1 Views expressed in this presentation are my own, and do not necessarily reflect official FDA opinions/policy Views expressed in this presentation are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stability Studies - Evaluation of Outcomes and Development of Documentation For Regulatory Submissions Bob Seevers.
Advertisements

1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
VALIDATION What is the new guidance?. What is a Compliance Policy Guide? Explain FDA policy on regulatory issues CGMP regulations and application commitments.
ICH Q11 – Definisjon av startmaterialer – Fleksibilitet og dokumentasjonskrav Andreas Sundgren LMI 17. april 2012.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
Implementation of Quality-by-Design: ONDQA Initiatives Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science October 5, 2006 Chi-wan Chen, Ph.D. Deputy Director.
MEDICAL DEVICE STERILIZATION
Define ● Deliver ● Sustain Sundar Chellamani Technical Director SysComm Project Management Ltd.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT DEFINITIONS AND CONCEPTS QUALITY MANAGEMENT TOOLS QA / QC PROCESS COMPUTERS AND PROJECT QUALITY.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
Purpose of the Standards
1 PowerPointPresentation by PowerPoint Presentation by Gail B. Wright Professor Emeritus of Accounting Bryant University MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 10 TH EDITION.
PAT Validation Working Group Process and Analytical Validation Working Group Arthur H. Kibbe, Ph.D. Chair June 13, 2002.
ONDQA Perspective on Post Approval Changes Eric P. Duffy, PhD Director, Division of Post-Market Evaluation, ONDQA, CDER, FDA Public Meeting: Supplements.
Learnings from Pre-approval Joint Inspection of a GSK QbD Product with US-FDA & EMA and the application of Continuous Verification 17 May 2011, Beijing,
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Quality By Design and Dissolution PhRMA 10/25/05
Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Andrea Pranti.
QbD for Biologics: Learning’s from the Product Development and Realization Case Study (A-Mab) and the FDA OBP Pilot Program July 19-20th 2010.
Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
FDA Regulatory Perspective on Continuous Manufacturing
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Slide 1 May 2008 Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Mumbai, India Date: May 2008 QUALITY BY DESIGN.
1 Manufacturing Processes and Validation for Next Generation Implants.
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
MB RESEARCH LABORATORIES Increased Regulatory Vigilance with respect to GLP Test Article Characterization George L. DeGeorge, Ph.D., DABT MB Research Laboratories.
Introduction to ISO 9001:2000.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
NIPTE-FDA Collaborative Case Study On Model-based Design Space Development Across Scales & with Stability Considerations Preliminary Design Space 1.
1 Unit 1 Information for management. 2 Introduction Decision-making is the primary role of the management function. The manager’s decision will depend.
Quality by Design (QbD) Myth : An expensive development tool ! Fact : A tool that makes product development and commercial scale manufacturing simple !
1-7.The ICH Q8 “Minimal Approach” to Pharmaceutical Development
Important informations
Lecture 7: Requirements Engineering
Regular process for global reporting and assessment of the state of the marine environment, including socio-economic aspects Guidance for Authors.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
a guidance to conversion
Safety Critical Systems 5 Testing T Safety Critical Systems.
BioTx Pharmaceutical Sciences Movement within the design space with a robust control strategy Jon Coffman, Ph.D. Principal Engineer III BioTherapeutic.
Design Space: Case Study for a Downstream Process Post Approval
Risk-Based CMC Review - OGD Perspective Gary J. Buehler, R.Ph. Director Office of Generic Drugs July 21, 2004 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science.
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
Workshop Session 3 Questions 1 How would a control strategy look different in a traditional submission vs a QbD submission? How would parameters that are.
Project quality management. Introduction Project quality management includes the process required to ensure that the project satisfies the needs for which.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Validation | Slide 1 of 27 August 2006 Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006.
Maintaining and Sustaining System Integrity Configuration Management for Transportation Management Systems Configuration management (CM) describes a series.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10.
Marianne M. Elliott Office of Research Integrity and Ethics Bureau of Medicine and Surgery U. S Navy.
Prepared by Amira Selim 31 st October 2009 Revised by Dahlia Biazid Requirements Analysis.
1. Our Presentation Topic: Importance Of Validation & Qualification In Pharmaceutical Industries Presented By: Md. Tanjir Islam (Group C) 2.
In the name of God. Common Technical Document On Biotech.
Implementing Quality by Design Concepts in Clinical Trials Cinzia Piccini, Global Medical Quality, Data Quality Consultant Eli Lilly and Company April.
BSB Biomanufacturing CHAPTER 4 GMP – Documentation Part I (SOP)
GOVERNING BODY SELF-EVALUATION TOOLKIT
World Health Organization
End to End Testing– Are we doing too Much?
Quality by design (Qbd)
Northeast Biomanufacturing Center and Collaborative
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Quality Systems in a Production Facility
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
QUALITY BY DESIGN Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Mumbai, India Date: May 2008.
Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER.
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
GL 51 – Statistical evaluation of stability data
Protocol Approval Criteria
Presentation transcript:

1 Views expressed in this presentation are my own, and do not necessarily reflect official FDA opinions/policy Views expressed in this presentation are my own, and do not necessarily reflect official FDA opinions/policy. Disclaimer What parameters should be included in the Design Space? QMS control of non-CPPs…

2 AmAb (no CPPs) BLA 123XXXBLA 123YYY 0.1 AU Protein A Column Parameters: AMab vs. ‘Standard’ BLA WC-CPP AMab (no CPPs?) BLA 123XXX BLA 123YYY

3 Through the Looking Glass What parameters should be included in the Design Space? QMS control of non-CPPs…

4 AmAb (no CPPs) BLA 123XXXBLA 123YYY 0.1 AU Regulatory Perspective on Design Space Definition-Points to Consider How confident are we that CPPs have been correctly identified?  Definition of CPP Critical “Describes a process step, process condition, test requirement, or other relevant parameter or item that must be controlled within predetermined criteria to ensure that the API meets its specification.” (Q7; 2001) CPP - A process parameter whose variability has an impact on a critical quality attribute and therefore should be monitored or controlled to ensure the process produces the desired quality. (Q8(R2); 2009)

5 AmAb (no CPPs) BLA 123XXXBLA 123YYY 0.1 AU Regulatory Perspective on Design Space Definition-Points to Consider How confident are we that CPPs have been correctly identified?  Definition of CPP  Range (s) investigated/strength of data/info to support  Range of CQA (e.g., HMW, HCP, DNA, virus removal/inaction) identified as being impacted by unit op  Range of acceptance criteria for CQA  Range of parameters and material attributes selected to study for a unit op  Operating range of parameter studied Everything CPP Nothing CPP CPPs correctly identified

6 AmAb (no CPPs) BLA 123XXXBLA 123YYY 0.1 AU Regulatory Perspective on Design Space Definition-Points to Consider How confident are we that CPPs have been correctly identified?  Definition of CPP  Range (s) investigated (Goldilocks paradigm)  Interactions between CQAs, between PPs and between unit ops  Scale dependence of data What additional ‘regulatory commitments’ are present in the application.

7 AmAb (no CPPs) BLA 123XXXBLA 123YYY 0.1 AU Regulatory Perspective on Design Space Definition-Points to Consider How will non-CPP ranges be handled after approval? Should not exceed the ‘knowledge’ space defined in the submission? If the knowledge space is expanded after licensure, how will this be accomplished, what studies and acceptance criteria will be used to support new ranges, how will this be documented and how will the Agency be notified (type of supplement)? How will non-CPP ranges be controlled, monitored and documented? How will non-CPP deviations be defined and identified?

8

9 AmAb (no CPPs) BLA 123XXXBLA 123YYY 0.1 AU Protein A CPP Examples Without full details on the assessments, information and studies used to identify CPPs, plus information on design space being requested etc., a determination on whether these are acceptable can not be made. Process 1 Load challenge Wash 1 [component] Elution flow rate Number of resin cycles Column height Process 2 Load challenge Elution buffer pH Elution molarity A-Mab Protein Load Elution buffer pH Parameter X range studied Process 1 (CPP) Process 2 (non-CPP, in DS) A-Mab (KPP) CQA Impact