of the barrel is installed and running –High tower trigger is running –Patch and Jet triggers are under commissioning EMC software –Ready for full production –Ready for embedding –All necessary infra-structure in place for data analysis. Analysis of the data –Many topics Et,  0, electrons –First look at dAu suggests that data is promising